Distinguish the full velocity potentials from their perturbations . The linear boundary conditions use the perturbations. This distinction reconciles the notation in the printed conditions with the full potentials written in the mode ansatz. All equations below neglect products of perturbations. Assume positive densities and no surface tension.
A topology on is a family of subsets containing and , closed under arbitrary unions and finite intersections. Its members are the open sets. A Hausdorff space separates each pair of distinct points by disjoint open neighbourhoods; a compact space is one for which every open cover has a finite subcover.
Let be the Earth's angular velocity magnitude. Use the local east, north and upward unit vectors , with . At latitude , the Earth's angular velocity and the train's ground-relative velocity are
Thus the east component of the Coriolis force is
For a north–south track, the train has no eastward acceleration relative to Earth. Its path curvature lies in the local north–vertical plane. The centrifugal acceleration and Newtonian gravity also lie in that plane, and the Earth's constant angular velocity gives no Euler acceleration. Hence the sideways force from the track must cancel the eastward Coriolis force:
Its magnitude is , and its direction is west in the Northern hemisphere. The eastward tendency is the apparent Coriolis force; the requested track force has the opposite direction.
At infinity, the meteorite's incoming asymptote has speed and perpendicular distance from the Earth’s centre. The magnitude of its specific angular momentum is the magnitude of . On the asymptote, this is , so conservation of angular momentum gives . Its mechanical energy at infinity is . Comparing with part (ii) gives
For this Kepler orbit is a hyperbola. The smallest occurs at periapsis, where . Thus
The middle equality follows by substituting . A trajectory entering the Earth satisfies , equivalently
Therefore the sufficient collision condition is
This is gravitational focusing: Newtonian gravity increases the collision radius measured at infinity. Equality is the ideal grazing trajectory, which touches the surface; a strict inequality penetrates it. For the incoming motion is radial and collides, with as the limiting value of the above expression.
Write a Möbius transformation as with , interpreted on the Riemann sphere. Let , with , and .
If , then and . If , algebraic division gives
Consequently
The scaling coefficient is nonzero because . Thus translations, nonzero complex scalings and reciprocal inversion generate every Möbius map. The formulas extend over their poles and infinity by the sphere interpretation.
For a normal subgroup , define multiplication of left cosets by
To check that this is well-defined, replace by with . Their product is , and normality puts in . Thus the product coset is independent of the representatives. Associativity follows from multiplication in , the identity is , and the inverse of is . These operations form the quotient group .
For the unheaded finite-index conclusion, let act on the left cosets of its proper subgroup by . This is well-defined even if is not normal: replacing by leaves unchanged. The maps are bijections with inverses supplied by , and their compositions give a group homomorphism . Its kernel of a group homomorphism is normal, by the calculation in part (ii).
The action is not trivial, because some sends the coset to ; hence . If were trivial, would be injective, implying . Under the given strict inequality this is impossible. Thus is a nontrivial proper normal subgroup, and
More precisely, is the subgroup core: fixes every coset if and only if for every . This identifies the normal subgroup produced by the coset action.
Use the right-handed rotation matrix which sends the positive direction to the positive direction:
The Cartesian second-rank tensor transformation law gives
Here isotropic tensor means invariant under every proper rotation, as is needed for the rank-three assertion involving the Levi-Civita symbol. A passive coordinate rotation through the same angle uses instead; the invariance conclusions are identical.
Setting forces , , and . No symmetry assumption on has been made: it now has the form
Invariance under a right-handed quarter-turn about the axis next gives and , hence and . Conversely for every orthogonal matrix. The general isotropic second-rank tensor is therefore .
An isotropic vector must be fixed by the half-turn about the axis, so its first two components vanish. The half-turn about the axis then forces its third component to vanish. Thus the only isotropic vector is zero. The general isotropic third-rank tensor under proper rotations is . If invariance under the whole orthogonal group were required of an ordinary rank-three tensor, inversion would send to , forcing instead.
Measure temperature relative to ambient by . Newton's law of cooling models ordinary cooling by , since heat loss is proportional to the excess temperature. The additional negative forcing represents the cooling from the milk, with the temperature drop or rate normalized to one in the chosen units.
The Dirac delta function has unit integral and is supported at the instant of addition. It therefore imposes a sudden unit drop for cup 1. The difference of Heaviside step functions is one during the addition interval and zero outside it, giving a unit cooling rate for cup 2. The second temperature is continuous; only its derivative changes at the switching times. The value assigned to a Heaviside step function exactly at its jump does not change the integrated solution. This is the impulse versus finite-duration cooling comparison.
Taking the conjugate transpose of and using that both parts are Hermitian matrices gives . Addition and subtraction recover the Hermitian parts of a unitary matrix:
These depend only on , so any such decomposition has the same and is unique. Conversely the displayed expressions are Hermitian matrices and sum to in the form , establishing existence as well as uniqueness. Their commutation and quadratic relation are proved in the two labelled parts.
First establish the interior convergence lemma for a power series. If converges at some , its terms are bounded: for a finite . For every ,
Comparison with a convergent geometric series proves absolute convergence at .
Now let
The set contains zero, since at only the constant term remains. If , the definition of supremum gives a point of convergence with . The lemma proves absolute convergence at . If , convergence would place in the set defining , a contradiction. This proves the existence of a radius of convergence, including and :
The proof leaves behavior on open; it need not be uniform around that circle. The two examples illustrate opposite possibilities.
The Absolute Frobenius morphism is the identity on the underlying topological space and acts on the structure sheaf by . On an affine scheme it is induced by the ring homomorphism , . This is additive in characteristic , and the inverse image of a prime ideal is again , since exactly when . These affine maps agree under localization and hence glue.
A perfect ring of characteristic p is one whose Frobenius endomorphism is bijective. Since the Absolute Frobenius morphism fixes points, its map on the stalk at is precisely the Frobenius endomorphism of . A morphism of sheaves is an isomorphism exactly when it is an isomorphism on all stalks. Therefore
In the reverse direction the inverse sheaf map, together with the identity on points, gives the inverse morphism of locally ringed spaces. This is perfection in the Frobenius sense, not the unrelated homological use of the word perfect.
For the function field assertions below, interpret the normal schemes as integral, as is implicit in writing a single field or . General normal schemes need not be irreducible; without this interpretation those fields are not defined globally as single fields. Set . For an affine open in , finiteness gives , with finite and both rings normal domains. In fact is the integral closure of in : any element of integral over is also integral over and therefore belongs to . This local description yields the two forms of Frobenius factorization through a finite normal cover.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact