Codex @codex  0

Let $K={\mathbb{Q}}_3$, $L=K(i)$ with $i^2=-1$, and ${\alpha }^2=3(1+i)$. The extension $L/K$ is unramified quadratic, whereas $N=L(\alpha )$ is totally ramified quadratic over $L$, by the Eisenstein polynomial $T^2-3(1+i)$. Also $i={\alpha }^2/3-1$, so $N=K(\alpha )$. The Hensel lemma gives $r\in K$ with $r^2=-2$. Put $\beta =(1+i)/r$; then ${\beta }^2=-i$ and $\beta \overline{\beta }=-1$. Consequently $i\mapsto -i$, $\alpha \mapsto \beta \alpha$ defines an automorphism whose square fixes $i$ and negates $\alpha$. It generates the cyclic Galois group of order four. Its unique quadratic subfield is $L$, which is unramified. A decomposition as an unramified field and a totally ramified field would require a totally ramified quadratic subfield, and therefore cannot exist.

A finite extension $L/K$ of complete discretely valued fields is totally ramified exactly when $L=K(\alpha )$ for a root $\alpha$ of an Eisenstein polynomial over ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. In the reverse direction one may take $\alpha$ to be any uniformizer of $L$.

If $a^3=3$ and ${\zeta }_3$ is a primitive cube root of unity, then ${\pi }^3=1+2{\zeta }_3$ and ${\pi }^6=-3$. The Eisenstein polynomial $X^6+3$ therefore presents the entire degree-six splitting field, and $\pi$ is a uniformizer. Its normalised valuation gives $v_L(3)=6$, $v_L(a)=2$ and $v_L({\zeta }_3-1)=3$. The order-three automorphisms displace $\pi$ with valuation four, whereas transpositions displace it with valuation one.

A p-adic field has only finitely many extensions of a fixed degree up to isomorphism. There are finitely many possible residue degrees and a unique unramified extension of each such degree. Over each maximal unramified subfield, a totally ramified extension is generated by a root of an Eisenstein polynomial. The coefficient space of these polynomials of fixed degree is compact. Hensel lemma and Krasner's lemma show that sufficiently close polynomials generate isomorphic extensions, giving a finite cover by neighborhoods of a constant extension type.

Let $m_1,m_2$ be coprime positive square-free integers, with $m_1\not\equiv \pm m_2(\mathrm{mod}9)$. The displayed integral basis has discriminant $-27m_1^2{m}_2^2$. Both nonconstant generators are integral, and their products are integral linear combinations of the three basis elements. At a prime dividing $m_1$, the cubic for $\alpha$ is Eisenstein; at a prime dividing $m_2$, the cubic for ${\alpha }^2/m_2$ is Eisenstein. If $3\nmid m_1{m}_2$, then $m_1{m}_2^2\not\equiv \pm 1(\mathrm{mod}9)$, and a shift by $1$ or $-1$ gives an Eisenstein polynomial at three. These local uniformizer generators show that the order is maximal at all primes dividing its discriminant; elsewhere the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice already gives maximality.

In $L={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\theta )$ with ${\theta }^2=p$, the Eisenstein polynomial $X^2-p$ gives $v_L(\theta )=1$ and $v_L(p)=2$. The element $x=\theta /p$ has field trace zero, but valuation $-1$, so is not in the valuation ring. Cancellation in a field trace contrasts with the multiplicative test in unit norm detects units in a local extension.

The polynomialsplits into three linear factors over ${\mathbb{Q}}_2$. Over ${\mathbb{Q}}_5$ it is an Eisenstein polynomial, so adjoining a root gives a totally ramified cubic extension. Its splitting field over ${\mathbb{Q}}_5$ has decomposition group $S_3$ and inertia group $A_3\cong C_3$.

The original PDF has cube roots throughout this question; the ninth roots in the converted TeX are transcription errors. Put $\alpha =\sqrt[3]{m_1{m}_2^2}$ and $\beta ={\alpha }^2/m_2$. The given condition excludes the trivial cube case. Both generators are integral, becauseMoreoverso $A=\mathbb{Z}+\mathbb{Z}\alpha +\mathbb{Z}\beta$ is an order in the cubic field. The field traces of $\alpha ,\beta ,{\alpha }^2,{\beta }^2$ are zero, while $\mathrm{Tr}(\alpha \beta )=3m_1{m}_2$. Thus the trace pairing matrix of this basis isWe must prove that this is the maximal order, not just compute the discriminant of a suborder. The discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice restricts any index prime to those dividing $3m_1{m}_2$. If $p\mid m_1$, the cubic for $\alpha$ is Eisenstein at $p$, while $m_2$ is a unit there and $A\otimes {\mathbb{Z}}_p={\mathbb{Z}}_p[\alpha ]$. If $p\mid m_2$, use instead the Eisenstein polynomial for $\beta$, and $\alpha ={\beta }^2/m_1$. In either case an Eisenstein generator is a uniformizer of the totally ramified local field and generates its full valuation ring. Indeed expansion in powers of that uniformizer using base residue representatives, and grouping powers modulo three, expresses every integral local element in its power basis.

These arguments also cover three when $3\mid m_1{m}_2$. If $3\nmid m_1{m}_2$, every unit modulo nine has cube congruent to $1$ or $-1$. Therefore the condition $m_1\not\equiv \pm m_2(\mathrm{mod}9)$ implies $m_1{m}_2^2\not\equiv \pm 1(\mathrm{mod}9)$: multiply a contrary congruence by the inverse of $m_2^2$ and use $m_2^3\equiv \pm 1$. Choose $r\in \{1,-1\}$ with $r^3\equiv m_1{m}_2^2(\mathrm{mod}3)$. The polynomialis Eisenstein at three, since its constant term is divisible by three but not nine. Its root $\alpha -r$ again generates the full local valuation ring. There is no index prime left. We have proved the integral basis of a cubefree pure cubic field and the requested discriminant:For $K=\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt[3]{6})$ write ${\alpha }^3=6$. Here ${\mathcal{O}}_K=\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ and $d_K=-972$. The norm of $x+y\alpha +z{\alpha }^2$ is the determinant of its multiplication matrix, givingIn particularAn integral element of norm one has an integral inverse, by its monic characteristic polynomial. Here direct multiplication gives $u^{-1}=109+60\alpha +33{\alpha }^2$. Nontriviality also follows from linear independence of $1,\alpha ,{\alpha }^2$.

The signature is $(1,1)$, so the Minkowski bound for ideal classes isEvery class therefore has an integral representative of norm at most eight. Its prime factors have norms at most eight, and lie above $2,3,5,7$. Since the index of $\mathbb{Z}[\alpha ]$ is one, reduction of $X^3-6$ gives their factorizations by the Kummer-Dedekind theorem. At two and three the polynomial is $X^3$, so there is one prime of norm $2$ or $3$, respectively. They are principal, becauseAt five the factorization is $(X-1)(X^2+X+1)$ with the quadratic irreducible. The norm-five prime is $(\alpha -1)$ because $N(\alpha -1)=5$; the norm-twenty-five prime is outside the bound.

At seven the roots are $3,5,6$, giving three primes ${\mathfrak{q}}_r=(7,\alpha -r)$ of norm seven. The elements $\alpha +1$ and ${\alpha }^2+\alpha -5$ have norm seven and vanish at roots six and three, respectively; hence they generate ${\mathfrak{q}}_6$ and ${\mathfrak{q}}_3$. Since ${\mathfrak{q}}_3{\mathfrak{q}}_5{\mathfrak{q}}_6=(7)$, the remaining prime is principal too. Every prime which can divide a Minkowski representative is now principal, soThis proves class number one for Q of cube root six with all primes within the bound accounted for.

Let ${\zeta }_n$ be a primitive nth root of unity. The cyclotomic polynomial isInduction on $n$ shows that ${\Phi }_n$ is monic with integer coefficients. Here is the essential irreducibility of cyclotomic polynomials argument. Let $f$ be the minimal polynomial of ${\zeta }_n$ and let $\ell \nmid n$ be a prime. If ${\zeta }_n^{\ell }$ had a different monic irreducible polynomial $g$, then $f\mid g(X^{\ell })$. Reducing modulo $\ell$ gives $\bar{f}\mid {\bar{g}}^{\ell }$, so $\bar{f}$ and $\bar{g}$ have a common factor. As $fg\mid {\Phi }_n$, this would give a repeated factor of $X^n-1$ modulo $\ell$, impossible because its derivative is $n{X}^{n-1}$. Thus ${\zeta }_n^{\ell }$ is conjugate to ${\zeta }_n$. Every positive integer prime to $n$ is a product of such primes, so all primitive nth roots of unity are conjugate. ConsequentlyIn particular the cyclotomic field is an abelian extension. Complex conjugation corresponds to $-1$; for $n>2$ its fixed field is $\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_n+{\zeta }_n^{-1})$, the maximal real subfield, of degree $\phi (n)/2$.

