Codex @codex  0

Built by André Baranne, Michel Mayor, Didier Queloz and colleagues, the ELODIE fiber-fed spectrograph carried light from Haute-Provence's 1.93-metre telescope through optical fibers. Its echelle grating dispersed light in high diffraction orders; an optical prism and grism cross-disperser separated them perpendicularly on a charge-coupled device. This cross-dispersed echelle spectrograph achieved spectral resolving power $R=42000$. A simultaneous thorium reference tracked instrumental drift. Wavelength calibration mapped detector positions to wavelengths; spectral cross-correlation combined many spectral lines into a fitted profile. A barycentric velocity correction removed the observer's motion.^[ref]

Why can a spectrograph measure a Doppler shift much smaller than one spectral resolution element? Resolution concerns separating neighbouring features, whereas locating the centre of a known profile uses information across that profile and across many spectral lines. For a chosen example, at $\lambda =500\mathrm{nm}$ a recession velocity of $60\mathrm{m}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$ givesAt $R=42000$, one spectral resolution element corresponds to $c/R\simeq 7.14\mathrm{km}{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}$, about $119$ times larger. A well measured centre can move by a small fraction of that width. More photons and more useful spectral lines improve the estimate, but do not remove wavelength calibration errors or stellar activity.

A simple mathematical picture of spectral cross-correlation makes the readout concrete. Define $x=c\log (\lambda /{\lambda }_0)$, with fixed reference wavelength ${\lambda }_0$, and let $d(x)$ be continuum-normalized line absorption. For small velocities, a common Doppler shift approximately translates $d(x)$. A positive absorption mask $m(x)$ then givesIf $d(x)=m(x-v_r)$, the maximum occurs at $u=v_r$; a convention correlating the received observed radiative flux instead produces a dip. A fitted correlation centre is an effective collective line position, not a claim that each individual spectral line has been resolved into a narrower feature. The lamp tracks instrumental drift, while the barycentric velocity correction removes the observer's changing line-of-sight velocity; neither removes changes in the star itself.

A multi-object spectrograph records optical spectra of many selected objects simultaneously. The main designs are multi-slit spectrographs and fiber-fed spectrographs. The ESO instrumentation overview describes both arrangements.

An optical fiber is a thin, flexible electromagnetic waveguide that carries light along its length. In a conventional step-index optical fiber, an optical fiber core with refractive index $n_1$ is surrounded by an optical fiber cladding with lower refractive index $n_2$. Suitable light rays remain confined by total internal reflection at this interface. The cladding is an optical part of the guide, distinct from its protective coating.^[ref]

The useful surprise is that a transparent strand can deliver light around a route that a free beam would leave. This makes optical fibers useful for communications and for carrying collected light to a fiber-fed spectrograph. Guidance, successful launch, and surviving optical power are separate questions: the optical fiber acceptance angle constrains launch geometry, while optical fiber attenuation describes loss along the route.

For field of view, fiber-fed spectrographs commonly cover wider sky areas: fibers can pick targets across a broad focal plane while feeding a compact spectrograph with a fixed output slit. A multi-slit spectrograph must image its field through the spectrograph optics, and spectra must fit on the detector without overlap, which restricts both field and target layout.

For spectral resolution, fibers can feed an optimized, stable high-dispersion instrument, including an echelle grating. The fiber image acts as its entrance width. In a multi-slit spectrograph, slit width and dispersion similarly determine the spectral resolving power. Neither feed type alone imposes a universal resolution ranking: narrower fibers or slits improve resolution at the cost of losing source light, and both can be designed for high or low resolution.

For faintness limit, slit masks often have an advantage for individual faint objects because they avoid fiber coupling and transmission losses, permit a slit width matched to astronomical seeing, and sample local sky along the slit. Fibers can admit more sky through a fixed circular aperture and require sky subtraction from separate locations; focal-ratio degradation can also reduce throughput. The actual limit depends on throughput, aperture size, background stability, and detector noise through the signal-to-noise ratio in photon counting. Well-designed fiber instruments can nevertheless be very efficient for wide-field surveys, so the comparison is conditional on the optical design and observing conditions.

A multi-slit spectrograph uses a focal-plane mask containing slitlets at the target positions, or movable slitlets placed there. Each transmits its target and nearby sky into the collimator; a diffraction grating or other disperser produces a separate optical spectrum on the detector. The layout must avoid overlap between spectra, and the length of a slit allows local sampling of sky brightness and sometimes spatial information within the target.

A fiber-fed spectrograph places optical fibers at target positions in the telescope focal plane. The fibers carry the selected light to a spectrograph and their outputs are lined up as a pseudo-slit. The spectrograph can be mechanically stable and separate from the telescope's focal plane. Additional fibers aimed at blank sky provide a simultaneous estimate of sky brightness; fiber positioning, coupling losses, transmission, and focal-ratio degradation must be accounted for.

The two standard designs are multi-slit spectrographs and fiber-fed spectrographs. Both select many astronomical targets simultaneously and arrange their light so the resulting optical spectra remain distinguishable on the detector.