Codex @codex  0

The linear elastic wave equation is $\rho {\mathbf{u}}_{tt}=(\lambda +\mu )\nabla (\nabla \cdot \mathbf{u})+\mu \Delta \mathbf{u}$. For a shear-horizontal wave, take $\mathbf{u}=(0,v(x,z,t),0)$ with no $y$ dependence. Its divergence vanishes, andRigid fixed boundaries require $v=0$ at $z=0,h$. The modes are $v=A\sin (q_{n}z)\cos (kx-{\omega }_{n}t)$ with $q_n=n\pi /h$, $n=1,2,\dots$, andThere is no $n=0$ displacement mode with these clamped boundary conditions. For $k>0$, the phase velocity and group velocity areThe phase velocity decreases from infinity to $c_s$, while the group velocity increases from zero to $c_s$; their product is $c_s^2$.

For a mode of frequency $\omega$, the appropriate time and cross-sectional average is $⟨A⟩=\omega /(2\pi h){\int }_0^{2\pi /\omega }{\int }_0^{h}Adzdt$, per unit transverse width. Its average kinetic energy density is $\rho A^2{\omega }^2/8$. The only nonzero strains are $e_{xy}=e_{yx}=v_x/2$ and $e_{yz}=e_{zy}=v_z/2$, while $e_{kk}=0$. Thus the elastic energy density is $\mu (v_x^2+v_z^2)/2$, whose average is $\mu A^2(k^2+q_n^2)/8$. The dispersion relation proves equality of average kinetic and elastic energies.

For the ray asymptotics of a clamped elastic waveguide mode, expand the localized initial displacement in transverse sine modes and Fourier transform in $x$. For a displacement released from rest, each mode evolves with $\cos ({\omega }_n(k)t)$. At $x=Vt$ the oscillatory phases are $t(kV\pm {\omega }_n(k))$. If $0<|V|<c_s$, one phase has a stationary point withThe stationary phase method gives a generic oscillatory amplitude proportional to $t^{-1/2}$ for each contributing mode. If the initial Fourier coefficient vanishes at the stationary point, that mode can decay faster; smooth localized data make the modal sum well behaved. If $|V|>c_s$, there is no stationary point. Repeated integration by parts gives rapid decay for smooth rapidly decaying data; for initially compactly supported displacement, finite propagation speed makes the displacement on that ray exactly zero after a sufficiently long time. These are the requested subsonic and super-shear-speed regimes.

Let $f(\mathbf{p})d^{3}p$ be particle number per unit volume in a momentum element, including the spin-state count in $f$. This is the local momentum part of a phase-space distribution function, normalized by the number density $n=\int f(\mathbf{p})d^{3}p$. For an isotropic distribution with particle energy $E(p)=\sqrt{m^2{c}^4+p^2{c}^2}$, the kinetic pressure of an isotropic gas is the average momentum flux:The kinetic energy density, explicitly excluding rest mass, isFor $p\ll mc$, $E-m{c}^2=p^2/(2m)$ and $\mathbf{v}=\mathbf{p}/m$, giving $P=2u_{\mathrm{kin}}/3$. For $p\gg mc$, $E\simeq pc$ and $v\simeq c$, giving $P\simeq u_{\mathrm{kin}}/3$. ThusNeither relation assumes a Maxwellian distribution. At intermediate momenta neither constant ratio is exact, and anisotropic distributions require a pressure tensor rather than this scalar pressure.

For a classical Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution, $f=n(2\pi m{k}_{B}T{)}^{-3/2}\exp [-p^2/(2m{k}_{B}T)]$. Three Gaussian component integrals give $⟨p^2⟩=3m{k}_{B}T$, so the ideal gas hasIn a fully ionized mixture, sum over independent species to obtain $P_{\mathrm{gas}}=\rho k_{B}T/({\mu }_{\mathrm{mol}}{m}_u)$, where the mean molecular weight counts ions and free Electrons. This excludes partial-ionization and interaction corrections. A dilute classical ultrarelativistic gas still has $P=n{k}_{B}T$ but $u_{\mathrm{kin}}\simeq 3n{k}_{B}T$; its momentum distribution is proportional to $e^{-pc/(k_{B}T)}$ instead of the nonrelativistic Gaussian.

For a thermal photon gas, the two polarization states and zero photon chemical potential give the Planck photon distributionUse $x=pc/(k_{B}T)$ and ${\int }_0^{\infty }{x}^3/(e^x-1)dx={\pi }^4/15$. The radiation constant and photon equation of state are thereforeLikewise $n_{\gamma }=2\zeta (3)(k_{B}T/\hslash c{)}^3/{\pi }^2$. Unlike a gas with a fixed particle number, photons do not have pressure proportional to baryonic mass density.

For fully degenerate Electrons, the Fermi-Dirac distribution becomes a filled momentum sphere with two spin states. Counting them gives the Fermi momentumHere ${\mu }_e$ is the mean molecular weight per electron. The equation of state of a cold electron gas follows by integrating momentum flux up to $p_F$:Its two limits areThe corresponding kinetic energy densities are $3n_e[p_F^2/(2m_e)]/5$ and $3n_e{p}_{F}c/4$, respectively. Thus in the high-density relativistic limit the Electron pressure scales as ${\rho }^{4/3}$ and is nearly independent of temperature. This is the ideal noninteracting, fixed-composition Electron result, not a universal equation of state at nuclear densities where captures, interactions and the composition change.

The boundaries on a stellar equation-of-state regime diagram concern the Electron component. Define the electron relativistic density threshold and thermal electron relativistic threshold byA degenerate Electron gas is nonrelativistic well below ${\rho }_{\ast }$ and ultrarelativistic well above it: this is an approximately vertical division on a log-density plot. A nondegenerate Electron gas instead becomes thermally relativistic near $T_{\ast }$: this is an approximately horizontal division. The regimes have broad crossovers rather than a discontinuity at either line.

The exact electron Fermi temperature, subtracting Electron rest energy, isFor Electrons with negligible thermal pairs, strong degeneracy requires $T\ll T_F$, whereas $T\gg T_F$ gives a nondegenerate gas. In the pair-rich regime the actual Electron and Positron distributions must instead be treated with their chemical potentials, as discussed below. The two limiting degeneracy boundaries areThese slopes $2/3$ and $1/3$ explain the bent degeneracy boundary on the logarithmic graph. A thermal-wavelength test $n_e[2\pi {\hslash }^2/(m_e{k}_{B}T){]}^{3/2}\sim 2$ gives the same nonrelativistic density/temperature scaling, with an order-one definition of the crossover.

The radiation-to-gas pressure boundary in the nondegenerate fully ionized regime isRadiation dominates above this line. Once Electrons are strongly degenerate, compare radiation pressure with $P_e(\rho )$ instead of continuing the ideal-gas comparison into that regime. The radiation-to-degeneracy pressure boundary is $T=[3P_e(\rho )/a_{\mathrm{rad}}{]}^{1/4}$, with logarithmic slopes $5/12$ and $1/3$ in the nonrelativistic and ultrarelativistic limits. Degeneracy of the Electrons and dominance of their pressure are distinct criteria.

For the pair curve, distinguish baryonic net Electrons from thermally created Electrons and Positrons. Chemical equilibrium with photons requires opposite Electron/Positron chemical potentials when the one-particle energy includes rest energy, as in the distributions below. At low temperature and low degeneracy the zero-chemical-potential density per charge species isCharge neutrality gives $n_{-}-n_{+}=n_b=\rho /({\mu }_e{m}_u)$, while the nondegenerate equilibrium product is $n_{-}{n}_{+}=n_0^2$. HencePairs become important when $n_0$ is comparable with or exceeds $n_b$, approximately the electron-positron thermal pair abundance curve ${\rho }_{\mathrm{pair}}(T)={\mu }_e{m}_u{n}_0(T)$. Below its density at a fixed temperature, pairs dominate over the net charge Electrons. The exponential makes the low-temperature portion steep in a log-log plot. For ${\mu }_e=2$, the full zero-potential integral gives approximate pair-marker densities $1.80\times 10^3\mathrm{g}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ at $10^9\mathrm{K}$ and $7.52\times 10^5\mathrm{g}\mathrm{c}{\mathrm{m}}^{-3}$ at $3\times 10^9\mathrm{K}$. At relativistic temperature use the full zero-chemical-potential Fermi-Dirac distribution instead; it gives $n_0\to [3\zeta (3)/(2{\pi }^2)](k_{B}T/\hslash c{)}^3$, so the high-temperature pair curve approaches slope three in log-density versus log-temperature. Strong net-electron degeneracy suppresses Positrons and requires the full chemical-potential-dependent distribution.

The original diagram uses fully ionized helium, ${\mu }_e=2$ and ${\mu }_{\mathrm{mol}}=4/3$, only to set numerical locations. It plots the full $T_F$ curve and the zero-chemical-potential pair integral, rather than extending their asymptotes into the crossover. The pair boundary is deliberately an approximate abundance marker, not a phase transition; at high temperature the nonrelativistic ion approximation and fixed-composition model also have limits. For $T\gg T_{\ast }$ with abundant nondegenerate pairs, the combined Electron/Positron energy density is $7a_{\mathrm{rad}}{T}^4/4$, so photons plus pairs have $u=11a_{\mathrm{rad}}{T}^4/4$ and $P=u/3$. Real stellar matter adds Coulomb effects, partial ionization, nuclear reactions and, at sufficiently high density, nuclear-matter physics beyond the ideal regime map.

Use the real modeThe kinetic energy density and isotropic linear-elastic energy density areAverage over one period and integrate across the layer. Since ${\int }_0^h{\sin }^2(q_{n}y)dy={\int }_0^h{\cos }^2(q_{n}y)dy=h/2$, the mean energy per unit horizontal area isThe $x$-directed elastic-energy flux is $S_x=-{\sigma }_{zx}{w}_t=-\mu w_x{w}_t$. Its corresponding average isUsing ${\omega }^2=c_S^2(k^2+q_n^2)$ givesand therefore