The Beurling–Gelfand spectral radius formula states that for every element of a complex Banach algebra,
For a Hermitian element of a C-star algebra , the C-star identity gives . Iterating,
The subsequence in the spectral-radius limit therefore proves .
Let be a unital C-star homomorphism. If is invertible in , its inverse is sent to an inverse of in . Thus without assuming continuity of . For Hermitian , is also Hermitian, so
For arbitrary , apply this inequality to and the C-star identity in both algebras:
Hence for every .
Now assume is injective. For a fixed , it is enough to prove norm preservation on , a commutative unital C-star algebra: the preceding square-norm identity will then recover the norm of . By the Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem, identify with . Let . It is also a commutative unital C-star algebra, and its character space is compact. Each restricts along to a character of , hence to evaluation at a point . The map is continuous, so is closed.
If , the Urysohn lemma provides a nonzero vanishing on . Then for every . Faithfulness of the Gelfand transform in gives , contradicting injectivity. Thus is onto. The isometric Gelfand transform of now gives
Finally,
This proves that an injective C-star homomorphism is isometric without assuming its image is closed before norm preservation has been established.
For the first norm-one assertion, use the usual unital Banach algebra convention . A character of an algebra is a nonzero complex linear multiplicative functional, initially without any continuity assumption. It satisfies , since otherwise for every . Moreover, cannot be invertible: applying to an inverse identity would give . Thus
This proves automatic continuity of characters and . Evaluation at the normalized identity gives the reverse inequality, so
If a convention permits , only follows in general: on with norm , the identity character has norm . The later completion argument needs only the upper bound.
If is invertible, , so every character is nonzero on . Conversely, if is not invertible, its principal ideal is proper and lies in a maximal ideal by Zorn lemma. The ideal is closed: if its closure were the whole algebra, it would contain with , making invertible by the Neumann series, which is impossible for a proper ideal. Maximality therefore gives . The quotient is a complex Banach division algebra, hence is by the Gelfand-Mazur theorem. The quotient map yields a character vanishing at . Consequently
Now let . Its evaluation characters give the map . Every character has this form. Indeed, its kernel is a proper ideal. If the functions in that kernel had no common zero, compactness would give finitely many in the kernel with no common zero. Then belongs to the kernel and is everywhere positive, hence is invertible in , a contradiction. At a common zero , the fact that belongs to the kernel gives for every . Continuous functions distinguish points of the compact Hausdorff space , so the map is bijective. It is continuous for the Gelfand topology, and the compact-to-Hausdorff continuous bijection theorem gives
For the norm comparison is trivial; assume henceforth that .
Let be the completion for the other algebra norm . It remains commutative and unital, with embedded densely. The restriction of any is a nonzero character of , since it takes to , and is automatically continuous for the original supremum norm. Thus maps into . It is injective because two continuous characters agreeing on the dense subalgebra agree on , and it is continuous because each coordinate is weak-star continuous.
The character space is weak-star compact even if its identity was not normalized: the spectral bound puts all its characters in , and the conditions , define a weak-star closed set. Apply Banach-Alaoglu theorem. Consequently is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset .
Suppose . The compact Hausdorff space is normal, so choose an open with . By the Urysohn lemma, choose with and on , and choose with on and on . Then . Every character of restricts to evaluation at a point of , so . The invertibility criterion proved above makes invertible in . Multiplying by in gives , contradicting . Therefore and is onto .
For each , choose a character extending . Its spectral bound gives
Taking the supremum over proves the minimality of the supremum norm on C(K):
The Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem states that a complex commutative unital C-star algebra is isometrically star-isomorphic to through its Gelfand transform, with a compact Hausdorff space. The l-infinity sequence space is such an algebra under coordinatewise multiplication and conjugation, with the supremum norm. Therefore
gives the required isometric isomorphism.
Uniqueness as a Banach space representation uses the Banach–Stone theorem, rather than just uniqueness as an algebra representation. To justify the relevant theorem, the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem gives
the extreme points of the dual unit ball of C(K). A norm-one measure whose variation measure is not concentrated at one point splits into two normalized restrictions to disjoint sets of positive variation, and so is not extreme. Conversely, equality in the variation bound shows that any decomposition of into the average of two dual-unit-ball elements forces both to be : after removing the phase, the two measures must be positive and their average is concentrated at .
