Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2008 ii Paper 1 20G a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-24
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 24 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The inverse different is the trace-dual latticeThe integral closure is finite free over the complete discrete valuation ring . Choose an integral basis and use the nondegenerate trace pairing to form its dual basis over . This exhibits as a full, finite -lattice. It is stable under multiplication by , because for , and bounded denominators make it a fractional ideal of . Integral elements have integral field traces, so . A nonzero fractional ideal of a discrete valuation ring is invertible; its inverse is consequently an integral ideal, the different ideal .
Assume now , with monic separable minimal polynomial of degree . Lagrange interpolation at its distinct roots givesIndeed, these are the leading coefficients in the interpolation formula for . For any element of , this trace is the coefficient of in its degree-less-than- representative modulo . The resulting pairing on the basis is integral and unimodular: reversing the order of one basis makes its matrix triangular with diagonal ones, since entries vanish when the exponent sum is less than . Thus it identifies with its full -dual. Translating back to the trace pairing proves
For a totally ramified extension of degree , any uniformizer is an Eisenstein generator of a totally ramified extension, and . To see the latter equality, use the common residue field to expand an integral element in powers of with digits from ; reduce powers using its Eisenstein polynomial and take limits in the finite complete -module generated by . Write that polynomial as , with for . When , the derivative's leading term has valuation , while every other nonzero derivative term has valuation at least . There can be no cancellation of the unique smallest term. Therefore
For the prime-power p-adic cyclotomic extension, put and . Modulo , the shifted cyclotomic polynomial is , while its constant term is , not a multiple of . It is therefore Eisenstein, so is a uniformizer and . Fromwe obtain, by differentiating the numerator at ,The denominator is a primitive- root of unity minus one and has -valuation . The different exponent is consequently , givingThis includes : the extension is trivial and its different exponent is zero.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2014 iii Paper 24 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
The idele group is the multiplicative restricted productwith respect to at the finite places of a number field; is the completion of a valued field at the place . Thus each tuple has nonzero components, and all but finitely many finite components are units. Its restricted product topology on the idele group has basic open sets , where is finite and contains the infinite places, and each is open in . In particular is an open subgroup.
Embed diagonally. Take a neighbourhood of one whose finite components all lie in and whose infinite components satisfy in the usual real or complex modulus. A diagonal element there is an algebraic unit . If , then is a nonzero algebraic integer, so its field norm is a nonzero integer. Buta contradiction. Thus is discrete. It is also closed: in a topological group, a subgroup with an isolated identity cannot have an external accumulation point, since quotients of two nearby subgroup elements would approach the identity.
Send an idele to its associated fractional ideal byOnly finitely many exponents are nonzero. This homomorphism is onto, by choosing powers of local uniformizers, and its kernel is . Diagonal elements map to principal fractional ideals. The resulting quotient givesIt is a topological isomorphism when the ideal class group is given the discrete topology, since is open.
Use normalized local moduli: real modulus, squared complex modulus, and at a finite place. The idelic modulus defines , the norm-one idele group. The product formula puts inside this kernel. Every ideal class has a representative in , because an infinite component can be rescaled to correct the modulus without altering its fractional ideal. The compact space therefore maps continuously onto the discrete ideal class group. Its image must be finite, proving is finite.
For the Dirichlet unit theorem, put and . Let count real embeddings and count conjugate complex pairs. Infinite logarithms define a continuous surjectionusing at real places and at complex places. Its kernel is compact: it consists of real signs, complex unit circles, and the product of compact finite-place unit groups. More generally the inverse image of a bounded closed subset of is compact. Since is closed and discrete, its intersection with each such inverse image is finite. Hence is discrete in , and the kernel is a finite group. It is exactly the roots of unity , since every element of a finite multiplicative group has finite order and every root of unity has all local moduli one.
