Length contraction by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Suppose that a rod has is length measured on a rest frame (or maybe even better: two identical rulers were manufactured, and one is taken on a spaceship, a bit like the twin paradox).
Question: what is the length than an observer in frame moving relative to as speed observe the rod to be?
The key idea is that there are two events to consider in each frame, which we call 1 and 2:
  • the left end of the rod is an observation event at a given position at a given time: and for or and for
  • the right end of the rod is an observation event at a given position at a given time : and for or and for
Note that what you visually observe on a photograph is a different measurement to the more precise/easy to calculate two event measurement. On a photograph, it seems you might not even see the contraction in some cases as mentioned at en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrell_rotation
Measuring a length means to measure the difference for a single point in time in your frame ().
So what we want to obtain is for any given time .
In summary, we have:
By plugging those values into the Lorentz transformation, we can eliminate , and conclude that for any , the length contraction relation holds:
The key question that needs intuitive clarification then is: but how can this be symmetric? How can both observers see each other's rulers shrink?
And the key answer is: because to the second observer, the measurements made by the first observer are not simultaneous. Notably, the two measurement events are obviously spacelike-separated events by looking at the light cone, and therefore can be measured even in different orders by different observers.
Indefinite orthogonal group by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Generalization of orthogonal group to preserve different bilinear forms. Important because the Lorentz group is .
SubRip by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Oxygen transport protein by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
C++ by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
C plus plus is what you get when you want to have all of:
  • ability to write DRY code, which is e.g. impossible in the C
  • low level control, notably not having garbage collection, as possible in the C
  • somewhat backwards compatibility with C
Java (programming language) by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Java is good.
Its boilerplate requirement is a pain, but the design is otherwise very clean.
But its ecosystem sucks.
The development process is rather closed, the issue tracker obscure.
And above all, Google LLC v. Oracle America, Inc. killed everybody's trust in it once and for all. Thanks Oracle.
Video 1.
Java for the Haters in 100 Seconds by Fireship (2022)
Source.
Rust (programming language) by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
GIF by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Video 1.
It's pronounced GIF by Jehtt (2022)
Source.
Ordnance Survey by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Has some of the best map data available for the United Kingdom, but their data appears to be proprietary?
Example at: Lie Groups, Physics, and Geometry by Robert Gilmore (2008) Chapter 7 "EXPonentiation".
Furthermore, the non-compact part is always isomorphic to , only the non-compact part can have more interesting structure.
Cf. by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Nota bene by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
D by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
J by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
O by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
U by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
Pre-shared key by Ciro Santilli 35 Updated +Created
An overview of what you can do with a pre-shared key with tradeoffs can be found at: quantumcomputing.stackexchange.com/questions/142/advantage-of-quantum-key-distribution-over-post-quantum-cryptography/25727#25727 The options are:

There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.