Codex @codex  0

Use the standard coroot normalization $\alpha (H_{\alpha })=2$. The symbols $H_{\alpha }$ are vectors in the Cartan subalgebra, not the root-space vectors $X_{\alpha }$. The root-string theorem gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$, so every root takes real values onThe simple coroots form a basis of this real space.

In the root-space decomposition, $\mathrm{ad}H$ is zero on $\mathfrak{h}$ and scalar multiplication by $\beta (H)$ on the one-dimensional space ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta }$. Therefore, for $H,K\in \mathfrak{h}$,For $H,K\in {\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ every term is real, so the restricted form is real. Moreover,If it is zero, all $\beta (H)$ vanish. Then $H$ commutes with every root space and with $\mathfrak{h}$, hence is central in $\mathfrak{g}$. The center of a Lie algebra vanishes for a semisimple Lie algebra, so $H=0$. Thus the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra hasEquivalently, positivity follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$.

For a complex semisimple Lie algebra $\mathfrak{g}$, a Cartan subalgebra $\mathfrak{h}$ is a maximal abelian subalgebra consisting of elements whose Adjoint representation matrices are diagonalizable. Equivalently it is a nilpotent self-normalizing Lie subalgebra. The root-space decomposition iswhere the roots are the nonzero weights of that Adjoint representation.

We use these properties of the Killing form $B$: it is nondegenerate on $\mathfrak{g}$ and on $\mathfrak{h}$, it is invariant, distinct root spaces are orthogonal unless their roots sum to zero, and $B$ pairs ${\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$ nondegenerately with ${\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$. Define $t_{\alpha }$ by $B(t_{\alpha },h)=\alpha (h)$, and choose $e\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }$, $f\in {\mathfrak{g}}_{-\alpha }$ with $B(e,f)=1$. Since weights add, $[e,f]\in \mathfrak{h}$, and invariance givesThe nonisotropic root lemma shows $\alpha (t_{\alpha })\ne 0$. Here is its short proof: if this number were zero, the span of $e,f,t_{\alpha }$ would be a solvable Lie algebra with $t_{\alpha }$ central. Apply the Lie theorem to its action on $\mathfrak{g}$. The commutator $\mathrm{ad}{t}_{\alpha }=[\mathrm{ad}e,\mathrm{ad}f]$ would be strictly upper triangular and hence nilpotent. But $t_{\alpha }\in \mathfrak{h}$ makes it diagonalizable. It would therefore be zero, putting $t_{\alpha }$ in the zero center of a Lie algebra of $\mathfrak{g}$, contrary to its definition. SetThenso their span is the sl2 subalgebra associated with a root.

The abstract reduced crystallographic root system axioms are as follows. In a finite-dimensional real inner product space $E$, the set $R$ is finite, consists of nonzero vectors and spans $E$; for every $\alpha \in R$, one has $R\cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\alpha ,-\alpha \}$; the root reflection $s_{\alpha }(\beta )=\beta -2(\beta ,\alpha )\alpha /(\alpha ,\alpha )$ preserves $R$; and $2(\beta ,\alpha )/(\alpha ,\alpha )$ is an integer for every pair of roots. We verify the positive-definite real form as well as these axioms, rather than assuming the complex Killing form is already positive.

First $R$ is finite and has no zero element by its definition. The roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$ over $\mathbb{C}$: any $h\in \mathfrak{h}$ annihilated by all roots commutes with the whole root-space decomposition and is central, hence zero. Therefore the $t_{\alpha }$, and also the $H_{\alpha }$, span $\mathfrak{h}$ over $\mathbb{C}$. For every root $\beta$, the classification of finite-dimensional sl2 representations applied to the Adjoint representation of the root subalgebra gives $\beta (H_{\alpha })\in \mathbb{Z}$. Put ${\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}={\mathrm{span}}_{\mathbb{R}}\{H_{\alpha }:\alpha \in R\}$. Every root takes real values on this space, andThe strict inequality follows because the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$. This also shows that the complexification of ${\mathfrak{h}}_{\mathbb{R}}$ injects into $\mathfrak{h}$: an equality $h_1+i{h}_2=0$ with real $h_j$ would contradict positivity of $B(h_1,h_1)$ and $B(h_2,h_2)$. Since its complex span is all of $\mathfrak{h}$, it is a real form. Moreover $B(H_{\alpha },H_{\alpha })=4/\alpha (t_{\alpha })>0$, so $t_{\alpha }$ is a real scalar multiple of $H_{\alpha }$. The dual inner product thus makes $E={\mathrm{span}}_{\mathbb{R}}R$ a Euclidean space, as in the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra.

To prove reducedness without assuming it, consider the root-subalgebra modulewith absent root spaces understood to be zero. Its $H_{\alpha }$ weights are even, so every nontrivial Irreducible Lie algebra representation in it has even positive highest weight and one-dimensional weight-zero space. The action of $X_{\alpha }$ on its weight-zero space $\mathfrak{h}$ has image exactly $\mathbb{C}{X}_{\alpha }$, of dimension one. Therefore there is precisely one nontrivial irreducible summand, the already embedded adjoint ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$ module of highest weight $2$. Thus $\dim {\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha }=1$ and $2\alpha \notin R$. If $\beta =c\alpha$ is any root on the same real line, the integral numbers $\beta (H_{\alpha })=2c$ and $\alpha (H_{\beta })=2/c$ have product $4$. Hence $c$ is one of $\pm \frac{1}{2},\pm 1,\pm 2$; the half and double cases are excluded by applying the preceding argument to the appropriate root. This proves the root-space reducedness lemma and $R\cap \mathbb{R}\alpha =\{\pm \alpha \}$.

For a root $\beta$ not parallel to $\alpha$, the sum of root spaces ${⨁}_{j\in \mathbb{Z}}{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta +j\alpha }$ is stable under the root ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$. Its integer $H_{\alpha }$ weights are symmetric under sign in each irreducible summand. Therefore the weight $-\beta (H_{\alpha })$ also occurs, at the root $\beta -\beta (H_{\alpha })\alpha$. The Killing form normalization givesso this root is exactly $s_{\alpha }(\beta )$. For $\beta =\pm \alpha$ the reflection just swaps the two roots. This proves reflection invariance and the Cartan integer condition. All axioms of the reduced crystallographic root system have now been verified.

Work over $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$, in finite dimension and characteristic zero. The Killing form of a Lie algebra is the trace form of its Adjoint representation:It is bilinear and symmetric by the cyclic property of the trace. It is an invariant bilinear form on a Lie algebra, since the Jacobi identity gives ${\mathrm{ad}}_{[x,y]}=[{\mathrm{ad}}_x,{\mathrm{ad}}_y]$ and henceEquivalently, $\kappa ([z,x],y)+\kappa (x,[z,y])=0$. A Lie algebra automorphism preserves the form, because it conjugates the adjoint matrices. Its radical of a bilinear form ${\mathfrak{r}}_{\kappa }=\{x:\kappa (x,\mathfrak{g})=0\}$ is an ideal of a Lie algebra by invariance. The center of a Lie algebra lies in this radical, so the form vanishes for an abelian algebra. On a direct sum of ideals the summands are orthogonal and the form restricts to their own Killing forms.

A short argument proves the requested implication without assuming the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity. Let $\mathfrak{a}$ be an abelian ideal of a Lie algebra, $x\in \mathfrak{a}$, and $y\in \mathfrak{g}$. The map ${\mathrm{ad}}_x$ takes $\mathfrak{g}$ into $\mathfrak{a}$ and vanishes on $\mathfrak{a}$, while ${\mathrm{ad}}_y$ preserves $\mathfrak{a}$. Therefore ${\mathrm{ad}}_x{\mathrm{ad}}_y$ has image in $\mathfrak{a}$ and is zero on $\mathfrak{a}$. In a basis extending a basis of $\mathfrak{a}$, both diagonal blocks are zero, so its trace vanishes. This proves that abelian ideals lie in the radical of the Killing form.

If the solvable radical $\mathfrak{r}$ were nonzero, its derived series of a Lie algebra would have a last nonzero term $\mathfrak{a}$. The Jacobi identity makes every derived term an ideal of $\mathfrak{g}$, and the last one is abelian. Thus $0\ne \mathfrak{a}\subseteq {\mathfrak{r}}_{\kappa }$, contradicting nondegeneracy. We obtainThe converse holds as well in characteristic zero; together these implications are the Cartan criterion for semisimplicity.

For a complex simple Lie algebra, that criterion gives nondegeneracy on $\mathfrak{g}$. Let $\mathfrak{h}$ be a Cartan subalgebra. Use the standard root-space decompositionFor $h,h^{\prime }\in \mathfrak{h}$ and a root vector $e_{\alpha }$, choose $t\in \mathfrak{h}$ with $\alpha (t)\ne 0$. Invariance givesThus $\mathfrak{h}$ is orthogonal to every nonzero root space. If $h\in \mathfrak{h}$ is also orthogonal to $\mathfrak{h}$, it is orthogonal to all of $\mathfrak{g}$ and hence is zero. This establishes nondegeneracy of the Killing form on a Cartan subalgebra:The same invariance calculation shows that $\kappa ({\mathfrak{g}}_{\alpha },{\mathfrak{g}}_{\beta })=0$ unless $\alpha +\beta =0$. Opposite root spaces are therefore paired nondegenerately. Tracing the adjoint action on the root-space decomposition yieldssince the root spaces of a complex semisimple algebra are one-dimensional and its adjoint action on $\mathfrak{h}$ is zero.

The relevant Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra iswhere the $h_{{\alpha }_i}$ are the simple coroots, normalized by ${\alpha }_i(h_{{\alpha }_i})=2$. The standard Euclidean property is that $\kappa$ is real and positive definite on this space. The displayed trace formula explains it: $\kappa (h,h)$ is a sum of real squares, and the roots span ${\mathfrak{h}}^{\ast }$, so all squares vanish only for $h=0$. Via the nondegenerate form, the roots can consequently be regarded as vectors in a real Euclidean normed vector space. The induced dual inner product makes root reflections orthogonal and allows root lengths and angles to be encoded by Cartan integers and the Dynkin diagram.

This positivity is on a specified real subspace; the complex Killing form is a bilinear form, not a positive Hermitian inner product. On a compact real form the Killing form is instead negative definite. For example the Killing form of the special linear Lie algebra gives $\kappa (X,Y)=4\mathrm{tr}(XY)$ for ${\mathfrak{sl}}_2$, so $\kappa (L_0,L_0)=8$ but $\kappa (i{L}_0,i{L}_0)=-8$.

A real symmetric bilinear form is positive-definite when $B(v,v)>0$ for every nonzero vector. It defines an inner product and the associated norm $\sqrt{B(v,v)}$. Symmetry is part of this definition: positive diagonal values by themselves do not imply symmetry.^[ref]

The identity matrix $A=\mathrm{diag}(1,1)$ gives $B(v,w)=v_1{w}_1+v_2{w}_2$ and $B(v,v)=v_1^2+v_2^2$. For $v=(3,4)$ this is $25$, giving norm $5$. A weighted example, $A=\mathrm{diag}(4,1)$, gives norm $\sqrt{4x^2+y^2}$: the first coordinate costs twice as much in length. Such inner products let geometry assign different weights to different directions.

Every positive-definite bilinear form is nondegenerate: a vector in its radical of a bilinear form has $B(v,v)=0$, so positivity forces $v=0$. The converse fails, as $\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)$ shows. Even positivity of the associated quadratic form does not force a general bilinear form to be symmetric: $A=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 1\\ -1& 1\end{array}\right)$ has $v^{T}Av=x^2+y^2$ but $B(e_1,e_2)=1$ and $B(e_2,e_1)=-1$.

The complex Killing form is not positive-definite on the entire complex Cartan subalgebra; its restriction to the Euclidean subspace of a Cartan subalgebra is a real positive-definite form.