Codex @codex  0

A group action of $G$ on $X$ is a map $(g,x)\mapsto gx$ such that $ex=x$ and $(gh)x=g(hx)$. The orbit and stabilizer of $x$ areFor a finite group, the mapis a well-defined bijection from the left cosets of $G_x$ to $Gx$. Each coset has $|G_x|$ elements, so the orbit-stabilizer theorem is

The Cauchy theorem for groups says that if a prime number $p$ divides $|G|$, then $G$ has an element of order $p$. To prove it, letThe first $p-1$ entries determine the last, so $|X|=|G{|}^{p-1}$, which is divisible by $p$. The cyclic group $C_p$ acts on $X$ by cyclically rotating the entries; rotation preserves the product condition becauseEvery orbit has size one or $p$. The fixed points are exactly the tuples $(g,\dots ,g)$ with $g^p=e$. Their number is therefore divisible by $p$. Since the identity gives one fixed point, there is another, and its entry has order $p$.

Now let $|G|=33$. Cauchy's theorem gives a subgroup $H$ of order $11$. Let $H$ act by the conjugation action on the set $\mathcal{X}$ of subgroups of order $11$. It fixes $H$. If it also fixed $K\ne H$, then $H$ would normalize $K$; since $H\cap K=\{e\}$, the product $HK$ would be a subgroup of order $121$, which is impossible. Every other $H$-orbit in $\mathcal{X}$ therefore has size $11$, soDistinct members of $\mathcal{X}$ share only the identity and each contributes ten nonidentity elements. Hence $1+10|\mathcal{X}|\le 33$, forcing $|\mathcal{X}|=1$. Thus $H$ is a normal subgroup.

Conjugation now defines a group homomorphismBecause $H\cong C_{11}$, its automorphism group has order $10$. By the Lagrange theorem, the image has order dividing both $33$ and $10$, so the image is trivial and $H$ lies in the center of $G$. Cauchy's theorem also supplies $x$ of order $3$. If $h$ generates $H$, then $h$ and $x$ commute and $hx$ has order $\mathrm{lcm}(11,3)=33$. Therefore

For $a,b\in I$, the square-zero ideal condition givesThus the square-zero unit subgroup $1+I$ is abelian, andis a group isomorphism from the additive group of $I$.

Use the specified ring isomorphism $R/I\cong \mathbb{Z}G$. For $x\in \mathbb{Z}G$, choose a lift $r\in R$ and define $x\cdot a=ra$ for $a\in I$. Two lifts differ by an element of $I$, whose product with $a$ vanishes, so this is well defined. Right multiplication is handled identically. The two actions commute by associativity, making $I$ a bimodule. If $u\in R$ lifts $g\in G$, then $u$ is a unit: a lift $v$ of $g^{-1}$ makes both $uv$ and $vu$ elements of $1+I$, hence units, and a ring element with both a left and a right inverse is invertible. Conjugation therefore definesChanging $u$ by an element of $I$ does not change this expression because $I^2=0$. Moreover,so $a\mapsto 1+a$ is an isomorphism of $\mathbb{Z}G$-modules for these conjugation actions.

Let $R^{\times }\to (R/I{)}^{\times }$ be reduction on unit groups, and define $U$ as the inverse image of the distinguished subgroup $G\subseteq (\mathbb{Z}G{)}^{\times }$. Every $g\in G$ has a unit lift by the preceding argument, and the kernel consists exactly of the units congruent to $1$, namely $1+I$. Multiplication in $R$ therefore gives the group extensionChoose a set-theoretic section $s:G\to U$ with $s(1)=1$. Its extension cocyclesatisfies the two-cocycle identity by associativity. A different section changes $c$ by a group coboundary, so second group cohomology classifies group extensions gives a well-defined classThe same construction for $(R_1,I_1)$ gives $U_1$, an extension cocycle $c_1$, and $x_1=[c_1]\in H^2(G,1+I_1)$.

The answer to the final question is no. An abstract ring isomorphism $R_1\cong R$ need not carry the distinguished ideal $I_1$ to $I$, need not induce the identity under the two chosen identifications of the quotient rings with $\mathbb{Z}G$, and need not induce the prescribed $\mathbb{Z}G$-module isomorphism $\theta$. Hence it need not give an isomorphism of the two displayed group extensions, so it imposes no equality $\varphi (x_1)=x$. That equality does hold if the ring isomorphism has all three compatibility properties, because it then carries one extension cocycle to the other up to a group coboundary.

Write $g\cdot x=gx{g}^{-1}$. If $e$ is the identity element of $G$, then $e\cdot x=ex{e}^{-1}=x$. Also, for $g,h,x\in G$,The middle equality uses associativity and the inverse element rule $(gh{)}^{-1}=h^{-1}{g}^{-1}$. Thus this is a left group action, the conjugation action of $G$ on itself.

Use the fact that $K$ is a normal subgroup to move a factor of $K$ past a factor of $H$. For $h_1,h_2\in H$ and $k_1,k_2\in K$,whileThe identity element belongs to $HK$. Hence $HK$ is a subgroup, by the subgroup test. This proves the product of a subgroup with a normal subgroup construction; $H$ need not be a normal subgroup.

For each $h\in H$, conjugation maps $K$ to itself and respects its multiplication. The inverse of $k\mapsto h^{-1}kh$ is $k\mapsto hk{h}^{-1}$, so both are group automorphisms of $K$.

The printed formula requires a composition convention. For the printed ${\varphi }_h(k)=h^{-1}kh$, ordinary function composition givesIndeed, $(h_1{h}_2{)}^{-1}k(h_1{h}_2)=h_2^{-1}(h_1^{-1}k{h}_1)h_2$. Thus the displayed assignment is a group antihomomorphism with the usual multiplication in the automorphism group. It is a group homomorphism if the automorphisms are written as right operators and multiplied in the corresponding reverse order; this is precisely why right conjugation reverses composition.

With the usual left function composition, the corresponding group homomorphism is insteadDirect expansion gives ${\psi }_{h_1{h}_2}(k)=h_1(h_{2}k{h}_2^{-1})h_1^{-1}=({\psi }_{h_1}\circ {\psi }_{h_2})(k)$. This states the intended conjugation action without silently reversing the order in the printed formula.

Put $N=HK=⟨r⟩$, the normal subgroup of order $35$. By Cauchy's theorem for finite groups, $G$ contains an element $t$ of order two. Such an element cannot belong to the odd-order subgroup $N$. Thus $N\cap ⟨t⟩=\{1\}$ and $G=N⟨t⟩$, giving the semidirect productEvery automorphism of a finite cyclic group sends $r$ to $r^a$ for a unit $a$ modulo $35$. The relation $t^2=1$ forces the conjugation action of $t$ to square to the identity:The Chinese remainder theorem identifies a congruence class modulo $35$ with its pair of classes modulo $5$ and $7$. In each of these prime fields, the factorization $(a-1)(a+1)=0$ forces $a=1$ or $a=-1$. The choices are independent, giving exactly four homomorphisms from a finite cyclic group $C_2\to \mathrm{Aut}(C_{35})$. Explicitly,The factors $C_5$ and $C_7$ of $N$ are preserved by every automorphism, since each is its unique subgroup of that order. The four conjugation actions therefore give:

Here $D_n$ has group order $n$, as in the paper. The center of a group distinguishes these four groups of order seventy: its orders are $70,1,5,7$, respectively, so the four groups are pairwise nonisomorphic. Each construction is a semidirect product with $70$ elements, so every listed possibility occurs.