For a proper lower-semicontinuous convex function , the proximal operator is . Its optimality condition is .
The proximal map of sends to , with zero assigned at . This removes vectors inside the radius- ball and shortens all larger vectors by a fixed radial distance. It is useful for groupwise sparsity.
On a Banach space one can define the set of minimizers of , but existence and uniqueness need additional geometry or coercivity hypotheses. The optimality condition is , with the duality mapping . The Hilbert completion-of-square shift by a dual vector does not generalize unchanged. On with and , every with is a minimizer; the vector is not one.
For a real Hilbert space, , and , identify with its vector by the Riesz representation theorem. Completing the square in shifts the input to . Substitute and multiply by to obtain the displayed formula, valid also for negative . If and , the answer is ; if , the objective is identically infinite and no proper proximal problem remains.
The Moreau envelope of a proper closed convex function is
It is differentiable even when is not, with and -Lipschitz gradient.
For , the Moreau envelope of the Euclidean norm is when and otherwise. Its gradient is in the core and outside. The approximation error is between zero and .
For proper lower semicontinuous convex functions, the Moreau envelope has gradient . This follows by subgradient inversion under convex conjugacy and the quadratic conjugate. Firm nonexpansiveness of the proximal residual makes the gradient -Lipschitz continuous.
For a proper convex function with sequential lower semicontinuity , form with . The Moreau envelope theorem gives . If is integrable, it defines a smooth surrogate probability density function. Infimizing the logarithm of a probability density function with a positive quadratic penalty has the opposite sign and does not generally smooth it. For the Laplace distribution, that incorrect operation leaves , which is not differentiable at zero.
For a nonempty closed convex set , the squared-distance function is the Moreau envelope of its indicator functional of a constraint set. It is convex and differentiable with
and this gradient is one-Lipschitz.
For , the generalized Moreau decomposition is , where is the convex conjugate.
For a nonempty closed convex set , the Moreau decomposition and give .
The proximal gradient method minimizes , where has an -Lipschitz gradient and is convex with a tractable proximal operator, by . A standard choice gives objective error in the general convex case.
This basic forward-backward update is one of the proximal gradient methods for learning.
Fix with nonempty subdifferential for a convex function . If and , monotonicity of a convex subdifferential gives for any fixed . Hence
The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality proves the bound uniformly for . If has an -Lipschitz gradient, this makes the remainder in the proximal gradient mapping descent bound at most . Thus the big O notation is justified despite the dependence of the proximal gradient mapping on .
Target: convex-optimization.bigb, under Coordinate descent.
For , with a convex function having an -Lipschitz gradient and a proper convex function with a well-defined proximal operator, the proximal gradient method with step size satisfies the displayed bound whenever a global minimizer exists. The one-step subgradient inequality and descent lemma give
The objective function values are nonincreasing. A telescoping sum over , followed by comparison of the last error with the arithmetic mean of the errors, proves the result. The bound controls the last objective function error without requiring a strongly convex function or a unique minimizer.
Target: convex-optimization.bigb, under Proximal gradient method.
For a convex function with a well-defined proximal operator, and a differentiable function , the proximal gradient mapping is the displacement of one proximal gradient method update divided by its positive step size . Writing , the subgradient optimality condition gives . For convex functions , its zeros are precisely the global minimizers of , by the subgradient optimality condition and subdifferential sum rule. When , it is the ordinary gradient.
Target: convex-optimization.bigb, under Proximal gradient method.
Let be a differentiable convex function whose full gradient is -Lipschitz continuous, with . The alternating update first solves the implicit step and then the explicit step:
The implicit step is the proximal operator of , so it exists uniquely. The gradient bound must control the full joint variable; smoothness alone supplies no global constant .
For two updates, let be the difference of their mixed points and the corresponding full gradient difference. The input and output differences are and . The mixed-point norm identity for alternating updates and Baillon–Haddad theorem give
Hence is a -averaged operator for . Its fixed points have both block gradients zero and are exactly the global minimizers of . If a minimizer exists, Browder convergence theorem for averaged operators gives norm convergence of iteration in the stated finite-dimensional setting.
Let be convex with an -Lipschitz gradient, , and let be a proper lower semicontinuous convex function. For , take
The proper closed convex assumption on ensures that the implicit section has a well-defined proximal operator.
For two mixed points with difference , write for the gradient difference of and for the difference of the selected subgradients of . Inputs differ by and outputs by . Monotonicity of a convex subdifferential gives , while cocoercivity gives . Expanding these squared norms proves
for . Thus the combined update is firmly nonexpansive. Its fixed points are the minimizers of ; if one exists, the Browder convergence theorem for averaged operators gives norm convergence in finite dimensions.
For two mixed points with difference and gradient difference , the input difference is and the output difference is . Their squared-norm difference is . This exact identity is a reusable way to prove averagedness without assuming the two block maps are individually nonexpansive.
The iterative soft-thresholding algorithm applies the proximal gradient method to :
Here is coordinatewise soft thresholding. The objective is convex and coercive, so iterates converge to a minimizer in finite dimensions; uniqueness requires additional hypotheses.

Ancestors (5)

  1. Convex optimization
  2. Mathematical optimization
  3. Area of mathematics
  4. Mathematics
  5. Home

Synonyms (2)

Discussion (0) New discussion

There are no discussions about this article yet.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.