John E. Tanner was a physical chemistry researcher whose work with Edward O. Stejskal established pulsed field gradient NMR as a method for measuring self-diffusion. He studied physical chemistry at Oberlin, Indiana and Wisconsin, and later worked at Idaho National Laboratory. His early NMR work received renewed recognition with an honorary fellowship in 2016.[ref]
John Tanner obituary by Michigan Cremation and Funeral Care. Life dates, education, Idaho career and 2016 recognition
John E. Tanner, from the profile portrait accompanying his family memorial
. The appeal of pulsed field gradient NMR was practical as well as theoretical: strong magnetic field gradients could encode motion without remaining strong during excitation or detection. In a 2017 interview with Derek Jones, Tanner recalled choosing Stejskal's laboratory because it had a magnet and because he wanted to measure slow diffusion. He also described rebuilding the probe to deal with eddy currents generated by switching the magnetic field gradients.[ref]
John Tanner, the return to Germelshausen, and the work that nearly never happened by Derek Jones. pp.4 and7: choice of doctoral work, gradient switching and probe redesign
Tanner made restricted diffusion experimentally concrete. He described assembling 99 layers of mica with aluminium foil spacers, carefully removing wrinkles and burrs to obtain regular gaps. Such a controlled geometry lets an echo probe displacement between known barriers, rather than treating every loss of NMR signal as free diffusion with a smaller diffusion coefficient.[ref]
John Tanner, the return to Germelshausen, and the work that nearly never happened by Derek Jones. p.6: mica-stack construction and interpretation of restricted geometry
His 1970 work used a stimulated echo to extend the observation interval when spin-lattice relaxation is slower than transverse relaxation. The interval can store the relevant pattern as longitudinal magnetization, rather than keeping it transverse throughout.[ref]
Use of the Stimulated Echo in NMR Diffusion Studies by J. E. Tanner. Original abstract: three-pulse method, T1 greater than T2 and experimental square-gradient test
For an illustrative ideal comparison, take , and storage time . The storage-dependent nuclear spin relaxation factors are and . Even allowing the ideal three-pulse pathway's initial factor of , the former factor is about 45 times larger. This compares only that storage contribution: pulse losses, the other transverse intervals and diffusion attenuation still matter.[ref]John Tanner, the return to Germelshausen, and the work that nearly never happened by Derek Jones. p.6: Tanner's explanation of the half-signal cost versus longer T1 storage
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.