The curve has good reduction at five and seven: its discriminant is , and the hypotheses make a unit at those primes. Over the cubing map is a bijection, so
The character sum vanishes after replacing by a variable ranging over the whole field. Over , where , the possible cubes are zero once, one three times, and minus one three times. The corresponding right sides are two, three and one. Two and one are nonzero squares while three is not, so the count is .
Rational torsion injects into the reduction group at a good odd prime, a standard reduction theorem. Thus its order divides . If a point of order three existed, its coordinates would be integral by the Nagell–Lutz theorem. Since , the duplication formula gives
Thus either and , or and .
At the prime in the hypothesis, is a nonsquare unit. Since , there is a nontrivial cube root of unity , and . Hence is a nonzero square, so both and are nonsquares. Neither ordinate equation is possible even modulo . There is no rational point of order three, proving
Here . A nonzero ordinate of a torsion point must have its square dividing 31, so . The curve equation then becomes , whose only integer solution is . No point with exists over the rationals: the monic cubic has no integer root, since its only possible integer roots are and neither works.
It remains to test . Doubling either gives abscissa , which is not an integer. If the original point were torsion its double would satisfy the integrality part of the Nagell–Lutz theorem, a contradiction. Therefore
The rational point consequently has infinite order, so its multiples give infinitely many distinct rational points.
For a nonsingular curve with integers , the Nagell–Lutz theorem states that a finite rational torsion point has integer coordinates and satisfies either or
The point at infinity is the identity and is treated separately. Integrality is the result allowed in the source. To prove the remaining divisibility, suppose . Then the doubled point is finite and also torsion, so its coordinates are integral. Its tangent slope is and its abscissa is . Thus is an integer. A rational number whose square is an integer is itself an integer, so divides . In particular divides . It also divides . Evaluating the permitted polynomial identity at the integer therefore proves the divisibility of by .
For , the point equals its negative and has order two. The theorem gives a finite set of torsion candidates, but the divisibility condition by itself does not assert that every candidate is torsion.
Let be the nonzero reductions of . The square set in has members, including zero. Multiplication by , and separately the transformation , preserve this cardinality. Hence the two sets in the hint have total cardinality and must intersect. This gives a solution modulo .
The solution cannot have both coordinates zero since . If , choose any integral lift of and apply Hensel's lemma to the polynomial in : its derivative at the reduced root is . If , use the other variable instead. The nonzero derivative uses . Thus a solution lifts to as required.
The reduction has equation . At the origin both first partial derivatives vanish, so the point is singular, also when . A lift reducing to the origin would require . Its two cubes would then lie in , whereas the right side of the original equation has valuation one. This is impossible.
For an example which does lift, choose
It has the same reduction and the rational point reduces to the origin. Over , which has characteristic zero, a singular affine point would require , which does not lie on this curve. Its projective closure is also smooth: the simultaneous partial derivatives of cannot vanish at a projective point. Thus this is a nonsingular curve for every prime , including three. A singular point in the reduction can therefore fail to lift or can lift, depending on the original equation.
The expansion is
The notation has the units digit before the comma and successive positive powers afterwards, as defined in the source. To check it, the geometric series converges in the 3-adic norm and its sum is .
For the general repeating block, gives
Both numerator and denominator are integers, and the denominator is a -adic unit.
For , a root would have valuation zero because five is a unit. It would therefore reduce to a unit cube modulo nine. The only cube residue classes modulo nine are , none equal to five. Thus no root exists in .
For , the valuation equation would be , impossible because the valuation of a nonzero element of is an integer. Thus no root exists in .
For , and the derivative . Hensel's lemma lifts this simple root to a root in . Thus a root exists in .
If , choose with . The cubic has the three distinct roots , so all four two-torsion points are rational over . They form a subgroup of order four, hence by Lagrange's theorem.
If , let be the Legendre symbol with . Since is odd and , the terms for and cancel in . Counting the possible second coordinates gives
Thus in both cases
The assumptions and ensure nonsingularity and keep the displayed two-torsion roots distinct when they exist.
Write in lowest terms and put . For ,
Before reduction to lowest terms, both numerator and denominator are bounded in magnitude by . Cancellation can only decrease the height. Hence one may choose
The duplication formula for is
The numerator has magnitude at most , and the denominator at most . Thus
satisfies the second bound. At the identity or any point whose relevant image is the identity, the image height is zero and the same nonnegative constants work directly. Thus the formulas cover every rational point, including the exceptional points of the displayed coordinate expressions.
The doubling slope at is , giving
These denominators are invertible modulo . To add again, the difference of first coordinates is , so the new slope would be . This requires inversion of a number divisible by 97. The elliptic curve method instead computes
It is a proper factor. The failure of the group-law division modulo the composite integer reveals different behavior modulo its prime factors.
Here , and the two-isogenous curve is . Let and be the first-coordinate square-class maps, using the coefficient or at the point . The same chord argument shows that both maps are homomorphisms.
