Taylor expansion of about has integral coefficients, so
In a Non-Archimedean absolute value, adding an error of norm strictly smaller than cannot change a quantity of norm . Therefore
This simultaneously verifies the derivative assumption used at the next step of part (i).
Let and . At any step before reaching a root, set
Assuming inductively that and , this gives
All derivatives of a polynomial over are integral on , so . Hence , and the ultrametric inequality keeps in . If a root is reached, retain that value for subsequent terms, and the asserted weak step inequality still holds.
Use the two-isogeny formula formula with and . Its companion is
Both curves are nonsingular because . With , choose
Each map extends across its exceptional affine points, and . On , the first coordinate of the dual can also be written .
Let and solve . The first coordinate gives . Since , the equation of then gives
The second coordinate selects the signs. The two rational preimages are exactly
Substituting into the dual formula checks that both map to . Their coordinates are nonexceptional under the assumptions, and the degree-two map has no further preimages.
The two-torsion square-class homomorphism has kernel , and on these two points it is their nonzero -coordinate modulo squares. Thus is in the image of exactly when is a rational square, and is in that image exactly when is a rational square.
If , then is one of the two preimages, because . Conversely, if , applying the dual shows . Therefore
Finally, if an integer equals in lowest terms, then forces . Thus rational squareness of these integer parameters is exactly integer squareness, and
This is the two-isogeny halving criterion for the alpha family.
Figure 1.
Halving the point is equivalent to lifting either of its two dual-isogeny preimages
. Details.
For with , the factor is strictly positive on the real line. Thus every nonzero rational -coordinate is positive. In the two-isogeny descent map, prime support restricts its square class to or . Both are realized by the identity and , although only the upper bound is needed:
The two-isogenous curve is . Its two-torsion square-class homomorphism has signed squarefree representatives supported on the primes dividing . For odd these are among
Hence the second image has at most eight elements. At the list reduces to , so the bound by eight remains valid. The two-isogeny rank formula therefore gives
In fact the same simple count yields when . The positivity restriction on the first descent image is essential for the stated bound of two for all primes.
We use two-isogeny descent, stating the arithmetic results involved. For
define the two-torsion square-class homomorphism by , , and otherwise. Its kernel is the image of the dual two-isogeny formula; the analogous map has kernel the image of the forward two-isogeny formula. The two-isogeny rank formula is
The images have signed squarefree representatives supported on primes dividing and , respectively. This prime-support bound in two-isogeny descent follows by valuation comparison: if a prime does not divide , the valuations of at that prime must be even, whether positive or negative. A candidate squarefree class is represented precisely when its quartic covering in a two-isogeny descent
has the corresponding rational solution, apart from the separately included identity and two-torsion cases; clearing denominators permits coprime integers .
Here , so
On the possible classes are . They all occur: the identity gives one, gives , and gives . Since the image is a group, their product also gives five. Thus its image has order four.
On , the quadratic factor is strictly positive for real . Every nonzero rational -coordinate is therefore positive. The prime-support bound in two-isogeny descent restricts its image to . The identity gives one and gives , that is class five.
Class three is impossible. Its quartic covering in a two-isogeny descent would require
Modulo three this is , so three divides and at least one of . They cannot both be divisible. If and , the right side has valuation exactly one, from . If and , it again has valuation exactly one, from . Either case contradicts its being a square. Class fifteen is then impossible too, since multiplying it by the known image class five would give class three.
Hence the second image is exactly , of order two. The rank formula gives
This proves the rank-one elliptic curve with coefficients five and minus five calculation, including the local obstruction that removes the spurious extra descent classes.
Since neither nor is a square, both cubics have exactly one rational root, zero. Thus each torsion point of an elliptic curve group has exactly one nonidentity 2-torsion, namely .
Neither curve has a rational point of order four. Indeed on the duplication formula gives
If , then is neither the identity nor a 2-torsion, so the denominator is nonzero and . Thus must be a rational square; an integer that is a rational square is an integer square. Applying this with or contradicts the hypotheses.
If , both curves have good reduction of an elliptic curve at three and exactly four points over . To see this, there, so the equation is . For the right side runs through all residues, and for it is always zero; either way there are three affine points. Injection of torsion point of an elliptic curve at this odd good prime bounds each torsion element order by four. An order-four torsion subgroup with just one nonzero 2-torsion would contain an order-four point, which was excluded. Therefore in this case both torsion subgroups equal .
The remaining case is . The literal hypothesis then ensures , so both curves have good reduction of an elliptic curve at five. Direct square counting gives
For example the square residues are ; substituting gives this table, including the point at infinity. The pair has residues or in some order. In either pair at least one reduction group has order two or four. The same injection and absence of order-four points then force that curve's torsion point of an elliptic curve to have order two. Thus
This torsion alternative for opposite quartic-twist coefficients uses only ; it does not strengthen the source hypothesis to coprimality with fifteen.
The discriminant of is , so five and seven are primes of good reduction of an elliptic curve. Count solutions over their residue fields.
Modulo five the values of for are . They yield affine points, respectively, and the point at infinity gives .
