Ciro Santilli @cirosantilli 37

Ciro Santilli studied there for a few years starting in 2007.

In retrospect, doing electrical engineering (and likey the other engineering degrees) felt like taking a trip to the 60s in the United States, due to both the subject matter, and how old the concrete buildings were!

This does not need to be a bad thing. It is in that era (and earlier) that much of the exciting foundations of the field were set, and there is great value in there is value in tutorials written by early pioneers of the field. Not that they were amazing at excting history lessons as they should be. But the course outline suggested that intent.

But that point of view must also be accompanied by the excitement of the great ongoing advances of technology (and impact they had in the past). And on that, they failed.

One day, one day, we will fix that.

www.uopeople.edu/.

Online and free. Pay only for exams, i.e. exam as a service. Almost perfect according to Ciro Santilli's idea.

TODO is teaching material open or not?Asked: twitter.com/cirosantilli/status/1687865554722562048

Requires entangled particles, unlike BB84 which does not.

There are infinitely many prime k-tuples for every admissible tuple.

Generalization of the Twin prime conjecture.

As of 2023, there was no specific admissible tuple for which it had been proven that there infinite of, only bounds of type:But these do not specify which specific tuple, e.g. Yitang Zhang's theorem.

Generally, prizes that pay big lumps of money to well established individuals are a bit useless, it would be better to pay smaller sums to struggling beginners in the field, of which there are aplenty.

The most important part about prizes should not be the money, nor the recognition, but rather explaining better what the laureates did. In this, most prizes fail. Thus Ciro Santilli's project idea: Project to explain each Nobel Prize better.

Ah, this list: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_prizes_known_as_the_Nobel_or_the_highest_honors_of_a_field

Preprint: arxiv.org/abs/2303.10798

"Game" is a bit of a stretch as there are no player choices at all.

A more precise word would be simulation.

More precise, this "game" is exactly an absorbing Markov chain.

Short for Doctor of Philosophy, it's how some weird places like the University of Oxford say PhD. In Oxford they also analogously say MPHil.

Can either be a cell's dick used during bacterial conjugation, or little attachment anchors.