The image of in is an open subgroup, hence also closed, and is homeomorphic to . The assumed compactness therefore makes compact, and its continuous quotient is compact. A discrete cocompact subgroup of a real vector space is a full Euclidean lattice, of rank . Thus , and lifting a lattice basis splits off the free factor:This derives both finiteness and the unit rank from the stated compactness assumption, rather than assuming either conclusion to prove compactness.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 28 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
For a finite extension of number fields, the inverse different is the fractional idealThe different ideal is its inverse. The trace pairing is nondegenerate because extensions of number fields are separable, so this definition gives a full fractional ideal. The inclusion shows that is integral.
Write its prime ideal factorization as . For above , with ramification index and residue characteristic , the different exponent and tame ramification theorem saysThe equivalence uses the separability of finite residue-field extensions. In particular, precisely at unramified prime ideals; in the wild case . This theorem does not require a Galois extension. The relative discriminant is the norm of the different ideal:For , this gives .
Now take and . For any prime number , the square-free integer hypothesis makes an Eisenstein polynomial at . It is therefore irreducible, and is a pure cubic number field of degree . Since is an algebraic integer, is an order in a number field. The discriminant of elements of a number field for its basis isFor example, the resultant of and is , and the degree-three sign in the polynomial discriminant is negative. If , the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice givesOnly prime numbers dividing can therefore divide .
For , the Eisenstein polynomial gives a totally ramified extension of of degree . Thus has a unique prime ideal above , with ramification index and residue-field degree . Since , this is tame ramification, and the different exponent and tame ramification theorem gives . Hence . Comparing with in the discriminant-index formula for an integral lattice yields .
At , use the shifted Eisenstein polynomial of :Because , the constant term is divisible by . Moreover,when : the factors and cannot both be divisible by . The hypotheses therefore give , so the translated polynomial is an Eisenstein polynomial at . The resulting completion is a totally ramified extension of degree , with residue-field degree , and its ramification index is divisible by the residue characteristic. Thus its different exponent is at least .
It follows that . But , soforces and . No prime number divides . We have proved the integral basis of a nonexceptional pure cubic field:Using local Eisenstein polynomials here only establishes the local ramification indices; it does not assume that is already the full ring of integers of a number field.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2015 iii Paper 28 4 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-06
Here a divisor is a modulus of a number field, rather than an arbitrary real-weighted divisor. Writewhere is a nonzero integral ideal, the finite multiplicities are nonnegative integers, and is a set of real Archimedean places. The multiplicity of a place in a modulus is at the finite place corresponding to , is at a real place in , and is at every other infinite place. In particular complex places have multiplicity .
Let be the group of nonzero fractional ideals prime to . PutLet consist of the principal ideals with . The generalized ideal class group is the ray class groupLet be the unit group, let be the group of ray units, and define the residue and signature group of a modulusThe first factor is omitted when . There is a group homomorphism recording the unit's finite residues and its signs. Its kernel is .
Let consist of all principal fractional ideals prime to , and put . The two short exact sequences areandFor the first short exact sequence, weak approximation for number fields realizes every choice of finite unit residues and real signs by some prime to . Send that data to the class of in . Changing without changing its residues and signs multiplies it by an element of , so the map is well-defined. Its kernel consists exactly of data arising from units: if with , then . This gives . For the second short exact sequence, forget the ray conditions. Its kernel is , and weak approximation for number fields gives a representative prime to for every ideal class. These are the two parts of the ray class exact sequence.
For , the ring of integers of a quadratic field is . The finite modulus is trivial and both real places occur, so is the narrow ideal class group and . The two field embeddings send to and . The given unit is positive at both places, since ; the unit is negative at both. Thus the unit signature map has imageThe given ideal class group has order . The second short exact sequence therefore givesTo determine the group structure, retain the ideal that generates the ordinary ideal class group. We have : all generators , and lie in , whileputs in . Since is totally positive, in the narrow ideal class group. Its image in the ordinary ideal class group is nontrivial, so has order exactly .
