For a polynomial of degree , its splitting field has , including in positive characteristic when the polynomial is inseparable. Prove this by induction on the degree. If is irreducible, adjoining a root gives degree and leaves a polynomial of degree to split, so the tower law for field extensions gives the divisibility. If with positive degrees , split first and then over the resulting field. The degree divides , which divides . This separate reducible case avoids the invalid step of assuming that the degree of an arbitrarily chosen irreducible factor must divide .
Consider the constructible angle whose cosine is and sine is . If one fifth of this angle were constructible, its cosine would satisfy the displayed polynomial, by the identity . The identity follows by taking the real part of and substituting .
The polynomial is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion at five, so has degree five over the rational numbers. The initial angle field already has degree two, and adjoining any finite collection of constructible numbers gives total degree over the rational numbers a power of two. Such a field cannot contain the degree-five element , by the tower law for field extensions. Hence this constructible angle cannot be divided into five equal angles by straightedge and compass construction. Some particular angles can be quintisected; the obstruction disproves a construction valid for all angles.
Doubling the volume of a unit cube requires constructing its new side length . Its minimal polynomial is irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion at two, so this length has degree three. Every constructible number belongs to a finite tower of quadratic extensions, whose total degree is a power of two. The tower law for field extensions would force the degree three to divide that power of two, a contradiction. Thus no such straightedge and compass construction exists.
Every permutes the factors:
Thus all coefficients lie in the fixed field . Let be the field they generate over . Then
Because and has degree with root ,
Part (a) and the tower law for field extensions give
Consequently , so
This is the coefficients of an orbit polynomial for a primitive generator result.
The tower law for field extensions states that for finite field extensions
one has
To prove it, let be a -basis of and an -basis of . Every can be written as with , and expanding each in the basis shows that the products span over .
If
then independence of the over gives for every , and independence of the over gives every . Thus is a -basis of , proving the formula.
If the minimal polynomial of has degree , then
has elements and is an intermediate field of
. The tower law for field extensions gives
so .
The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. Choose a generator
of , of order . If lay in a proper intermediate field of degree , its order would divide , a contradiction. Thus
and its minimal polynomial has degree .
For arbitrary , let be the splitting field of
over . Its roots form a field: the Frobenius endomorphism shows they are closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and inversion. The derivative is , so there are exactly distinct roots. Thus this root field has order . Applying the preceding generator argument supplies an element whose minimal polynomial over has degree , proving that an irreducible polynomial of every positive degree exists.
Put . The roots of are , so its splitting field is
The polynomial is irreducible over by the Eisenstein criterion at , and does not contain . The tower law for field extensions therefore gives .
Define automorphisms
They satisfy and . The eight maps and are distinct, so they exhaust the Galois group. Hence
the dihedral group of order eight.
The Galois correspondence gives all intermediate fields. The full list, with a single generator for each field, is
For example, has stabilizer , and has stabilizer ; the other entries follow similarly. Also has trivial stabilizer, so its orbit has eight elements and the primitive element theorem conclusion holds explicitly.
Finally, the normal subextension criterion says that normal intermediate fields correspond exactly to normal subgroups. In these are , , the two index-two Klein four-groups, , and , which gives exactly the “yes” rows above. This is the subfields of the splitting field of x to the fourth minus seven lattice.
If a monic polynomial has roots in a splitting field, its polynomial discriminant is
It is a symmetric polynomial in the roots, so it belongs to the base field; it is nonzero exactly when is a separable polynomial.
Put
the Vandermonde determinant. A root permutation sends to . Hence the Galois group of a polynomial is contained in the alternating group exactly when every Galois automorphism fixes , which by the fixed-field property is equivalent to . This implies that is a square in . Conversely, if for , then , so . The Galois group therefore fixes and consists of even permutations. This proves the discriminant criterion for an alternating Galois group.
Now let
The rational root theorem shows that none of is a root, so this cubic is irreducible over . The discriminant of a depressed cubic is
This is not a square in , so the Galois group of an irreducible cubic is over .
Over , the discriminant is the square
The cubic remains irreducible: a root in the degree-two extension would generate over both a degree-three field, by irreducibility, and a subfield of a degree-two field, contradicting the tower law for field extensions. Its Galois group over is consequently .
First, the number of embeddings extending a prescribed base embedding is at most the extension degree. Prove this for any finite extension by choosing finitely many algebraic generators and applying part (i) successively. At each step the number of extensions is at most the degree of that simple step; multiplication and the tower law for field extensions give the total bound.
If is not separable, choose with inseparable minimal polynomial of degree . Its image under has strictly fewer than distinct roots in any target field: inseparability is preserved under the coefficient embedding. Thus there are embeddings of extending . Each extends to in at most ways, giving at most
If instead does not split in , it again has fewer than distinct roots in , and exactly the same estimate applies. Hence either obstruction makes the embedding count strictly less than .
Identify with the Euclidean plane and start with the points . A complex number is a constructible number if a finite sequence of drawing lines through known points and circles with known centres and known distances as radii, and selecting their intersections, produces that point.
