Bowen metric 2026-10-14
For a continuous map on a compact metric space, the Bowen metric compares the first points of two forward orbits. Its radius- ball is . If is the largest cardinality of an -separated set in this metric, then topological entropy is . The uniform continuity of the identity between two compatible metrics gives the comparison of separated-set counts needed for independence of the original metric.
Given a continuous surjection from Cantor space to a nonempty compact metric space, the pullback is a unital isometric embedding of into . Transport a normalized positive linear functional to its image, take a positive extension from a unital subspace of C(K), and represent that extension on Cantor space. The pushforward measure then represents the original functional.
On a compact metric space, every sequence of Borel probability measures has a subsequence with weak convergence of probability measures to a Borel probability measure. To see this, choose a countable uniformly dense subset of continuous functions, extract a diagonal subsequence of their bounded integrals, and extend the resulting positive normalized functional to all continuous functions. The Riesz representation theorem supplies its Borel probability measure. This is useful for constructing an invariant measure from orbit empirical measures.
For a Borel probability measure on a compact metric space, inner regularity and outer regularity give with compact, open and . The Urysohn lemma supplies a continuous function equal to one on and zero outside , with values in . Its difference from the indicator function of is supported in and bounded by one, proving the displayed estimate. This transfers identities established for continuous test functions to measurable sets.
Full shift 2026-10-05
The two-sided full shift on a finite alphabet consists of all functions , with the product topology and the left shift. It is a compact metric space. A compatible metric isAgreement on increasingly large finite coordinate sets is equivalent to convergence in this topology. The metric above is compatible but is not invariant under the left shift.
Generic point for an invariant measure 2026-10-14
A point is generic for an invariant measure of a continuous map on a compact metric space if the displayed convergence holds for every continuous function . Its empirical probability measures converge against continuous test functions to . The same test-function condition may be used before invariance is known: the telescoping identity for then proves that the limiting Borel probability measure must be invariant. If almost every point is generic for the same measure, continuous approximation of invariant-set indicators proves that this measure is ergodic.
Gromov-Hausdorff distance 2026-09-28
For compact metric spaces and , the Gromov-Hausdorff distance iswhere the infimum runs over all metric spaces and all isometric embeddings and . It measures how closely the two spaces can be placed inside one ambient metric space.
Gromov-Hausdorff topology 2026-09-28
The Gromov-Hausdorff topology on isometry classes of compact metric spaces is the topology induced by the Gromov-Hausdorff distance.
Hall matching of maximal separated sets 2026-10-14
Two maximum-cardinality -separated subsets of a compact metric space have a bijection that moves each point by less than . Join to when their distance is below . If had fewer than neighbours, replacing these neighbours in by would create a larger separated set. The Hall marriage theorem therefore supplies a perfect matching. This allows empirical averages on a compact isometry group to be made approximately invariant without assuming a prior Haar measure construction.
Inner regular measure 2026-10-14
A measure is inner regular on its measurable sets if their measures are suprema of the measures of contained compact sets. Every Borel probability measure on a compact metric space is inner regular and has outer regularity. Combining the two properties allows approximation of an indicator function by a continuous function in the norm.
For continuous functions on a compact metric space satisfying , set . The triangle inequality makes -Lipschitz, while the constraint gives and evaluation at gives . Thus the feasible pair has at least as large an objective against any two probability measures. This explains why metric optimal transport duality reduces to a single -Lipschitz function.
Lusternik–Schnirelmann theorem 2026-10-14
A cover of by closed sets has a member containing an antipodal pair. The equivalent version for open sets follows by shrinking finite open covers on a compact metric space; the reverse implication follows by enlarging antipodal-pair-free closed sets slightly. This is a covering formulation of the Borsuk-Ulam theorem.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2001 ib Paper 4 1A Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The strict distance inequality also gives when , so is Lipschitz continuous with constant at most one, hence continuous. Put . The triangle inequality givesThus is also Lipschitz continuous and continuous.