For an equation with integer coefficients, its first-coordinate square class has a square-free representative dividing , including a possible sign. Indeed, at a prime not dividing , a negative valuation of must be even because dominates; a positive valuation must be even because is a unit. Thus only primes dividing can occur to odd order. For , the possibilities are . The classes occur at the identity and . If class two occurred, write with coprime integers . Substituting in the equation would give a rational square, necessarily an integer square,
Modulo three, the right side is two whenever are not both divisible by three: this holds whether just one or both are units. That is impossible. Since the image is a subgroup containing , exclusion of two also excludes minus one. Therefore .
For , the quadratic is positive, so every nonzero first coordinate is positive. Its square class can only be one or three. Both occur, with three supplied by , so .
Let be the dual two-isogeny, with . The kernel identities of part (ii), applied to both curves and the usual coordinate scaling, give and . Moreover lies in , since is a square. Thus , and
This is a rank-zero two-isogeny descent for roots zero one and minus two. The rational two-torsion has four points, since the cubic factors as . By the Mordell-Weil theorem, the last index is . Therefore
For an affine point of with , the first coordinate of its image is . Thus its image has trivial square class whenever that coordinate is nonzero. The identity and map to the identity. If a point maps to , it has and , forcing to be a rational square; in that case too. Hence .
Conversely, let have and . Write with . The equation of gives
Set and . Then solves and is nonzero because . Hence , so . Also , giving .
The identity is an image of the identity. Finally, exactly when is a rational square; then either nonzero root gives mapping to . This covers all exceptional points and proves
In the typical case, the line through , or their tangent when they coincide, is . Its intersections with have first coordinates given by
Their product is . The third intersection is , which has the same first coordinate as . Consequently
Passing to the quotient by rational squares gives . Every square class is its own inverse, so
The excluded cases have their specified special values; the source asks only for this chord-and-tangent argument away from them.
The discriminant is , which is nonzero modulo three because . Thus there is good reduction at three. For every , the reduced right side is , so its only affine points are . Together with the identity they form .
By part (ii), the rational torsion subgroup injects into this four-element group and hence has exponent two. Over , the two-torsion points have , requiring . Since , the only rational root is zero. Therefore
For a short Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve with coefficients in the p-adic integers, a point with nonintegral has valuations and for some integer : the term strictly dominates in the equation, so . Its formal parameter therefore has valuation . These points, together with the identity, form the formal neighborhood of the identity, with parameter in and the elliptic formal group law over the p-adic integers. For a point with , the equation gives too.
The formal neighborhood has no nontrivial torsion. Multiplication by an integer coprime to has series and preserves , so any torsion there must have -power order. If , part (i) gives , contradicting .
The printed hypotheses also allow . In that case, a nontrivial torsion point in the formal neighborhood would have order a power of two and hence yield a point of order two in that neighborhood. But every nonidentity point of order two on a short Weierstrass equation of an elliptic curve has and a root of the monic cubic over the p-adic integers . Such a root lies in the p-adic integers, so it cannot belong to the formal neighborhood, whose nonidentity points have nonintegral coordinates. This excludes the remaining case. This is the torsion-free formal subgroup for a short Weierstrass equation. Thus every affine torsion point satisfies
With good reduction, the reduction homomorphism has kernel exactly this torsion-free formal neighborhood. Its restriction to the torsion subgroup is therefore injective, proving the required subgroup isomorphism. The short model over the p-adic integers is essential to the prime-two argument; no blanket torsion-injectivity assertion for arbitrary models is needed.
If as an element of , the stated lower bound is zero and is immediate. Otherwise set . The supplied formal group expansion has , because . For , the non-Archimedean estimates give
If , then , so the two terms cannot cancel and . The same strict inequality persists under iteration, so no such can have finite -power order. Every nonzero -power torsion point therefore satisfies .
For a point of order , itself forces , proving the bound for . For , put , of order . Since , the preceding maximum is . By induction,
This proves the formal torsion radius for prime power order. Taking the positive th root gives
Choose a nonzero integer with . By the Chinese remainder theorem, choose satisfying and . Put . Then
This proves the requested simultaneous approximation, even when the rational targets have denominators divisible by either prime.
A rational sequence converging to zero at every standard absolute value is:
Its ordinary absolute value is at most , hence tends to zero. For a fixed prime and all sufficiently large , the denominator is congruent to one modulo , so . Therefore for each prime as well. The assertion concerns each fixed prime separately, rather than uniform convergence over all primes.
No prime works. The p-adic valuation induces a well-defined homomorphism
The class of maps to one, whereas the class of maps to zero. They therefore cannot be equal. Equivalently, cannot be a th power because its valuation is not divisible by .
In the P-adic numbers, converges to . Consequently
Since , the digits one and two are both between zero and , so no carrying is required. These are its p-adic digits, with the unique negative-power digit at exponent minus one.
The strict inequality means . Taking gives , so
For the other expression, if then and its p-adic valuation is zero. If , then has p-adic valuation exactly one. It can never have valuation greater than two. Thus no such integer exists for the second strict inequality.

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact