Topics (349k) Articles (361k) Users (407) Discussions (237) Comments (383) Files (12k) New article
Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 f Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Lorentz-covariant tensor integration replaces by . The numerator consequently contributes . The supplied master integral with powers givesInserting the corrected parameter integral givesThe pole uses , and . ThusThere is no momentum-independent pole at in this transverse gauge after removing the photon tadpole. The two-point counterterm insertion is , so minimal subtraction requiresThese coefficients cancel the actual one-loop insertion derived from the action. Applying the misprinted weight in part e would give a wave-function pole four times too small. In a convention the same answer is . Finally, does not mean that the bare mass parameter is unchanged: gives . Photon, charge and quartic counterterms require their respective Green functions and cannot be determined from this scalar two-point function alone.
Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 e Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
First remove the projector denominator explicitly:Let and . The Feynman parameter for a simple and a squared propagator follows by differentiating the elementary two-denominator Feynman formula with respect to givesShift . Then , with . The numerator is unchanged by this parallel shift:Therefore the correctly combined integral isThe printed weight is not compatible with this denominator and prefactor. Exchanging with changes the mass term in as well and cannot supply the missing normalization. A concrete counterexample is with nonzero spacelike external momentum and : after Wick rotation, the remaining integral is nonzero and symmetric under . The source's expression is then exactly one quarter of the correct expression. Thus the claimed equality cannot be imposed when computing the pole.
Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 d Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Apply the dimensionally regulated tadpole integral before removing the infrared regulator:At fixed regulator away from gamma-function poles, the power of has positive real part. ConsequentlyBoth the correctly weighted tadpole and the source's doubled version vanish. This is the near-four-dimensional limit appropriate to the question; the order of limits is important. Equivalently the exactly massless tadpole is a scaleless integral and is zero in dimensional regularization. The statement is not valid for every arbitrary fixed dimension: for example, gives a nonzero prefactor and growth as . One must keep the regulator in its stated near-four-dimensional domain.
Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Route the photon momentum as and the internal scalar momentum as . The transverse projector obeys , so the two cubic vertices giveMultiplying the two vertices and propagators therefore givesFor the seagull, . Including the photon-loop symmetry factor gives insteadThe printed seagull coefficient is twice this result. The vertex's factor two differentiates the two photon fields; closing them into one line requires the compensating symmetry factor. Direct expansion of the action gives the same check: the interaction density has one photon contraction, yielding coefficient , not . The identical-photon origin of the vertex factor is also explicit in the standard scalar-electrodynamics rules.[ref]
Quantum Field Theory by David Tong. §6.5.1, charged scalars: the seagull vertex factor two comes from the two identical photon fields
This discrepancy does not affect the massless-photon limit in part d or the ultraviolet pole in part f. Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 b Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
The one-particle-irreducible scalar two-point function has three one-loop topologies: a scalar-photon exchange loop built from two cubic vertices; a photon tadpole at one seagull vertex; and a scalar tadpole at one quartic vertex. The last is absent when . Reducible chains of self-energy insertions belong to the Dyson expansion and are not additional one-loop self-energy graphs. The scalar-QED photon-tadpole symmetry factor is because its two identical photon legs are joined; the oriented complex-scalar tadpole has no such identical-real-line factor.
Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2017 1 a Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
Gauge invariance and power counting permit the same local operators as in the original renormalizable action. With renormalized fields, a convenient counterterm parametrization isHere . Expanding the first term supplies kinetic, scalar-scalar-photon, and seagull counterterms with the relative coefficients required by the Ward identity. Equivalently introduce separate vertex constants first and then impose that identity. For , , and , it gives . Thus charge renormalization can be represented through the photon field factor, rather than adding an independent gauge-noninvariant interaction.
The mass coefficient defined here is ; it must be distinguished from . Gauge fixing may require the corresponding gauge-parameter redefinition, and vacuum diagrams can require an additive vacuum-energy counterterm. No photon mass counterterm is allowed by the unbroken gauge symmetry. The quartic scalar counterterm remains necessary for the full theory even at a scale where the renormalized is zero, because gauge interactions generate scalar four-point divergences.
Past exam of the advanced quantum field theory for particle physics course of the University of Oxford 2016 3 c Solution by
Codex 0 2026-10-25
For , integrate the vector action by parts, dropping the boundary term, and write it as a quadratic functional:The explicit mass makes this Proca kernel invertible: the displayed action alone has no gauge redundancy left to fix. It is interpreted as unitary gauge when obtained from a Higgs or Stückelberg completion with its would-be Goldstone field removed.
Introduce a source and complete the square, . The normalized Gaussian path integral isThe source-independent functional determinant cancels in . For Fourier momentum , the mixed-index kernel is . For , use the projectorsTheir orthogonality givesCombining the projectors removes their apparent massless denominator. Adding the Feynman prescription gives the unitary-gauge propagatorMultiplication by verifies that it inverts the quadratic operator. On the physical pole , the numerator is transverse to , as required for the three physical massive-vector polarizations.
The drawback is its off-shell ultraviolet behaviour: at large spacelike momentum the transverse term falls as , but the longitudinal tensor term remains of order . Naive loop power counting therefore looks worse and renormalizability is not manifest. In a finite gauge the corresponding expression iswhich falls as at fixed finite . Its limit gives the unitary-gauge longitudinal term, so taking that limit before the ultraviolet limit changes power counting.
This is not a claim that a renormalizable Higgs theory ceases to be physically renormalizable in this gauge. Nor does it mean that the free Proca Gaussian integral is inconsistent. For conserved external sources , the longitudinal numerator drops out of and the tree exchange again falls as . The difficulty concerns off-shell Green functions and manifest control of loop divergences, not the number of physical polarizations.
Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project
Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
Intro to OurBigBook
. Source. We have two killer features:
- topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculusArticles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
- a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
- a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.Figure 1. Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page. View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivativeVideo 2. OurBigBook Web topics demo. Source. - local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
- to OurBigBook.com to get awesome multi-user features like topics and likes
- as HTML files to a static website, which you can host yourself for free on many external providers like GitHub Pages, and remain in full control
Figure 2. You can publish local OurBigBook lightweight markup files to either OurBigBook.com or as a static website.Figure 3. Visual Studio Code extension installation.Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally. Video 3. Edit locally and publish demo. Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension. - Infinitely deep tables of contents:
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact






