Solution
ID: past-exam-of-the-mathematics-course-of-the-university-of-cambridge/2007/iii/paper-49/1/solution
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2007 iii Paper 49 1 Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A cubic spline belongs to and is a polynomial of degree at most three on each interval separated by the spline knots. A natural cubic spline is additionally an affine function on the exterior intervals and . On this is equivalent to the endpoint conditions ; these conditions remain part of the definition when an outer knot coincides with or .
Let be the natural cubic spline interpolant of the prescribed values, and let be any other interpolating function. Set , so . On the interval , integration by parts twice givesbecause the fourth derivative of each cubic piece is zero. The second boundary term is zero because vanishes at the spline knots. After summing the first terms, the interior contributions cancel by continuity of and , and the two remaining terms vanish by the natural endpoint conditions. On the exterior intervals . Thus , and the second derivative roughness penalty satisfiesIf equality holds, the continuous nonnegative function has zero integral, so everywhere. Hence is an affine function, and its zeros at two distinct spline knots force . This proves the minimum roughness property of the natural cubic spline interpolant and its equality case: the unique minimum-roughness interpolant is .
For the fixed-design nonparametric regression fit, use the penalized least squares criterionLet be the natural cubic spline interpolant with value vector . Replacing by for leaves the residual sum unchanged and reduces the second derivative roughness penalty, strictly unless . It therefore remains to minimize the finite-dimensional quadratic formThe supplied spline roughness penalty matrix is positive semidefinite. For every nonzero vector ,Consequently is a positive-definite matrix, and is strictly convex. Its normal equations for linear least squares have the unique solutionThe preceding strict reduction also proves uniqueness over the whole class , not just over the natural cubic splines. This is the cubic smoothing spline. If the residual criterion is divided by instead, the corresponding formula is , reflecting a change in the numerical convention for the smoothing parameter.
The independence and specified error mean and variance are not needed for existence or uniqueness of this minimizer. They do imply, with smoothing matrix and , that and . The null space of consists of sampled affine functions: these have zero roughness, and conversely zero roughness forces their natural cubic spline interpolant to be an affine function. Thus these functions are reproduced without bias of an estimator, while other components are smoothed.
New to topics? Read the docs here!