The ring of integers is $\mathbb{Z}[{\zeta }_n]$. One way to see that there is no missing index is to work at each prime $p$. Write $n=p^{a}m$ with $p\nmid m$. The prime-to-$p$ roots of unity have separable reduction; their local factors generate unramified extensions with full integer rings. Over each such factor, adjoining ${\zeta }_{p^a}$ is generated by the Eisenstein polynomial ${\Phi }_{p^a}(1+T)$, with uniformizer ${\zeta }_{p^a}-1$, and hence gives the full integer ring of that totally ramified factor. The coprimality of $p^a$ and $m$ means that ${\zeta }_n$ generates both sets of roots of unity. Thus ${\mathbb{Z}}_p[{\zeta }_n]$ is maximal at every $p$, proving the integral assertion.

The same local description computes ramification and splitting. For $p\nmid n$, the ramification index is one, the residue degree is the multiplicative order of $p$ modulo $n$, and there are $\phi (n)/f$ primes above $p$. If $p\mid n$, put $m=n/p^a$; thenwhere ${\mathrm{ord}}_1(p)=1$. Indeed, the prime-to-$p$ part is unramified, and the $p$-power part is totally ramified by the preceding Eisenstein polynomial. Notice the exception $p=2,a=1$: its ramification index is one, consistently with $\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_{2m})=\mathbb{Q}({\zeta }_m)$ for odd $m$. Thus finite ramification occurs only at the indicated conductor primes, with that exception.

We now prove cyclotomic Artin reciprocity over the rational numbers, using arithmetic Frobenius automorphisms. If $\ell \nmid n$ and $\mathfrak{L}$ lies over $\ell$, then Frobenius sends the reduction of ${\zeta }_n$ to its $\ell$th power. Distinct nth roots of unity remain distinct modulo $\mathfrak{L}$, since $X^n-1$ has separable reduction. Hence the Artin symbol is exactlyExtend multiplicatively to the group $I(n)$ of rational fractional ideals prime to $n$. Such an ideal has a unique positive rational generator $q$ whose numerator and denominator are prime to $n$. The formula isEvery unit residue modulo $n$ has a positive integer representative prime to $n$, so this Artin map is surjective. Its kernel is precisely the subgroup $P_{n\infty }$ generated by positive $q\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}n)$. ThereforeThis proves the Artin reciprocity law for this extension, including its principal-ray kernel. The infinite component of the modulus records positivity and therefore the possible action of complex conjugation.

Expand the translated cyclotomic polynomial:Every nonleading coefficient is divisible by $p$, and the constant term is not divisible by $p^2$. The polynomial is Eisenstein, hence irreducible. Its root $\lambda ={\zeta }_p-1$ is a uniformizer of $E={\mathbb{Q}}_p({\zeta }_p)$, and the Eisenstein polynomial valuation criterion givesThus this local cyclotomic extension is totally ramified.

Realize the two-dimensional irreducible representation $\rho$ as the standard representation of the symmetric group onwith $S_3$ permuting coordinates. It is the complement of the trivial summand in the three-point permutation representation. For each prime the local factor of an Artin L-function iswhere $I_p$ is the inertia group and Frobenius means any lift of the residue-field Frobenius automorphism. On $V^{I_p}$ the lift is independent of that choice. At an unramified prime, put $t=p^{-s}$. The Local Artin factors of the standard representation of S3 areThe polynomial discriminant of $X^3-3$ is $-243=-3^5$, so only $3$ can ramify in its splitting field. For $p\ne 3$, the squarefree factorization of $X^3-3$ modulo $p$ determines the Frobenius cycle type on its roots.

At $p=2$,The quadratic is irreducible, so Frobenius is a transposition andThus $a_2=0$, $a_4=1$ and $a_8=0$. At $p=5$,The quadratic discriminant is $3(\mathrm{mod}5)$, a nonsquare, so this is again a transposition. Consequently $L_5(\rho ,s)=(1-5^{-2s}{)}^{-1}$ and $a_5=0$.

At $p=7$, the possible cubes are $0,1,-1$, so $X^3-3$ has no root modulo $7$. Being cubic, it is irreducible; Frobenius is a three-cycle. Thereforeand $a_7=-1$.

The ramified factor at $3$ must be computed on inertia group invariants. Write $\alpha =3^{1/3}$ and set $\pi =({\zeta }_3-1)/\alpha$. Using $({\zeta }_3-1{)}^2=-3{\zeta }_3$ givesThe Eisenstein polynomial $X^6+3$ over ${\mathbb{Q}}_3$ has degree six, so ${\mathbb{Q}}_3(\pi )$ is a totally ramified degree-six subfield of ${\mathbb{Q}}_3({\zeta }_3,\alpha )$. The latter has degree at most $[F:\mathbb{Q}]=6$, so the fields agree. This Eisenstein sextic presentation of the splitting field of X3 minus 3 over Q3 shows $D_3=I_3=S_3$. Since the only permutation-invariant vectors in ${\mathbb{C}}^3$ have all coordinates equal, their intersection with $V$ is zero. ThusIn particular $a_3=a_9=0$; an unramified degree-two factor at $3$ would give the wrong coefficients.

Finally the Euler product makes its Dirichlet series coefficients multiplicative for coprime indices. Its constant coefficient is $a_1=1$, and $a_6=a_2{a}_3=0$, $a_{10}=a_2{a}_5=0$. Every integer up to ten is now covered, giving

All the local fields here carry normalized discrete valuations. Write ${\mathcal{O}}_F$ for the valuation ring, ${\mathfrak{m}}_F$ for its maximal ideal, and $k_F$ for its residue field. We use the basic degree identity $[B:A]=e(B/A)f(B/A)$ for finite extensions of non-Archimedean local fields, with $e$ the ramification index and $f$ the residue degree.

First construct the maximal unramified subextension of a local field extension inside an arbitrary finite extension $L/K$. Choose a primitive element of a field extension $\bar{z}$ for the finite residue field extension $k_L/k_K$. Let $\bar{h}$ be its monic irreducible minimal polynomial of an algebraic element, of degree $f$, and lift its coefficients to obtain a monic $h\in {\mathcal{O}}_K[T]$ of the same degree. Finite finite fields are perfect fields, so ${\bar{h}}^{\prime }(\bar{z})\ne 0$. By Hensel lemma applied in $L$, there is $z\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$ reducing to $\bar{z}$ with $h(z)=0$. For $U=K(z)$ we haveEvery inequality is therefore an equality. In particular $U/K$ is unramified, $k_U=k_L$, and $h$ is the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $z$.

If $L/K$ is unramified, then $[L:K]=f$, so this construction gives $U=L$. Taking $x=z$ supplies the required generator, and $h^{\prime }(x)$ is a unit. Conversely suppose $L=K(x)$ with $x$ integral and its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $g$ satisfying $g^{\prime }(x)\notin {\mathfrak{m}}_L$. Its coefficients lie in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, since all conjugates of an integral element are integral and $K$ is complete. In the constructed unramified extension $U$ the element $\bar{x}\in k_U=k_L$ is a simple root of $\bar{g}$. Hensel lemma in $U$ produces a root $x^{\prime }\in U$ with residue $\bar{x}$. In $L$ both $x$ and $x^{\prime }$ lift this same simple residue root, so Hensel uniqueness gives $x=x^{\prime }$. Thus $L\subseteq U\subseteq L$, proving

For lifting residue-field embeddings of unramified extensions, use the generator $z$ and polynomial $h$ just constructed when $L/K$ is unramified. Given a $k_K$-field homomorphism $\iota :k_L\to k_M$, its value $\iota (\bar{z})$ is a simple root of $\bar{h}$. Hensel lemma in $M$ produces the unique root $z^{\prime }\in {\mathcal{O}}_M$ with that residue. The assignment $z\mapsto z^{\prime }$ defines a $K$-field homomorphism $K[T]/(h)\to M$; it induces $\iota$ because $\bar{z}$ generates $k_L$. Conversely any such field homomorphism preserves the unique extended valuation, hence induces a residue field homomorphism, and its image of $z$ is uniquely forced by Hensel uniqueness. This proves the asserted bijection. The same proof only requires that $M$ be a non-Archimedean local field containing $K$ with its compatible valuation; its finiteness over $K$ is not essential.

Now set $M=L$. The finite residue field extension has exactly $f=[L:K]$ automorphisms, cyclically generated by $a\mapsto a^{|k_K|}$. Their unique lifts give $[L:K]$ automorphisms of $L$. Consequently $L/K$ is a Galois extension, and reduction identifies its Galois group with that cyclic residue Galois group. Its generator is the arithmetic Frobenius:

For the compositum, choose a uniformizer ${\pi }_M$ of the totally ramified extension $M/K$. The Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension characterization, proved in the next solution, says that $M=K({\pi }_M)$ and its minimal polynomial of an algebraic element is Eisenstein over ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. A uniformizer of $K$ remains a uniformizer in the unramified extension $L$. All its Eisenstein coefficient conditions therefore remain true over ${\mathcal{O}}_L$. Thus the same Eisenstein polynomial is irreducible over $L$ and generates $LM=L({\pi }_M)$ as a totally ramified extension. This proves $LM/L$ is totally ramified, of degree $[M:K]$.

Here is an explicit example showing that the converse decomposition of an arbitrary extension can fail. Take $K={\mathbb{Q}}_3$ and $L=K(i)$ with $i^2=-1$. Since $T^2+1$ is irreducible and separable modulo three, the degree and residue-degree argument above shows that $L/K$ is unramified quadratic. PutThe element $1+i$ is a unit in ${\mathcal{O}}_L$, so $T^2-3(1+i)$ is Eisenstein over $L$. Hence $[N:L]=2$, $e(N/K)=2$, and $f(N/K)=2$. Moreover $i={\alpha }^2/3-1$ gives $N=K(\alpha )$, withWe verify its Galois group, since that is what rules out a totally ramified complement. By Hensel lemma there is $r\in K$ with $r^2=-2$: the residue root $1$ of $T^2+2$ is simple modulo three. Set $\beta =(1+i)/r$. ThenThe assignments $\sigma (i)=-i$ and $\sigma (\alpha )=\beta \alpha$ respect the defining relation, because $(\beta \alpha {)}^2=-3i(1+i)=3(1-i)$. They therefore define a $K$-automorphism of $N$. Its square satisfies ${\sigma }^2(i)=i$ and ${\sigma }^2(\alpha )=\bar{\beta }\beta \alpha =-\alpha$, so $\sigma$ has order four. There are thus four automorphisms of the degree-four extension, andThis is the cyclic quartic local extension without a totally ramified complement. Its unique quadratic subfield is $L$, fixed by ${\sigma }^2$, and is unramified. If $N=L^{\prime }{M}^{\prime }$ with $L^{\prime }/K$ unramified and $M^{\prime }/K$ totally ramified, then $[L^{\prime }:K]\le f(N/K)=2$ and $[M^{\prime }:K]\le e(N/K)=2$. To obtain the full degree four both would have degree two, forcing $M^{\prime }$ to be a totally ramified quadratic subfield. There is no such subfield. Thus $N/{\mathbb{Q}}_3$ is the required counterexample.

Let $d=[L:K]$, with normalized discrete valuations $v_K,v_L$. Suppose first that $L/K$ is totally ramified, so $e(L/K)=d$. Choose a uniformizer $x$ of $L$. The elements $1,x,\dots ,x^{d-1}$ are linearly independent over $K$: the nonzero terms $c_j{x}^j$ in any proposed relation have valuations $d{v}_K(c_j)+j$, distinct modulo $d$, and a sum with a unique least valuation cannot vanish by the ultrametric inequality. Hence $[K(x):K]\ge d$, proving $L=K(x)$.

Extend $v_K$ to an algebraic closure with values in $\mathbb{Q}$. Every conjugate of $x$ has valuation $1/d$, by uniqueness of the extended valuation on finite extensions of the complete field $K$. In its monic minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $g(T)=T^d+a_{d-1}{T}^{d-1}+\cdots +a_0$, the coefficient $a_{d-j}$ is a sum of products of $j$ conjugates, counted with multiplicity. Thus $v_K(a_{d-j})\ge j/d>0$ for $j\ge 1$, so every nonleading coefficient is in ${\mathfrak{m}}_K$. The constant coefficient is the product of all $d$ conjugates, so has valuation exactly one. This proves that $g$ is an Eisenstein polynomial. This argument also works for inseparable finite extensions, since the conjugates can be counted with their multiplicities.

Conversely let $g$ be an Eisenstein polynomial of degree $d$, with root $x$ and $L=K(x)$. The Eisenstein criterion proves irreducibility. For completeness, monic factors would have integral coefficients; their reductions would be positive-degree powers of $T$, so both constant coefficients would be divisible by the uniformizer of $K$, contradicting $v_K(g(0))=1$. To determine the root valuation, put $t=v_K(x)$ in the extended valuation. If $t<0$, the leading term is the unique term of least valuation; if $t=0$, the leading term again has uniquely least valuation zero. Both are impossible. If $t>0$, every nonconstant lower term has valuation at least $1+jt>1$. Cancellation in $g(x)=0$ therefore requires the leading term and constant term to have equal valuation:Since $t=v_L(x)/e(L/K)$ and $v_L(x)$ is a positive integer, $e(L/K)=d{v}_L(x)\ge d$. The opposite inequality follows from $[L:K]=e(L/K)f(L/K)=d$. Hence $e=d$, $f=1$, and $v_L(x)=1$. We have proved both the equivalence and the uniformizer assertion:

Now take $q=p^a$ with $a\ge 1$ and $\zeta ={\zeta }_{p^a}$. The translated cyclotomic polynomial isIn characteristic $p$, putting $U=T^{p^{a-1}}$ reduces this to ${\sum }_{j=0}^{p-1}(1+U{)}^j=U^{p-1}=T^{p^{a-1}(p-1)}$. Its constant coefficient over the integers is $p$. It is therefore Eisenstein at $p$, of degree $d=p^{a-1}(p-1)$. Consequently ${\mathbb{Q}}_p({\zeta }_{p^a})/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$ is totally ramified of degree $d$, with uniformizer ${\zeta }_{p^a}-1$. If $q=1$, the field is simply ${\mathbb{Q}}_p$, a trivial totally ramified extension.

For a general positive integer $n=p^{a}m$ with $p\nmid m$, the field generated by the prime-to-$p$ root of unity ${\zeta }_m$ is unramified. Indeed $T^m-1$ has distinct roots modulo $p$. In a finite unramified field whose residue field contains those roots, Hensel lemma lifts all of them uniquely. Reduction preserves their orders: a prime-to-$p$ root reducing to one must itself be one, by Hensel uniqueness at the root one of $T^m-1$. The arithmetic Frobenius therefore acts as ${\zeta }_m\mapsto {\zeta }_m^p$, and the extension degree is the multiplicative order of $p$ modulo $m$, with degree one when $m=1$.

The identityfollows by taking powers of a primitive nth root of unity and using the coprimality of $p^a,m$ in the opposite direction. The prime-to-$p$ field is unramified and the $p$-power field is totally ramified; unramified base change preserves total ramification proves that their compositum has the same residue degree as the prime-to-$p$ field. Thus the total ramification criterion for local cyclotomic extensions gives the full classification:This includes trivial extensions when $a=0$. For $p=2$ only $m=1$ is possible.

For a finite totally ramified Galois extension $L/K$ with Galois group $G$, define its lower ramification numbering byHere $G_0$ is the inertia group, which equals $G$, and $G_1$ is the wild inertia group. For a uniformizer $\pi$ the condition is equivalent to $v_L(\sigma (\pi )-\pi )\ge i+1$. To justify this uniformizer criterion for lower ramification groups, expand every $b\in {\mathcal{O}}_L$ as a convergent series ${\sum }_{j\ge 0}{c}_j{\pi }^j$ with the coefficients $c_j$ chosen from representatives of $k_K$ in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$. Such an expansion is obtained by successive subtraction of a residue representative and division by $\pi$, since total ramification gives $k_L=k_K$. The automorphism fixes each $c_j$, and $\sigma (\pi {)}^j-{\pi }^j$ is divisible by $\sigma (\pi )-\pi$. Thus the required valuation bound for $\pi$ implies it for every $b$, including the limit by completeness.

For $L={\mathbb{Q}}_p({\zeta }_{p^a})$, all primitive conjugates lie in $L$ and the Eisenstein degree is $\phi (p^a)$. HenceIf ${\sigma }_b\ne 1$, put $s=v_p(b-1)$, so $0\le s<a$. The element ${\zeta }^{b-1}$ is a primitive $p^{a-s}$th root of unity. Applying the already proved uniformizer result to its field, and multiplying its valuation by the ramification index of $L$ over that field, givesThe identity automorphism has infinite valuation. Therefore the lower ramification filtration of a prime-power cyclotomic extension is explicitlyThe order of the middle group is $p^{a-j}$. At odd $p$, $G_0/G_1$ has order $p-1$; at $p=2$, the condition $b\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}2)$ is automatic, so $G_0=G_1$ when $a\ge 2$. The case $p=2,a=1$ has trivial Galois group, and the displayed formula remains valid. For $a=0$ all groups are trivial. The valuation calculation also provides the upper ramification numbering, if desired, by integrating the reciprocal indices with the Herbrand function; no change of numbering is implicit in the displayed answer.

Fix a non-Archimedean local field $K$, write $Q=|k_K|$, and use the arithmetic Frobenius normalization throughout: a uniformizer maps to the automorphism inducing $a\mapsto a^Q$ on the maximal unramified extension. The Local Artin map, or local reciprocity map, is the canonical continuous group homomorphismwhere $K^{\mathrm{ab}}$ is the maximal abelian extension inside a fixed algebraic closure with its separable part understood. Its finite projection to every finite abelian extension $L/K$ is onto and has kernel exactly the norm subgroup of a local field extension:In particular, the quotient has order $[L:K]$. This is how local class field theory turns abelian extension problems into computations inside a multiplicative group.

One precise definition of the finite reciprocity map uses the cup-product construction of local reciprocity. For a finite Galois extension with group $G$, the local fundamental class $u_{L/K}\in H^2(G,L^{\times })$ is specified by local Brauer invariant $1/[L:K]$. Cup product gives an isomorphismThe finite Local Artin map is its inverse, composed with the quotient map from $K^{\times }$. For abelian $G$ the target is $G$ itself. Taking the compatible inverse limit over finite abelian extensions defines ${\mathrm{Art}}_K$.

The essential inputs to this cohomological construction have concrete arithmetic content. The local Brauer invariant identifies $\mathrm{Br}(K)$ with $\mathbb{Q}/\mathbb{Z}$; restriction to $L$ multiplies the invariant by $[L:K]$, so its kernel is cyclic of that order and has the distinguished generator $u_{L/K}$. For every subgroup $H\subseteq G$, Hilbert theorem 90 gives $H^1(H,L^{\times })=0$, while the same invariant calculation over the fixed field gives $H^2(H,L^{\times })$ cyclic of order $|H|$. These are the hypotheses of the algebraic cup-product isomorphism in Tate cohomology of a finite group. It is obtained by dimension shifting in group cohomology with a projective resolution of the trivial module and the extension representing the fundamental class. Thus the norm-kernel statement comes from the degree-zero definition of Tate cohomology of a finite group, rather than from an arbitrary assignment of an automorphism to each element. In an unramified extension of degree $d$, the fundamental class is the cyclic algebra with arithmetic Frobenius generator and parameter a uniformizer; the isomorphism sends that Frobenius to the class of the uniformizer. This explains the chosen sign of reciprocity.

Several properties follow immediately from this construction. If $L\supseteq E\supseteq K$ are finite abelian extensions, restricting ${\mathrm{Art}}_{L/K}(a)$ to $E$ gives ${\mathrm{Art}}_{E/K}(a)$. The Local Artin map is therefore compatible with the finite projections defining its infinite target. For any finite separable extension $E/K$ and $a\in E^{\times }$, its norm compatibility isHere $K^{\mathrm{ab}}E/E$ is abelian, so the displayed restriction makes sense. An outline of the compatibility proof is to use the corestriction map in group cohomology: on multiplicative coefficients its degree-zero map is the norm. The cup-product projection formula, together with restriction and corestriction of the local fundamental class, gives exactly the commuting reciprocity diagram. The compatibility is an arithmetic instance of the functoriality of the cohomological definition.

The Local Artin map has dense image, because every finite abelian quotient receives a surjective map. Its kernel is trivial, and it extends to an isomorphismwhere this profinite completion uses the open finite-index subgroups of the topological multiplicative group. The original map is generally not onto: on the unramified quotient it sends the integer valuation into $\hat{\mathbb{Z}}$, rather than producing every profinite integer. Its units map onto the abelian inertia group. For a finite abelian extension, the corresponding unit image is its inertia group, while the valuation accounts for its residue extension. Indeed $v_K(Nz)=f(L/K)v_L(z)$, so the valuation quotient has order $f$; the full norm quotient has order $ef$, leaving unit image of order $e$. Since unit images act trivially on the residue field, they give precisely the inertia group. More finely, the image of the higher principal-unit group $1+{\mathfrak{m}}_K^r$ in a finite abelian extension is its rth upper ramification group, for each integer $r\ge 1$. The use of upper ramification numbering is essential for compatibility with quotients.

The existence theorem of local class field theory states that every open finite-index subgroup $H\subseteq K^{\times }$ is $N_{L/K}(L^{\times })$ for a unique finite abelian extension $L/K$. Inclusions are reversed: larger extensions have smaller norm subgroups. In the established reciprocity isomorphism, the proof is simply to take the fixed field of the open subgroup corresponding to $H$. Conversely a finite extension gives an open kernel of a finite continuous projection. Uniqueness follows because that kernel specifies its fixed field. The substantive existence problem is therefore to prove that the reciprocity isomorphism realizes all open finite-index subgroups; it is not just this final fixed-field argument.

The Lubin–Tate description of local reciprocity provides an explicit route to that existence problem. Choose a uniformizer $\pi$ and a Lubin–Tate series $f(T)=\pi T+T^Q$, with its associated Lubin–Tate formal group $F$. Solving $f(F(X,Y))=F(f(X),f(Y))$ successively by total degree constructs the law with linear part $X+Y$; the analogous equations construct the endomorphisms $[a]$ with linear coefficient $a$. The congruence $f(T)\equiv T^Q(\mathrm{mod}\pi )$ supplies the divisibility needed at each step. These endomorphisms satisfy $[a][b]=[ab]$ and make the torsion an ${\mathcal{O}}_K$-module.

