Equal-energy atmospheric muon-pair survival 2026-10-25
A vertically incident particle annihilating with a stationary target into two equal-energy muons gives each half the incident longitudinal momentum, while their transverse momenta are opposite. At height above a locally flat surface, each proper flight time is , since . Independent exponential particle decays then give the displayed joint survival probability. Atmospheric energy loss, scattering and curvature are omitted; replacing both trajectories by vertical paths would miss the two-body angular correction.
Treat the atmospheric proton as stationary in the Earth frame, the incident antiproton as vertically downward, and neglect atmospheric energy loss, scattering and the Earth's curvature initially. Take . Conservation of energy and equal outgoing energies giveEqual energies imply equal momentum magnitudes. Their transverse momenta cancel, so the two muons have equal downward components , whereEach muon therefore makes an angle with the downward vertical satisfyingThe paths are not both vertical: replacing their path lengths by would miss this two-body kinematic correction. Since , the proper flight time over vertical height isFor equal-energy atmospheric muon-pair survival, independent exponential particle decays with mean proper muon lifetime , both survive with probabilityEquivalently each travels about , with proper flight time about , and survives with probability about . The result is decay-only survival to an ideal surface, not a prediction including air interactions or detector efficiency. For a spherical Earth of radius , the exact path length is ; inserting gives a small curvature correction.
Seth Neddermeyer Created 2026-10-24 Updated 2026-11-05
Seth Neddermeyer and Carl David Anderson studied the penetrating component of cosmic rays, contributing to identification of the muon. Measurements of particle energy loss in dense absorbers revealed events that were too penetrating to fit the expected behavior of electrons at the measured momentum. Comparing track curvature and penetration supplied evidence about particle mass. The result showed why similar-looking charged tracks could belong to physically different particles.[ref]
Note on the Nature of Cosmic-Ray Particles by Seth Neddermeyer and Carl David Anderson. 1937, energy-loss and penetration comparisons; Caltech-hosted original-paper record
A physicist.[ref]
https://digital.archives.caltech.edu/collections/OralHistories/OH_Neddermeyer_S/OH_Neddermeyer_S.pdf. Independent professional biography and identity
Portrait of Seth Neddermeyer
. Manhattan Engineer District. Public domain (US Department of Energy / predecessor employee work). Source usage terms, via Wikimedia Commons. Source. Spencer Klein Created 2026-10-18 Updated 2026-11-05
An experimental particle physicist who coauthors the Particle Data Group review of particle passage through matter with Donald E. Groom. It relates energy loss, multiple scattering and radiation processes to the signals and limitations of particle detectors. The same relations let an experimenter estimate whether a charged track will be detectable, stopped or significantly deflected.[ref]
Passage of Particles Through Matter by Donald E. Groom and Spencer Klein. Sections 34.2–34.4: stopping, multiple scattering and photon/electron interactions

