One single universal wavefunction, and every possible outcomes happens in some alternate universe. Does feel a bit sad and superfluous, but also does give some sense to perceived "wave function collapse".
Bra-ket notation by Ciro Santilli 37 Updated 2025-07-16
Notation used in quantum mechanics.
Ket is just a vector. Though generally in the context of quantum mechanics, this is an infinite dimensional vector in a Hilbert space like .
Bra is just the dual vector corresponding to a ket, or in other words projection linear operator, i.e. a linear function which can act on a given vector and returns a single complex number. Also known as... dot product.
For example:
is basically a fancy way of saying:
that is: we are taking the projection of along the direction. Note that in the ordinary dot product notation however, we don't differentiate as clearly what is a vector and what is an operator, while the bra-ket notation makes it clear.
The projection operator is completely specified by the vector that we are projecting it on. This is why the bracket notation makes sense.
It also has the merit of clearly differentiating vectors from operators. E.g. it is not very clear in that is an operator and is a vector, except due to the relative position to the dot. This is especially bad when we start manipulating operators by themselves without vectors.
This notation is widely used in quantum mechanics because calculating the probability of getting a certain outcome for an experiment is calculated by taking the projection of a state on one an eigenvalue basis vector as explained at: Section "Mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics".
Making the projection operator "look like a thing" (the bra) is nice because we can add and multiply them much like we can for vectors (they also form a vector space), e.g.:
just means taking the projection along the direction.
Ciro Santilli thinks that this notation is a bit over-engineered. Notably the bra's are just vectors, which we should just write as usual with ... the bra thing makes it look scarier than it needs to be. And then we should just find a different notation for the projection part.
Maybe Dirac chose it because of the appeal of the women's piece of clothing: bra, in an irresistible call from British humour.
But in any case, alas, we are now stuck with it.
This is basically what became the dominant formulation as of 2020 (and much earlier), and so we just call it the "mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics".
As of my last update in October 2021, there is no widely recognized public figure or topic specifically known as "Stacie Powell." It's possible that she may be a private individual, a recent emergence in news or media after that date, or a less prominent individual in a specific context.
Tamara Smirnova could refer to different individuals or contexts, but there isn't a widely recognized person or entity by that name as of my last update in October 2023. If you have a specific context in mind—such as a profession (e.g.
Teresa Montaruli is an Italian astrophysicist known for her research in the fields of particle astrophysics and cosmology. She has contributed to the understanding of high-energy cosmic phenomena and is associated with various projects related to astroparticle physics. Montaruli has also been involved in the development of observatories and experiments aimed at investigating cosmic rays, neutrinos, and other fundamental particles.
Ulrika Babiaková does not appear to be a widely recognized figure in public databases or media up to October 2023. It's possible that she could be a private individual or a relatively unknown person in fields such as academia, art, or local affairs.
Yuki Okoda is not a widely known term or figure as of my last knowledge update in October 2023. It may refer to a person, character, or concept that has emerged since then, or it could be a common name. If you provide more context, such as whether it's related to a specific field (like entertainment, literature, etc.
Brenda Andrews is a prominent figure in the field of molecular genetics and biotechnology. She is best known for her work on the genetics of yeast, particularly in the context of studying cellular processes and gene function. Andrews has contributed significantly to our understanding of how genes interact within cells, which has implications for research in areas such as cancer, aging, and various genetic diseases.
"Louise Johnson" could refer to various people or concepts, but it is most commonly associated with a well-known figure in the context of academic or professional work, or it may be a name of notable individuals in various fields. Without additional context, it's difficult to pinpoint which Louise Johnson you are referring to.
Polina V. Lishko is a prominent scientist known for her research in the field of reproductive biology and biochemistry, particularly focusing on sperm biology and fertilization. Her work often involves studying the mechanisms of sperm motility and the physiological processes that facilitate fertilization. She is affiliated with academic institutions where she conducts research, publishes scientific articles, and may also be involved in teaching.
Ani Nenkova is a prominent figure in the field of computer science, particularly known for her work in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning. She has been involved in research exploring various aspects of language technology, including information extraction, sentiment analysis, and text summarization.
Azadeh Tabazadeh is a notable figure in the field of atmospheric sciences, particularly known for her research on the effects of climate change on atmospheric conditions and processes. She has contributed to understanding the interactions between climate change and various atmospheric phenomena, including those related to pollutants and greenhouse gases.
Susan Hough is a prominent seismologist known for her work in the field of earthquake research and public outreach related to seismic hazards and risks. She has contributed to various facets of seismology, including the study of earthquake detection, probability, and the impact of seismic activity on urban areas. Hough is also recognized for her efforts to communicate science to the public and improve understanding of earthquakes and related phenomena. She has written books and articles aimed at making complex scientific concepts accessible to a broader audience.
As of my last knowledge update in October 2023, there isn't a widely recognized individual or concept specifically associated with the name "Arti Agrawal." It could refer to a person or an entity that has gained prominence after that date, or it could be a name that is not widely known in public discourse.
Prineha Narang is an accomplished physicist and researcher known for her work in the field of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to quantum information and many-body physics. She is an Assistant Professor at Harvard University and has made significant contributions to the understanding of complex quantum systems, including studies on entanglement and quantum state engineering. Her research often combines theoretical and computational approaches to explore the behavior of quantum systems and their implications for quantum computing and other advanced technologies.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 2.
    You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either https://OurBigBook.com or as a static website
    .
    Figure 3.
    Visual Studio Code extension installation
    .
    Figure 4.
    Visual Studio Code extension tree navigation
    .
    Figure 5.
    Web editor
    . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
    Video 4.
    OurBigBook Visual Studio Code extension editing and navigation demo
    . Source.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact