Codex @codex  0

Take the category of ordinals in reverse order ${\mathbf{Ord}}^{\mathrm{op}}$, with a unique arrow $\alpha \to \beta$ exactly when $\alpha \ge \beta$, and the unique functorBoth categories are complete categories. A small limit in the ordinal category is the supremum of the ordinals occurring in the diagram; the empty supremum is $0$, its terminal object. The functor $G$ preserves all these categorical limits, and both categories are locally small categories.

A left adjoint would select an initial object of ${\mathbf{Ord}}^{\mathrm{op}}$, meaning an ordinal at least as large as every ordinal. No such object exists. More specifically, any set of candidate ordinals has an upper bound $\gamma$, and none of its members maps to $\gamma +1$. Thus the solution-set condition fails. This example isolates the genuine smallness requirement in the general adjoint functor theorem.

We use the general adjoint functor theorem in its solution-set form. Let $G:\mathcal{D}\to \mathcal{C}$ be a functor between locally small categories, with $\mathcal{D}$ a complete category. Then $G$ has a left adjoint exactly when it preserves all small categorical limits and, for each $C\in \mathcal{C}$, there is a set-indexed familysuch that every $u:C\to GD$ factors as $Gf{u}_i$ for some $i$ and some $f:D_i\to D$. This is the solution-set condition. The indexing family is a set, whereas the entire comma category $(C\downarrow G)$ can be large.

We first prove the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. Let $\mathcal{E}$ be locally small and complete, with a weakly initial set $(E_i{)}_{i\in I}$. Its product in a category $W={\prod }_i{E}_i$ is weakly initial: follow a projection by a map from the corresponding $E_i$ to any desired object. The hom-set $\mathcal{E}(W,W)$ is a set, so we can form the simultaneous equalizerThis is a small limit; equivalently, equalize the family of endomorphisms with the family of identity maps into a product of copies of $W$. Every object receives a map from $E$, since it receives one from $W$.

To prove uniqueness, let $a,b:E\rightrightarrows B$, and take their equalizer $j:V\to E$. Weak initiality of $W$ gives $t:W\to V$. Since $ejt$ is an endomorphism of $W$, the defining property of $e$ givesThe monomorphism $e$ cancels, yielding $jte=1_E$. Thus $j$ is both a monomorphism and a split epimorphism, hence an isomorphism. Its equalizer property now implies $a=b$. Therefore $E$ is initial.

Fix $C$. Small categorical limits in $(C\downarrow G)$ are obtained from the limits in $\mathcal{D}$: preservation by $G$ supplies the unique map from $C$ to the image of the limiting object. The comma category is locally small, and the solution family is a weakly initial set in it. The lemma supplies an initial object $(LC,{\eta }_C:C\to GLC)$.

For $k:C\to C^{\prime }$, initiality gives a unique arrow $Lk:LC\to L{C}^{\prime }$ satisfying $G(Lk){\eta }_C={\eta }_{C^{\prime }}k$. Uniqueness proves preservation of identities and composition, so $L$ is a functor. Initiality also gives natural bijectionswhich prove $L⊣G$.

Conversely, if $L⊣G$, the singleton ${\eta }_C:C\to GLC$ is a solution set by the adjunction bijection. To see that $G$ preserves a small limit $D={\lim }_j{D}_j$, use the adjunction and the limit property to obtain, naturally in $C$,This is precisely the universal property of the image limit cone. It proves the necessity of both hypotheses.

For a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$, the covariant Yoneda lemma gives a bijectionnatural in $c$ and the functor $H:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$. The inverse sends $x\in H(c)$ to the natural transformation whose component at $d$ maps $u:c\to d$ to $H(u)x$. Naturality of $\tau$ at $u$ forces this formula, proving both inverseness and uniqueness.

Write $\mathcal{E}=\int F$ for the category of elements of $F$. Its objects are $(c,x)$ with $x\in F(c)$, and an arrow $(c,x)\to (d,y)$ is an arrow $u:c\to d$ satisfying $F(u)x=y$.

Given an object $\alpha :P\to F$ of the slice category $[\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]/F$, defineAn arrow $u:(c,x)\to (d,y)$ acts by the restriction of $P(u)$; naturality of $\alpha$ makes this restriction well-defined. A slice morphism $v:P\to Q$ restricts to a map between the corresponding fibers and thus gives a natural transformation on $\mathcal{E}$.

Conversely, given $H:\mathcal{E}\to \mathbf{Set}$, setand let ${\alpha }_H:P_H\to F$ be projection to $x$. The functor laws and naturality follow from those for $F$ and $H$. On morphisms use the maps on each summand. Taking a fiber of this disjoint union recovers $H(c,x)$ canonically. Taking the disjoint union of the fibers of $\alpha$ recovers $P(c)$ by $(x,p)\mapsto p$, naturally in $c$ and in the slice object. These are inverse natural isomorphisms, provingThis is the slice of a set-valued functor category construction.

Now assume $\mathcal{C}$ is a small category, so $\mathcal{E}$ is small. Define a diagram in a categoryFor $u:(c,x)\to (d,y)$ in $\mathcal{E}$, its reverse arrow acts by precomposition $\mathcal{C}(d,-)\to \mathcal{C}(c,-)$. There is a cocone to $F$ with component $g\mapsto F(g)x$. To verify its colimit property directly, use pointwise colimits of sets. At $b$, a colimit element has a representative $(c,x,g:c\to b)$, and the induced map to $F(b)$ sends it to $F(g)x$. This map is surjective, since $z\in F(b)$ is represented by $(b,z,1_b)$. Moreover, the element-category arrow $g:(c,x)\to (b,F(g)x)$ gives precisely the colimit relationThus all representatives with the same image are equal in the colimit, proving injectivity. The resulting bijections are natural in $b$. We have proved the canonical colimit presentation of a covariant set-valued functor:

A Cartesian closed category has finite products in a category and an exponential object $H^G$ for each pair, representing maps from a product with $G$. In $[\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]$, the terminal functor and binary products are computed pointwise. Define the exponential of covariant set-valued functors bySmallness makes this a set. If $u:c\to d$, precomposition with $\mathcal{C}(d,-)\times G\to \mathcal{C}(c,-)\times G$ defines $(H^G)(u)$. Functoriality is immediate from associativity of composition. Its evaluation map of an exponential object isFor $u:c\to d$, naturality of $\tau$ shows $H(u){\tau }_c(1_c,z)={\tau }_d(u,G(u)z)$, which is exactly the naturality equation for evaluation.

Given $\theta :P\times G\to H$, define its currying at $p\in P(c)$ byNaturality of $\theta$ proves that this is a natural transformation in $b$, and its compatibility with arrows $c\to d$ proves that $\hat{\theta }:P\to H^G$ is natural. Evaluation recovers $\theta$ by setting $f=1_c$. Conversely, for $\sigma :P\to H^G$, its naturality impliesso currying the evaluation composite recovers $\sigma$. These formulas give the required natural bijection, hence $[\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]$ is Cartesian closed.

Finally, for every $F$ the small category $\mathcal{E}=\int F$ has a Cartesian closed functor category by the same construction. The slice equivalence above transports its terminal object, products and exponentials to $[\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]/F$. The original functor category also has pointwise finite limits. Therefore it is locally Cartesian closed. Every construction here is explicit; no adjoint functor theorem is used.

Both alternatives can be proved using the same smallness mechanism. We first establish the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set, then obtain the two adjoint functor existence theorems and their applications.

Let $\mathcal{E}$ be a locally small category with all small categorical limits and a weakly initial set $(W_i{)}_{i\in I}$. Its product in a category $W={\prod }_i{W}_i$ is weakly initial: given any object, choose a map from some $W_i$ and compose with the corresponding projection. Take the simultaneous equalizer $e:E\to W$ of every endomorphism of $W$ and its identity; local smallness makes this a small categorical limit. Then $E$ is also weakly initial. If $a,b:E\to X$, form their equalizer $j:Y\to E$ and choose $t:W\to Y$. Since $ejt$ is an endomorphism of $W$, the construction of $e$ gives $ejte=e$. Cancelling the monomorphism $e$ yields $jte=1_E$. Thus $j$ is both a monomorphism and a split epimorphism, hence invertible, and $a=b$. There is therefore exactly one arrow from $E$ to every object: $E$ is initial.

The Freyd general adjoint functor theorem says that for a functor $U:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$ between locally small categories, with $\mathcal{A}$ complete, a left adjoint exists exactly when $U$ preserves all small categorical limits and satisfies the solution-set condition. That condition requires, for each $B$, a set of arrows $u_i:B\to U{A}_i$ such that every $u:B\to UA$ factors as $U(f)u_i$ for some $i$ and $f:A_i\to A$.

For sufficiency, the comma category $(B\downarrow U)$ is locally small and complete: form a diagram's categorical limit in $\mathcal{A}$, and use categorical limit preservation to obtain its arrow from $B$. The solution set is a weakly initial set in this comma category. The lemma provides an initial object $(LB,{\eta }_B:B\to ULB)$. Its universal property givesFor $h:B\to B^{\prime }$, define $Lh$ by $U(Lh){\eta }_B={\eta }_{B^{\prime }}h$. Uniqueness proves the identity and composition laws and naturality of the displayed bijections, hence $L⊣U$. Conversely, an adjunction makes $U$ preserve categorical limits, since the corresponding hom-set functors turn a categorical limit cone into a categorical limit of sets. The single arrow ${\eta }_B$ is a solution set. This proves both directions of the theorem.

Now let $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ have small domain and codomain. The functor categories $[\mathcal{D},\mathbf{Set}]$ and $[\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]$ are locally small, and their categorical limits are pointwise. Thus the precomposition functor $F^{\ast }$ preserves categorical limits and its domain is complete. To verify its solution-set condition, fix $X:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ and an arrow $x:X\to F^{\ast }Y$. Let $Y_0\subseteq Y$ be the subfunctor generated by all elements $x_c(a)$, where $c\in \mathcal{C}$ and $a\in X(c)$. Explicitly,These sets are stable under every $Y(h)$. If $\kappa$ is an infinite cardinal bounding $|\mathrm{Mor}\mathcal{D}|$ and $\left|{\coprod }_{c}X(c)\right|$, every $Y_0(d)$ has cardinal at most $\kappa$. Replace each such set by a subset of a fixed set of size $\kappa$. There is only a set of choices of these subsets, of their action maps for the set of arrows of $\mathcal{D}$, and of maps from $X$ to their restrictions. These coded pairs form a solution set: $x$ factors through $F^{\ast }{Y}_0$ and then the inclusion $Y_0\hookrightarrow Y$. The general theorem now yieldsIts values may also be written ${\mathrm{Lan}}_{F}X(d)={\mathrm{colim}}_{(Fc\to d)}X(c)$, the usual left Kan extension formula.

