By James F. Price. An appendix to Essay 2: Dimensional Analysis of Models and Data Sets. Section 8 credits the experiments, models, code, text and technical figures to the author. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution is his affiliation and provides administrative support; MIT OpenCourseWare hosts the appendix in its Topics in Fluid Dynamics resource collection.

Online text: ocw.mit.edu/courses/res-12-001-topics-in-fluid-dynamics-fall-2024/mitres_12_001_f24_appendix.pdf

Inspected version: 9 February 2026, printed on the PDF cover. This version date is distinct from the Fall 2024 resource-collection label; no original publication date is asserted.

Cited passages: PDF cover p. 1, author and February 9, 2026 date; §§2.1–2.3, printed pp. 9–12: parameter control, semitransparent beaker, temperature and dye preparation, volume/time readout, repeatability and bore uncertainty; equations (1)–(2), printed pp. 10–11: head from measured volume, flow from volume/time differences; Fig. 2, printed p. 12: head trajectories and incomplete low-head drainage; §§2.5 and 3.1, printed pp. 15–18, equations (10)–(14) and Fig. 3: ideal speed and empirical discharge normalization; §4 introductory discussion, printed pp. 19–20: protruding cap and surface tension; §5 introduction and §2 apparatus description: viscous outlet-tube effects; §8, printed p. 51: attribution of experiments and technical figures.

Online text: pdfs.semanticscholar.org/77e1/3f407ab09f2539523bf8d29acd1048524a2a.pdf

By Meng Cui and Changhuei Yang.

Published in Optics Express 18(4), 3444–3455, by the Optical Society of America. The printed first-page footer gives online publication on 2 February 2010; the issue footer gives 15 February 2010. Semantic Scholar hosts the linked PDF copy.

DOI: doi.org/10.1364/OE.18.003444

Publication record: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20389354/

Cited passages: §2, Figure 1, pp. 3446–3447, recording and playback geometry; §§3.1–3.2, Figures 2–3, pp. 3447–3450, 532 nm source, sensor/modulator arrangement and calibration; §4.1, Figure 4, p. 3450, readout; §4.2, Figure 6(e–f), pp. 3451–3452, ordinary-mirror displacement control; §§5.1–5.2, Figure 7(a–c), pp. 3452–3453, prepared bead sample, conjugate return and zero-phase control.

David Tong's University of Cambridge lecture notes: www.damtp.cam.ac.uk/user/tong/aqm/topicsinqm.pdf. Section 3.1.3, printed pp. 71–75, develops the magnetic-moment argument for atomic spin-orbit coupling and its Thomas precession correction.

The laboratory explains how conventional radiocarbon ages, historical half-life conventions and time-varying atmospheric ratios relate to calendar dating.

Official edition: pdg.lbl.gov/2022/

Muon listing: pdg.lbl.gov/2022/listings/rpp2022-list-muon.pdf

Charged-pion mass listing: pdg.lbl.gov/2022/listings/rpp2022-list-pi-plus-minus.pdf

Proton mass listing: pdg.lbl.gov/2022/listings/rpp2022-list-p.pdf

Neutron mass listing: pdg.lbl.gov/2022/listings/rpp2022-list-n.pdf

TIPP 2021 presentation: indico.cern.ch/event/981823/contributions/4295324/attachments/2250469/3818551/KDK_TIPP_2021_pub.pdf

Its potassium-40 decay scheme gives the approximate atomic mass-energy differences of $1.311$ MeV to calcium-40 and $1.505$ MeV to argon-40, and distinguishes capture to an excited argon level from the rare positron branch. The positron kinetic-energy endpoint additionally subtracts $2m_e$ from the atomic mass difference.

The original report by Albert Abraham Michelson and Edward W. Morley describes an interferometer experiment constraining the orientation dependence of light propagation. Scanned report: history.aip.org/exhibits/gap/PDF/michelson.pdf

The original report of the Eddington experiment, based on observations at the total solar eclipse of 29 May 1919.

Official publication: doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1920.0009

Original paper scan: w.astro.berkeley.edu/~kalas/labs/documents/dyson1920.pdf

The original Pound-Rebka experiment report, using resonant gamma-ray absorption to measure gravitational redshift in a laboratory height difference.

Official publication: journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.4.337

Institutional account: physics.aps.org/story/v16/st1

By William Shockley and Hans-Joachim Queisser, Journal of Applied Physics 32(3), pp.510–519.

DOI: doi.org/10.1063/1.1736034

Abstract and publication record: cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1363107368395790720

Institutional author.

Institutional author.

Institutional author.

Eiji Saitoh coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]

Sadamichi Maekawa coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]

Ryo Takahashi coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]

Jun’ichi Ieda coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]

Mamoru Matsuo coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]

Satoru Okayasu coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]

Kazuya Harii coauthored a Barnett effect experiment on gadolinium above its Curie temperature. A fluxgate magnetometer measured magnetization during rapid mechanical rotation, testing rotation-induced magnetic response in the regime of paramagnetism.^[ref]