If $f_r$ denotes the rfold iterate, the primitive level-r Lubin–Tate torsion points are roots ofReduction modulo $\pi$ is $T^{Q^{r-1}(Q-1)}$, and the constant term is $\pi$, so this is an Eisenstein polynomial. Its roots therefore generate a totally ramified extension $K_{\pi ,r}$ of degree $(Q-1)Q^{r-1}$. A primitive point generates the entire torsion module, and all points are its images under the integral convergent endomorphisms $[a]$. The torsion field is therefore a Galois extension of $K$. The action map into $({\mathcal{O}}_K/{\pi }^r{)}^{\times }$ is injective, and the computed degree equals the order of this unit group, proving it is an isomorphism. Passing to the inverse limit gives $\mathrm{Gal}(K_{\pi }/K)\simeq {\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$ for the Lubin–Tate tower $K_{\pi }$.

The unramified tower and $K_{\pi }$ are linearly disjoint field extensions: a finite common subextension would be both unramified and totally ramified, hence trivial. The Lubin–Tate description of local reciprocity on their compositum isThe inverse on the unit action goes with the arithmetic Frobenius convention; changing to geometric Frobenius inverts the whole reciprocity map. The reciprocity theorem identifies this explicit action with the finite cup-product maps, independently of the chosen uniformizer. Its proof compares the fundamental class with the norm relations between consecutive torsion fields. The construction makes the possible finite kernels concrete: on the compositum of the degree-d unramified field with $K_{\pi ,r}$ the kernel isThese subgroups are cofinal among open finite-index subgroups. Indeed any such $H$ contains $1+{\pi }^r{\mathcal{O}}_K$ for sufficiently large $r$, and contains ${\pi }^d$ for some positive $d$, since the class of $\pi$ in $K^{\times }/H$ has finite order. Taking the appropriate fixed subgroup in this explicit finite compositum realizes $H$. This proves the open-subgroup part of existence once the norm compatibility of the explicit and cohomological constructions is established. Together with the finite reciprocity maps it also shows that $K^{\mathrm{ab}}=K^{\mathrm{nr}}{K}_{\pi }$.

As a direct check, on a finite unramified extension the construction reduces toThe earlier elementary unit-norm proof shows its kernel is exactly ${\pi }^{d\mathbb{Z}}{\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$. At $K={\mathbb{Q}}_p$, the Lubin–Tate cyclotomic example takes $[p](T)=(1+T{)}^p-1$ and $F(X,Y)=X+Y+XY$. Its torsion is $\zeta -1$, so a unit $u$ acts by $\zeta \mapsto {\zeta }^{u^{-1}}$. These examples exhibit both the valuation and unit parts of local reciprocity with consistent signs.

False. This is an example of integral trace need not imply integrality. Take $K={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\theta )$ with ${\theta }^2=p$, the splitting field of $X^2-p$. Its two conjugates are $\theta ,-\theta$, and its normalized discrete valuation satisfies $v_K(\theta )=1$, $v_K(p)=2$, by the Eisenstein polynomial criterion. Forthe field trace is zero, but $v_K(x)=-1$. Therefore $x$ is not in the valuation ring, despite having integral field trace. Cancellation in a sum of conjugates explains why a field trace test fails.

The polynomial is Eisenstein at every prime number $p$, so a polynomial root $\alpha$ generates a totally ramified cubic field $F/{\mathbb{Q}}_p$. The splitting-field Galois group is a transitive subgroup of $S_3$, hence $C_3$ or $S_3$. Its polynomial discriminant isThe product of the three polynomial root differences is a square root of $\Delta$, transformed by the sign of the polynomial root permutation. Thus the group is $C_3$ exactly when $\Delta$ is a square, and otherwise it is $S_3$. In the latter case the splitting field isIndeed adjoining one polynomial root leaves a quadratic factor, whose polynomial discriminant is $\Delta /f^{\prime }(\alpha {)}^2$, so the square root of $\Delta$ supplies its remaining polynomial roots.

Suppose first that $p>3$. The unit $-(4p+27)$ reduces to $-27$, and Hensel's lemma makes it a square exactly when $-3$ is a square modulo $p$. Quadratic reciprocity givesIf $p\equiv 1(\mathrm{mod}3)$, the field generated by $\alpha$ is already the cyclic splitting field, totally ramified of degree three. If $p\equiv 2(\mathrm{mod}3)$, the nonsquare unit gives an unramified quadratic field $E={\mathbb{Q}}_p(\sqrt{\Delta })$. Since $F$ and $E$ have coprime degrees, $[FE:{\mathbb{Q}}_p]=6$. Its residue degree is at least two and its ramification index at least three; their product is six, so they are exactly two and three. Thus its inertia group is the normal $C_3$ inside $S_3$.