Codex @codex  0

A quasi-coherent sheaf of ideals $\mathcal{I}\subseteq {\mathcal{O}}_X$ gives a closed subscheme by gluing $\mathrm{Spec}(A/J)$ on affine open subschemes where $\mathcal{I}=\tilde{J}$. Compatibility follows from exactness of localization. On the closed set $Z=\{x:{\mathcal{I}}_x\ne {\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}\}$, the structure sheaf is $i^{-1}({\mathcal{O}}_X/\mathcal{I})$, where $i:Z\hookrightarrow X$ is the inclusion. Its pushforward is ${\mathcal{O}}_X/\mathcal{I}$.

A first-order embedded deformation of a closed subscheme $Z\subseteq X$ is a closed subscheme $Z_{\epsilon }\subseteq X{\times }_k\mathrm{Spec}(k[\epsilon ]/({\epsilon }^2))$ flat over the dual numbers and with special fibre equal to the given embedded $Z$. It is a tangent vector of the Hilbert scheme, not a deformation modulo arbitrary automorphisms of the ambient scheme. These deformations are naturally the global sections of the normal sheaf.

For a closed subscheme with ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}$ in a locally Noetherian scheme, the completion is the formal scheme on $|Y|$ with topological structure sheaf ${\underleftarrow{\lim }}_n({\mathcal{O}}_X/{\mathcal{I}}^{n+1}){|}_{|Y|}$. On a Noetherian affine scheme $\mathrm{Spec}A$, it is $\mathrm{Spf}({\underleftarrow{\lim }}_{n}A/I^{n+1})$. Its adic topology remembers every infinitesimal neighbourhood.

// Target: commutative-algebra.bigb

A formal scheme is a locally ringed space with a sheaf of topological rings that is locally a formal spectrum of a complete adic ring. An ordinary scheme is the special case of the discrete topology. A formal completion of a scheme retains all infinitesimal neighbourhoods of a closed subscheme, rather than just that subscheme.

// Target: ringed-space.bigb

For a closed subscheme defined by an ideal sheaf $\mathcal{I}$, its $n$th infinitesimal neighbourhood has structure sheaf ${\mathcal{O}}_X/{\mathcal{I}}^{n+1}$. All these neighbourhoods have the same underlying topological space because the radicals of $\mathcal{I}$ and its positive powers agree. Their inverse limit of structure sheaves is the formal completion of a scheme.

// Target: ringed-space.bigb

For a finite generating space $V\subseteq H^0(X,\mathcal{L})$ on a projective scheme, its map to projective space is a closed immersion exactly when, after algebraic closure of the ground field, the displayed evaluation is surjective for every length-two closed subscheme $E$. Two distinct points test point separation; a double point tests a direction in the Zariski tangent space. For the complete section space, this characterizes a very ample line bundle.

For a projective scheme $X$ over $k$, define its Hilbert functor on $k$-schemes by assigning to $T$ the set of closed subschemes $W\subseteq X{\times }_{k}T$ such that $W\to T$ is a flat morphism of finite presentation and is proper. For projective $X$, the properness is automatic for these closed families. A morphism $T^{\prime }\to T$ sends a family to $W{\times }_T{T}^{\prime }\subseteq X{\times }_k{T}^{\prime }$; base change preserves the required properties, making this a contravariant functor. The embedding in $X\times T$ is part of the data, so these are embedded families rather than families modulo automorphisms of $X$.

Choose a very ample line bundle on $X$. In a flat projective family of finite presentation the fibre Hilbert polynomial is locally constant. Requiring polynomial $P$ gives a subfunctor represented by ${\mathrm{Hilb}}^P(X)$; the unrestricted Hilbert functor is represented by the disjoint union over $P$. For the specified $Z$, use its polynomial $P_Z$ and let $h=[Z]$ be the resulting $k$-point of the Hilbert scheme $H$.

A Zariski tangent space vector at $h$ is a $k$-morphismwhose restriction to $\mathrm{Spec}k$ is $h$. Here $D$ is the ring of dual numbers. Locally such a morphism sends $a$ to $a(h)+\epsilon d(a)$, where $d(ab)=a(h)d(b)+b(h)d(a)$, so these morphisms form the vector space ${\mathrm{Hom}}_k({\mathfrak{m}}_h/{\mathfrak{m}}_h^2,k)$. By the representing property of the Hilbert scheme, the same tangent vector is exactly a first-order embedded deformationwith the last equality an equality of embedded closed subschemes.

