Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 26I c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 26I b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
An arrival at time is still present at exactly when its independent service time exceeds . Thinning the marked Poisson process with this retention probability gives a Poisson count with parameterThusThis reasoning allows atoms in the service-time distribution; the strict survival inequality correctly treats a customer whose service has ended.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 26I a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The model is a general-service infinite-server queue, usually denoted : arrivals form a Poisson process, each wandering time is a service time with distribution that of , and trapping ends service. Infinitely many servers mean that mosquitoes wander concurrently without waiting or delaying one another. General service times are not necessarily exponential, so the count alone need not be a Markov chain.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 25J iii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Choose a step function with , by part (i). The Fourier transform satisfiesBy part (ii), . Since is arbitrary,This proves the Riemann-Lebesgue lemma with the transform convention in the question.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 25J ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For , direct integration of each interval in the Fourier transform givesHence , andThe finite value at zero is and does not affect this limit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 25J i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Work in the real space, consistent with the specified real step coefficients. First approximate an integrable function by a finite-valued measurable function with bounded support. Truncate its domain to and its values to ; the error tends to zero by integrability. Quantize those remaining values in intervals of mesh , producing a simple function with finite-measure Borel sets and error at most on the truncated domain. Thus can be made arbitrarily small.
For each , use the allowed approximation by a finite union of intervals , choosing the symmetric-difference errors soThese unions can be written as finite disjoint bounded intervals, and changing endpoints to the required half-open convention changes only a null set. The function is therefore a step function of the specified form, andCombining the two approximations proves the step functions are dense in . In the complex version of , the same argument applies to real and imaginary parts when complex step coefficients are allowed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 24H d Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The assertion is false without further global hypotheses. For a concrete non-spherical surface of constant Gaussian curvature one, fix and setHere , and , so this is a connected regular embedded surface of revolution with unit-speed meridian. Its metric is , whose Gaussian curvature is . This formula also follows by multiplying its principal curvatures and .
At these principal curvatures are and . Every point of a radius-one sphere is umbilical with both principal curvature magnitudes one. The displayed surface therefore cannot lie in any such sphere, despite having everywhere.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 24H c Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
A simple closed curve on the sphere bounds two topological disks. Equal areas give area for each, since the unit sphere has area . Apply Gauss-Bonnet theorem to either disk , with and :A continuous geodesic curvature that were strictly positive everywhere, or strictly negative everywhere, would have a correspondingly strict sign for this integral. Therefore neither everywhere strictly positive nor everywhere strictly negative geodesic curvature is possible. Orientation reversal changes its sign but not this conclusion.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 24H b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Parametrize a regular curve by arclength , write its unit tangent as , and choose an oriented surface unit normal . Its signed geodesic curvature isIt vanishes exactly when the acceleration of the unit-speed curve is normal to the surface, equivalently when the curve is a geodesic with arclength parametrization. For an arbitrary regular parametrization, this means the curve becomes a geodesic after reparametrization.
The global Gauss-Bonnet theorem for a compact oriented surface with smooth boundary, positively oriented with the surface on the left, isFor piecewise smooth boundary, add the signed exterior turning angles at its corners to the left side.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 24H a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For a compact triangulated surface, the Euler characteristic is , independent of the triangulation. For a connected closed orientable surface, the genus is its number of handles, characterized byA connected compact orientable surface with boundary components instead has . For multiple connected components the Euler characteristics add, with genus specified for each component. A compact boundaryless surface embedded in is orientable, so the usual closed-surface formula applies to each connected component.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 22F v Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Apply the proved projection result to and write with . By part (iii), , while part (iv) gives and hence . ThusThe limit is the orthogonal projection onto the fixed vectors of . This is norm convergence, not just weak convergence.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 22F iv Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
If , then for all . The adjoint identity gives , so . Multiplying by givesSince , implies and yields the same result. Conversely a fixed vector is perpendicular to by this calculation, identifying as the fixed subspace.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 22F iii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
If , choose with . By part (i),The last term tends to zero by part (ii). Taking the limit superior and then proves for every .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 22F ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The set is the range of the linear operator , hence is a linear subspace. If , the sum telescopes:Since is an isometry, . Hence the averages tend to zero on .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 22F i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
For the unitary operator,Thus it is an isometry, and every power has norm one. The triangle inequality gives
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 21F ii Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Take a homotopy equivalence with inverse , and universal covering maps . Since the covering spaces are simply connected, the path lifting theorem constructs lifts of and of , after specifying one value in the appropriate fiber. Explicitly, define the lift at a point by lifting the image of a path from the chosen base point; independence from the path follows from simple connectedness and homotopy lifting.
Lift a homotopy starting at . The homotopy lifting theorem for a covering map makes its endpoint a map with . Such a lift of the identity is a deck transformation and is a homeomorphism: lift the identity again with the base point image reversed, and uniqueness of path lifts makes the two compositions identities. Likewise for a deck transformation of .
Thus both compositions are homotopy equivalences, even though the lifted homotopies need not end at the particular identity lift. Part (i) then provesKeeping the possible deck transformations is essential when the original homotopies do not fix base points.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 21F i Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
More generally let be a homotopy inverse of and one of . Then satisfies , and satisfies . The first argument applies. Hence the separate one-sided hypotheses imply that is a homotopy equivalence, as expressed by separate homotopy inverses combine into a homotopy equivalence.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 20G b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The polynomial is irreducible by Eisenstein criterion at two, so is a rational basis and each of these elements is integral. The nontrivial automorphism of sends to . For an algebraic integer , its relative trace and the trace of the algebraic integer areBoth are in , proving . Multiplying by its conjugate gives the field normAgain this is in , so both displayed coefficients are integers.
To finish the denominator argument, put , , , , all integers. The two norm coefficients implyThe second congruence modulo two first gives even. Modulo four it then gives even. Therefore vanishes modulo four, and the first congruence reads . The possible squares modulo four force even and then even. Returning to the second congruence now gives , so is divisible by four. Thus are all integers.
Conversely, every integer linear combination of these powers is integral. We have proved the integral basis of the fourth-root-of-two field:
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 20G a Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
An integral basis of a degree- number field is a -basis of its ring of integers: each algebraic integer has a unique integer linear combination of those elements. For , the standard quadratic-integer criterion gives , since is squarefree and is not congruent to one modulo four. Thus
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 4 19G b Solution by
Codex 0 Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Induct on the order of the p-group. Every complex irreducible representation of an abelian group is one-dimensional: commuting group operators preserve a common eigenspace, and irreducibility makes that eigenspace the whole space. This handles the abelian cases.
If is not faithful, it is an irreducible representation of a smaller quotient , where is its kernel. Induction expresses it as induced from a one-dimensional representation of a subgroup of . Pulling back the subgroup and inflating the character gives the same induction statement for , because the coset spaces of the quotient subgroup and its inverse image agree.
Now suppose is faithful and is nonabelian. Use the allowed abelian normal subgroup not contained in the centre. If restriction to were isotypic, its irreducible type would be one-dimensional, so every would act as a scalar. It would therefore commute with every representing matrix of . Faithfulness would imply in for every , contradicting the choice of . By part (a), for an irreducible representation of a proper subgroup . Induction on gives with one-dimensional. Transitivity of induction yieldsThis proves the monomiality of irreducible representations of finite p-groups.
There are unlisted articles, also show them or only show them.