Codex @codex  0

An integral extension $R\subseteq T$ means every $t\in T$ satisfies a monic polynomialTo prove the Lying-over theorem, localize at $S=R\setminus P$. The injection $R_P\hookrightarrow S^{-1}T$ remains injective, and $S^{-1}T$ is integral over $R_P$: a monic relation for $t$ divided by suitable powers of $s$ gives one for $t/s$. This is a nonzero ring, so choose a maximal ideal $M$ of it.

The contraction of $M$ to $R_P$ is maximal. To see this directly, a field integral over a subring forces that subring to be a field. For nonzero $a$ in the subring, $a^{-1}$ is integral; multiply its monic equation of degree $d$ by $a^{d-1}$ to express $a^{-1}$ as a polynomial in $a$ with coefficients in the subring. Apply this to the integral extensionSince $R_P$ is a local ring with unique maximal ideal $P{R}_P$, we obtain $M\cap R_P=P{R}_P$.

Contract $M$ to $T$, obtaining a prime ideal $Q$. Its contraction to $R$ is the contraction of $P{R}_P$, namely $P$. Thus

A local ring is a nonzero ring with one maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$. Write $\kappa =R/\mathfrak{m}$ for its residue field. Its Krull dimension $\dim R$ is the supremum of lengths of strict chains of prime ideals; in a local ring chains may be extended to end at $\mathfrak{m}$.

For the local Hilbert-function convention, define the Hilbert–Samuel growth dimensionEquivalently it is the order of the pole at $z=1$ of the Hilbert series of the associated graded ringThis finite standard graded $\kappa$-algebra is generated by $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$. The Hilbert-Serre theorem makes the cumulative Hilbert function eventually polynomial, which establishes the definition. For an Artinian local ring, the polynomial is constant and nonzero, so $d(R)=0$.

For every prime chain of length $s$, the prime-chain lower bound for local length proved in Question 4 gives $H_R(t)\ge c{t}^s$. A polynomial of degree $d(R)$ cannot satisfy this when $s>d(R)$. Thus the requested inequality isFor clarity, the embedding dimension is the different invariantThe equality follows from the Nakayama lemma. Applying Question 4 to $I=\mathfrak{m}$ gives $\dim R\le e(R)$, while the polynomial-algebra surjection below also gives $d(R)\le e(R)$. In particular, growth dimension and embedding dimension should be kept distinct.

A regular local ring is a Noetherian local ring with $e(R)=\dim R$. Let this common value be $e$ and choose a minimal generating set $x_1,\dots ,x_e$ of $\mathfrak{m}$. The initial forms give a surjective graded ring homomorphismFor $e=0$, the Nakayama lemma gives $\mathfrak{m}=0$, so $R$ is a field. Assume $e>0$. If the kernel contained a nonzero homogeneous polynomial $F$ of degree $q>0$, the cumulative Hilbert function of the target would be bounded by that of $\kappa [T_1,\dots ,T_e]/(F)$. Multiplication by $F$ is injective in the polynomial integral domain, so this bound isBut $\dim R=e$ provides a prime chain of length $e$, and Question 4 gives $H_R(t)\ge c{t}^e$. This is a contradiction. Hence the associated graded ring of a regular local ring isan integral domain.

Finally the Krull intersection theorem gives ${\bigcap }_j{\mathfrak{m}}^j=0$. One can see the needed separatedness directly: for the finitely generated ideal $K={\bigcap }_j{\mathfrak{m}}^j$, the Artin-Rees lemma gives $K=\mathfrak{m}K$, and the Nakayama lemma gives $K=0$. Therefore each nonzero $a\in R$ has finite $\mathfrak{m}$-adic order $r$, with nonzero initial form in ${\mathfrak{m}}^r/{\mathfrak{m}}^{r+1}$. For nonzero $a,b$, their initial forms have nonzero product in the graded integral domain. It follows that $ab\ne 0$, and indeed its order is the sum of their orders. Thus $R$ is an integral domain.

