For a finite integral inclusion of domains, a nonzero has a monic minimal polynomial over the fraction field with nonzero constant term . Its equation gives . Consequently the image of under the finite morphism to is contained in the proper Zariski-closed set . Finite morphisms preserve the dimension of a closed subvariety and its image, so this proves dimension drops for proper closed subsets after Noether normalization. A power of , up to sign, is the field norm of .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2003 iii Paper 15 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The usual field norm is defined for a finite field extension. The printed hypothesis “algebraic” alone allows an infinite extension, for which this determinant norm is not defined. We therefore assume . For an arbitrary algebraic extension the meaningful elementwise statement is instead , and we prove this as well.
First a unique factorization domain is an integrally closed domain. Indeed, write an integral fraction as with relatively prime numerator and denominator. A monic integral equation, after multiplication by , shows that divides . Unique factorization forces to be a unit.
Let be the monic minimal polynomial of . Because is an integral element over , it satisfies a monic polynomial , and divides in . Every root of in an algebraic closure is therefore integral over . This assertion includes repeated roots when the extension is inseparable. The coefficients of are elementary symmetric expressions in these roots. The integral elements form a ring: finitely many integral elements generate a finite -module algebra, and the determinant trick shows every element of that algebra is integral. Thus all are integral over . Since and is integrally closed, .
Multiplication by on , in the basis , has the companion matrix of , whose determinant is . If , take a -basis of . Multiplication by preserves each summand in the resulting direct sum of copies of , so its determinant over isIn particular . The argument requires no separability; in fact it holds for every integrally closed domain, not just a unique factorization domain.
For the connection with dimension, let be the coordinate ring of an irreducible affine variety. By Noether normalization there is a finite integral inclusion , with . Their fraction fields form a finite extension. For any , its minimal-polynomial constant term is nonzero and lies in . Its equation givesThus a nonzero function on the normalized variety produces a nonzero function on the base that vanishes wherever vanishes. Up to sign, the field norm is a power of this , so it too belongs to .
Under the finite morphism to , the image of is therefore contained in the proper Zariski-closed set of dimension at most . Finite morphisms preserve the dimension of a closed subvariety and its image. Applying this to a nonzero element of the ideal of any proper closed subvariety proves proper closed subvarieties have strictly smaller dimension. This is the useful role of the norm argument: nonzero equations upstairs give nonzero equations downstairs under a finite normalization.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 3 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Throughout, rings are commutative with identity and ring homomorphisms preserve identity. The spectrum of a commutative ring is . For an ideal , put ; these are the closed sets of the Zariski topology. Its axioms follow fromFor the last equality, a prime ideal containing must contain or : if it contained neither, choose and , contradicting . The other equalities follow directly from containment. Thus arbitrary intersections and finite unions of closed sets are closed, proving that this is a topology.
The Zorn lemma says that a nonempty partially ordered set in which every chain has an upper bound has a maximal element. For , apply it to proper ideals ordered by inclusion. The zero ideal is proper. The union of a nonempty chain is an ideal and is proper, because containing one would put one in a member of the chain; the empty chain has the zero ideal as an upper bound. There is therefore a maximal ideal . If , then , so the class of in is invertible. This quotient ring is a field, making a prime ideal. Hence .
For a ring homomorphism , define by . The inverse image is proper because , and primality follows from . Moreoverwhere is the ideal generated by . This proves continuity. Inverse images also give and . Thus is a contravariant functor from rings to topological spaces.
For the specified inclusion, the fundamental theorem of algebra gives the points and of . Over , the nonzero prime ideals are generated either by with , or by with , ; all irreducible real polynomials have degree one or two. Contraction gives the spectrum map for the complexification of a real polynomial ring:Indeed, a real polynomial vanishing at a nonreal also vanishes at , and is divisible by their quadratic factor; the converse is immediate. This map is surjective. Its fibers contain one point over a real linear factor, two conjugate points over an irreducible quadratic factor, and only the generic point over zero. It identifies complex-conjugate pairs. Since each proper Zariski-closed set in either one-variable polynomial ring is a finite set of closed points, images of closed sets are closed; hence the Zariski topology on the target is the quotient topology for this identification.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2011 ii Paper 1 24H i Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
An affine variety is irreducible when it is nonempty and cannot be expressed as the union of two proper Zariski-closed sets. If a nonempty open subset were not dense, would be such a union: the first set is proper by assumption, and the second is proper because is nonempty. Hence every nonempty open subset of an irreducible variety is dense.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 101 1 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
The induced map on the spectrum of a commutative ring is contraction of an ideal:To see that it is well defined, let be a prime ideal of . Its inverse image is an ideal of , and it is proper because . If , then , whence or . This proves that the inverse image is a prime ideal.
For any ideal , its extension of an ideal to is . We haveThus inverse images of Zariski-closed sets are Zariski-closed sets, which proves that is a continuous map.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 iii Paper 101 1 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-05
We first establish the nilradical as the intersection of prime ideals:Every nilpotent element belongs to every prime ideal. In the other direction, if is not nilpotent, the multiplicative subset avoids zero. By the Zorn lemma, there is an ideal maximal among those disjoint from . It is a prime ideal: if and neither nor belongs to , then and each meet . Multiplying elements in these two intersections gives an element of lying in , a contradiction. Since , this proves the identity. The identity also holds for the zero ring, with the intersection over an empty family interpreted as the whole ring.