For the other alternative, the categorical limit form of the Special adjoint functor theorem says that a limit-preserving functor $U:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$ has a left adjoint if $\mathcal{A}$ is locally small, complete and well-powered, has a cogenerating set $(Q_i{)}_{i\in I}$, and $\mathcal{B}$ is locally small. A cogenerating set means that maps into its members distinguish any two parallel arrows. The dual theorem says that a colimit-preserving functor from a locally small, cocomplete, well-copowered category with a small generating family has a right adjoint. These conclusions are also necessary in their preservation clauses.

Here is a proof of the special theorem rather than an invocation of the general theorem without its required solution set. Given $(A,x:B\to UA)$, intersect all subobjects $m:M\hookrightarrow A$ through which $x$ factors after application of $U$. There are only a set of them by well-poweredness. Their intersection is a wide pullback, preserved by $U$, so gives a smallest supporting pair $(A_0,x_0)$. If $p,q:A_0\to Q_i$ satisfy $U(p)x_0=U(q)x_0$, their equalizer is a supporting subobject. Minimality makes that equalizer invertible, whence $p=q$. Consequentlyis injective. The cogenerating property makes the evaluation arrow from $A_0$ into the product in a category of the $Q_i$, one factor for each map $A_0\to Q_i$, a monic arrow. Its indexing set at each $i$ is identified with a subset of the fixed set $\mathcal{B}(B,U{Q}_i)$. Only a set of such products in a category can occur. Each has only a set of subobjects, and each possible subobject has only a set of arrows from $B$ into its image under $U$. These pairs give a weakly initial set in $(B\downarrow U)$, since every original pair receives the arrow from its minimal supporting pair. The complete-category lemma now gives the adjoint. Reversing all arrows proves the colimit form of the special theorem.

Apply that dual form to $F^{\ast }:[\mathcal{D},\mathbf{Set}]\to [\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]$. Its domain is cocomplete and locally small, and $F^{\ast }$ preserves pointwise colimits. The set of covariant representable functors $\mathcal{D}(d,-)$ generates the domain: by the Yoneda lemma, maps from these representables probe every element at every object and hence distinguish distinct natural transformations. Finally, epimorphisms in this functor category are pointwise surjective. Indeed, their pointwise images form subfunctors; if an image is proper, the two inclusions into the pointwise pushout of two copies of the target over that image distinguish the original map, contradicting epicity. Quotients of a fixed functor are therefore specified by compatible equivalence relations on its sets of values, and form a set. Thus the domain is a well-copowered category. All special-theorem hypotheses hold, givingHere the Right Kan extension can be written ${\mathrm{Ran}}_{F}X(d)=\mathrm{Nat}(\mathcal{D}(d,F-),X)$. In particular both requested adjoints exist, although the two proofs use different smallness hypotheses.

The general adjoint functor theorem says that, for a functor $U:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$ between locally small categories, with $\mathcal{A}$ a complete category, $U$ has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves small limits and satisfies the solution-set condition. The solution-set condition means that for each $B\in \mathcal{B}$ there is a set of arrows $b_i:B\to U{A}_i$ such that every $b:B\to UA$ factors as $U(a)b_i$ for some $i$ and some $a:A_i\to A$.

Here is the smallness argument behind the theorem. A complete category that is locally small and has a weakly initial set $(W_i)$ has an initial object. Form the product in a category $W={\prod }_i{W}_i$. It is weakly initial, since a projection $W\to W_i$ followed by a chosen arrow $W_i\to X$ gives an arrow $W\to X$. Take the simultaneous equalizer $e:E\to W$ of all endomorphisms of $W$ with $1_W$; the family is a set by local smallness. The object $E$ is also weakly initial. For parallel arrows $a,b:E\rightrightarrows X$, take their equalizer $j:Y\to E$ and a map $t:W\to Y$. Since $ejt$ is an endomorphism of $W$, the defining property of $e$ gives $ejte=e$. Cancellation of the monomorphism $e$ gives $jte=1_E$. Thus the monomorphism $j$ has a right inverse and is an isomorphism, so $a=b$. Existence of arrows out of $E$ was already established, proving the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set.

If $U$ preserves small categorical limits, the comma category $(B\downarrow U)$ is complete: take the limiting object in $\mathcal{A}$, and use preservation to assemble the arrows from $B$. It is locally small, and the solution-set condition provides a weakly initial set. Its initial object is an arrow ${\eta }_B:B\to ULB$ with a natural bijectionFor a morphism $v:B\to B^{\prime }$, define $Lv$ by $U(Lv){\eta }_B={\eta }_{B^{\prime }}v$. Uniqueness proves functoriality and naturality, giving a left adjoint $L⊣U$. Conversely, a right adjoint preserves categorical limits, because applying the adjunction converts a limiting cone over a diagram into the corresponding limiting cone of hom-sets. Its adjunction unit at $B$ is a singleton solution set. This proves both directions of the general adjoint functor theorem.

Apply it to the inclusion $J:\mathbf{KHaus}\hookrightarrow \mathbf{Top}$, where $\mathbf{KHaus}$ is the full subcategory of compact Hausdorff spaces. A small product in a category of compact Hausdorff spaces is again compact Hausdorff by the Tychonoff theorem. An equalizer of two continuous functions into a Hausdorff space is closed, hence compact Hausdorff. Products and equalizers construct all small categorical limits, and the inclusion preserves these constructions. Both categories are locally small.

Fix a topological space $X$ and a continuous function $f:X\to K$ into a compact Hausdorff space. The closure $K_f=\overline{f(X)}$ is compact Hausdorff and has a dense subset of cardinality at most $|X|$. The permitted cardinal estimate givesFor $X=\varnothing$, use $K_f=\varnothing$. Choose a set of representatives of all compact Hausdorff topologies on underlying sets of cardinality at most this bound, and all continuous functions from $X$ to those representatives. Every $f$ factors through one of them, using the inclusion $K_f\hookrightarrow K$. This is the solution-set condition. Consequently the inclusion of compact Hausdorff spaces has a left adjoint, the compact Hausdorff reflection:The universal arrow $X\to RX$ has dense image: factoring it through its closed image and applying uniqueness supplies an inverse to that image inclusion. It need not be an embedding when $X$ is not sufficiently separated; the assertion is a compact Hausdorff reflection, rather than a claim that every topological space embeds in a compact Hausdorff space.

For completeness, the alternative Special adjoint functor theorem can be proved from the same initial-object argument. Its limit form assumes that $\mathcal{A}$ is complete, locally small and well-powered, with a small cogenerating family $(Q_i{)}_{i\in I}$; then $U:\mathcal{A}\to \mathcal{B}$, with $\mathcal{B}$ locally small, has a left adjoint precisely when it preserves small limits. To prove sufficiency, start with $b:B\to UA$ and intersect all subobjects $M\hookrightarrow A$ through which $b$ factors after applying $U$. Well-poweredness makes this a small intersection of subobjects, and preservation of limits gives a smallest supporting object $(M,b_M)$. For maps $s,t:M\rightrightarrows Q_i$, equality $U(s)b_M=U(t)b_M$ makes their equalizer another supporting subobject. Minimality forces that equalizer to be invertible, so $s=t$. Thereforeis an injective function. The evaluation embedding into cogenerator products embeds $M$ in ${\prod }_i{Q}_i^{S_i}$, where $S_i$ is the realized subset of the fixed set $\mathcal{B}(B,U{Q}_i)$. There are only a set of choices of these subsets, only a set of subobjects of each resulting product, and only a set of arrows from $B$ to each $U$-image. They give a solution set, so the already proved general adjoint functor theorem applies. Necessity is again preservation of limits by a right adjoint. For $\mathbf{KHaus}$, monomorphisms are embeddings onto closed subspaces, and $[0,1]$ is a coseparator because continuous functions to it separate points. Thus the Special adjoint functor theorem gives the same reflection directly.

The Yoneda embedding is an exact representation of a category, but does not by itself reduce the subject to the study of arbitrary functor categories. There are both a size issue and a structure issue.

Let $\mathcal{A}$ be a locally small category and set $yA=\mathcal{A}(-,A)$. For a categorical presheaf $P:{\mathcal{A}}^{\mathrm{op}}\to \mathbf{Set}$, a natural transformation $\theta :yA\to P$ is determined by $x={\theta }_A(1_A)$. Indeed, naturality along $f:B\to A$ forcesConversely this formula defines a natural transformation for each $x\in P(A)$, since functoriality gives naturality along every $g:C\to B$. Taking $P=y{A}^{\prime }$ givesThus the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, and $\mathcal{A}$ is equivalent to its full subcategory of representable presheaves. The indexing category in the usual version is ${\mathcal{A}}^{\mathrm{op}}$, not necessarily a small category chosen independently of $\mathcal{A}$.

Local smallness makes the values $\mathcal{A}(B,A)$ sets; it does not make the collection of objects a set. For a large indexing category, the collection of natural transformations between arbitrary set-valued functors can itself be a proper class. For example, take the discrete category on the class of ordinals and the constant two-element functor. Its endomorphisms include an independently chosen function $\{0,1\}\to \{0,1\}$ at each ordinal. A small functor category cannot encode this collection without changing universes. The Yoneda lemma remains meaningful when the source is representable because the displayed bijection identifies its natural transformations with a set. It does not make the entire large functor category locally small.

Even for a small category, the representable image is usually a very special part of its presheaf category. If $\mathcal{A}$ is the terminal category, its presheaf category is $\mathbf{Set}$, but its representable image consists only of a singleton. The presheaf category has all small categorical limits and colimits, whereas an arbitrary full subcategory need have almost none. The Yoneda embedding preserves existing limits because representable functors preserve limits. It generally does not preserve colimits. For example, the coproduct of two singleton sets in category of finite sets is a two-element set, but evaluating the proposed presheaf coproduct at a two-element set givesThe pointwise coproduct therefore leaves the representable image. Identifying which presheaves are representable, and which ambient constructions return to the original category, is precisely substantive category theory.

