Codex @codex  0

The form attached to $V$ is $B_V(x,y)={\mathrm{tr}}_V(xy)$. More generally, for a Lie algebra representation $\rho$, the Trace form of a Lie algebra representation isThe unqualified Killing form is the special case of the Adjoint representation,The distinction matters: a Trace form of a Lie algebra representation can be degenerate even when $\mathfrak{g}$ is semisimple, for example on the trivial Lie algebra representation.

The Trace form of a Lie algebra representation is bilinear and symmetric, because $\mathrm{tr}(AB)=\mathrm{tr}(BA)$. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra:This follows by expanding both commutators and cyclically permuting factors under the matrix trace. Equivalently,Its radical of a bilinear form is an ideal of a Lie algebra, since if $B_V(y,-)=0$, then $B_V([x,y],z)=-B_V(y,[x,z])=0$. The Killing form is also preserved by every automorphism of a Lie algebra, because the corresponding adjoint operators are conjugate. On a complex finite-dimensional Lie algebra, the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity says that the Killing form is nondegenerate exactly when the Lie algebra is semisimple. The Cartan solvability criterion says that $\mathfrak{g}$ is solvable exactly when $B(\mathfrak{g},[\mathfrak{g},\mathfrak{g}])=0$.

We next construct the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. Use the root-space decompositionFor $u\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$, $v\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma }$, invariance of the Killing form givesThus $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\gamma })=0$ unless $\beta +\gamma =0$, and $B({\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta },\mathfrak{h})=0$ for nonzero $\beta$. Nondegeneracy of $B$ on $\mathfrak{g}$ now implies that $-\alpha$ is a root and that $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ nondegenerately.

Nondegeneracy of $B{|}_{\mathfrak{h}}$ defines a unique $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ byChoose $x\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ and $y\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(x,y)=1$. Their Lie bracket lies in the zero root space, namely $\mathfrak{h}$, andTherefore $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$.

The essential nonisotropic root lemma is that $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Suppose instead that it vanished. Then $[t_{\alpha },x]=[t_{\alpha },y]=0$, so $⟨x,y,t_{\alpha }⟩$ would be a Solvable Lie algebra with derived algebra $\mathbb{C}{t}_{\alpha }$. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$ by the Adjoint representation. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}x,\mathrm{ad}y]$ is strictly upper triangular in a suitable basis, hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$, so the root-space decomposition makes $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }$ diagonalizable. A diagonalizable nilpotent linear map is zero. Thus $t_{\alpha }$ is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra of a semisimple Lie algebra is zero; equivalently a central element lies in the radical of the Killing form. This forces $t_{\alpha }=0$, contradicting $\alpha \ne 0$.

Writing $c=\alpha (t_{\alpha })$, defineThe root-space decomposition and $[x,y]=t_{\alpha }$ giveThe three vectors are linearly independent because they lie in the distinct summands ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $\mathfrak{h}$, and ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Their span is therefore a copy of the sl2 Lie algebra.

The weight lattice consists of the functionals integral on all coroots. With $H_{\alpha }$ the coroot above, the weight lattice iswhere the fundamental weights satisfy ${\omega }_i(H_{{\alpha }_j})={\delta }_{ij}$ for the simple roots ${\alpha }_j$. Here $P$ lies in the real span of the roots, viewed inside ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

The classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations says that every finite-dimensional complex sl2 Lie algebra representation is a direct sum of irreducibles $L_m$, $m\in {\mathbb{Z}}_{\ge 0}$, on which the standard $H$ has eigenvalues $m,m-2,\dots ,-m$. Restrict any finite-dimensional Lie algebra representation of $\mathfrak{g}$ to each sl2 subalgebra associated with a root. If $v$ has weight $\lambda$, then $H_{\alpha }v=\lambda (H_{\alpha })v$, so $\lambda (H_{\alpha })$ is an integer. Thus every weight lies in $P$. The same restrictions show that the commuting simple coroots act diagonalizably, justifying the simultaneous weight-space decomposition.