A Zariski-closed set contains the image of exactly whenThe last equality follows because is a nilpotent element exactly when for some . Consequently the smallest Zariski-closed set containing the image, namely its closure, isThis is all of precisely when the kernel of a ring homomorphism is contained in every prime ideal of . Hence
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2018 ii Paper 2 24I b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-03
Write a polynomial by its coefficients. Evaluation of and of each first partial derivative at is polynomial in these coefficients and in the coordinates of . Consequently the bad incidence locusis Zariski closed, and is Zariski open. Here a hypersurface is regarded as smooth at an ambient point outside it automatically.
In fact is empty. For homogeneous of degree , the Euler homogeneous function theorem saysIf , its left side is zero while its right side is , which is nonzero because . Thus every nonzero level is covered by the smoothness of a nonzero homogeneous level set, andwhich is certainly nonempty and Zariski open.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2020 ii Paper 1 25F Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-29
Suppose first that the affine variety is irreducible. If , thenBoth pieces are Zariski closed in . Irreducibility forces one to equal , so either or . Thus is a prime ideal.
Conversely, suppose that is prime and that with closed in . If both were proper, the Hilbert Nullstellensatz would giveChoose and . Their product vanishes on , so , contradicting primality. Hence one piece equals . This proves the criterion of irreducibility and prime vanishing ideal:
For the semicubical parabolaconsiderCertainly . Divide any polynomial by the monic polynomial as a polynomial in ; its remainder is . If this remainder lies in , thenThe first summand contains only odd powers of and the second only even powers, so both vanish and . ThereforeThe latter is a subring of the integral domain , hence is a domain. Thus is prime and
An affine variety of dimension is smooth at when its Zariski tangent space has dimension ; equivalently, the Jacobian criterion requires the Jacobian of its defining ideal to have rank . For this plane curve, put . Its gradient isAt the gradient vanishes, so the tangent space is all of and has dimension two rather than the curve dimension one. Hence the result on the coordinate ring and singularity of the semicubical parabola gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 1 25I Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
The Hilbert basis theorem makes a Noetherian ring. Reversing the inclusion of ideals shows that its Zariski-closed subsets satisfy the descending-chain condition, so every affine variety is a Noetherian topological space.
Suppose some nonempty closed subset had no finite decomposition into irreducible closed subsets. It would be reducible, so it could be writtenwith proper closed subsets. At least one of these would again admit no finite irreducible decomposition. Repeating that choice would produce an infinite strictly descending chain of closed subsets, contradicting Noetherianity. ThereforeRemoving any member contained in another leaves exactly the irreducible components.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 ii Paper 3 24I ii Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Write a conic as for a symmetric matrix , with off-diagonal entries equal to half the corresponding coefficients. A union of two distinct lines has matrix rank two. Thus is the rank-two part of the determinant hypersurface . Its closure also contains rank-one matrices, representing double lines, so it is not Zariski closed. Since the determinant is one nonzero homogeneous equation in , its dense rank-two locus has dimension .
The final sentence of the converted question writes , but the natural intended set is . The homogeneous ideal of its closure is the principal ideal generated by the cubic polynomial : the determinant hypersurface is irreducible, and is dense in it.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 3 24H Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Let be an irreducible variety of dimension . A point is nonsingular, or smooth, whenwhere is the Zariski tangent space; it is a singular point when . Equivalently, the local ring is regular exactly at a nonsingular point.
For an irreducible affine variety over a perfect field, the Jacobian criterion expresses the singular locus by the vanishing of the relevant Jacobian minors, so it is Zariski closed. At a point where the tangent-space dimension is minimal it equals ; equivalently, some -rowed Jacobian minor is nonzero. Its nonvanishing locus is therefore a nonempty Zariski-open set contained in the smooth locus. Every nonempty open subset of an irreducible topological space is dense, proving the density of the smooth locus.
Assume the ground field has characteristic other than two. Forthe partial derivatives are . They vanish simultaneously at the unique projective pointThus this point is the singular locus of the projective quadric cone.
For varieties ,If is smooth of dimension , the product point is singular exactly when is singular. HenceandThis is the singular locus of a product with a smooth variety.
To construct the requested examples, put . If , let be an irreducible quadric cone of dimension with one singular vertex. If , use instead the irreducible cuspidal cubicwhose only singular point is . Let denote the chosen -dimensional variety and embedin projective space by the Segre embedding. It is irreducible and has dimension , while its singular locus is the vertex or cusp point times , which is nonempty and has dimension exactly . This is the projective variety with a prescribed-dimensional singular locus construction.
Finally, suppose that the irreducible plane curve were smooth of degree . Since it is birational to a smooth projective curve of genus two, its geometric genus would be two. But the genus of a smooth plane curve isand no integer makes this number equal to two. Therefore cannot be smooth and must contain a singular point.
Contraction sends the zero prime ideal to zero. A complex closed point contracts to when is real, and to otherwise. Thus the map on the spectrum of a commutative ring is surjective and identifies each nonreal conjugate pair. Both spectra have only finite proper Zariski-closed sets, so this is also the topological quotient by complex conjugation.
For a finitely generated module and a prime ideal , if , choose annihilating . Their product annihilates all of . Conversely such an becomes a unit in , forcing . ThusThis identifies the support of a module with the Zariski-closed set . For , use . No Noetherian assumption on is required.
Zariski-open set Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
A Zariski-open set is the complement of a Zariski-closed set. A distinguished affine open has the form .