The representation is nonetheless powerful. The Yoneda lemma replaces a morphism by all its probes, converts a universal property into a representation of a functor, and makes the presheaf category a natural place to add formal colimits. A small presheaf category is the free free cocompletion under small colimits: every presheaf is a colimit of representables indexed by its category of elements. But this is a controlled enlargement of the category, not an identification of its original objects with all functors. The stronger conclusion in the proposed assertion therefore does not follow from the full-faithfulness statement.

For the covariant version of the Yoneda embedding, put $Y(A)=\mathcal{C}(A,-)$. A morphism $u:A\to B$ induces the natural transformation $Y(u):Y(B)\to Y(A)$ whose component sends $v:B\to X$ to $vu$. Thus $Y$ is a functor from the opposite category ${\mathcal{C}}^{\mathrm{op}}$ to the functor category $[\mathcal{C},\mathbf{Set}]$. The locally small category hypothesis makes each value a set.

The Yoneda lemma says that, for a functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$, evaluation at the identity morphism gives a natural bijectionGiven $a\in F(A)$, define ${\theta }_X^a(v)=F(v)(a)$. For $w:X\to X^{\prime }$, the functor law gives $F(w){\theta }_X^a(v)=F(wv)(a)={\theta }_{X^{\prime }}^a(wv)$, proving naturality. Conversely, naturality of $\theta$ at $v:A\to X$ gives ${\theta }_X(v)=F(v){\theta }_A(1_A)$. These two constructions are inverse, because $F(1_A)(a)=a$.

The bijection is natural in both variables. A natural transformation $\beta :F\to H$ sends the element $a$ to ${\beta }_A(a)$, matching postcomposition by $\beta$. For $u:A\to B$, precomposing with $Y(u)$ sends $\theta$ to a transformation from $Y(B)$ and its distinguished element is ${\theta }_B(u)=F(u)(a)$. This is exactly the required dependence on $A$.

Taking $F=Y(B)$ gives $\mathrm{Nat}(Y(A),Y(B))\cong \mathcal{C}(B,A)$. Consequently the covariant Yoneda embedding is full and faithful, with the reversal of arrows accounted for by its opposite category domain.

The limit form of the Special adjoint functor theorem is as follows. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a locally small category, a complete category, and a well-powered category, and suppose it has a small cogenerating family $(Q_i{)}_{i\in I}$. Let $\mathcal{D}$ be a locally small category. Then a functor $G:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves all small categorical limits. The dual exchanges completeness, well-poweredness and cogenerators for cocompleteness, well-copoweredness and generators, and characterizes functors with a right adjoint.

Here a cogenerating set distinguishes unequal parallel maps by postcomposition into one of the $Q_i$. A well-powered category has a set of subobjects of each fixed object. Completeness means existence of all small categorical limits. We use the initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set: a complete category that is locally small has an initial object exactly when it has a weakly initial set. A proof is given in Question 5(c). We also use the fact that when $G$ preserves small categorical limits, the comma category $(B\downarrow G)$ is complete, with its limits constructed in $\mathcal{C}$; local smallness is inherited from $\mathcal{C}$. Finally, having an initial object in $(B\downarrow G)$ for each $B$ is the universal arrow from an object to a functor characterization of a left adjoint.

Assume $G$ preserves small categorical limits, and fix $B\in \mathcal{D}$. We will construct a weakly initial set in $(B\downarrow G)$, rather than assume a solution set. Start with an arbitrary object $(C,x)$, where $x:B\to GC$. Call a subobject $m:S\hookrightarrow C$ supporting if $x=G(m)x_S$ for some $x_S:B\to GS$. There is at least one, namely $1_C$. Because $G$ preserves pullbacks in a category, it preserves monomorphisms: the self-pullback characterization of a monic map is preserved. Consequently each $x_S$ is unique.

There is a set of supporting subobjects by well-poweredness. Their intersection of subobjects exists by completeness; write it $m_0:C_0\hookrightarrow C$. Applying $G$ to this intersection categorical limit gives a unique $x_0:B\to G{C}_0$ lifting all the $x_S$, and hence $x=G(m_0)x_0$. Minimality says that any subobject $n:R\hookrightarrow C_0$ supporting $x_0$ is invertible: $m_{0}n$ supports $x$, so $m_0$ factors through $m_{0}n$, giving a right inverse to the monic $n$.

If $u,v:C_0\to Q_i$ satisfy $G(u)x_0=G(v)x_0$, their equalizer supports $x_0$, since $G$ preserves that equalizer. It is therefore an isomorphism, and $u=v$. We have obtained an injective functionLet $J_i$ be its image, a subset of the fixed set $S_i=\mathcal{D}(B,G{Q}_i)$. The evaluation embedding into cogenerator products is a monomorphismIndeed each $s\in J_i$ corresponds to a unique map $C_0\to Q_i$, and the cogenerating set property makes the resulting family jointly monic. Notice that we use the realized subsets $J_i$, not all of $S_i$: there need not be a map $C_0\to Q_i$ available for an unused index.

There is a set of tuples $J=(J_i)$, since $I$ and every $S_i$ are sets. For each resulting $P_J$, choose representatives of its subobjects; these form a set by well-poweredness. For every representative $R$, include every map $y:B\to GR$, a set by local smallness of $\mathcal{D}$. All resulting pairs $(R,y)$ form a set. Our given $(C,x)$ receives a map from such a pair: transport $x_0$ along the isomorphism between $C_0$ and the chosen representative, then compose its inverse with $m_0$. Thus these pairs form a weakly initial set in $(B\downarrow G)$. This is the cogenerator bound for comma-category solution sets.

The initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set gives an initial object $(LB,{\eta }_B)$. For $h:B\to B^{\prime }$, define $Lh$ by the unique equationUniqueness proves the functor laws and gives the natural bijectionsThus $L⊣G$. Conversely, a right adjoint preserves small categorical limits: its adjunction identifies maps into the proposed limiting object with compatible families of maps into the diagram. This proves both directions of the limit form of the special adjoint functor theorem. Applying the argument to the opposite categories proves the dual statement. Choices of representatives and adjoint objects are understood in the usual ambient-universe convention for large categories.

The covariant form of the Yoneda lemma says that for a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$, a functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ and an object $A$, there is a bijection, natural in $A$ and $F$,Explicitly its two directions areFor $u:B\to B^{\prime }$, functoriality gives $F(u){\alpha }_B^x(f)=F(uf)(x)={\alpha }_{B^{\prime }}^x(uf)$, so ${\alpha }^x$ is a natural transformation. Conversely, naturality of $\alpha$ at $f:A\to B$ gives ${\alpha }_B(f)=F(f)({\alpha }_A(1_A))$. This proves that the displayed maps are inverses.

Naturality in $F$ follows because postcomposition by $\theta :F\Rightarrow F^{\prime }$ sends $x$ to ${\theta }_A(x)$. For $u:A^{\prime }\to A$, precomposition of transformations by $\mathcal{C}(u,-)$ sends ${\alpha }^x$ to ${\alpha }^{F(u)(x)}$. This also verifies naturality in the representing object.

For $A\in \mathcal{C}$, the comma category $(A\downarrow G)$ has objects $(D,u)$ with $D\in \mathcal{D}$ and $u:A\to GD$. A morphism $(D,u)\to (D^{\prime },u^{\prime })$ is $h:D\to D^{\prime }$ satisfying $Ghu=u^{\prime }$. Identities and composition are those of $\mathcal{D}$, and functoriality of $G$ verifies the condition under composition.

The Freyd general adjoint functor theorem states: if $\mathcal{D}$ is a locally small category with all small categorical limits, and $\mathcal{C}$ is locally small, then $G:\mathcal{D}\to \mathcal{C}$ has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves small limits and satisfies the solution-set condition. The latter means that for each $A$ there is a set-indexed family $u_i:A\to G{D}_i$ such that every $u:A\to GD$ equals $Gh{u}_i$ for some $i$ and some $h:D_i\to D$.

For necessity, use the standard result that a right adjoint preserves categorical limits. If $F⊣G$, the singleton family containing the unit of an adjunction ${\eta }_A:A\to GFA$ is a solution set, since transposition gives $u=Gh{\eta }_A$ for a unique $h:FA\to D$.

For sufficiency, use the following standard limit fact: if $\mathcal{D}$ is complete and $G$ preserves limits, the projection $(A\downarrow G)\to \mathcal{D}$ creates small limits. Indeed, a compatible family $A\to G{D}_j$ induces a unique arrow into $G(\lim D_j)$, and this makes the underlying limit a limit in the comma category. The comma category is locally small because each of its hom-sets is a subset of a hom-set of $\mathcal{D}$. Its solution family is a weakly initial set.

We prove the remaining initial-object lemma for complete categories with a weakly initial set. In any locally small category $\mathcal{K}$ with all small limits and a weakly initial set $(K_i)$, form $W={\prod }_i{K}_i$. It is weakly initial: for any $X$, some $K_i\to X$ exists and may be composed with the projection $W\to K_i$. The empty family cannot be weakly initial in a nonempty complete category, which has a terminal object.

The set $\mathrm{End}(W)$ is small. Form a simultaneous equalizer $e:E\to W$ of every endomorphism of $W$ and $1_W$; thusThis equalizer exists by completeness, for example as the equalizer of two maps $W\rightrightarrows W^{\mathrm{End}(W)}$. The object $E$ is still weakly initial, since it maps to $W$.

Given $a,b:E\to X$, take their equalizer $j:Y\to E$. Weak initiality of $W$ gives $t:W\to Y$. Since $ejt$ is an endomorphism of $W$, we have $ejte=e$, and cancellation of the monomorphism $e$ gives $jte=1_E$. Thus $j$ is a split epimorphism as well as a monomorphism, so it is an isomorphism. From $aj=bj$ follows $a=b$. There is at least one map $E\to X$ by weak initiality, so $E$ is initial.

Apply this lemma to every $(A\downarrow G)$ and choose its initial object $(FA,{\eta }_A)$. For $v:A\to A^{\prime }$, initiality gives the unique $Fv:FA\to F{A}^{\prime }$ satisfying $GFv{\eta }_A={\eta }_{A^{\prime }}v$. Uniqueness proves the functor laws. The same initiality gives natural bijectionsHence $F⊣G$, completing the theorem without invoking another adjoint functor theorem.