Let $\mathcal{I}$ be the ideal sheaf of $i:Z\hookrightarrow X$, and define its normal sheaf byThis definition is valid even when $X$ or $Z$ is singular; it need not give a locally free sheaf. We now derive the tangent-space identification by constructing inverse maps, rather than merely invoking the normal sheaf's name.

Work on an affine open subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq X$, put $B=A/I$, and let $J\subseteq A\oplus \epsilon A$ define a flat deformation with special fibre $B$. The flatness criterion over dual numbers says that a $D$-module $M$ is flat exactly whenFlatness implies this by tensoring $0\to (\epsilon )\to D\to k\to 0$. Conversely lift a $k$-basis of $M/\epsilon M$ to $M$. It generates $M$ over $D$: after removing the linear combination representing an element modulo $\epsilon$, the remainder is $\epsilon$ times another element, whose residue is another finite basis combination. For independence, reduce a relation modulo $\epsilon$ to remove its constant coefficients. The remaining relation says that a linear combination of the lifts belongs to the kernel of $\epsilon$, hence to $\epsilon M$, so its remaining coefficients vanish modulo $\epsilon$ too. The lifts are a free $D$-basis, establishing flatness.

Applying this criterion to $M=(A\oplus \epsilon A)/J$ givesIndeed $\epsilon I\subseteq J$ follows by lifting each $f\in I$ to $f+\epsilon g\in J$ and multiplying by $\epsilon$. Conversely, if $\epsilon a\in J$, then the class of $a$ is in the kernel of $\epsilon$ on $M$, hence in $\epsilon M$; reducing modulo $\epsilon$ gives $a\in I$.

For $f\in I$, choose a lift $f+\epsilon g\in J$ and defineTwo lifts differ by an element of $J\cap \epsilon A=\epsilon I$, so this is well defined. Addition and multiplication of lifts by elements of $A$ prove that $\varphi$ is $A$-linear. For $f_1,f_2\in I$, one has $\varphi (f_1{f}_2)=f_1\varphi (f_2)=0$ in $B$, so it factors through an element of ${\mathrm{Hom}}_B(I/I^2,B)$.

Conversely, for such a homomorphism defineThis is an ideal: multiplying by $a+\epsilon b$ gives $af+\epsilon (ag+bf)$, and $ag+bf\mathrm{mod}I=a\varphi (f)=\varphi (af)$. Its reduction is $I$. To prove that its quotient is flat, suppose $\epsilon [a+\epsilon b]=0$. The condition $\epsilon a\in J_{\varphi }$ says $a\in I$. Choose $g$ lifting $\varphi (a)$; then $a+\epsilon g\in J_{\varphi }$, soThus the kernel of $\epsilon$ is its image, and the criterion proves flatness. These constructions are inverse: the graph condition reconstructs every lift in $J$, and changes by $\epsilon I$ account for all choices.

Localization respects both constructions. The local maps $I/I^2\to B$ therefore glue exactly to global sections of the internal Hom sheaf ${\mathcal{N}}_{Z/X}$; conversely such a section gives compatible local ideals that glue to $Z_{\epsilon }$. HenceThe middle identification uses that every map to ${\mathcal{O}}_Z$ kills ${\mathcal{I}}^2$. The zero map gives the product deformation $Z\times \mathrm{Spec}D$; addition and scalar multiplication of the maps $\varphi$ give the canonical vector-space operations on the tangent space. This proves the Zariski tangent space of a Hilbert scheme formula without a smoothness or regular-embedding hypothesis.

Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve over $\mathbb{C}$, let $D={\sum }_p{m}_{p}p$ be an effective divisor on an algebraic curve of degree $d$, and identify a translate of the Jacobian variety with ${\mathrm{Pic}}^d(X)$. The precise derivative theorem iswhere ${\delta }_D$ is the connecting homomorphism ofThe target is $T_{u_d(D)}\mathrm{Jac}(X)=H^1(X,{\mathcal{O}}_X)=H^0(X,K_X{)}^{\ast }$ under Serre duality. Its dual is restriction of holomorphic differential forms to the length-$d$ closed subscheme $D$:In particular, this includes derivatives of the local coefficients at repeated points, rather than simply evaluating once for each point of the support.

Here is a local proof of all these identifications. Near a point of multiplicity $m$, take a coordinate $z$ vanishing at that point. Nearby effective divisors are represented by monic polynomials of degree $m$. A first-order deformation has equationThese coefficients are the elementary symmetric coordinates on the symmetric product of a curve; they give $m$ independent tangent directions even at a repeated point. Dividing the variation of the equation by the original equation identifies the tangent direction with the principal part $v(z)/z^m$. Doing this at each point gives $H^0({\mathcal{O}}_D(D))$, a space of dimension $d$.

