BCS theory Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-18
BCS theory describes a superconducting instability caused by attractive interactions between opposite-momentum fermions near a Fermi surface.
John Bardeen, Leon Neil Cooper and John Robert Schrieffer developed BCS theory in 1957, using attraction mediated by phonons.[ref]
Theory of Superconductivity by John Bardeen and others. pp.1175–1177, introduction and microscopic pairing mechanism
Weak-coupling Cooper pairs overlap. The Cooper instability reorganizes an unpaired Fermi surface; it is not Bose-Einstein condensation of compact, pre-existing molecules. The original paper explicitly distinguishes these pictures.[ref]
Theory of Superconductivity by John Bardeen and others. p.1177, footnote 18 and coherence-distance discussion
Two complementary clues made the microscopic problem concrete. The superconducting isotope effect connected the transition to phonons.[ref]
Electron-Phonon Interactions and Superconductivity by John Bardeen. p.55, isotope effect as a clue to the microscopic mechanism
A 1957 transmission experiment used thin lead and tin films as samples in far-infrared and millimeter-microwave measurements. The measured transmission was converted to complex electrical conductivity, normalized to the normal-state value. Comparing film thickness, resistance, annealing and the two metals tested the response's reproducibility. Weak low-photon-energy absorption followed by an onset supported a superconducting energy gap; its extraction required a thin-film electrodynamic model.[ref]
Conductivity of Superconducting Films for Photon Energies between 0.3 and 40kTc by R. E. Glover III and M. Tinkham. Abstract: sample metals, transmission method, normal-state normalization and comparisons; inferred excitation gap
The later Giaever superconducting tunnelling experiment provided another way to resolve the superconducting energy gap through quantum tunnelling.[ref]
Electron-Phonon Interactions and Superconductivity by John Bardeen. p.61, section 4, tunnelling conductance and the superconducting density of states
The derivations below explain what the model predicts, including the distinction between a single quasiparticle's minimum energy and the threshold for making two of them. M. Tinkham Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
A physicist whose joint measurements with R. E. Glover III used infrared and microwave transmission to probe superconductivity. The dissipative and reactive parts of electrical conductivity changed differently with frequency. Comparing tin and lead films exposed a common scaled response and an excitation threshold, providing a quantitative way to investigate the superconducting energy gap.[ref]
Conductivity of Superconducting Films for Photon Energies between 0.3 and 40kTc by R. E. Glover III and M. Tinkham. Abstract: complex conductivity, reduced-frequency scaling and gap interpretation
R. E. Glover III Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental researcher whose work with M. Tinkham measured how thin superconducting films transmit radiation of different frequencies. Extracting their complex electrical conductivity revealed the onset of absorption above an energy threshold. That threshold supplied evidence for a superconducting energy gap, connecting optical response with the spectrum of allowed electronic excitations.[ref]
Conductivity of Superconducting Films for Photon Energies between 0.3 and 40kTc by R. E. Glover III and M. Tinkham. Abstract: lead and tin film transmission, complex conductivity and excitation gap