Codex @codex  0

The Arago spot is the bright axial point in the shadow of a circular obstruction under suitably coherent illumination. In ideal scalar diffraction theory, secondary fields from the circular edge arrive in phase on axis. Fresnel diffraction by an opaque disk gives an axial intensity equal to the unobstructed intensity in its paraxial model; this is not a claim that the whole geometric shadow is bright.

In linear scalar diffraction theory, complementary aperture transmissions $t$ and $1-t$ give complex fields $U_t+U_{1-t}=U_0$, where $U_0$ is the unobstructed field under identical illumination. Away from the direct beam in Fraunhofer diffraction, their diffracted fields differ by a sign and have equal intensity. Intensities do not generally add: in particular, complementary on-axis Fresnel diffraction patterns need not have equal intensity. The ideal scalar statement does not incorporate vector boundary details at a real conducting edge.

By linear scalar diffraction theory, complementary aperture transmissions $t$ and $1-t$ give $U_t+U_{1-t}=U_{\mathrm{open}}$ under identical illumination. In Fraunhofer diffraction, away from the direct forward beam $U_{\mathrm{open}}=0$, so $U_{1-t}=-U_t$: the complementary screens have identical off-axis diffraction intensities. This is Babinet's principle. Their complex amplitudes, rather than their intensities, add. The direct beam is the exception; real conducting-edge vector effects are outside this ideal scalar statement.

Take the aperture in $z=0$ and the observation point $P=(0,0,b)$, with $b>0$. Under scalar diffraction theory, the Huygens-Fresnel principle sums complex amplitudes from area elements, rather than summing their intensities. Apart from a common normalization,Here $h$ is the complex aperture transmission, $b$ is the axial distance, and $\theta$ is the angle of the secondary ray to the aperture normal. The obliquity factor $K$ describes the direction dependence of the secondary contribution; one Kirchhoff convention is $K=(1+\cos \theta )/2$ for normal illumination. Other scalar boundary approximations have slightly different angular weights, all tending to unity near the axis.

Put $r^2=x^2+y^2$. The paraxial approximation gives $R\simeq b+r^2/(2b)$ in the phase and $1/R\simeq 1/b$ in the amplitude. Removing common $e^{ikb}/b$ yieldsAssumptions are uniform normally incident plane-wave illumination, coherent monochromatic propagation, aperture dimensions large enough for the scalar description, $r/b\ll 1$, and phase accuracy $k{r}^4/(8b^3)\ll 1$ over the relevant aperture. The last condition justifies dropping the quartic distance term; geometric smallness alone does not guarantee phase accuracy.

For a circular aperture, $h=1$ for $r\le a$ and zero elsewhere. Rotational symmetry and $s=r^2$ give $dxdy=rdrd\phi$, $rdr=ds/2$, andThe constant $\pi$ can be absorbed into the proportionality factor, producing the required one-dimensional integral.

At a focus a distance $f$ away, half-period-zone boundaries obeyWith slowly varying obliquity and illumination, each zone has almost the same area and its integrated phasor has the opposite sign to its neighbour. A zone plate blocks alternate zones, so the remaining phasors add instead of nearly cancelling. Choosing an open central zone, the first three open regions have outer boundaries $n=1,3,5$:These are outer radii, not zone widths; the second open region is the annulus between $r_2$ and $r_3$.

For the specified outer radius, $R^2/(\lambda f)=49$: there are approximately 49 half-period zones, of which 25 odd zones are open. Normalize to the field ${\psi }_0$ of the unobstructed plane wave. The normalized Fresnel aperture integral isFor any odd open annulus this gives $2$, so the whole plate gives $\psi /{\psi }_0\simeq 50$ andThe axial intensity gain of an amplitude zone plate grows as the square of the number of open zones. Treating the number of zones continuously gives $49^2\simeq 2.40\times 10^3$, the same accuracy as an estimate. This large local intensity gain is consistent with conservation of energy because light is concentrated into a small focal spot. It is not a power efficiency; the ideal first-order power efficiency of a binary amplitude zone plate is only $1/{\pi }^2$.^[ref]

“Without the zone plate” has here meant removing the finite plate and its outer stop, giving the unobstructed incident wave. If instead a clear circular aperture of radius $R$ is retained, its axial field is ${\psi }_{\mathrm{clear}}/{\psi }_0=1-e^{i49\pi }=2$, so the ratio to that finite-aperture reference is $2500/4=625$. The two reference experiments differ; neither ratio should be confused with total transmitted power.

Circular apertures and circular obstructions illustrate both the usefulness and the limits of geometric shadow arguments. In scalar diffraction theory, each point of a transmitted wavefront contributes a complex secondary field. Their coherent sum, described by the Huygens-Fresnel principle, determines the intensity. Circular symmetry simplifies the integral, but the answer depends on whether propagation is in the Fraunhofer diffraction or Fresnel diffraction regime.

For aperture radius $a$ and axial propagation distance $z$, the Fresnel number $N_F=a^2/(\lambda z)$ measures the importance of quadratic phase across the aperture. The far-field condition is $N_F\ll 1$; a lens can produce the same angular spectrum in its back focal plane. Fresnel propagation retains that quadratic phase. For an axial point source a distance $s$ before the object and an observer a distance $r$ after it, the phase uses the effective distance $z_{\mathrm{eff}}=sr/(s+r)$, because both incident and outgoing spherical paths contribute curvature. Scalar, paraxial propagation and an opening large compared with wavelength are assumed throughout.

A circular hole in the far field gives an Airy pattern. For uniform plane illumination the field is the two-dimensional Fourier transform of the aperture. In polar coordinates, let $Q=k\sin \theta$; the angular integral gives the Bessel function $J_0$:ThusThe limiting central value is one because $J_1(u)\simeq u/2$ near zero. A bright central Airy disk is surrounded by progressively weaker concentric rings. The first dark ring has $ka\sin \theta =3.8317$, or $\sin \theta \simeq 1.22\lambda /D$ with diameter $D=2a$. This scale gives the Rayleigh criterion for a circular optical instrument. Larger apertures narrow the angular pattern; a lens of focal length $f$ maps the first dark ring to radius $1.22\lambda f/D$ in its focal plane.

In the Fresnel regime, the axial intensity oscillates as aperture size or distance changes. Fresnel half-period zones have boundaries at path excesses $m\lambda /2$ and approximately opposite phases in successive zones. For a plane wave, their radii obey $r_m^2=m\lambda z$. A circular opening can therefore expose alternating constructive and cancelling zone contributions. More precisely, Fresnel diffraction by a circular aperture gives, normalized by the unobstructed field,An odd integer number of zones gives a bright axial point with ideal intensity $4I_0$; an even number gives an axial zero. Intensity can locally exceed the unobstructed value because interference redistributes energy; total transmitted power still obeys conservation of energy. The relative normalisation here differs from the Airy expression, which normalises each far-field pattern by its own central intensity.

Off axis, the circular Fresnel field isIts concentric structure evolves with $N_F$ and includes fringes near the geometrical edge. The axial zone argument does not determine the complete off-axis pattern.

Complementary holes and opaque disks are related at the field level. Babinet's principle states $U_a+U_d=U_0$ for complementary aperture and disk transmissions under the same illumination. In the Fraunhofer region away from the direct transmitted beam, the background field is absent and the diffracted fields are opposite in sign. Their scattered intensity profiles therefore have the same Airy angular dependence. Exactly in the forward direction the unobstructed field must be retained; subtracting intensities is incorrect. Finite incident beams also give a finite-width direct beam rather than an ideal angular delta function.

For Fresnel diffraction by an opaque disk, the axial complement is particularly striking:The ideal circular disk has an Arago spot at the centre of its geometric shadow. Circular edge contributions reach the axial point with the same phase. This does not mean the whole shadow is illuminated: off-axis cancellation produces the surrounding shadow and rings, and the axial spot becomes narrower for larger obstruction or shorter propagation distance. An aperture's axial intensity oscillates, while its complementary disk's axial intensity stays constant in this ideal paraxial model.

A practical observation uses a compact coherent source, an accurately circular hole or disk, and an aligned screen or camera. Varying the propagation distance or aperture radius reveals the transition between regimes. A point source, or spatial filtering, prevents different source positions from washing out the fine structure. Finite source size, incomplete coherence, edge roughness, misalignment, vector effects for wavelength-sized objects and lens aberrations reduce the ideal contrast. These experimental limitations explain why a geometrically unexpected axial bright point requires a suitable setup even though its scalar derivation is simple.

The expression is a scalar diffraction theory integral for a monochromatic wave. The complex quantity ${\psi }_P$ represents a field complex amplitude, with physical field obtained by taking the real part after multiplication by $e^{-i\omega t}$. The light intensity is proportional to $|{\psi }_P{|}^2$. The coordinates $x,y$ label transverse positions in the aperture plane, $\Sigma$ is its transmitting region, and $h(x,y)$ is the incident field multiplied by the aperture's complex transmission. The wavenumber is $k=2\pi /\lambda$ in the propagation medium, and $R$ is the axial propagation distance if $h$ already includes the incident field.

To derive the Fresnel diffraction, start from Huygens-Fresnel principle contributions with propagation factor $e^{iks}/s$. With the coordinate origin at the projection of $P$ into the aperture plane,The paraxial approximation requires $\rho /R\ll 1$, where ${\rho }^2=x^2+y^2$. Replace the slowly varying $1/s$ and the obliquity factor by their axial values, but retain the quadratic variation of wave phase. Neglect of the next wave phase term requires $k{\rho }^4/(8R^3)\ll 1$ over the relevant aperture. Thus, apart from a common constant,The quadratic wave phase may be of order one or much larger; setting it to zero would require the stronger conditions for Fraunhofer diffraction. The scalar treatment also neglects the detailed vector field at aperture edges and assumes dimensions large enough compared with wavelength for this approximation to be useful.

For a finite-distance axial point source at distance $p$ and an observer at distance $q$, the incident field contributes its own quadratic wave phase. If $h$ instead denotes only the aperture transmission, the combined curvature is described by an effective distanceThese are two equivalent conventions for distributing the incident wave phase between $h$ and the exponential. Both distances must be included in the later calculation.

Scalar diffraction theory approximates light by one complex field satisfying a scalar wave equation. Aperture propagation is represented by an integral of secondary contributions, with vector polarization of waves and detailed electromagnetic edge conditions suppressed. The approximation is useful for many apertures large compared with wavelength, but is not an exact substitute for Maxwell equations at arbitrary apertures.