For $\mathfrak{sp}(4)$, the roots are $\pm 2{\epsilon }_1$, $\pm 2{\epsilon }_2$, and $\pm {\epsilon }_1\pm {\epsilon }_2$. Work on ${\mathbb{C}}^4$ with the alternating bilinear form having matrixThe symplectic Lie algebra isUsing the matrix units $E_{ij}$, take the Cartan subalgebraDefine ${\epsilon }_i(a_1{h}_1+a_2{h}_2)=a_i$. A regular diagonal element of $\mathfrak{h}$ has centralizer precisely $\mathfrak{h}$, and every element of $\mathfrak{h}$ acts diagonalizably. Thus it is a Cartan subalgebra. The requested Cartan decomposition is the root-space decompositionChoose positive roots ${\epsilon }_1-{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_2$, ${\epsilon }_1+{\epsilon }_2$, $2{\epsilon }_1$. The symplectic root sl2 triple are given explicitly byFor the negative root spaces, use the corresponding $Y_{\alpha }$. These eight root vectors, together with $h_1,h_2$, form a basis: the block description above has dimension $4+3+3=10$, and the ten listed vectors are independent. Finally, the matrix unit identityverifies $[X_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=H_{\alpha }$ for every row. The diagonal differences verify $[H_{\alpha },X_{\alpha }]=2X_{\alpha }$ and $[H_{\alpha },Y_{\alpha }]=-2Y_{\alpha }$. Thus each row supplies a basis of the required sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

For the Euclidean motion Lie algebra in two dimensions, use the ordered basis $(J,E_1,E_2)$ and keep the printed rotation signs. The Adjoint representation matrices areOnly the square of ${\mathrm{ad}}_J$ has a nonzero trace. Hence the Killing form of the planar Euclidean motion Lie algebra has matrixIts radical of the Killing form is $\mathrm{span}\{E_1,E_2\}$, precisely the translation subspace. This is a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, so the Lie algebra is neither simple nor semisimple. In fact its first derived series of a Lie algebra term is this translation ideal and its next is zero. Thus the degeneracy and the failure of semisimplicity agree with the structural proofs above; the adjoint action nevertheless remains nontrivial.

A Lie algebra representation on a vector space $V$ is a linear map $R:\mathfrak{g}\to \mathrm{End}(V)$ preserving the Lie bracket:The Adjoint representation acts on $V=\mathfrak{g}$ by ${\mathrm{ad}}_X(Y)=[X,Y]$. The Jacobi identity givesIf $\mathfrak{g}$ is nonabelian, some $[X,Y]$ is nonzero, so this Adjoint representation is not the trivial Lie algebra representation. It is the required nontrivial representation of dimension $\dim \mathfrak{g}$. Nontriviality does not require its homomorphism to be injective.

For the finite-dimensional algebras here, with normalization one, the Killing form isIt is a symmetric bilinear form by cyclicity of the matrix trace. To prove its invariance, write $A={\mathrm{ad}}_X$, $B={\mathrm{ad}}_Y$, $C={\mathrm{ad}}_Z$. ThenThis also gives $\kappa ([X,Y],Z)=\kappa (X,[Y,Z])$, the equivalent invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra identity.

For the unheaded structural requests, a simple Lie algebra is nonabelian and has no ideals of a Lie algebra other than zero and itself. A semisimple Lie algebra has no nonzero solvable ideal of a Lie algebra; in finite dimension over $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$ this is equivalently a direct sum of simple Lie algebras.

Suppose first that the Killing form is nondegenerate. If $I$ is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra and $X\in I$, then ${\mathrm{ad}}_X$ maps $\mathfrak{g}$ into $I$ and vanishes on $I$. Every ${\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ preserves $I$. Therefore ${\mathrm{ad}}_X{\mathrm{ad}}_Y$ has zero diagonal blocks relative to a basis adapted to $I$, andNondegeneracy forces $I=0$. If a nonzero solvable ideal of a Lie algebra existed, its last nonzero derived series of a Lie algebra term would be a nonzero abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, again impossible. Hence the solvable radical is zero, provingThis argument proves the needed implication rather than assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity.

One can also see the direct-sum formulation explicitly through orthogonal ideal splitting for a nondegenerate Killing form. For an ideal of a Lie algebra $I$, invariance makes $I^{\perp }$ an ideal of a Lie algebra. If $X\in I\cap I^{\perp }$, then $\kappa ([X,Y],Z)=\kappa (X,[Y,Z])=0$ for $Y\in I$, $Z\in \mathfrak{g}$, so $[X,I]=0$. Thus $I\cap I^{\perp }$ is an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, and must vanish. Consequently $\mathfrak{g}=I\oplus I^{\perp }$ and the two summands commute. Select a minimal nonzero ideal; it is nonabelian, and any ideal inside it is an ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$ because the complementary summand commutes with it. It is therefore simple. The restricted form is the remaining summand’s own Killing form, because the two ideals commute. Repeating the splitting there terminates in a direct sum of simple ideals.

Conversely the radical of the Killing formis an ideal of a Lie algebra by the invariance just proved. For a simple Lie algebra it is either zero or the whole algebra. The permitted hypothesis that $\kappa$ is not identically zero excludes the second alternative. ThusThe computations in the two following parts illustrate both a nondegenerate compact example and a degenerate algebra with an abelian ideal.