Write for the total variation seminorm on a domain. For a locally integrable real function its dual definition is
The bounded-variation space consists of functions with finite , equipped with . In the equivalent distributional derivative description, is a finite vector-valued Radon measure and is its total variation measure.
To establish completeness of the bounded-variation space, let be Cauchy in this norm. Completeness of gives in . Given , choose so that whenever . For fixed , the given lower semicontinuity yields
Since , we obtain . In particular has finite variation; the triangle inequality then puts in the BV space. The same bound proves convergence in the full norm, so this is a Banach space.
For the disk data, put and assume . The exact total variation denoising of a disk is
Here is the positive part. A total variation calibration certifies global optimality, including competitors that are not radial or piecewise constant. Define the bounded vector field
It has . Its normal component is continuous across the circle, so the distributional divergence has no extra boundary measure. Direct differentiation gives . The dual definition implies : for the standard domain one can cut off at radius , with the error bounded by , and then smooth the test field. In the larger homogeneous bounded-variation space, the same error is bounded by . Thus both usual whole-plane formulations give the same certificate.
Use the perimeter identity and . If , then and . Consequently every competitor satisfies
If , replace by . Its norm is still at most one, its divergence is , and equality in the calibration holds at . The identical comparison proves optimality and uniqueness of zero, including the threshold . The only general results used are completeness of , lower semicontinuity of variation, the indicator-perimeter identity, the distributional integration-by-parts/dual variation formula and the quadratic norm identity. For , the unique squared-error minimizer is simply .
The literal assumptions suffice for the scalar quadratic fidelity problem. One can avoid regularity of level-set boundaries by moving only a clipped part of the minimizer. We prove the stronger jump-amplitude inequality for total variation denoising:
Comparison with the zero function gives finite energy and hence . Here , and both differences use the same oriented BV traces on a hypersurface. Reversing the normal reverses both differences and leaves the inequality unchanged. Outside , the two traces of agree, so the inequality would read at a jump of . It therefore gives the requested no-new-jumps property of total variation denoising in every dimension.
First use residual-preserving clipping of an ROF minimizer. For an integer , put
The coarea formula for BV functions gives scalar total variation splitting under clipping:
Indeed the levels in contribute to , while the levels outside that interval contribute to . This uses the full signed coarea formula. For any , minimality of and the triangle inequality for the total variation seminorm give
Cancel the tail variation. Thus is a bounded ROF denoising minimizer for . The data may still be unbounded. This is an exact reduction preserving ; it does not truncate the data and then pass to a limit of different reconstructions.
We next prove the jump-amplitude inequality for a bounded ROF minimizer, allowing its data to be unbounded. Fix a coordinate , a nonnegative , and let be the local flow of the smooth vector field . The flow is the identity near the domain boundary, preserves each line parallel to , and satisfies . Write
These maps are diffeomorphisms, with and uniformly.
The useful trace calculation is the BV jump-product limit with one bounded factor. For and ,
The right side is integrable: and only the common jump part of contributes. The same limit holds with both increments replaced by their negative-time increments, still dividing by positive .
Here is why this calculation needs only one bounded factor. By the BV slicing theorem, almost every coordinate slice of and has one-sided representatives. On one such interval let and use its right-continuous representative. Since ,
Fubini's theorem rewrites the slice integral as
At each interior , the inner expression tends to ; if , it is zero. Its absolute value is at most . Dominated convergence against therefore leaves just the measure atoms common to the two slices. The bound is also integrable over the transverse coordinates, by the BV slicing theorem. Integrating the slice jump sums gives the surface integral and its factor . Negative-time increments give the same product, because both slice differences reverse sign. At no point is a uniform bound on across the slices required.
For , use the mixed competitors
The total variation under opposite smooth flows satisfies
To see this for the entire vector Radon measure , the change of variables formula gives
For , the two cofactor matrices expand as , with the same and opposite signs. Their norm expansions on have cancelling linear terms. Integrating proves the estimate, including the absolutely continuous, jump and Cantor parts. The BV transformation formula is also given in Lemma 4.2 on differentiable regularizers; that lemma does not assume bounded data. The total variation seminorm is a convex function, so
Thus minimality forces the sum of the two fidelity changes to have nonnegative limit after division by .
It remains to evaluate that sum without bounding . Put . Exact expansion of the quadratic fidelity, together with change of variables, gives the opposite-flow fidelity identity for quadratic data:
For completeness, the cross-term identity fixing its sign is
The last integral is : , while
Take first, then . Here and the local flow is strongly continuous in . The remaining Jacobian mass term is . This argument avoids multiplying an unbounded fidelity derivative by an uncontrolled derivative measure.
Apply the BV jump-product limit with one bounded factor with and , and use minimality. For every nonnegative and every coordinate ,
Let . These are inequalities for finite signed Radon measures, so arbitrary nonnegative smooth tests imply nonnegativity of their densities. Since at least one coordinate of a unit normal is nonzero,
This proves the bounded-minimizer lemma with arbitrary data.
