Let be the Galois group of a polynomial of the irreducible quartic. Irreducibility makes a transitive subgroup of . The three roots of the given cubic resolvent of a quartic correspond to the three partitions of the four quartic roots into two unordered pairs, and the kernel of the -action on these partitions is the Klein four-group . If the resolvent has Galois group , the image of in this action is all of . Among the transitive subgroups of the symmetric group on four points, only has this image. Hence
Now put . The Eisenstein criterion at proves that is an irreducible polynomial, and its cubic resolvent is
Its discriminant of a depressed cubic is
For odd , the -adic valuation of is three because ; for , . Thus is never a square in .
By the rational root theorem, a reducible has an integer root among . Reduction modulo shows that the root is divisible by ; writing it as , with , gives
The only possibilities are and , corresponding to roots and . For every other prime, is irreducible with nonsquare discriminant, so its Galois group is and the criterion above gives the quartic group . For or , the reducible resolvent makes the quartic group a proper subgroup. Therefore
The splitting field of is the smallest extension in which is a product of linear factors; equivalently, is generated over by all its roots of a polynomial. To prove existence and uniqueness of splitting fields, adjoin a root of an irreducible polynomial dividing and repeat until splits. If and are two resulting fields, an embedding between the fields generated so far extends by sending each newly adjoined root to a root of its transformed minimal polynomial. Repetition gives a -embedding , whose image contains every root of and is therefore all of . Thus the splitting field exists and is unique up to -isomorphism.
Now write , and let the distinct irreducible factors of have degrees . The irreducible factors of a finite-field Frobenius polynomial show that a root of the degree- factor lies in exactly when . Hence the splitting field over a finite field is
Every finite field is a perfect field, so is separable; it is normal because it is a splitting field. It is consequently a Galois extension. More explicitly, the Galois group of a finite field extension is the cyclic group of order generated by the finite-field Frobenius automorphism .
Finally, let denote the number of monic irreducible polynomials over a finite field of degree over . Since
and , , , we obtain
Because is irreducible, the ideal is maximal in the polynomial ring . Hence
is a field extension of . Let . Evaluation in the quotient gives , and the factor theorem in gives
for some . This is the standard adjoining a root of an irreducible polynomial construction.
Let be a splitting field of over . Its formal derivative is
The assumption on the characteristic of says that in . Any root of is nonzero, and hence . Thus and have no common root, so is a separable polynomial. Since it has degree and splits over , it has exactly distinct roots. This is the separability of roots of unity.
Fix a primitive root of unity . Define the th cyclotomic polynomial by
It is monic and has degree given by the Euler totient function . Partitioning all th roots of unity according to their exact multiplicative order gives the cyclotomic factorization
We now prove by mathematical induction that . The base case is . If the result holds for every proper divisor of , then
is monic and belongs to . Polynomial division of by the monic integer polynomial produces a quotient and remainder in . The factorization over says that the remainder is zero and the quotient is , proving the claim.
It remains to prove irreducibility of cyclotomic polynomials. Let be a monic irreducible polynomial dividing , let be a root of , and write . We claim that is a root of for every prime number . Otherwise is a root of , so is a root of . Since is the minimal polynomial of over , Gauss lemma for polynomials gives
After reduction of an integer polynomial modulo a prime, the Frobenius endomorphism gives
Choose an irreducible factor of the nonconstant monic polynomial . Then , so . The cyclotomic factorization would then make divide over . This is impossible because its derivative is coprime to it when .
Thus for every prime . Iterating this fact over a prime factorization shows that whenever . These are all primitive th roots, so
Because divides , equality holds and . Hence every cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over .
Finally, direct multiplication gives
Also
Applying the cyclotomic factorization to the two factors on the right gives
and therefore
Since , cancellation yields
The thirtieth cyclotomic polynomial is irreducible over by the theorem just proved, so is irreducible.
Because , the formal derivative is nonzero and has smaller degree than . Since is irreducible, it cannot divide , so
By the Bezout identity for polynomials, there are with . A repeated root of in would also be a root of , contradicting this identity. Thus the result that an irreducible polynomial in characteristic zero is separable gives
For a depressed quartic
with roots summing to zero, set
The cubic resolvent of a quartic is
The symmetric group acts on the three partitions of four roots into two unordered pairs. The resulting homomorphism has kernel the Klein four-group . If is a square and the characteristic is not two, the discriminant criterion for an alternating Galois group gives , and its image on the three resolvent roots lies in .