Modulo seven the values for are . Only the three values four are nonzero squares, giving six affine points and .
For a rational elliptic curve at an odd prime of good reduction of an elliptic curve, the kernel of reduction on has no torsion element: it is the formal group on , whose formal logarithm embeds it in the additive group . Thus the entire torsion subgroup injects into each of the two finite reduction groups. Its order divides both six and seven, hence is one:
Equivalently one may use prime-to-residue-characteristic injection at both primes; it gives the same coprime bound. This is a two-prime bound on rational elliptic torsion.
Choose the blocks
If , then , so in . By the ultrametric inequality, for ,
The partial sums are Cauchy sequence, and completeness of proves convergence of .
In the real series of p-adic absolute values, the block contains equal terms of size . Its sum is , independently of . Infinitely many such positive block sums force divergence. This exhibits p-adic convergence without summable absolute values: the criterion is that the terms tend to zero, rather than real absolute summability.
In the elliptic curve method, addition is attempted modulo the composite number. A denominator that is not a unit in a ring supplies a factor through its greatest common divisor with that number.
First double using the elliptic-curve addition formula. Its tangent slope is
These calculations are valid modulo since the only initial denominator is two, which is invertible. Thus , equivalently modulo .
To form , the chord slope would require
The denominator has
It cannot be inverted, and thirteen is the requested proper factor. The failure has a geometric explanation: modulo thirteen, , so is the point at infinity. Modulo seventeen that chord denominator remains nonzero. The differing behavior at the two primes is exactly what the elliptic curve method detects.
The three suggested values are
There is an obstruction at : every integer residue satisfies , whereas is not a square modulo three. Reduction of a solution in the p-adic integers would give an impossible solution modulo three.
At , take . The odd 2-adic unit in a ring is congruent to one modulo eight, so it is a square in . We use the standard 2-adic square criterion that an odd unit in a ring is a square exactly when it is one modulo eight. Its sufficiency follows by successively adjusting an odd square root modulo by to obtain the next required square congruence. Thus has a 2-adic integer solution.
For other than , the discriminant of is
so this model has good reduction of an elliptic curve. Hasse's theorem on elliptic curves gives
Since there is just one point at infinity, there is an affine point. Smoothness means that at least one partial derivative of is a unit in a ring modulo , so Hensel's lemma lifts the affine point to . The last exceptional odd prime is also soluble: at , has square roots , which are simple roots of modulo , and lift by Hensel's lemma.
For small-prime checks the suggested values also give at and at , where respectively and . Therefore
The same prime list holds if one only asks for a solution modulo , but the lifting above establishes the asserted p-adic integer solutions. This is local solubility of the cubic x cubed minus x minus one.
Work with the smooth projective cubic, including its points at infinity. For two points , draw their chord, using the tangent when they coincide, and let be its third intersection counted with intersection multiplicity. Draw the line through and , again using the tangent if necessary, and let be its third intersection. Define . When is a flex, this is the familiar reflection of the first third-intersection point across the Weierstrass involution. The two-line construction also works when the chosen identity is not a flex.
To prove associativity without assuming it in the geometry, use divisor class. A nonsingular plane cubic has genus one. By the Riemann-Roch theorem, every divisor class of degree one contains exactly one effective divisor on an algebraic curve of degree one: for such a divisor on an algebraic curve ,
and , so . Thus , and the nonzero section is unique up to scalar. Over , a degree-one effective divisor on an algebraic curve defined over is a -rational point. This also proves uniqueness of that point. In particular the map
is injective and identifies these points with the corresponding degree-zero Picard group of a curve: to recover the point from a class, add and take its unique effective representative. This is the elliptic curve group law from Riemann-Roch.
Let denote the divisor class cut out by a line. The two lines in the chord-and-tangent group law give
Their difference gives , hence
Addition of divisor class is associative. Therefore both and map to . Injectivity of proves the chord-and-tangent group law is associative. The same argument gives identity , commutativity and inverses, and covers tangencies through the use of intersection multiplicities. All constructions are defined over .
For prescribing a factor by elliptic-curve tripling, quadratic reciprocity gives when . Choose with and choose an integer by the Chinese remainder theorem so that
Then and it is four modulo .
The curve has discriminant . At , , since otherwise would force . Also cannot vanish: squaring would give , forcing or 11, neither in the required class. At , makes , and excludes . Thus both reductions are nonsingular.
The point is on every curve in this family. Doubling it uses the invertible denominator two and gives
Modulo this difference vanishes, and the doubling ordinate is , so and is the identity. Modulo , taking gives , so and have distinct abscissas and their sum is a finite point.
Consequently the attempted addition computing modulo asks to invert a denominator divisible by and not by . Its numerator is nonzero modulo , since the two ordinates there are minus one and one, so this is not a removable coincidence. The Euclidean gcd used for inversion returns
a proper factor. Thus the specified elliptic-curve computation successfully factors .
For prime-power contraction in a formal group, a one-dimensional formal group over has terms of total degree at least two with coefficients in . Induction under composition therefore gives
For this converges and the non-Archimedean inequality gives . The residue characteristic implies ; in equal characteristic the linear coefficient is zero, which only improves the bound.