Line-line intersections solve linear equations in the current coordinate field. Line-circle and circle-circle intersections require at most one quadratic equation after eliminating a coordinate. Hence all coordinates obtained lie in a finite tower of real quadratic extensions of . If is constructible, choose a common such real field containing . Adjoining if needed still gives an extension of power-of-two degree. By the tower law for field extensions,
A regular heptagon centred at with one vertex would have as another constructible vertex. But its cyclotomic degree is , which is not a power of two. Thus the regular heptagon is not constructible.
Let the monic minimal polynomial of over have coefficients , and put . Each coefficient is algebraic over , so adjoining these finitely many coefficients successively gives . The same polynomial makes algebraic over , giving . The tower law for field extensions yields . Its subfield therefore also has finite degree over . This holds for every , proving is algebraic.
A splitting field of a nonconstant polynomial over a field is an field extension in which factors into linear factors and which is generated over by those roots. We prove existence and the divisibility simultaneously by induction on ; constant nonzero polynomials have splitting field .
If is reducible, write with positive degrees . By induction first split , obtaining of degree dividing , then split over , obtaining of degree dividing . The tower law for field extensions gives . All adjoined elements are roots of , so has the required minimality.
If is irreducible, take and let be the image of . Then and in . Apply induction to , of degree , to obtain . Therefore
This proof also covers inseparable polynomials; it does not incorrectly identify extension degree with automorphism count in that case.
Since is an -vector subspace of the finite-dimensional vector space , it has a finite -basis . Any finite -spanning set for also spans over , so choose a finite -basis of .
Every can be expanded first in the and then in the , showing that the products span over . If with , independence of the over gives for every ; independence of the then gives every . The products form an -basis, proving the tower law for field extensions:
Put . The tower law for field extensions shows that both and divide . Since are coprime, their product divides , so .
The minimal polynomial of over has degree and is still an annihilating polynomial over . The minimal polynomial over divides it, so
The upper and lower bounds agree:
Coprimality is the step forcing the lower bound to equal the product; without it the two generated fields can overlap substantially.
Eisenstein criterion says that a primitive integer polynomial is irreducible over if some prime divides all coefficients except the leading one, does not divide the leading coefficient, and its square does not divide the constant coefficient. The passage from primitive integer factorization to rational factorization is Gauss lemma for polynomials.
Translate the variable:
This is Eisenstein at two. Translation is an automorphism of , so itself is irreducible.
Set and . Since is a root of that irreducible degree-eight polynomial, . Also , so and solves . The extension degree is at most two. It is not one, since every element of is real and is not. The tower law for field extensions now gives
The tower law for field extensions states that, for with both successive degrees finite,
Indeed, if form an -basis of and form a -basis of , their products form an -basis of : expansion gives spanning, and independence follows first over and then over .
Starting from a unit segment, every straightedge and compass construction introduces coordinates by solving linear or quadratic equations over the coordinates already available. Thus a constructible number belongs to a tower of field extensions whose successive degrees are one or two; the total degree is a power of two. Doubling the volume of a unit cube would require the edge length . Its minimal polynomial over is , irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion at the prime number two. Thus . If that number lay in a construction field of degree , the tower law would make three divide , a contradiction. Therefore doubling the cube by straightedge and compass is impossible.
The tower law for field extensions states that, for with both successive degrees finite,
Indeed, if form an -basis of and form a -basis of , their products form an -basis of : expansion gives spanning, and independence follows first over and then over .
Starting from a unit segment, every straightedge and compass construction introduces coordinates by solving linear or quadratic equations over the coordinates already available. Thus a constructible number belongs to a tower of field extensions whose successive degrees are one or two; the total degree is a power of two. Doubling the volume of a unit cube would require the edge length . Its minimal polynomial over is , irreducible by Eisenstein's criterion at the prime number two. Thus . If that number lay in a construction field of degree , the tower law would make three divide , a contradiction. Therefore doubling the cube by straightedge and compass is impossible.
Induct through the finitely many construction steps. Initially all available coordinates lie in . If coordinates obtained so far lie in a real field , the line through two of its points has coefficients in . A circle with centre in and radius a distance between two such points has equation
whose coefficients lie in , since the squared distance lies in ; the radius itself need not lie there.
Part (b) therefore puts every new intersection in or a real quadratic extension of . If a step produces several points, adjoin their coordinates successively, omitting extensions that add nothing. A finite construction ends in a real field containing the desired coordinates, with a tower of genuine quadratic extensions
The tower law for field extensions yields
A construction involving no nontrivial extension has and degree one.
Eisenstein's criterion says that an integer polynomial with leading coefficient not divisible by a prime , all other coefficients divisible by , and constant coefficient not divisible by is irreducible over the rationals, provided it is primitive; the usual Gauss's lemma supplies the passage from integer to rational factors.
Apply it with to
All nonleading coefficients are even and the constant is not divisible by four. A translation of the variable preserves reducibility, so is irreducible over .
Let and . The minimal polynomial of is , so . Since , the number satisfies over . This real field cannot contain the nonreal , so that extension has degree exactly two. The tower law for field extensions gives