For an irreducible quartic, is transitive on four roots, and its only possibilities inside are and . The resolvent is irreducible exactly when the image acts transitively on its three roots, equivalently when that image is . Thus
The printed statement omits the needed irreducibility hypothesis on . Literally it is false: has square discriminant and Galois group , and its resolvent is irreducible. Without quartic irreducibility, a reducible resolvent only implies , allowing the trivial group, , or .
For the specified polynomial ,
Its resolvent is . Modulo this is , which has no root in and is therefore an irreducible cubic. The quartic is given to be irreducible, so the preceding criterion yields
The element is a root of
By the rational root theorem, any rational root of this monic polynomial must be one of
Direct substitution shows that none is a root. A reducible cubic over a field has a linear factor, so is an irreducible polynomial over . It is therefore the minimal polynomial of , and
Write . If , its prime ideal has height one and is generated by an irreducible polynomial , because is a unique factorization domain. Then is a principal open subscheme and
If , its complement has codimension two. Since is normal, regular functions extend across that codimension-two subset, giving
This includes the calculation for the punctured affine plane. If has dimension two, then is empty and its ring of sections is the zero ring.
If the minimal polynomial of has degree , then
has elements and is an intermediate field of
. The tower law for field extensions gives
so .
The multiplicative group of a finite field is cyclic. Choose a generator
of , of order . If lay in a proper intermediate field of degree , its order would divide , a contradiction. Thus
and its minimal polynomial has degree .
For arbitrary , let be the splitting field of
over . Its roots form a field: the Frobenius endomorphism shows they are closed under addition, subtraction, multiplication, and inversion. The derivative is , so there are exactly distinct roots. Thus this root field has order . Applying the preceding generator argument supplies an element whose minimal polynomial over has degree , proving that an irreducible polynomial of every positive degree exists.
Let
be a primitive polynomial. The Eisenstein criterion states that if a prime number satisfies
then is an irreducible polynomial in , equivalently in by Gauss lemma for polynomials.
To prove it, suppose that with of positive degree. Primitivity and Gauss's lemma let us take such an integral factorisation if a factorisation over exists. Reducing modulo gives
Because does not divide the leading coefficient of , neither factor loses degree on reduction. The polynomial ring is a unique factorization domain, so both reductions are monomials of positive degree. In particular, divides both constant terms and . It follows that divides
a contradiction. This proves the criterion.
For a prime , translate the geometric sum by one:
Its leading coefficient is one, every other coefficient is divisible by , and its constant coefficient is , which is not divisible by . It is therefore Eisenstein at . Translation is an automorphism of , so
This is the geometric-sum irreducibility criterion.
The evaluation homomorphism
has image and contains in its kernel. Since is monic, division by in writes every as with . If , then ; the irreducibility of says that is the minimal polynomial of , so . Thus , and the first isomorphism theorem for rings gives
Now take . Then , and the Eisenstein integers are
Complex conjugation sends to , so the field norm is
Given , choose integers with . For ,
For with , apply this to and put . Then
Hence the norm is a Euclidean function, proving that is a Euclidean domain. This is the Euclidean norm on the Eisenstein integers.
Finally suppose satisfies . Make the free abelian group into a -module by defining
This is well-defined precisely because obeys the same polynomial relation as . The module is finitely generated. It is also torsion-free module: if and , multiplication by the conjugate of gives , and the additive group has no nonzero integer torsion.
A Euclidean domain is a principal ideal domain, and the structure theorem for finitely generated modules over a principal ideal domain says that a finitely generated torsion-free module over one is free. Thus
for some . Since has free module basis over , comparison of abelian ranks gives . There can consequently be no such matrix when is odd.
If , choose a -basis . Then
is a -basis, and . In this basis the matrix of is a direct sum of copies of
Every admissible matrix is therefore conjugate in to . Hence there is exactly one conjugacy class for even , and none for odd . This is the classification of integral matrices satisfying the third cyclotomic polynomial.
A finite extension is normal when every irreducible polynomial in having one root in splits completely over .
Suppose first that is normal. Choose with , and let be the minimal polynomial of over . Every splits in by normality, and is generated by their roots because it is already generated by the particular roots . Thus is the splitting field of .
Conversely, suppose that is the splitting field of . Every -embedding permutes the roots of , so . By the embedding characterization of normality, is normal. This proves the finite normal extension as a splitting field criterion.
False. Let
where is a primitive cube root of unity. Then is the splitting field of over , so is normal. The irreducible polynomial has a root in but does not split there, so is not normal.
Put . The roots of are , so its splitting field is
The polynomial is irreducible over by the Eisenstein criterion at , and does not contain . The tower law for field extensions therefore gives .
Define automorphisms
They satisfy and . The eight maps and are distinct, so they exhaust the Galois group. Hence
the dihedral group of order eight.
The Galois correspondence gives all intermediate fields. The full list, with a single generator for each field, is
For example, has stabilizer , and has stabilizer ; the other entries follow similarly. Also has trivial stabilizer, so its orbit has eight elements and the primitive element theorem conclusion holds explicitly.
Finally, the normal subextension criterion says that normal intermediate fields correspond exactly to normal subgroups. In these are , , the two index-two Klein four-groups, , and , which gives exactly the “yes” rows above. This is the subfields of the splitting field of x to the fourth minus seven lattice.
For an algebraically closed field , the strong Hilbert Nullstellensatz says that every ideal satisfies
Its weak form says that exactly when . Now let and let be a homogeneous ideal. The affine zero set of is the affine cone over together with the origin. Hence, when the projective zero set is empty, either
or the affine zero set is exactly the origin. In the latter case the Hilbert Nullstellensatz gives
the irrelevant ideal of projective space. Equivalently, some power is contained in . These are precisely the alternatives in the Projective Nullstellensatz.
Let be a smooth quadric surface. After a projective linear transformation, the Segre embedding identifies
Choose distinct points . The two fibres
are the promised disjoint curves on a smooth quadric surface: each is a smooth projective line, and . By the Bézout theorem, any two nonempty curves in the projective plane intersect. An isomorphism of algebraic varieties preserves intersections and takes projective curves to projective curves, so these disjoint curves prove
Next let be a smooth projective curve and let be a rational map to a projective variety. At a point outside its initial domain, write
using elements of the function field . The local ring of a smooth algebraic curve at is a discrete valuation ring. If , multiplying every coordinate by a function of valuation makes all coordinates regular at and at least one a unit there. They therefore define a morphism near . Repeating this at the finitely many missing points proves the extension of a rational map from a smooth projective curve.
Smoothness is essential. Let be the normalization of a nodal curve for a rational nodal cubic . The inverse is a rational map on the smooth locus. If it extended to a morphism , then would agree with the identity on a dense Zariski-open subset of and hence everywhere. But the two distinct points above the node would satisfy
a contradiction. This is the failure of rational-map extension on a singular curve.
Finally take the Fermat cubic curve
and define the projective hypersurface
Because and have no common irreducible factor, the bihomogeneous polynomial is irreducible, so is an algebraic variety. Let
be the second coordinate projection. Every homogeneous cubic in three variables has a projective zero over , so every fibre is nonempty and is a surjective morphism. Over the fibre is the Fermat cubic curve, which is smooth and has genus
Over the fibre is
the union of exactly three distinct projective lines, hence exactly three irreducible components. This is the cubic pencil with a triangular member required by the question.
We give the Agrawal–Biswas primality test, which has one-sided error. Small inputs and perfect powers can first be recognized deterministically. For every remaining integer , put and choose a uniformly random monic polynomial
Using repeated squaring in the quotient ring , test the identity
This takes time polynomial in because every intermediate polynomial has degree below .
If is prime, the intermediate binomial coefficients are divisible by , so the identity always holds. Now suppose that is composite and is not a prime power. Choose a prime divisor and write with and . Over ,
because an intermediate coefficient equal to is nonzero modulo . Hence
is a nonzero polynomial of degree below over .
Reduction of random modulo is uniform among the monic degree- polynomials. The polynomial has at most distinct monic irreducible factors of degree . On the other hand, the number of monic irreducibles of degree obeys the standard lower bound
Whenever is one of these irreducibles but does not divide , the tested congruence fails. Thus one trial detects compositeness with probability at least
after the finitely many small are handled directly. Repeating times makes the probability of missing a composite less than , while a prime is never rejected. Therefore compositeness is in RP, and primality testing is in
For an integer , let be a root of
Its roots are
The polynomial is irreducible over : its discriminant is , and the product of the coprime consecutive integers and cannot be a square unless both are squares, which is impossible for consecutive positive squares beyond .
The height-Mahler measure formula gives
Both algebraic conjugates of exceed , so
Consequently
Fix, for example, . For all sufficiently large , the ratio is larger than by a fixed margin, while . Hence, for every , some sufficiently large satisfies
If is an irreducible polynomial over a field , then a nonzero residue modulo has . The Euclidean algorithm supplies , giving inverse for . Thus the quotient ring is a field. If and has elements, polynomial division supplies exactly residue classes.