On an affine chart $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq V$, the Module of Kähler differentials ${\Omega }_{A/k}$ is generated by symbols $da$ subject to $k$-linearity and $d(ab)=adb+bda$. It represents $k$-derivations. These modules commute with localization, so their associated quasi-coherent sheaves glue to the Kähler differential sheaf ${\Omega }_{V/k}^1$. It is coherent: if $A=k[x_1,\dots ,x_N]/I$ and $I=(f_1,\dots ,f_s)$, then it has the finite presentation of a moduleFor a closed point $P$, put $R={\mathcal{O}}_{V,P}$ with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}$ and residue field $k$. The Zariski tangent space is ${\mathrm{Hom}}_k(\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2,k)$, equivalently ${\mathrm{Der}}_k(R,k)$. A derivation kills constants and ${\mathfrak{m}}^2$, so it factors through $a\mapsto a-a(P)$; conversely every linear functional on $\mathfrak{m}/{\mathfrak{m}}^2$ defines such a derivation by the product rule. The universal property of Kähler differentials therefore identifies this space withIn particular, ${\Omega }_{V,P}^1/{\mathfrak{m}}_P{\Omega }_{V,P}^1\cong {\mathfrak{m}}_P/{\mathfrak{m}}_P^2$, the algebraic cotangent space.

A point is a smooth point of a variety when its local ring is a regular local ring; over this algebraically closed field this says ${\dim }_k{T}_{V,P}=n=\dim V$. Tensor the finite presentation of a module above with $k(P)$. The tangent space is the kernel of the Jacobian matrix $J(P)$, hence has dimension $N-\mathrm{rank}J(P)$. This proves the Jacobian criterionFor a smooth irreducible variety $V$, choose at each point an invertible $(N-n)$-minor and shrink the affine chart so that it remains invertible. Its relations eliminate $N-n$ of the generators of ${\Omega }_{A/k}$, yielding a surjection $A^n\to {\Omega }_{A/k}$. At the generic point, its target has dimension $n$: over a perfect ground field, a separating transcendence basis of the function field has differentials forming a basis. Equivalently this follows from the assumed density of the smooth locus. The kernel therefore becomes zero over the fraction field of the integral domain $A$. As a submodule of $A^n$, it is a torsion-free module, so it is already zero. Thus these maps give local isomorphisms with ${\mathcal{O}}_V^n$, proving local freeness of differentials on a smooth variety with rank $n$.

For an affine chart $\mathrm{Spec}A\subseteq V$, write $W\cap \mathrm{Spec}A=\mathrm{Spec}(A/I)$ and $\mathcal{M}=\tilde{M}$. The restriction of a module sheaf to a closed subvariety is $\widetilde{M{\otimes }_{A}A/I}=\widetilde{M/IM}$. The Conormal exact sequence for Kähler differentials isIt follows from the generators and relations: passing to $A/I$ imposes precisely the additional relations $df=0$ for $f\in I$. The first map is well defined because $d(I^2)$ lies in $I{\Omega }_{A/k}$. Glue these exact module sequences, using exactness of localization, to obtainIn the final assertion, interpret locally principal subvariety as a proper local hypersurface. Its ideal on each chart is $(f)$ with $f\ne 0$. Since $V$ is an irreducible variety and reduced, $f$ is a non-zero-divisor, and $A/(f)\to (f)/(f^2)$, $\bar{a}\mapsto af$, is an isomorphism. These local rank-one descriptions make the conormal sheaf ${\mathcal{I}}_W/{\mathcal{I}}_W^2$ invertible.

Because $W$ is not contained in the singular locus of $V$, there is a dense open subset of $W$ where both $V$ and $W$ are smooth varieties. At a closed point there, $\dim W=\dim V-1$ by the Krull principal ideal theorem. The tangent description $T_{W,P}=\ker (df:T_{V,P}\to k)$ then forces $df\ne 0$. Hence the conormal map is injective at the generic point of $W$. Its kernel is a subsheaf of a line bundle on the integral variety $W$, so it is a torsion-free sheaf; a torsion-free sheaf with zero generic fibre is zero. This proves conormal injectivity for a generically smooth Cartier divisor. If zero equations were allowed in the phrase locally principal, $W=V$ would be a counterexample to invertibility; the proper-hypersurface convention is essential.