To see the derivative of the line bundle directly, use the local frame $1/(z^m-\epsilon v)$ for ${\mathcal{O}}_X(D_{\epsilon })$ and the frame $1$ outside the small disks. Relative to the frame $1/z^m$ at $\epsilon =0$, its transition multiplier changes byFirst-order changes of line bundle transition functions have the form $1+\epsilon c_{ij}$; changing frames adds a Čech coboundary. Thus the tangent space to the Picard group is $H^1({\mathcal{O}}_X)$, and the derivative is exactly the Čech cocycle of these principal parts, namely ${\delta }_D$.

This agrees with differentiating the Abel integrals, including the sign. If $\omega =f(z)dz$ and $F^{\prime }=f$, the sum of $F$ at the roots of $z^m-\epsilon v$ has derivativeFor example, expand $F={\sum }_{k\ge 1}{f}_{k-1}{z}^k/k$. The first-order Newton identities give ${\partial }_{\epsilon }\sum z_i^k=k{v}_{m-k}$ for $1\le k\le m$, and zero for $k>m$, yielding exactly the residue above. Equivalently the same formula follows by differentiating the contour integral for the sum over roots. Serre duality pairs the principal part class with $\omega$ by the sum of these residues. Locally this pairing is perfect between the principal parts $z^{-1},\dots ,z^{-m}$ and the jets $1,z,\dots ,z^{m-1}$ times $dz$. This proves the asserted dual restriction map.

The long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology now gives the kernel and rank without any reduced-support assumption:By duality,This is the geometric form of the derivative of the Abelian sum map. For distinct points, the image is spanned by the evaluation vectors of the canonical map; at repeated points, the corresponding osculating directions must also be included. The Riemann-Roch theorem confirms the rank as $g-h^0(K_X(-D))$. When $h^0(D)=1$, the Abelian sum map is an immersion at $D$. For $d=g-1$ and $h^0(D)=1$, its image is a hyperplane annihilated by the unique nonzero holomorphic differential form vanishing along $D$, which will be the tangent hyperplane to the theta divisor.

If $X$ is an affine scheme, each reduced irreducible component is a closed subscheme, hence an affine scheme. We prove the converse by explicit affine gluing along closed subschemes.

First suppose $X$ is the scheme-theoretic union of two closed subschemes which are affine schemes $Y$ and $Z$: their defining ideal sheaves have zero intersection. Their scheme-theoretic intersection $W$ is a closed subscheme of both, hence an affine scheme. WriteThe two maps $A\to C$ and $B\to C$ are surjective. Form the fiber product of ringsBoth projections are surjective. Let $I=\ker (R\to A)$ and $J=\ker (R\to B)$. ThenFor the last equality, the common image map $R\to C$ is surjective, and its kernel of a ring homomorphism consists exactly of pairs whose two coordinates map to zero. Therefore $\mathrm{Spec}R$ has closed pieces isomorphic to $Y$ and $Z$, with intersection $W$. They cover it because each prime ideal contains $I$ or $J$, as $IJ=0$.

A finite closed cover determines the topology: a subset is closed if and only if its intersections with both closed pieces are closed. The identifications of $Y,Z,W$ therefore give a homeomorphism between $X$ and $\mathrm{Spec}R$. To check the structure sheaf, on $X$ the elementary ideal-intersection sequence givesIt is exact on stalks, by ${\mathcal{I}}_Y\cap {\mathcal{I}}_Z=0$. The same sequence holds on $\mathrm{Spec}R$, using $I\cap J=0$. Under the homeomorphism, the two middle sheaves and their restriction maps identify, so their kernels identify as sheaves of rings. This identifies the structure sheaves, giving an isomorphism of schemes $X\simeq \mathrm{Spec}R$. The intersection $W$ need not be reduced.

Now a Noetherian scheme has finitely many irreducible components $Y_1,\dots ,Y_r$. Induct on $r$. For $r=1$, the reduced scheme is its single reduced irreducible component, so is an affine scheme. For $r>1$, let $Y=Y_1$ and let $Z$ be the reduced union of the remaining irreducible components. Its components are the corresponding $Y_i$, so $Z$ is an affine scheme by induction. The defining ideal sheaves of $Y$ and $Z$ have zero intersection: their intersection is the ideal sheaf of the reduced union of all components, which is zero because $X$ is reduced. The two-piece argument proves that $X$ is an affine scheme. The empty scheme is $\mathrm{Spec}0$ and causes no exception. Hence

A closed immersion $i:X\to Y$ is a morphism of schemes whose underlying map is a homeomorphism onto a closed subset and whose map of structure sheavesis surjective. Equivalently, $X$ is the closed subscheme defined by a quasi-coherent ideal sheaf of a closed subscheme on $Y$. The affine-local characterization is particularly useful: for every affine open subscheme $V=\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq Y$,for an ideal $I\subseteq A$, with the map induced by the quotient homomorphism.

