New articles - OurBigBook.com

Then, the Euler-Lagrange equation gives the maxima and minima of the that type of functional. Note that this type of functional is just one very specific type of functional amongst all possible functionals that one might come up with. However, it turns out to be enough to do most of physics, so we are happy with with it.

Given

F

, the Euler-Lagrange equations are a system of ordinary differential equations constructed from that

F

such that the solutions to that system are the maxima/minima.

In the one dimensional case, the system has a single ordinary differential equation:

\frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q ˙} = 0

(2)

\frac{\partial F}{\partial q}

and

\frac{\partial F}{\partial q ˙}

we simply mean "the partial derivative of

F

with respect to its second and third arguments". The notation is a bit confusing at first, but that's all it means.

Therefore, that expression ends up being at most a second order ordinary differential equation where

q

is the unknown, since:

the term $\frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q}$ is a function of $t, q (t), \overset{q}{˙} (t)$
the term $\frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q ˙}$ is a function of $t, q (t), \overset{q}{˙} (t)$ . And so it's derivative with respect to time will contain only up to $\overset{q}{¨}$

Now let's think about the multi-dimensional case. Instead of having

q : R \to R

, we now have

q : R \to R^{n}

. Think about the Lagrangian mechanics motivation of a double pendulum where for a given time we have two angles.

Let's do the 2-dimensional case then. In that case,

F

is going to be a function of 5 variables

F : R^{5} \to R

rather than 3 as in the one dimensional case, and the functional looks like:

I (q) = \int_{t_{0}}^{t} F (t, q_{1} (t), q_{2} (t), \overset{q_{1}}{˙} (t), \overset{q_{2}}{˙}) (t) d t

(3)

This time, the Euler-Lagrange equations are going to be a system of two ordinary differential equations on two unknown functions

q_{1}

and

q_{2}

of order up to 2 in both variables:

\frac{\partial F ( t , q _{1} ( t ) , q _{2} ( t ) , q _{1} ˙ ( t ) , q _{2} ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q _{1}} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial F ( t , q _{1} ( t ) , q _{2} ( t ) , q _{1} ˙ ( t ) , q _{2} ˙ ( t )}{\partial q _{1} ˙} = 0 \frac{\partial F ( t , q _{1} ( t ) , q _{2} ( t ) , q _{1} ˙ ( t ) , q _{2} ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q _{2}} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial F ( t , q _{1} ( t ) , q _{2} ( t ) , q _{1} ˙ ( t ) , q _{2} ˙ ( t )}{\partial q _{2} ˙} = 0

(4)

At this point, notation is getting a bit clunky, so people will often condense the

q_{i}

vector

\frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q _{1}} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q _{1} ˙} = 0 \frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q _{2}} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial F ( t , q ( t ) , q ˙ ( t ))}{\partial q _{2} ˙} = 0

(5)

or just omit the arguments of

F

entirely:

\frac{\partial F}{\partial q _{i}} - \frac{d}{d t} \frac{\partial F}{\partial q _{i} ˙} = 0

(6)

Video 1.

Calculus of Variations ft. Flammable Maths by vcubingx (2020)

Source.

 Read the full article

Calcium carbonate polymorph by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

ANSI C by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

A closed standard: stackoverflow.com/questions/81656/where-do-i-find-the-current-c-or-c-standard-documents. Nice.

 Read the full article

FreeBSD by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 Read the full article

Atomic Weapons Establishment by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

Their website, and in particular the recruitment section, are so creepy.

There's not mention of bombs. No photos of atomic explosions. The words "atomic" and "weapon" do not even show up in the front page!!! The acronym AWE is instead used everywhere as an euphemism.

In the recruitment section we can see a bunch of people smiling: web.archive.org/web/20211007213222/https://www.awe.co.uk/careers/working-at-awe/, suggesting:

We make nukes, and we do it with a smile!

There's even children outreach!!!

Ciro Santilli is not against storing a few nukes to be ready against dictatorships. But don't be such a pussy! Just say what the fuck you are doing more clearly! You are making weapons to kill people and destroy things in order to maintain the Balance of power. If the public can't handle such facts, then shut down the fucking program.

Video 1.

Keeping the peace: A history of AWE

. Source. By AWE, 2005.

 Read the full article

Nature (journal) by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

Ended up under Springer in 2015 after a massive merger.

 Read the full article

Planck's law by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

Used to explain the black-body radiation experiment.

Published as: On the Theory of the Energy Distribution Law of the Normal Spectrum by Max Planck (1900).

The Quantum Story by Jim Baggott (2011) page 9 mentions that Planck apparently immediately recognized that Planck constant was a new fundamental physical constant, and could have potential applications in the definition of the system of units (TODO where was that published):

Planck wrote that the constants offered: 'the possibility of establishing units of length, mass, time and temperature which are independent of speciﬁc bodies or materials and which necessarily maintain their meaning for all time and for all civilizations, even those which are extraterrestrial and nonhuman, constants which therefore can be called "fundamental physical units of measurement".'

This was a visionary insight, and was finally realized in the 2019 redefinition of the SI base units.

TODO how can it be derived from theoretical principles alone? There is one derivation at; en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck%27s_law#Derivation but it does not seem to mention the Schrödinger equation at all.

Video 1.

Quantum Mechanics 2 - Photons by ViaScience (2012)

Source. Contains a good explanation of how discretization + energy increases with frequency explains the black-body radiation experiment curve: you need more and more energy for small wavelengths, each time higher above the average energy available.

 Read the full article

Black-body radiation experiment by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

The Quantum Story by Jim Baggott (2011) page 10 mentions:
Early examples of such cavities included rather expensive closed cylinders made from porcelain and platinum.
and the footnote comments:
The study of cavity radiation was not just about establishing theoretical principles, however. It was also of interest to the German Bureau of Standards as a reference for rating electric lamps.
1859-60 Gustav Kirchhoff demonstrated that the ratio of emitted to absorbed energy depends only on the frequency of the radiation and the temperature inside the cavity
1896 Wien approximation seems to explain existing curves well
1900 expriments by Otto Lummer and Ernst Pringsheim show Wien approximation is bad for lower frequencies
1900-10-07 Heinrich Rubens visits Planck in Planck's villa in the Berlin suburb of Grünewald and informs him about new experimental he and Ferdinand Kurlbaum obtained, still showing that Wien approximation is bad
1900 Planck's law matches Lummer and Pringsheim's experiments well. Planck forced to make the "desperate" postulate that energy is exchanged in quantized lumps. Not clear that light itself is quantized however, he thinks it might be something to do with allowed vibration modes of the atoms of the cavity rather.
1900 Rayleigh-Jeans law derived from classical first principles matches Planck's law for low frequencies, but diverges at higher frequencies.

Video 1.

Black-body Radiation Experiment by sciencesolution (2008)

Source. A modern version of the experiment with a PASCO scientific EX-9920 setup.

 Read the full article

Ultraviolet catastrophe by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

Video 1.

What is the Ultraviolet Catastrophe? by Physics Explained (2020)

Source.

 Read the full article

Bitcoin non-standard transaction by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

Full list at: github.com/cirosantilli/bitcoin-inscription-indexer/blob/master/data/utxo_nonstandard

Bibliography:

Monday, January 29, 2024

 Read the full article

Base58 by

Ciro Santilli  40 Updated 2025-07-16

 View more

en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Base58Check_encoding

Invented for Bitcoin.

 Read the full article

 Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.

Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!

Video 1.

Intro to OurBigBook

. Source.

We have two killer features:

topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
Figure 1.
Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
Video 2.
OurBigBook Web topics demo
. Source.
local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
Figure 2.
You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either https://OurBigBook.com or as a static website
.
Figure 3.
Visual Studio Code extension installation
.
Figure 4.
Visual Studio Code extension tree navigation
.
Figure 5.
Web editor
. You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
Video 3.
Edit locally and publish demo
. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
Video 4.
OurBigBook Visual Studio Code extension editing and navigation demo
. Source.
Internal cross file references done right:
Infinitely deep tables of contents:
Figure 6.
Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
.
Live URL: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate
Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade

All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook

Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com

Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact

 Site settings

 Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project  Hide

 Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project