Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 13 1 i Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use the usual convention that a variety is an irreducible variety. For a quasi-projective algebraic set , its algebraic dimension is the supremum of the lengths of strict chainsof nonempty irreducible closed subsets of . It is the maximum of the algebraic dimensions of its irreducible components. On an affine algebraic set, the correspondence between irreducible closed subsets and prime ideals reverses inclusion, so this is the Krull dimension of the coordinate ring. On a quasi-projective algebraic set, it is the supremum of the Krull dimensions of the coordinate rings of its affine open subsets. At a closed point , the Krull dimension of the local ring measures chains through .
Here is a closed-point dimension lemma for affine domains that avoids transcendence degree. Put . By Noether normalization, there is a integral extensionThe number of variables is because integral extensions preserve Krull dimension and . For any maximal ideal of , its contraction to is a maximal ideal. Since is an algebraically closed field, has height of a prime ideal . The going-down theorem applies because is an integrally closed domain and is a integral domain. It lifts a length- chain below to one below . HenceThe opposite inequality follows from .
For the nonempty open subset , choose a nonempty principal open subset and a closed point . Every prime ideal below avoids , so the preceding chain survives in the localization . Consequently . Conversely, any chain of irreducible closed subsets in gives a chain of the same length after taking closures in : intersecting those closures with recovers the original subsets. Therefore
For the principal hypersurface dimension lemma, let be a minimal prime ideal over . Since in the integral domain , . The Krull principal ideal theorem gives . Choose a closed point on lying on none of the other finitely many irreducible components of . Such a point exists because those other components cut out proper closed subsets of the irreducible variety , and closed points are dense. Set . Then andWrite . Choose a system of parameters in and lift it to . The ideal has radical equal to the maximal ideal of . The Krull height theorem yields . On the other hand, any chain of prime ideals containing can be extended strictly at the bottom by the zero prime ideal of the integral domain , giving . Thus . Since is a localization of , . Extending a chain in by also gives . Hence every component has the required dimension:This argument uses Noether normalization, going-down theorem, and the Krull height theorem, never the dimension from the function field theorem. Irreducibility is essential: if the word variety were instead allowed to mean an arbitrary reducible affine algebraic set, neither assertion would hold without extra hypotheses. For example, a disjoint union of an affine plane and an affine line has an open component of smaller algebraic dimension; a function equal to on the plane and a coordinate on the line has a nonempty zero set of algebraic dimension .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 28 2 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A useful version is the strong form of Hensel lemma. Let be complete for a Non-Archimedean absolute value, let , and suppose satisfiesThen there is a unique root in the ball , and .
Put and . Starting with , apply Newton iteration over a valued field . Taylor expansion over the valuation ring givesfor integral . Inductively and . Indeed the Newton increment has size at most , so the derivative size is unchanged, and the new function value is bounded by the square of the increment. The increments tend to zero, and the ultrametric inequality makes the sequence Cauchy. Completeness supplies a root with the stated distance bound.
If are distinct points of the ball, their divided difference is plus a term of size at most , so is nonzero. Two roots in that ball are impossible. This proves the stated Hensel lemma. In particular a simple root modulo the maximal ideal lifts uniquely to a root in its residue class.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 28 4 c Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
We count extensions up to -isomorphism. An extension of degree has a maximal unramified extension inside it, with , and is totally ramified of degree . The unramified extension of each degree is unique, so there are only finitely many possibilities for .
Fix and . The coefficient space of monic degree- Eisenstein polynomials is compact: its nonconstant nonleading coefficients lie in the compact maximal ideal, and its constant coefficient lies in the compact set . Each such polynomial has a root generating a degree- extension. For sufficiently close coefficients of a polynomial , the numbers and are arbitrarily small, while because the characteristic is zero. The strong form of Hensel lemma, applied in , supplies a root of as close to as desired. Choose the neighborhood so that the Krasner's lemma inequality holds. Then , and both degrees are , so the extensions are equal. Compactness gives a finite cover by such neighborhoods, proving finiteness of degree- extensions. If extensions are realized as subfields of a fixed algebraic closure rather than counted up to isomorphism, each has only finitely many embeddings, so that count is finite too.
For odd , write . The square map is bijective on by Hensel lemma, and the finite residue field has cyclic multiplicative group of even order. ThusThe quadratic extensions from square classes correspond to its three nontrivial classes. Representatives are , where is a unit with nonsquare residue. There are quadratic extensions: is unramified, while and are totally ramified. For completeness, two nonsquare parameters give the same extension only if their ratio is a square: writing and squaring forces , hence .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 4 1 a Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Choose a separation into two nonempty clopen sets. Both are closed in the Zariski topology, so write and for ideals . Their disjointness gives . A proper ideal lies in a maximal ideal, so this forces .