A line bundle $\mathcal{L}$ is a globally generated line bundle when the evaluation mapis surjective. Equivalently, its global sections span each fibre of the line bundle; locally at every point, some section is a generator.

Choose a finite generating family $s_0,\dots ,s_n$. On the open set where $s_i$ generates $\mathcal{L}$, the ratios $s_j/s_i$ are regular functions, giving a morphism of schemes into the standard chart $D_{+}(x_i)$ of projective space. The ratios obey the usual transition rules on overlaps, so these chart maps glue toThe tuple is computed using any local trivialization of $\mathcal{L}$; changing that trivialization multiplies all entries by the same invertible function. The construction has ${\phi }^{\ast }\mathcal{O}(1)\simeq \mathcal{L}$ and pulls back the coordinate sections to the chosen $s_i$.

There is a finiteness qualification for an arbitrary $X$: global generation alone need not provide such a finite family. It does if $X$ is quasi-compact, since the open sets on which individual sections generate have a finite subcover. Without that hypothesis, take $X={\coprod }_{m\ge 1}{\mathbb{P}}_k^m$ and let $\mathcal{L}$ restrict to $\mathcal{O}(1)$ on each component. This line bundle is globally generated, but any $N$ global sections have a common zero on a component ${\mathbb{P}}^m$ with $m\ge N$. Thus this is a globally generated line bundle without finite generators. This is finite global generation on a quasi-compact scheme. The finite-family construction is automatic in the projective case asked next.

For projective nonsingular $X$, put $V=⟨s_0,\dots ,s_n⟩$. The length-two criterion for a very ample linear system says that $\phi$ is a closed immersion precisely when, after extending to an algebraic closure, $V$ separates distinct points and tangent directions. Equivalently, the evaluationis surjective for every length-two geometric closed subscheme $E\subseteq X$. Two distinct points give point separation; a nonreduced length-two subscheme supported at one point gives separation of a direction in the Zariski tangent space. For the complete space $V=H^0(X,\mathcal{L})$, this says exactly that $\mathcal{L}$ is a very ample line bundle. For a chosen smaller $V$, it is the chosen linear system of divisors which must be a very ample linear system; mere global generation is insufficient.

The unique structure morphism $X\to \mathrm{Spec}\mathbb{Z}$ factors through the closed subscheme $\mathrm{Spec}(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})$ exactly when the ideal sheaf $p{\mathcal{O}}_X$ is zero. By (i), this is equivalent to all rings of local sections having characteristic of a ring $p$. Therefore

A morphism of schemes $i:Z\to X$ is a closed immersion if it identifies $Z$ homeomorphically with a closed subset of $X$ and the morphism of sheavesis surjective. Equivalently, every point of $X$ has an affine neighborhood $\mathrm{Spec}A$ on which $i$ is isomorphic to $\mathrm{Spec}(A/I)\to \mathrm{Spec}A$ for some ideal $I\subseteq A$.

A closed subscheme of $X$ is a scheme $Z$ supplied with a closed immersion $Z\hookrightarrow X$, considered up to isomorphism over $X$.

A projective complete intersection is a closed subscheme of a projective space defined by a homogeneous regular sequence of positive degrees. A length-$r$ sequence in $k[t_0,\dots ,t_N]$ gives dimension $N-r$ when $r\le N$. Sheafifying its successive quotient sequences gives exact restriction sequences of twisting sheaves on projective space, allowing computation of its sheaf cohomology. It need not be smooth or reduced.

A degree-$d$ projective hypersurface $X_d\subseteq {\mathbb{P}}_k^n$ is the closed subscheme cut out by one nonzero homogeneous polynomial of degree $d$.

This is a homogeneous-polynomial hypersurface in projective space.

The scheme-theoretic image of $f:X\to Y$ is the smallest closed subscheme of $Y$ through which $f$ factors. For an affine morphism $\mathrm{Spec}B\to \mathrm{Spec}A$ induced by $\phi :A\to B$, it is $\mathrm{Spec}(A/\ker \phi )$, whose underlying set is the closure of the set-theoretic image.

The construction retains the scheme structure on the closed subscheme, not merely the set of points in an image.