The class of the principal ideal is a nontrivial element of . Its two signs are , and multiplying by a unit can only reverse both signs or neither, so no generator of this ideal is totally positive. Its square is , which does have a totally positive generator. Thus is another element of order , distinct from because its ordinary ideal class is trivial. These two elements are independent and generate all four classes. ConsequentlyThe nontrivial ordinary ideal class already has a lift of order , so the extension in the second short exact sequence splits; it cannot be cyclic of order .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2021 iii Paper 123 1 Solution 2026-09-28
Write . The field trace gives a nondegenerate -bilinear trace pairingThe inverse different, or codifferent, is the trace-dual latticeIt contains , because the trace of an element integral over belongs to the integrally closed ring . It is stable under multiplication by : if and , then . Nondegeneracy of the trace pairing and finite generation of show that this trace dual is a finitely generated -module spanning . Therefore it is a fractional ideal of .
The discriminant ideal is locally generated bywhere is a local -basis of . Equivalently, it is the image of the determinant of the trace pairingThis formulation makes the definition independent of a basis, since changing a basis multiplies its discriminant by the square of the determinant of the change-of-basis matrix.
The asserted identity of ideals can be checked after localization at every nonzero prime ideal of . We may therefore assume that is a discrete valuation ring and choose a basis of . Let be its trace-dual basis, so ; this is a basis of . If , thenThus the determinant measuring the inclusion is . The determinant description of the norm of a fractional ideal consequently givesLocalization then proves the equality over the original Dedekind domain.
Finally, the determinant-of-pairing map identifies the invertible -module with the discriminant ideal. Hence in the ideal class groupup to the harmless inverse caused by the convention used to identify invertible modules with fractional ideals. In either convention the class is a square.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 2 20H a Solution Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-09-25
Distinct prime-power ideals are pairwise comaximal. For comaximal ideals, product equals intersection, so induction givesThe Chinese remainder theorem therefore gives the ring isomorphism
The ideal approximation theorem, proved by applying this Chinese-remainder map one prime power deeper, suppliesEquivalently, at every prime dividing .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2022 ii Paper 4 20H Solution Created 2026-09-23 Updated 2026-09-25
Two nonzero fractional ideals of are in the same ideal class whenfor some , equivalently when is principal. Multiplication is well defined on classes:The identity is , the inverse of is , and commutativity comes from ideal multiplication. Nonzero fractional ideals are invertible because is a Dedekind domain. Thus these classes form the abelian ideal class group .
For finiteness, begin with a nonzero integral ideal . By hypothesis choose withSince , the idealis integral, represents , and satisfiesHence every class has an integral representative of bounded norm. There are only finitely many integral ideals of bounded norm, so is finite. This is the bounded-norm ideal representatives argument.
Now take . Since ,The imaginary-quadratic Minkowski bound for ideal classes isEvery class is therefore represented by an integral ideal of norm at most seven.
The ramified prime ideals above two and three arewithNeither is principal, since the norm equationhas no integer solution. Their product is also nonprincipal, since has no solution. Thusare four distinct classes, all of order at most two.
The prime five is inert, so it contributes no ideal of norm five. The prime seven splits asSincecomparison of norms, all equal to , confirms the factorization and givesThe conjugate prime has the inverse class, which is the same because this class has order two. Ideals of norms four and six yield respectively the principal class and . The Minkowski bound now shows that the four displayed classes exhaust the group. ThereforeThis is the Ideal class group of Q of square root of minus thirty-three.
Principal fractional ideal 2026-10-06
A principal fractional ideal of a number field is for a nonzero . Its generators differ by a unit in the ring of integers of a number field. Quotienting nonzero fractional ideals by principal fractional ideals gives the ideal class group; requiring congruences and signs of the generators instead gives a ray class group.
Trace dual of a fractional ideal 2026-10-06
For a nonzero fractional ideal of a number field, its trace-dual lattice is the fractional idealThe equality follows from the definition of the inverse different and invertibility of fractional ideals. Under the positive metric on the Minkowski embedding of a number field, the Euclidean dual lattice of is : coordinatewise complex conjugation converts the positive inner product into the trace pairing. This assertion does not require that conjugation preserve the number field itself.