Their union is all of the spectrum of a commutative ring, and . Thus every prime ideal contains , soThe last equality uses that is a reduced ring. For comaximal ideals, : if and , then . Therefore the Chinese remainder theorem givesThe isomorphism sends to its two residue classes. Its kernel is ; for surjectivity, and are obtained from , where , and . The two factors are nonzero because are nonempty, so are proper.
This is a disconnected reduced spectrum product decomposition. The elements also satisfy , , , exhibiting the ring product decomposition by an idempotent. No Noetherian hypothesis is required.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 4 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
Use on the target and on the source, so the map of coordinate rings sends to . A closed point of the real affine line corresponds to a maximal ideal generated either by , , or by a monic irreducible quadratic . The scheme-theoretic fibre over that point has coordinate algebraHere is the residue field, and in the real-point case. The fibre is a scheme, so its nilpotents must be retained.
For , put . The factors , , are pairwise coprime, with the last one irreducible over . The Chinese remainder theorem identifies with , giving three irreducible components.
For , put . The exact factorization isEach quadratic has discriminant , and they are distinct and coprime. Thus , giving two irreducible components.
For , . It has one prime ideal, generated by the class of , so one irreducible component. It is not the reduced point : its class of is a nonzero nilpotent element with nilpotency index four.
Finally write the irreducible quadratic as , with . Over , has four roots above and four above . They are all simple, because , and the two sets are disjoint. None is real. Conjugation pairs them into four distinct irreducible real quadratics. Hence and this fibre has four irreducible components.
| Target closed-point type | Real coordinate algebra of the fibre | Irreducible components |
|---|---|---|
| , | ||
| , | ||
| Irreducible quadratic |
All fibres in each row are isomorphic as affine schemes over . The rows are distinct: their numbers of irreducible components already distinguish them, and the zero fibre is additionally nonreduced. ThereforeThese are ordinary scheme components, not geometric components counted after complexifying the base. Counting only real roots would miss both the complex-residue factors and the nonreal closed points.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2012 iii Paper 4 5 b Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A nilpotent element belongs to every prime ideal and therefore to every maximal ideal, soFor the reverse containment, let be nonnilpotent. The localization of a ring is nonzero: if there, some power of would annihilate in . This is still a finite-type integer algebra, because it can be presented as .
Choose a maximal ideal of . Its residue field is a finite-type integer algebra, hence finite by part (a). Consider the image of in . It is a finite integral domain containing , so it is a field: multiplication by a nonzero element is injective on the finite set , hence surjective, and therefore has an inverse in .
The kernel of is consequently maximal. The image of is nonzero, since became a unit in and remains a unit in its nonzero residue field. Thus . Every nonnilpotent element can therefore be avoided by a maximal ideal, givingThis radical equality for finitely generated integer algebras uses part (a) to ensure that the contraction of the localized maximal ideal is maximal. Such contraction is not generally maximal for arbitrary localization of a ring; the finite-field image is the decisive additional step. The zero ring is immediate, with the intersection of its empty set of maximal ideals understood as the whole ring. No general theorem that integer algebras are Jacobson rings is being quoted.
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 13 1 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
A ring homomorphism is understood to preserve . Start with . Its map on spectra of rings isContraction gives a prime ideal, and . Thus is continuous for the Zariski topology. On each principal open subscheme, the structure sheaf map is the ring homomorphismThese maps commute with restrictions, so they define a sheaf morphism . At , with , its stalk map is . The inverse image of the maximal ideal is , so this is a local homomorphism. We have constructed a morphism of locally ringed spaces.
Conversely, let be a morphism of locally ringed spaces. Its map on global sections gives , using and . Fix and put . Compatibility with the stalk maps and the local homomorphism property giveConsequently , so the underlying map is forced. On , the sheaf morphism is forced as well: it extends and sends to a unit, hence agrees with the displayed map by the universal property of localization. The principal open subschemes form a basis, so the entire sheaf morphism is determined. Taking global sections of the construction recovers . The two constructions are inverse, proving the affine-target adjunction for schemes in the affine-source case:
To describe the real affine plane scheme points, write . It is a unique factorization domain of Krull dimension two. Its points are exactly the following prime ideals:
- , the generic point of the whole affine plane.
- for each nonconstant irreducible polynomial , taken up to multiplication by a nonzero real constant. These are the height-one points, each the generic point of the integral scheme .
- The maximal ideals, or closed points. By the Zariski lemma, their residue fields are finite algebraic extensions of . Because is a real closed field, those fields are or . The first type is with . The second type is the kernel of evaluation at a nonreal pair ; the pairs and give the same maximal ideal, and these are the only repetitions.
For completeness, any height-one prime ideal contains an irreducible polynomial ; since is already a height-one prime ideal, it must equal . Every remaining nonzero prime ideal has height two and is maximal, by Krull dimension. For a nonreal pair, evaluation generates all of over , so its kernel is maximal. Conversely, each residue field isomorphic to has exactly the two conjugate real-algebra embeddings into , proving the assertion about repetitions.
