Meissner effect discovery
ID: meissner-effect-discovery
The 1933 report Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitfähigkeit by W. Meissner and R. Ochsenfeld describes cooling tin and lead cylinders in a fixed transverse magnetic field. Two parallel cylinders were about long and thick, separated by . A roughly rotating search coil between them drove a ballistic galvanometer. At about , the reported below/above-transition induction ratios were for tin single crystals and for polycrystalline lead. The increased gap magnetic field indicates redistribution outside the cylinders, rather than an unchanged frozen field. Coil-winding geometry and noncircular tin specimens limited comparison with the ideal prediction. [ref]
Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitfähigkeit by Walther Meissner and others. 1933 report, first arrangement; English translation PDF pp. 1–2, printed p. 119, alongside the German text
Their second arrangement used a lead tube, about long with outer and inner diameters. A rotating search coil could sit inside or alongside it. The bore retained magnetic flux after removing the applied magnetic field; the coil nearly filled the bore, preventing a test of interior field uniformity. A hole containing magnetic field is distinct from magnetic field penetrating the surrounding material exhibiting superconductivity. [ref]
Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitfähigkeit by Walther Meissner and others. 1933 report, second arrangement; translation PDF p. 2, printed p. 119, bore retention and explicitly stated spatial-resolution limitation
The modern Field-cooled Meissner experiment provides a complementary readout. MIT's probe I places a sample in a brass holder, with an -turn test coil of inner diameter, outer diameter and length, inside a longer solenoid. A nearby silicon-diode thermometer tracks cooling by helium gas. With lead still normal, the guide applies about to the solenoid and connects the test coil to a current-integrator box and oscilloscope. Cooling produces a transient; warming gives the opposite sign. Switching off the solenoid while the sample is normal checks the sign. [ref]
The inferred change is in linked magnetic flux, not a direct scan of . For a stationary test coil the pulse obeys , where is its magnetic flux linkage. An integrator or AC-coupled oscilloscope needs its transfer response accounted for before extracting this pulse area. Keep the source electric current fixed during cooling, monitor temperature, and compare warming and cooling slowly enough to reduce sample–thermometer lag. An AC inductance change alone can reflect changed normal-state electrical conductivity; the fixed-field expulsion test distinguishes that alternative. [ref]
Superconductivity: The Meissner Effect, Persistent Currents and the Josephson Effects by MIT Department of Physics. §5.1, printed pp. 8–9, thermometer lag; §5.2.2, printed p. 10, limitation of AC mutual-inductance evidence
Neither this coil readout nor the historical gap-field measurement resolves the microscopic London penetration depth by itself. New to topics? Read the docs here!