Assume the compact metric space is nonempty, as needed for existence of a point. By the extreme value theorem, attains its infimum at some . If , then , and strict distance decrease givescontradicting minimality. Since distances are nonnegative, and . If two different fixed points existed, then , another contradiction. Therefore there is exactly one fixed point. This is strict distance decrease on a compact metric space; no uniform contraction factor less than one was assumed.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2002 ib Paper 2 10E b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The strict distance inequality implies for all points, so is Lipschitz continuous. Henceis a continuous function, since . On the nonempty compact metric space, attains its minimum at some .
If , the strict distance inequality applied to givesa contradiction. Thus . If were different fixed points, then , again impossible. There is exactly one fixed point. This proves strict distance decrease on a compact metric space without assuming a uniform contraction constant.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 16 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The convention intended by this question is existence of a dense forward orbit, also called point transitivity. On a nonempty compact metric space, this means that some satisfiesEquivalently, that forward orbit visits every nonempty open set.
The other common definition of topological transitivity uses intersections of iterated open sets, as in part (b). The distinction matters on spaces with isolated points: parts (b) and (c) ask precisely how the two conventions are related. We use point transitivity for the dense-orbit convention throughout this solution. As usual for this definition, the state space is assumed nonempty; on an empty space the open-set condition is vacuous and there is no point with a forward orbit.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 16 2 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
A compact metric space is second countable. To see this concretely, for each positive integer choose a finite cover by balls of radius . Their centres, over all , form a countable dense subset; balls centred there with positive rational radii form a countable basis of a topology. Enumerate its nonempty members as , repeating members if the basis is finite.
For each , putEach is an open set, because all iterations of a map are continuous. It is dense: if is any nonempty open set, the hypothesis supplies and with , so .
A compact metric space is a complete metric space, hence a Baire space. The Baire category theorem implies that is dense, and in particular nonempty. For any , the forward orbit of meets every , and therefore every nonempty open set. Its orbit closure is . Thus the open-set intersection hypothesis implies point transitivity, and in fact the set of points with a dense forward orbit contains the dense intersection .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 16 2 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Let have a dense forward orbit , and suppose that is surjective. Every tail is then dense. Indeed, continuity givesand the left side equals by surjectivity.
Given nonempty open sets , choose with . The dense tail supplies with . Taking gives . This proves the required positive-time intersection property.
The result can fail without surjectivity. Take the compact metric spacewith the metric induced from the real line. All nonzero points are isolated, so continuity there is automatic; at zero, proves continuity. The forward orbit of is , whose closure is , so this is point transitivity. But . The singletons and are nonempty open sets, and for every ,The isolated initial point can be visited only at the start of the dense forward orbit; deleting that initial segment destroys density.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 16 5 Solution 2026-10-14
We first prove invariance, before using any assertion that requires it. Write . Choose a point whose forward orbit has the prescribed convergence against every continuous function; the hypothesis gives a set of such points of full measure. For each continuous function , telescoping givesbecause a continuous function on a compact metric space is bounded. Both test functions are continuous, so their averages converge to their prescribed integrals. Hencefor every continuous function . The continuous-test criterion for an invariant measure therefore gives . The points in the hypothesis can now be called generic points for an invariant measure.
For ergodicity, let be a Borel set invariant modulo null sets, and set , . Then almost everywhere. Since invariance preserves null preimages, deleting the union of all iterated preimages of the exceptional null set gives for every on one full-measure set. Thus almost everywhere for every .
Given , the continuous approximation of Borel indicators on a compact metric space, proved in the supporting steps below, supplies with and . By the hypothesis, almost everywhere. Since , the dominated convergence theorem also gives convergence in . Invariance and the triangle inequality give the uniform estimateConsequently,Letting and then proves . Explicitly,so . Every invariant Borel set has measure zero or one, which provesThis proof controls measurable-set averages through a uniform estimate; convergence only against continuous test functions is not silently assumed to include indicator functions.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2006 ib Paper 4 14F b Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-14
The nearest-point assertion requires . If , there is no possible point , so the literal assertion for every closed subset has that exception.
For a nonempty closed subset of a compact metric space, is itself compact. The function is continuous, since by the triangle inequality. The extreme value theorem therefore gives a minimizer , with