If is a surjective linear isometry, its dual map preserves these extreme points and their scalar orbits. Hence for a bijection and . Evaluating at gives the continuous function , while
shows that is continuous, since continuous functions determine the topology of a compact Hausdorff space. It is consequently a homeomorphism. Thus any other compact space representing is homeomorphic to this . The Banach–Stone theorem is also stated in Leonard Tomczak's notes on András Zsák's functional analysis lectures.
Embed by the evaluation characters . They are distinct because the coordinate indicator functions distinguish them. Moreover, , so every character has . If , then
and hence . It follows that is open in . Thus is a homeomorphism from the discrete natural numbers onto its image.
To prove density, suppose . The Urysohn lemma provides a nonzero vanishing on . Write . Then for all , so and , a contradiction. Every bounded function is an element of , and is its continuous extension to . Density makes this extension unique. Therefore
This identifies with the Stone-Čech compactification of the natural numbers.
By the Riesz-Markov-Kakutani representation theorem, the continuous dual space of is isometrically the space of finite regular Borel measures, signed for real scalars and complex for complex scalars:
Here is the variation measure, whose total mass is the total variation norm of a measure.
If in , evaluation at each gives . The Uniform boundedness principle also gives . For any , the dominated convergence theorem with respect to the finite positive measure yields
since pointwise and . Thus
The same proof works for complex squares, because the absolute-value domination remains valid.
The Hahn-Banach separation theorem for two convex sets states that disjoint nonempty convex sets in a real locally convex space, with open, admit a nonzero continuous linear functional and such that
There need not be a positive uniform gap between the two sets.
For a proof, set . It is open and convex, and . Choose , let , and let be the Minkowski functional of . Because is open, convex and contains zero, is a finite sublinear functional, and . Put . Since , . On define . For this equals ; for it is nonpositive and hence at most . The Hahn-Banach theorem extends it to a linear with . Both and are bounded near zero, so this domination makes continuous; it is nonzero because . For ,
Thus for every . Define , which is finite because any fixed bounds it above. Openness of and nonzeroness of ensure for every , and for every . This proves the stated separation.
For the sequence criterion, suppose and . If each , then
Conversely, the assumed inequality implies that every convex combination of the has norm at least . Hence is disjoint from . Apply the separation theorem with the open set to obtain and
Then has norm one and satisfies for every . Therefore
The PDF confirms the “if and only if” that is garbled in the TeX transcription.
Use the usual unital-subalgebra convention . The spectral theorem for a commutative operator algebra states that the character space , equipped with the Gelfand topology, is a compact Hausdorff space, and there is a unique regular projection-valued measure on its Borel sigma-algebra satisfying
where is the Gelfand transform. The map is an isometric unital star-isomorphism from onto by the Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem.
More explicitly, every is an orthogonal projection, , , and for disjoint Borel sets ,
with convergence in the norm of the Hilbert space. Regularity means that each scalar spectral measure is a regular Borel measure. The integral identity then implies . No separability assumption on is needed.
Take , the natural initial-data assumption needed for the requested convergence but not explicitly stated in this subpart. Use the genuine Dirichlet eigensystem from part (b)(iii) and put . The spectral construction of a parabolic solution is
Each finite sum has zero Dirichlet boundary condition and satisfies .
To justify all derivatives, fix . For any integers , the squared norm of a tail of the th time derivative is
uniformly for . Use the corrected Sobolev domains of powers of an elliptic Dirichlet operator, not the inaccurate unqualified assertion in the PDF. Their norm equivalence gives convergence in every ordinary . The Sobolev embedding theorem then gives convergence of every desired spatial derivative by choosing large enough. Thus termwise differentiation is justified, , and for every . The trace remains zero, and holds pointwise.
Finally Parseval identity gives
by the dominated convergence theorem, since each factor tends to zero and is bounded by one. No boundary compatibility of the initial data is required for positive-time smoothness.
On the zero-boundary Sobolev space , the associated bilinear form is
The homogeneous Dirichlet boundary condition removes the boundary term, so for sufficiently regular and .
Formal self-adjointness means that equals its formal adjoint, or equivalently for compactly supported smooth functions. Here
With the symmetric real principal coefficients in the question, is equivalent to . It makes a symmetric bilinear form.
For the assertions in part (b), positivity must mean strict Dirichlet positivity:
This is the positive-definite operator convention. The weaker positive semidefinite operator convention does not suffice: has zero energy on a first Dirichlet eigenfunction. Under strict positivity, the compactness argument in part (b)(i) gives a uniform lower bound as well.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact