For , a nonempty closed convex set in an Lp space has exactly one nearest point to every . A minimizing sequence is a Cauchy sequence: the Clarkson inequality bounds by , where is the infimum of the distances. Completeness of Lp spaces and the closed set property give a limit in . Applying the same inequality to two minimizers proves uniqueness. Nonemptiness is essential.
Let be a Cauchy sequence in the L2 space , choosing measurable representatives. There is a subsequence withWrite and . Repeated Minkowski inequality gives . As increases pointwise, the monotone convergence theorem givesHence is finite almost everywhere and represents an L2 function. Definewhere the series converges, and set on the exceptional Lebesgue null set. It is a measurable function, and almost everywhere, so Minkowski inequality gives .
For fixed , Fatou's lemma applied to squares of finite tails and then Minkowski inequality giveThus the subsequence converges to in norm. Given , choose a sufficiently late with and with for every sufficiently large , using the original Cauchy sequence property. The triangle inequality then gives . ThereforeThis proves the needed instance of completeness of Lp spaces without assuming the result being proved.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 5 4 ii Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . Since , choose simple functions of finite-measure support with in . These belong to both endpoint domain spaces. The given simple-function estimate applies also to their differences, soBy completeness of Lp spaces, including , there is with in . Taking limits of the simple-function bound yields .
It remains to identify with the already defined , rather than just define an unrelated extension. Write and with their sum norms. The endpoint estimates implyIndeed, split , bound the two images in their endpoint norms, and take the infimum over all splits. Part (i) gives , hence in .
The inclusion is also continuous. For distinct finite endpoints this is the same threshold argument as part (i), after ordering the endpoints. If the larger endpoint is infinity, splitting at bounds both the lower endpoint norm of the large-value part and the supremum norm of the small-value part by . If the endpoints coincide, the inclusion is immediate. Thus also in . Uniqueness of limits in the sum norm gives almost everywhere. Consequently the Riesz-Thorin theorem estimate extends as
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 iii Paper 34 3 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The real L2 space on a probability space consists of equivalence classes of measurable functions satisfying , where two random variables represent the same element if they are equal almost surely. Its norm isPassing to equivalence classes makes this a genuine norm: exactly when almost surely. The Minkowski inequality gives the triangle inequality.
Let be a Cauchy sequence in this norm. Choose an increasing sequence of indices such thatThis is possible by choosing beyond a Cauchy threshold for tolerance . Set . The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality on a probability space gives . By Tonelli theorem,Thus the series of absolute differences is finite almost surely. Define on this probability-one event, and give it the value zero on its complement. It is a measurable function, and almost surely.
For , the Minkowski inequality givesApply the Fatou lemma to the squared difference as . It follows thatIn particular , and therefore by the Minkowski inequality. This proves convergence in L2 of the subsequence. To recover the entire sequence, for a prescribed choose a Cauchy threshold for , then choose with and . For every ,Hence , proving completeness of Lp spaces for without assuming the desired completeness in the argument.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 9 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
The statement requires ; an empty set is closed and convex but contains no minimizer. Assume this necessary condition and put . Since is closed and , . Choose a minimizing sequence with .
The midpoint lies in the convex set . Applying the stated Clarkson inequality to and givesThe right side tends to zero, so is a Cauchy sequence. By completeness of Lp spaces, proved in Question 2(a), it converges to some . Closedness puts in , and continuity of the norm gives . This is the closest point theorem for a closed convex subset of Lp. The same inequality applied to two minimizers forces their difference to be zero, so the minimizer is also unique.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2009 iii Paper 9 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
First let , and take a Cauchy sequence in the Lp space, with functions identified almost everywhere. Choose a subsequence with and put . The triangle inequality givesBy the monotone convergence theorem, belongs to , and is finite almost everywhere. The series therefore converges almost everywhere to an function . Applying the same argument to each absolute tail yieldsThe original sequence is Cauchy, so the triangle inequality extends convergence from this subsequence to the whole sequence.
For , choose the same subsequence in essential supremum norm. Outside one null set, all its difference bounds hold simultaneously:The series then converges uniformly on that full-measure set to a bounded measurable , and . Again the full sequence converges. Thus every , , is a Banach space, proving completeness of Lp spaces.
Set , where the norms are operator norms, and . Independence of the Brownian coordinates and the vector Itô isometry giveInduction, as in part (b), yields the Factorial Picard estimate for a linear stochastic differential equationFor , the triangle inequality in therefore bounds any tail of the iterates by the corresponding tail ofThis numerical series converges by the ratio test: successive terms have ratio . Thus the iterates are Cauchy in , uniformly in the deterministic time parameter on each bounded interval. Completeness of Lp spaces gives a limit . Once its continuous adapted version is chosen in part (d), the Itô isometry permits passage to the limit in the integral equation: the squared norm of each integral difference is bounded by . Consequently the Picard limit solves the stochastic differential equation.