Past exam of the mathematical methods I course of the University of Oxford 2015 1 Solution 2026-10-25
Use polar coordinates , where . The equation sets , giving an Archimedean spiral. The origin is excluded because the complex argument of zero is undefined. With the principal complex argument in , the locus isIt approaches the excluded origin along the positive real axis, passes through , and ends at . The choice of argument matters: the convention instead gives , while allowing all values of the complex argument gives every turn with .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ia Paper 4 9C Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
Let be the cylindrical unit vectors. The surface has an upward normal vector proportional to . If is the vertical component of the normal force, its radial component is . In the stated approximation, vertical acceleration and the vertical driving-force component are neglected, so vertical balance gives . The horizontal contact force is consequently . The projected velocity and its speed areThe driving force is parallel to this velocity, with components and . Use the acceleration in polar coordinates and Newton's second law to obtainThese equations apply where ; at rest the direction of an exactly velocity-aligned drive is not determined.
For a prescribed path, write , . The chain rule gives and . Subtract times the azimuthal equation from the radial equation. The driving force and both cancel:Thus the constraint for tangentially driven motion on an axisymmetric surface isThe denominator must give a nonnegative squared speed, and the calculation uses . At the polar origin a limiting Cartesian description is appropriate.
For the paraboloid and Archimedean spiral, putThen, for ,The branch tending to has positive angular velocity, henceSince , solve the azimuthal equation for the required force:This is positive for , consistent with a forward drive. Taking the limit gives
These are the large-time limits of the printed projected equations. Their mechanical approximation has a precise range limitation: on the exact surface, gives , which along this solution grows like . At fixed positive , it is not small as . Thus the requested limits are formal limits of that reduced model; neglect of vertical motion is not a uniform approximation to the full three-dimensional motion all the way to infinity.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 ia Paper 3 4A c Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-06
This plane curve is an Archimedean spiral. Put and , so and . ThenTherefore the curvature of a plane curve isThe parametrization is regular even at , where the curvature of a plane curve is .
Use the polar radius as the parameter of the Archimedean spiral. Its angle in polar coordinates is . The radial and angular contributions to its arc length are orthogonal, soThere is no need to evaluate this integral. The simple bounds implyThe squeeze theorem therefore gives the scaled length of an Archimedean spiral:Geometrically, the radial contribution becomes negligible after multiplying the arc length by ; the remaining contribution is the area under the function graph on .
The distance from the origin is . The direction angle, measured counterclockwise from the positive horizontal axis, is modulo . Thus the path is an Archimedean spiral, turning clockwise through two complete revolutions as its radius decreases linearly from to zero.
It starts at , reaches at , crosses at , returns to the positive vertical axis at when , and ends at the origin when . These crossings fix both the scale and direction of the sketch.
Plane curve Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-25
A plane curve is a curve contained in a plane. In algebraic geometry, one studies plane curves defined by polynomial equations. General plane curves, such as an Archimedean spiral, need not be algebraic curves.
Scaled length of an Archimedean spiral 2026-10-25
Let an Archimedean spiral have polar radius and angle in polar coordinates, with , where is fixed. Parameterizing by gives the arc lengthThe bounds yieldThe squeeze theorem proves the displayed limit. Thus the arc length grows like as the turns become closely spaced, without requiring an explicit antiderivative.