Let , so . If there is nothing to prove. Otherwise put . Inductively , and then . Thus
Completeness ensures convergence of the formal-series evaluations. The contraction argument in fact does not need the extra discreteness assumption.
For rank-one two-isogeny descent with parameters three and minus three, use the standard two-isogeny rank formula. For and its dual curve , let be the abscissa square-class maps, with their usual values at and the identity. If is the Mordell–Weil rank, then
For the present curve , its possible classes are , and the identity and supply . Exclude the class three as follows. A point in that class has , with coprime integers , and substitution in the curve gives the necessary quartic equation
with integer . Modulo three this forces . Coprimality then makes a unit modulo three, and modulo nine the right side is , while , a contradiction. The class minus one is excluded as well, since multiplying it by the known class minus three would give three. Therefore the first image has size two.
The dual curve is . Its quadratic factor is on the real line, so every nonzero rational abscissa is positive. By (i) its image is contained in . The point supplies 21 and the point supplies three. As the square-class map is a homomorphism, their product supplies seven. All four occur. Hence the descent formula gives , so
For a point with , consider the valuation at any rational prime. If , the term has strictly lower valuation than and , since the coefficients are integral. Thus , forcing even. If and , the factor is a unit, so , again even. At valuation zero there is no odd exponent to remove.
Therefore every odd valuation in the square class of lies at a prime dividing , and all negative valuations are even. Removing rational squares gives a signed squarefree integer with . For the assigned class is that of , whose squarefree representative also divides ; the identity has representative one. Hence
The brackets stress that these integers represent square classes, which is the target of .
Write the equation as . Its duplication formula uses slope and . At the three listed points the slopes are respectively , , and . Substitution gives
These are nonidentity points of order two, so each listed point has exactly order four.
For the three distinct roots zero, one and four give the full two-torsion subgroup of order four over . At least one of is a square: if neither of the first two is, their product is. If is a square, the first listed point exists over the field. If three is a square, the third exists. If is a square, the second can be written and exists without requiring the two separate square roots. The duplication computations remain valid after reduction; their ordinates do not vanish unless or three. Thus a rational two-torsion point has a half over the field. Together with a different two-torsion point this generates a subgroup of order eight. Consequently for every stated prime.
Over the rationals there are already four two-torsion points, including the identity. Counting at five gives eight points: the abscissas zero, one and four give one ordinate each, two and three give two each, and there is the identity. Thus rational torsion has order dividing eight.
There are no rational points of order four. For a curve , translating to zero and using the duplication formula shows that a half of must satisfy . For the three roots here, the candidate abscissas are , , and . The last two pairs are nonrational; at the ordinate squares are , also impossible over . A group of order eight containing this two-torsion subgroup would contain an element of order four, because an elliptic curve has only four points killed by two. Hence

Pinned article: Introduction to the OurBigBook Project

Welcome to the OurBigBook Project! Our goal is to create the perfect publishing platform for STEM subjects, and get university-level students to write the best free STEM tutorials ever.
Everyone is welcome to create an account and play with the site: ourbigbook.com/go/register. We belive that students themselves can write amazing tutorials, but teachers are welcome too. You can write about anything you want, it doesn't have to be STEM or even educational. Silly test content is very welcome and you won't be penalized in any way. Just keep it legal!
We have two killer features:
  1. topics: topics group articles by different users with the same title, e.g. here is the topic for the "Fundamental Theorem of Calculus" ourbigbook.com/go/topic/fundamental-theorem-of-calculus
    Articles of different users are sorted by upvote within each article page. This feature is a bit like:
    • a Wikipedia where each user can have their own version of each article
    • a Q&A website like Stack Overflow, where multiple people can give their views on a given topic, and the best ones are sorted by upvote. Except you don't need to wait for someone to ask first, and any topic goes, no matter how narrow or broad
    This feature makes it possible for readers to find better explanations of any topic created by other writers. And it allows writers to create an explanation in a place that readers might actually find it.
    Figure 1.
    Screenshot of the "Derivative" topic page
    . View it live at: ourbigbook.com/go/topic/derivative
  2. local editing: you can store all your personal knowledge base content locally in a plaintext markup format that can be edited locally and published either:
    This way you can be sure that even if OurBigBook.com were to go down one day (which we have no plans to do as it is quite cheap to host!), your content will still be perfectly readable as a static site.
    Figure 5. . You can also edit articles on the Web editor without installing anything locally.
    Video 3.
    Edit locally and publish demo
    . Source. This shows editing OurBigBook Markup and publishing it using the Visual Studio Code extension.
  3. https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook-media/master/feature/x/hilbert-space-arrow.png
  4. Infinitely deep tables of contents:
    Figure 6.
    Dynamic article tree with infinitely deep table of contents
    .
    Descendant pages can also show up as toplevel e.g.: ourbigbook.com/cirosantilli/chordate-subclade
All our software is open source and hosted at: github.com/ourbigbook/ourbigbook
Further documentation can be found at: docs.ourbigbook.com
Feel free to reach our to us for any help or suggestions: docs.ourbigbook.com/#contact