This describes the topology too: consists of the prime ideals containing , and the closure of a point is . In particular, the closure of is the whole affine plane, while the closure of contains precisely the closed points on , together with itself. The spectrum is much larger than the set . For example, is a height-one point although its curve has no real points. Its structure sheaf has and stalk at .
The induced morphism of schemesis contraction of prime ideals, with the structure sheaf maps given above. On closed points, it sends to the kernel of real-polynomial evaluation at . A real closed point has one complex point above it; a nonreal closed point has two, interchanged by complex conjugation. The source generic point maps to the target generic point. The source height-one points are generated by irreducible complex polynomials . Their contractions are height-one prime ideals , and is a factor of over . An irreducible real either stays irreducible over or splits into two distinct conjugate irreducible factors. Indeed, complex conjugation acts transitively on its distinct factors, or a proper orbit product would give a real factor of ; every orbit has size at most two. Repeated factors are excluded by separability in characteristic zero. Thus one or two height-one points lie above .
The complexification fibres of a real scheme give a uniform description of all scheme-theoretic fibres, including the nonclosed points, is especially useful. The extension of coordinate rings isa free -module with basis . At , with residue field , the scheme-theoretic fibre isIf is a square in , the Chinese remainder theorem gives , hence two points. Otherwise it is a quadratic field extension, hence one point. The polynomial has no repeated root in characteristic zero, so all these scheme-theoretic fibres are reduced schemes. This also proves surjectivity. Conjugation acts on each two-point fibre by exchanging its points and fixes each one-point fibre. As a finite morphism, is closed, so its underlying topological space is the quotient by complex conjugation. The fibre formula explains why a real closed point gives one complex point, whereas the generic point gives a single point with residue field .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2013 iii Paper 13 3 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-07
The point to retain in the direct-image theorem is quasi-compactness of inverse images of affine opens and of overlaps; no separation assumption has been supplied. The underlying space of a Noetherian scheme is Noetherian, so every open subset of is quasi-compact. Fix an affine open subscheme of , put , and choose a finite open cover by affine open subschemes . For each pair , choose a finite affine cover of . Empty overlaps contribute no terms.
Write . The sheaf gluing axiom gives the exact sequencewhere is the difference of the two restrictions to each overlap chart. All terms are -modules through . For , the inverse image of cuts each and by a principal open subscheme. Because is a quasi-coherent sheaf, sections on these smaller affine charts are the corresponding module localizations at . Exactness of localization and its commutation with finite products now identify the localized equalizer with the equalizer for the restricted cover. ThusThe isomorphisms respect restrictions, proving on the basis of principal open subschemes. Since was arbitrary, is a quasi-coherent sheaf. The finite covers of overlaps are what allow the proof to work for nonseparated Noetherian schemes; this is the quasi-coherence of direct image under a quasi-compact quasi-separated morphism.
For a quasi-coherent sheaf which is not coherent but has coherent direct image, use andThis infinite negative-twist sum with zero global sections is quasi-coherent: on each standard affine chart it is the sheaf associated with a direct sum of free rank-one modules. Its stalk at every point, modulo the maximal ideal, is an infinite-dimensional vector space. A finitely generated module would have a finite-dimensional quotient, so is not a coherent sheaf.
Nevertheless, . This follows from cohomology of twisting sheaves on projective space, or directly by gluing on the two standard affine charts: if , a section is a polynomial on the first chart and on the second with , which forces both to vanish. Global sections commute with this direct sum: they are the kernel of the difference map for the two-chart cover, and direct sums commute with that finite equalizer of modules. Hencewhich is coherent on . Both schemes in this example are Noetherian.
For a finite morphism, such an example is impossible. On an affine open subscheme of the target, its inverse image is , with a finite -module. Write . Its direct image corresponds to considered as an -module. If the direct image is coherent, is finitely generated over . The same generators also generate it over , because acts through . Since is Noetherian, is coherent. Conversely, a finite set of -generators combined with a finite set of -generators of gives finitely many -generators of . Thus coherence reflected by finite direct image gives the stronger equivalence
Finally, let , let be the punctured affine plane, and let be the open immersion. Both are integral schemes, but is not an isomorphism of schemes because it omits a point. The cover givesinside the field of fractions . Indeed, in a reduced fraction, membership in the first localization forces every denominator factor to be associated to , while membership in the second forces it to be associated to . Unique factorization and coprimality force the denominator to be a unit. By the theorem just proved, is quasi-coherent on the affine , hence determined by this module of global sections. The natural map corresponds to the identity of , soa coherent sheaf. This is a concrete case of codimension-two extension of regular functions on a normal variety.