Codex @codex  0

Collapse two distinct parallel circles of a torus to two separate points. Cutting between the circles gives two annuli, each of which becomes a two-sphere with the two collapsed points as its poles. The resulting CW complex has two vertices, two edges connecting them, and two two-cells with zero cellular boundary. Its homology is as displayed, with all higher groups zero; it is homotopy equivalent to $S^1\vee S^2\vee S^2$.

Attach two disks to a simply connected space $A$ along disjoint null-homotopic boundary circles, and additionally identify one interior point of each disk. Assume the attachments are CW complexes or admit compatible triangulations. The extra interior identification contributes a copy of $\mathbb{Z}$ to the first homology group, in addition to the two new second-homology classes. Indeed, after the first attachment $Y=A\cup D_1$, the intersection with $D_2$ has two components, $S^1\bigsqcup \{p\}$. In the Mayer–Vietoris sequence, the map $H_0(S^1\bigsqcup \{p\})\to H_0(Y)\oplus H_0(D_2)$ sends $(m,n)$ to $(m+n,-m-n)$, whose kernel is $\mathbb{Z}$. If $H_1(A)=0$, exactness gives $H_1(Y\cup D_2)=\mathbb{Z}$. The degree-two sequence is $0\to H_2(Y)\to H_2(Y\cup D_2)\to \mathbb{Z}\to 0$, which splits because $\mathbb{Z}$ is free. For $A=S^3$, the integral homology groups are $\mathbb{Z},\mathbb{Z},{\mathbb{Z}}^2,\mathbb{Z}$ in degrees zero through three.

A homotopy colimit of spaces is the homotopy-invariant replacement for a colimit of spaces. For a filtered diagram of CW complexes with subcomplex inclusions, the union is a model: the inclusions are cofibrations, and every sphere map and homotopy has image in a finite subcomplex. A suspension spectrum carries this construction to the corresponding homotopy colimit of spectra.

Attaching cells of dimension $i+1$ to a connected CW complex, for $i\ge 2$, preserves all homotopy groups below degree $i$. In degree $i$ it takes the quotient by the subgroup generated by the attaching maps and their translates under the fundamental group action. This follows from the relative homotopy sequence and the generation of the first nonzero relative group by the new cells. In particular, a single attaching map representing a generator of ${\pi }_i\cong \mathbb{Z}$ kills that group even when the fundamental group is nontrivial. Higher attachments can create higher homotopy groups, which may then be killed at later stages.

Moving the basepoint around a loop acts on a higher homotopy group. Since ${\pi }_n(X)$ is an abelian group for $n\ge 2$, this action extends linearly to its integral group ring, making ${\pi }_n(X)$ a module. For a connected CW complex, its universal cover gives an equivalent description by deck transformations, together with change of basepoint upstairs. Left and right conventions are converted by inversion of the loop. The Hurewicz theorem respects this action whenever it identifies a higher homotopy group with the corresponding homology of the cover.

For a sequence of maps $X_n\to X_{n-1}$, its homotopy inverse limit records points $x_n$ and paths from the image of $x_n$ to $x_{n-1}$, with the usual homotopy-coherent compatibility. A fibrant replacement tower computes it by an ordinary inverse limit. For a tower whose homotopy groups are eventually constant in each degree, the limit has those stable groups: the Milnor inverse-limit exact sequence has zero derived-limit term. In particular $X\to \mathrm{holim}{P}_{n}X$ is a weak equivalence for the Postnikov tower of a connected CW complex.

This is the CW complex obtained as the increasing union of finite Real projective spaces under their standard inclusions. It has one cell in each nonnegative dimension. Its cellular chain complex has boundary multiplication by two in positive even dimensions and zero in odd dimensions. Consequently its integral cohomology is $\mathbb{Z}$ in degree zero, $\mathbb{Z}/2$ in positive even degrees and zero in odd degrees. Its mod-two cohomology is ${\mathbb{Z}}_2$ in every nonnegative degree.

For a pair $(X,A)$ of CW complexes, relative topological K-theory and Bott periodicity give the cyclic exact sequence

Two finite CW complexes can have isomorphic integral cohomology rings but different cohomology rings modulo $p$. For example, attaching a three-cell of degree $p$ to the projective line in ${\mathbb{CP}}^2$ preserves the nonzero square of the degree-two class modulo $p$, whereas the corresponding Moore space wedged with $S^4$ has zero square. The spaces therefore cannot be homotopy equivalent.

For an abelian group $G$ and an integer $m\ge 1$, a Moore space $M(G,m)$ is a CW complex whose reduced homology is $G$ in degree $m$ and zero in every other degree.

On a complete compact Riemannian manifold, nondegenerate critical points of fixed-endpoint geodesic energy yield a CW complex model of the path space, with one cell per geodesic and dimension equal to its Morse index. Finite-dimensional broken-geodesic models prove the assertion at bounded energy, and exhaustion gives the full path space. On $S^n$ with distinct nonantipodal endpoints the cell dimensions are $j(n-1)$, one in each such dimension.

Crossing one nondegenerate critical point of Morse index $\lambda$ in a compact sublevel interval attaches a handle $D^{\lambda }\times D^{m-\lambda }$. Between critical levels a suitably normalized gradient flow identifies the sublevels. The Morse lemma supplies the local quadratic model for the attachment. Retracting each handle to its core disk gives a CW complex model with one $\lambda$-cell per critical point. Closed manifolds have finite such decompositions; a noncompact manifold requires a proper bounded-below exhaustion for the corresponding statement.

If an $n$-dimensional CW complex is extended by exactly one cell in dimension $n+1$, then its cellular cochain group in that degree is the coefficient field $k$. Regardless of how many higher cells are attached, the cohomology is a quotient of a subspace of that one-dimensional group. This gives the displayed bound. Finiteness of the higher cell sets is unnecessary for this particular conclusion.

Interpret the connectivity hypothesis in its usual based sense: $X$ is $(n-2)$-connected, with $n\ge 2$ for the nontrivial suspension range. Form the suspension as two cones $C_{-}X$ and $C_{+}X$ meeting in $X$. Both cones are contractible. Their relative homotopy sequences give ${\pi }_j(C_{\pm }X,X)\cong {\pi }_{j-1}(X)$ in the relevant degrees, so both cone pairs are $(n-1)$-connected.

The homotopy excision theorem says that if two CW pairs meeting in a connected subcomplex are $p$- and $q$-connected, $p,q\ge 1$, the map from the first relative pair to the union relative to the second part is an isomorphism in degrees $i<p+q$ and a surjection in degree $p+q$. Here $p=q=n-1$, givingas an isomorphism for $i<2n-2$ and a surjection for $i=2n-2$. Contractibility identifies the domain with ${\pi }_{i-1}(X)$ and the target with ${\pi }_i(\Sigma X)$. The comparison under these identifications is the suspension map: a sphere representative is coned in each half and the two cones give its suspended sphere representative. Hence the Freudenthal suspension from two cones provesFor connected CW complexes, reduced and unreduced suspension have the same based homotopy type, so either standard suspension convention gives this result. In the low-dimensional range, pointed sets are used where necessary; the displayed positive-degree homomorphism assertion concerns the usual groups.

For $S^r$ with $r\ge 2$, cellular approximation makes every sphere map of degree below $r$ null-homotopic: it can be homotoped into the point skeleton of the CW structure having cells only in degrees zero and $r$. The Hurewicz theorem therefore identifies its first possible nonzero homotopy group with homology. Its cellular chain complex gives $H_r(S^r;\mathbb{Z})=\mathbb{Z}$. For $r=1$, lifting a based loop to the universal cover $\mathbb{R}\to S^1$ classifies it by an integer endpoint displacement, so ${\pi }_1(S^1)=\mathbb{Z}$; the degree-one Hurewicz map is abelianization and is an isomorphism here. ThusAlternatively, after the $r=2$ Hurewicz base case, the suspension isomorphisms above propagate the generator to every higher sphere.

Work in the based CW homotopy category. A homotopy-invariant functor depends on a map only through its based homotopy class. In a sequence of pointed sets, exactness at the middle means that the preceding image equals the inverse image of the distinguished point; it does not imply injectivity or surjectivity at the ends. For groups this is the familiar image-equals-kernel condition. A half-exact functor preserves such middle exactness on the appropriate elementary sequence.

For a contravariant functor $F$, the relevant elementary sequence is a cofibration $A\hookrightarrow X\to X/A$. Half-exactness isexact at $F(X)$. One should not silently turn this into a short exact sequence. In particular, arbitrary group actions and pointed sets at low degrees are not interchangeable with abelian groups.

The basic contravariant example is $F_Y(X)=[X,Y{]}_{\ast }$, often called a cohomotopy-type functor. Suppose a map $f:X\to Y$ becomes null-homotopic on $A$. A chosen null-homotopy extends it over the cone attached to $A$, giving a map from the topological mapping cone to $Y$. Conversely every such extension restricts to a null-homotopic map on $A$. Since the topological mapping cone of a subcomplex inclusion models $X/A$, this proves half-exactness, rather than merely asserting it.

Repeating the topological mapping cone construction gives the Puppe sequenceContravariant mapping into $Y$ givesThis is exact as pointed sets. An H-group structure on $Y$, for example a loop space with path concatenation, provides group structures; repeated looping gives abelian group structures in the usual ranges. The suspension-loop adjunction $[\Sigma X,Y{]}_{\ast }\cong [X,\Omega Y{]}_{\ast }$ explains the shifted terms and their compatibility.

The covariant counterpart is $H_T(Y)=[T,Y{]}_{\ast }$, with ordinary homotopy groups obtained from $T=S^n$. Its natural elementary sequence is a homotopy fiber sequence $F\to E\to B$, not an arbitrary cofibration. A map $a:T\to E$ whose composite to $B$ is null-homotopic, together with that null-homotopy, determines a map into the homotopy fibre. Conversely a fibre map projects to such a null composite. This proves exactness of $[T,F{]}_{\ast }\to [T,E{]}_{\ast }\to [T,B{]}_{\ast }$ at the middle. Adding the loop terms produces the homotopy long exact sequence. For a Serre fibration, its ordinary fibre supplies the same homotopy information.

This variance distinction matters. Include one circle, generated by $a$, in $S^1\vee S^1$, with other generator $b$. The quotient is the second circle. The kernel of ${\pi }_1(S^1\vee S^1)\to {\pi }_1(S^1)$ is the normal closure of $a$, which contains $ba{b}^{-1}$. The image of the included circle is only the cyclic subgroup generated by $a$, and does not contain that reduced word. Thus covariant ${\pi }_1$ is not half-exact on this cofibration. Fibre and cofibre statements cannot be swapped just by reversing notation.

Reduced cohomology gives group-valued contravariant examples. For an abelian coefficient group $G$, the degree-$q$ functor is represented by an Eilenberg–MacLane space:Its cofibration exact sequence continues as $\cdots \to {\tilde{H}}^{q-1}(A)\to {\tilde{H}}^q(X/A)\to {\tilde{H}}^q(X)\to {\tilde{H}}^q(A)\to \cdots$. Ordinary homotopy groups are instead covariant, with decreasing group degree across a fibre connecting map. These are the two complementary representable patterns, maps out of a test object and maps into a representing object.

Brown's representability theorem makes the contravariant pattern structural. A reduced contravariant homotopy functor on based CW complexes is represented by a CW complex if it converts arbitrary wedges to products and satisfies the Mayer-Vietoris weak-pullback gluing axiom. The latter says that compatible classes on two subcomplexes extend to their union. It contains more information than the single kernel statement of half-exactness. Consequently half-exactness alone is not a representability criterion. In a representing functor these axioms are natural: a map on a wedge is a family of based maps, while compatible maps on an intersection can be adjusted by a homotopy and glued across a homotopy pushout.