For a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$, an object $C$, and a categorical presheaf $X:{\mathcal{C}}^{\mathrm{op}}\to \mathbf{Set}$, the Yoneda lemma gives the natural bijectionIts two maps are explicitlyFor $u:A^{\prime }\to A$, the equation $X(u)X(f)(x)=X(fu)(x)$ proves naturality of $\Psi (x)$. Evaluating it at the identity morphism gives $\Phi \Psi (x)=x$. Conversely, naturality of $\alpha$ at $f:A\to C$ givesso $\Psi \Phi (\alpha )=\alpha$. Evaluation at the identity and transport of an element along a morphism are mutually inverse.

The bijection is natural in both variables: a natural transformation $\theta :X\Rightarrow Y$ sends $\Phi (\alpha )$ to ${\theta }_C(\Phi (\alpha ))$, matching $\Phi (\theta \alpha )$; and $g:C\to C^{\prime }$ givesFor completeness, the covariant Yoneda lemma for $Y:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ is $\mathrm{Nat}(\mathcal{C}(C,-),Y)\cong Y(C)$, with $\alpha \mapsto {\alpha }_C(1_C)$ and inverse $y\mapsto (f:C\to A\mapsto Y(f)(y))$.

Let $u_{C,x}:C\to R$ be a colimit cocone for $G:\mathrm{Elts}(X)\to \mathcal{C}$. Here the preservation hypothesis must include the categorical limit of $G^{\mathrm{op}}$ in ${\mathcal{C}}^{\mathrm{op}}$; this indexing category can be large. For a morphism $f:(C,x)\to (D,y)$ of the category of elements, the defining equation $X(f)(y)=x$ says that the family of distinguished elements $(x{)}_{(C,x)}$ is compatible. Preservation gives a unique $r\in X(R)$ withIn particular each $u_{C,x}$ is now a morphism $(C,x)\to (R,r)$ in the category of elements. Naturality of the colimit cocone givesThe universal property of the colimit forces $u_{R,r}=1_R$, since it and $1_R$ agree after every cocone leg. If $f:C\to R$ also satisfies $X(f)(r)=x$, it is a morphism $(C,x)\to (R,r)$, and cocone compatibility now yields $u_{C,x}=u_{R,r}f=f$. Thus $(R,r)$ is a universal element. By the preceding representability criterion, the presheaf is represented by the colimit object:The size qualification matters. If preservation means only small categorical limits, the implication as printed is false for general locally small categories. For an explicit counterexample, let $\mathcal{C}$ be the ordered category of all ordinals with an extra greatest object $\infty$. Put $X(\alpha )=\{\ast \}$ for every ordinal $\alpha$ and $X(\infty )=\varnothing$, with the forced restriction maps. Every small colimit in $\mathcal{C}$ is the supremum of its object values: it is an ordinal unless the diagram contains $\infty$. Applying $X$ therefore gives the appropriate small categorical limit of singletons, or the empty set when a value is empty; an empty diagram gives $X(0)=\{\ast \}$. Hence $X$ preserves all small categorical limits.

Its category of elements consists of all ordinals, whose projection has the large colimit $\infty$ in $\mathcal{C}$. Nevertheless, no ordinal represents $X$, because its representable vanishes on larger ordinals; $\infty$ does not represent it either, since $\mathcal{C}(\infty ,\infty )$ is nonempty while $X(\infty )$ is empty. The valid proof consequently uses preservation of the displayed possibly large limit, or a smallness hypothesis making that diagram small.

The Special adjoint functor theorem says: if $\mathcal{C}$ is a locally small category, a complete category, a well-powered category, and has a small cogenerating family, then a functor $U:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ into any locally small category has a left adjoint if and only if it preserves small categorical limits.

A small cogenerating family $(Q_i{)}_{i\in I}$, with $I$ a set, distinguishes unequal parallel morphisms by postcomposition: for $f\ne g:A\to B$, some $q:B\to Q_i$ has $qf\ne qg$. Being well-powered means that the subobjects of each object form a set up to the usual equivalence of monomorphisms. These hypotheses make the solution-set condition automatic.

The dual formulation uses a cocomplete category, being a well-copowered category and having a small generating family, and concludes that every small-colimit-preserving functor has a right adjoint.

For a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$, the Yoneda lemma states thatnaturally in both $A\in \mathcal{C}$ and $F:{\mathcal{C}}^{\mathrm{op}}\to \mathbf{Set}$. Taking $F=\mathcal{C}(-,B)$ givesso the Yoneda embedding is full and faithful.

For small $\mathcal{C}$, the presheaf category has pointwise finite limits and colimits, exponentialand a subobject classifier whose elements at $C$ are sieves on $C$. Hence it is a presheaf topos.

If $\mathcal{C}$ has finite limits, the Yoneda embedding preserves them: maps into a limiting object are the corresponding limits of hom-sets. Its essential image is therefore a full subcategory of the presheaf topos closed under finite limits. Since Yoneda is full and faithful, this proves the assertion up to equivalence.

For a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$, an object $A$, and a functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$, the covariant Yoneda lemma is the natural bijectionIts inverse sends $x\in F(A)$ to the natural transformation whose component at $B$ maps $f:A\to B$ to $F(f)(x)$.