Finally return to and . At almost every finite approximate jump point of , choose an integer . The BV traces on a hypersurface commute with clipping, so , and there. It is consequently a jump point of , and its inequality is exactly . A countable union over removes all exceptional surface-null sets. Outside , the BV traces on a hypersurface of agree almost everywhere. We conclude
The mechanism is exact scalar coarea splitting, paired smooth-flow variations, a one-bounded-factor BV trace limit, and localization through integer clipping levels. It works in every dimension under the printed hypotheses, without essential boundedness of or and without regularity of their level-set boundaries.
In total variation calibration notation, . Since this divergence is itself in the BV space, the proved inequality equivalently reads
Thus an upward output jump forces the appropriate nonpositive jump of the calibrated divergence. This is a consequence of the variational argument above, with common oriented BV traces on a hypersurface; no curvature of the rectifiable interface or differentiability of its normal is assumed.
A one-dimensional Sobolev representative is absolutely continuous. For , the fundamental theorem of calculus and Holder inequality give
Thus has a representative in . The qualification about representatives matters because a Sobolev space element is an almost-everywhere equivalence class.
In two dimensions, the Sobolev fundamental theorem of calculus on lines and Fubini's theorem imply that almost every horizontal and vertical slice belongs to and has this one-dimensional Hölder continuity. The slice seminorm depends on the slice; this does not give one uniform pointwise estimate on the square. For , Morrey's inequality additionally gives a globally Hölder continuous representative of exponent . For , global continuity need not hold. For example, with a smooth cutoff around an interior point, lies in when , but is unbounded. At , the cutoff version of is unbounded while its gradient has finite squared integral, since
These examples distinguish Sobolev slicing and planar continuity from a false two-dimensional application of the interval exponent.
Put . A BV space is a function whose distributional derivative is a finite vector-valued Radon measure. Equivalently its total variation seminorm is finite:
The BV space has norm . For , integration by parts against the compactly supported field gives . Conversely the measurable choice on nonzero gradients attains the pointwise bound. Approximating this bounded field by smooth fields, using interior cutoffs and the finite measure , justifies the supremum and gives
It is a norm of the derivative measure, rather than a pointwise derivative at jump discontinuities.
There is a genuine mismatch in the printed definition of the next functional. Its constraints on and are independent. Hence its stated supremum, denoted , separates as
The scalar supremum is , by cutoffs approaching one, and the vector supremum is the variation. For an affine image signal with , this gives , whereas the displayed square-root area would give . The intended relaxed graph-area functional instead uses the coupled pointwise constraint , giving
where is the singular part of . Both readings have a minimizer, but their equations are different.
Here is the direct method in the calculus of variations for either reading. Let be the literal or the corrected , and define the energy on , assigning infinity elsewhere. A minimizing sequence has bounded energy by comparison with . Both , so its variation is bounded, and the fidelity bounds , hence also and . By bounded-variation compactness, a subsequence converges strongly in to , and after another subsequence almost everywhere. Fatou's lemma proves
The regularizer is a supremum of affine functionals continuous in , since the test-field divergence is bounded. It is therefore lower semicontinuous. Combining the two lower bounds proves existence of a minimizer. In fact the convex regularizer and the strictly convex squared fidelity make the minimizer unique up to null sets. This does not assert that the minimizer must belong to .
For the intended graph area, conditionally assume that the minimizer is in . For , differentiate at . The derivative of the integrand is bounded by , so dominated convergence applies. The weak equation is
that is,
This is the graph-area Euler-Lagrange equation. Compactly supported variations impose no boundary condition in this statement.
For the literal printed supremum, the constant drops out and one obtains total variation denoising. Its total variation calibration form is
The distributional equation means . In particular wherever the gradient is nonzero; writing this quotient without handling zero gradients would be incomplete. Formally the one-sided derivative of is
Minimality in the directions and bounds the remaining linear functional by the second integral. The Hahn-Banach theorem extends it on that zero-gradient set to a bounded vector field of magnitude at most one, furnishing and the displayed weak equation. Thus the literal definition has a nonsmooth subgradient equation, not the square-root equation above.
Let , with . Its indicator function has L2 norm squared and total variation seminorm on a domain . On the family , the objective is , whose minimizer is . To prove global optimality, a total variation calibration is needed.
Define the bounded radial vector field
It satisfies and has a continuous normal component across . Its distributional divergence therefore has no boundary measure, and direct differentiation yields . Although is not compactly supported, multiply it by a smooth radial cutoff equal to one through radius and zero beyond . The extra divergence has magnitude on an annulus of area , hence L2 norm . Smoothing the continuous piecewise field gives compactly supported smooth admissible test vector fields with divergences tending to in , preserving the bound . The dual definition therefore gives for every finite-penalty , and trivially for all other .
Moreover . By the subgradient characterization of an absolutely one-homogeneous functional, for every , and . If , choose ; then . If , choose ; then belongs to , since multiplying the dual bound by a number in preserves it. The previous optimality criterion proves
The quadratic fidelity is strictly convex, so this minimizer is unique, including the threshold . The disk retains its radius on the positive branch and disappears on the zero branch; this is total variation denoising of a disk.
For data on , the minimizer of is the displayed amplitude shrinkage, including extinction at . The total variation calibration uses inside the disk and outside. Its continuous normal component creates no boundary measure, and . This subgradient certifies the positive branch; scaling it down certifies the zero branch. The quadratic fidelity is strictly convex, ensuring uniqueness.