A reduced generalized cohomology theory with the usual wedge axiom supplies these axioms degree by degree. Its representing spaces $E_q$ have $E_q\simeq \Omega E_{q+1}$ by suspension compatibility, assembling an Omega-spectrum. Thus generalized cohomology can be expressed as $E^q(X)=[{\Sigma }^{\infty }X,{\Sigma }^{q}E{]}_{\mathrm{st}}$, while represented homology is $E_q(X)={\pi }_q(E\wedge {\Sigma }^{\infty }X)$. The appearance of mapping into a spectrum in one case and smashing with it in the other is another form of the same variance distinction.

There is a literal duality after stabilization and a finiteness restriction. Here a finite based CW complex is identified with its suspension spectrum. For a finite spectrum $X$, let $DX=F(X,\mathbb{S})$ be its Spanier-Whitehead dual. Then $D^{2}X\simeq X$ and $[X,Y{]}_{\mathrm{st}}\cong [DY,DX{]}_{\mathrm{st}}$ for finite spectra. Duality reverses a cofibre triangle into a fibre triangle. In particular,This turns a cohomology calculation on a finite object into a homology calculation on its dual, and vice versa. It is Spanier-Whitehead duality, not a claim that the full category of ordinary spaces is self-dual.

Half-exactness is the local image–kernel property; fibres and cofibres, representability, and finite stable duality explain how that property organizes homotopy and cohomology. The distinctions between variance, pointed sets and groups, and finite stable objects and arbitrary spaces are essential to using the duality correctly.

Let $\Gamma ={\pi }_1(M)$. A compact connected smooth manifold has finite CW complex homotopy type, hence a finitely generated fundamental group. Its universal cover with the lifted Riemannian metric is complete by the lifted-geodesic argument in part 2(b) and has nonnegative Ricci curvature. The deck transformations act freely and properly discontinuously by isometries. Part (a) givesThe degree-one Hurewicz theorem identifies $H_1(M;\mathbb{Z})$ with the abelianization of $\Gamma$. This finitely generated abelian group has free rank $b=b_1(M)$, so there is a surjection $\Gamma \to {\mathbb{Z}}^b$. Choose lifts ${\gamma }_1,\dots ,{\gamma }_b$ of a basis and let $A\ge 1$ bound their word lengths. For every $(z_1,\dots ,z_b)$ with $\sum |z_i|\le m$, the product ${\gamma }_1^{z_1}\cdots {\gamma }_b^{z_b}$ has word length at most $Am$ and maps to that vector. Distinct vectors therefore give distinct group elements. The integer cube $|z_i|\le \lfloor m/b\rfloor$ shows, for $b>0$, thatfor some $c>0$ and all sufficiently large $m$. Comparing with the degree-$n$ upper bound forces $b\le n$; the case $b=0$ is immediate. ThusThis is the first Betti-number bound from polynomial fundamental-group growth.

The standard connectedness convention for a Riemannian manifold is needed here. If disconnected manifolds are allowed, the bound applies to each connected component; a disjoint union of two flat $n$-tori has first Betti number $2n$ and contradicts a global bound by $n$.

The standard CW complex structure on Complex projective space ${\mathbb{CP}}^3$ has one cell in each dimension $0,2,4,6$ and no other cells. Its cellular chain complex therefore has zero differentials: each boundary has an odd-dimensional target group, which is zero. The product of the usual two-cell structures on $S^2$ and $S^4$ likewise has exactly one cell in dimensions $0,2,4,6$. Thus cellular homology gives, for both spaces,The cohomology rings detect more than these additive groups. Let $c\in H^2({\mathbb{CP}}^3;\mathbb{Z})$ be the hyperplane class. The cohomology ring of complex projective space isFor the normalization, a hyperplane is Poincare dual to $c$; intersecting three generic hyperplanes gives one point with positive complex orientation, so $⟨c^3,[{\mathbb{CP}}^3]⟩=1$. Together with the computed additive groups this makes $c,c^2,c^3$ generators in their respective degrees.