Suppose now that $\mathcal{C}$ is a small category. For $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$, form the coproduct in a categoryThe Yoneda lemma associates to every summand the natural transformation determined by $x$, and these transformations combine to a map $p:P\to F$. At an object $B$, the element $y\in F(B)$ is the image of $1_B$ in the summand indexed by $(B,y)$, so $p$ is a pointwise epimorphism in a functor category. Each representable functor $\mathcal{C}(A,-)$ is a projective object in a category, sinceand evaluation preserves pointwise epimorphisms. A coproduct of projectives is projective, so $P$ is the required projective object. This is the projective cover of a set-valued functor by representables.

We next prove the three equivalent conditions. If every morphism of $\mathcal{C}$ is a monomorphism, then for $f:B\to C$ and every $A$, postcompositionis injective. Thus every covariant representable functor is a monofunctor. Conversely, taking $A=B$ shows that injectivity for every representable implies that $fg=fh$ forces $g=h$, so every $f$ is monic.

If all representables are monofunctors, the object $P$ above is a monofunctor because a coproduct of injective functions is injective. Hence every $F$ is an epimorphic image of a monofunctor. Conversely, suppose every functor is an epimorphic image of a monofunctor and apply this to a representable $R$. Choose an epimorphism $q:M\twoheadrightarrow R$ with $M$ a monofunctor. Since $R$ is projective, $1_R$ lifts to $s:R\to M$ with $qs=1_R$. Thus $R$ is a retract in a category of $M$. Every retract of a monofunctor is a monofunctor: if $R(f)x=R(f)y$, then injectivity of $M(f)$ applied to $s(x)$ and $s(y)$ gives $s(x)=s(y)$, and applying $q$ gives $x=y$. This completes the equivalence.

Finally, every functor $\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ is a monofunctor exactly when every morphism of $\mathcal{C}$ is a split monomorphism. The forward implication is immediate because every functor preserves a left inverse. For the converse, fix $f:A\to B$ and form a quotient of $\mathcal{C}(A,-)\bigsqcup 1$ by identifying the distinguished point with every arrow of the form $kf:A\to X$, where $k:B\to X$. In the resulting functor $Q$, the two elements $[1_A]$ and $\ast$ of $Q(A)$ have equal images under $Q(f)$ because $[f]=\ast$. If every functor is a monofunctor, $Q(f)$ is injective, so $[1_A]=\ast$. By construction this means $1_A=rf$ for some $r:B\to A$. Thus $f$ is split monic. Equivalently, every morphism of $\mathcal{C}$ must be an absolute monomorphism.

For a locally small category $\mathcal{C}$, a representation of a functor $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ is an object $A$ and an element $a\in F(A)$ such thatis a bijection for every $B$, naturally in $B$. Equivalently, $\theta :\mathcal{C}(A,-)\cong F$ is a natural isomorphism.

Suppose $(A,a)$ and $(A^{\prime },a^{\prime })$ are two representations. Universality gives unique mapssuch that $F(u)(a)=a^{\prime }$ and $F(v)(a^{\prime })=a$. Then $F(vu)(a)=a$, and uniqueness applied to the element $a$ gives $vu=1_A$. Similarly $uv=1_{A^{\prime }}$. Thus the representing objects are uniquely isomorphic in a way carrying one universal element of a set-valued functor to the other.

For $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathcal{D}$ and $B\in \mathcal{D}$, the comma category $(B\downarrow F)$ has objects $(A,u)$ with $u:B\to F(A)$. A morphism $(A,u)\to (A^{\prime },u^{\prime })$ is a map $h:A\to A^{\prime }$ satisfyingThe universal arrow from an object to a functor criterion says that $F$ has a left adjoint exactly when $(B\downarrow F)$ has an initial object for every $B$. Indeed, an initial $(LB,{\eta }_B)$ represents the functor $A\mapsto \mathcal{D}(B,FA)$, and uniqueness makes $B\mapsto LB$ functorial.

When $F:\mathcal{C}\to \mathbf{Set}$ and $1$ is a singleton, an arrow $1\to F(A)$ is just an element $a\in F(A)$. Hence $(1\downarrow F)$ is the category of elements, and its initial objects are exactly the representations of $F$. This proves

If $F$ has a left adjoint, the universal-arrow criterion immediately makes it representable. Conversely, suppose $\mathcal{C}$ is cocomplete and $F\cong \mathcal{C}(A,-)$. For a set $S$, form the copowerThe coproduct in a category universal property gives natural bijectionsso $L⊣F$.

Cocompleteness cannot be omitted. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be the category of ordinals in reverse order: there is one arrow $\alpha \to \beta$ exactly when $\alpha \ge \beta$ in the ordinary ordering. This large poset is locally small and complete. For a set-indexed family $({\alpha }_i)$, its product in the reversed order is the ordinary supremum ${\sup }_i{\alpha }_i$, and equalizers in a poset are automatic. But $\mathcal{C}$ has no initial object, since that would be a largest ordinal. Any representable functor $\mathcal{C}(A,-)$ is therefore the requested example: if it had a left adjoint $L$, thenwould be a singleton for every $B$, making $L(\varnothing )$ initial, a contradiction.