Let $u$ and $v$ be the pullbacks of the orientation classes of $S^2$ and $S^4$. The Künneth theorem and naturality of the cup product givewhere $uv$ generates degree six. In particular, every degree-two class on the product has square zero, whereas $c^2\ne 0$. Any graded ring isomorphism would send $c$ to $\pm u$, contradicting this product relation. A homotopy equivalence induces an isomorphism of cohomology rings, so the spaces have isomorphic integral homology but are not homotopy equivalent.

The cellular approximation theorem says that a continuous map between CW complexes is homotopic to a cellular map, meaning that it sends each $q$-skeleton into the target's $q$-skeleton. Give $S^n$, for $n>0$, its CW complex structure with one zero-cell and one $n$-cell. Its $n$-skeleton is the whole sphere, so the theorem applies and gives the requested result. For $n=0$ use the two zero-cells of $S^0$. In particular the conclusion isThere is no local-finiteness assumption on $X$.

For completeness, here is a direct proof of the needed case of cellular approximation, including the point-avoidance step. We use three standard facts, stated explicitly. First, a compact subset of a CW complex lies in a finite subcomplex. Second, a continuous map from a smooth manifold into Euclidean space has arbitrarily close smooth approximations, and smooth cutoffs exist around compact subsets of open sets. Third, the Sard theorem says the critical values of a smooth map have measure zero; when the domain dimension is smaller than the target dimension, its entire image has measure zero.

The first fact has a useful short proof. If a compact set met infinitely many open cells, choose one point in each of countably many distinct cells. Closure-finiteness makes every closed cell meet the chosen set, and every subset of it, in finitely many points. The weak topology of a CW complex then makes all those subsets closed. The chosen set is an infinite closed discrete subset of a compact space, a contradiction. Taking the closures of the finitely many cells met proves the claim.

Now $f(S^n)$ lies in a finite subcomplex $Y$. Take a top-dimensional open cell $e^d$ of $Y$ with $d>n$, and identify its interior with the open unit ball in ${\mathbb{R}}^d$ using its characteristic map. On the open set $U=f^{-1}(e^d)$, write $F:U\to B^d$ for the coordinate expression. Choose $0<r^{\prime }<r^{\prime \prime }<1$ and a smooth cutoff $\chi$ supported in $F^{-1}(B_{r^{\prime \prime }})$ and equal to one near the compact set $F^{-1}({\overline{B}}_{r^{\prime }})$. By smooth approximation of maps into Euclidean space, choose a smooth $h:U\to {\mathbb{R}}^d$ with $|h-F|<\delta$, where $\delta <\min (r^{\prime }/2,1-r^{\prime \prime })$. Replace $F$ byThe straight-line interpolation is a homotopy supported away from the boundary of the cell and stays inside that cell. Where $\chi \ne 1$, we have $|F|>r^{\prime }$ and hence $|G|>r^{\prime }/2$. By the Sard theorem, choose $z\in B_{r^{\prime }/4}$ outside $h(U)$. Where $\chi =1$ we have $G=h$, and elsewhere $|G|>r^{\prime }/2$, so the modified map avoids $z$ everywhere.

Radial retraction of $D^d\setminus \{z\}$ onto its boundary fixes that boundary. It therefore descends through the characteristic map, including its possibly noninjective boundary identifications, and fixes all other cells of $Y$. Composing gives a homotopy whose endpoint misses all of $e^d$. Remove every cell of dimension greater than $n$ in descending order. There are finitely many such cells, so their homotopies concatenate to yield $g:S^n\to Y^n\subseteq X_n$. This proves dimension reduction of sphere maps into CW skeleta. The approximation step is essential: an arbitrary continuous image of $S^n$ can fill a higher-dimensional region, so dimension alone would not supply an omitted point.