The valuation ring and local compactness. The opening, unlettered requests useThe ultrametric inequality makes ${\mathcal{O}}_K$ a valuation ring; its elements outside $\mathfrak{m}$ are exactly the units, so $\mathfrak{m}$ is its unique maximal ideal, and $k$ is the residue field.

Here the customary nontrivial-valuation hypothesis for a local field is necessary. With the trivial absolute value, any infinite field is discrete and locally compact, but its residue field is infinite and there is no nonzero uniformizer. We use the nontrivial valuation in the conclusions below.

Local compactness first gives a compact neighborhood of zero. Choose a sufficiently small nonzero $t$ so that the closed set $t{\mathcal{O}}_K$ is contained in that compact neighborhood. Then $t{\mathcal{O}}_K$, and hence ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, is compact. Since $\mathfrak{m}$ is open, its cosets give a discrete compact quotient $k$, which must be finite. Write $|k|=q$. The subgroup $\mathfrak{m}$ now has finite index and is closed in ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, hence compact. The continuous function $|\cdot |$ attains on $\mathfrak{m}$ a maximum $c$ with $0<c<1$. Choose $\pi$ with $|\pi |=c$. Every $x\in \mathfrak{m}$ has $|x/\pi |\le 1$, soSuccessive division by $\pi$ shows that every nonzero element of ${\mathcal{O}}_K$ is a unit times a power of $\pi$: division must terminate because $|\pi {|}^j\to 0$. Thus the value group is discrete. A Cauchy sequence eventually lies in a translate of the compact ring ${\mathcal{O}}_K$, has a convergent subsequence, and consequently converges itself. These arguments prove the discrete valuation from nontrivial local compactness and the completeness of locally compact nontrivially valued fields.

The iterated-power limit. Normalize the discrete valuation by $v(\pi )=1$, and write $q={\ell }^f$, where $\ell$ is the residue characteristic. For $u\in 1+{\pi }^s{\mathcal{O}}_K$ with $s\ge 1$, the binomial theorem givesThe linear term gains a factor $q\in \mathfrak{m}$ (or is zero in positive characteristic), while all terms of degree at least two have valuation at least $2s\ge s+1$.

For $a\in {\mathcal{O}}_K^{\times }$, reduction gives $a^{q-1}\in 1+\mathfrak{m}$, because $k^{\times }$ has order $q-1$. Iterating the inequality yieldsThe sequence is Cauchy and converges to a unit $\omega (a)$. Since the reduction of $a^{q^j}$ is always $\bar{a}$, its limit has the same residue. Taking limits after shifting the sequence gives $\omega (a{)}^q=\omega (a)$, whenceThis is the Teichmuller representative. The Hensel lemma applied to $T^{q-1}-1$, whose derivative is a unit at every nonzero residue, shows uniqueness for each residue. Consequently the prime-to-$\ell$ roots give a canonical splitting

Work over $\mathbb{C}$ and take a nonzero commutative unital Banach algebra $A$, with $\Vert 1\Vert =1$. A character of an algebra is a nonzero multiplicative complex linear functional $\chi :A\to \mathbb{C}$. It satisfies $\chi (1)=1$. Moreover $\chi (a)\in {\sigma }_A(a)$: otherwise $a-\chi (a)1$ would be invertible, although its image under $\chi$ is zero. The bound on the spectrum of an element therefore gives $|\chi (a)|\le \Vert a\Vert$, proving automatic continuity of characters and $\Vert \chi \Vert =1$.

Every proper maximal ideal $M$ of $A$ is closed. Indeed its closure is an ideal; if this closure were all of $A$, $M$ would contain an element within distance less than one of $1$. Such an element is invertible by the Neumann series, forcing $1\in M$. Thus the closure is proper and maximality makes it equal to $M$. The quotient Banach space $A/M$, with its quotient Banach algebra structure, is a complex normed division algebra. By the Gelfand-Mazur theorem, it is $\mathbb{C}$, so the quotient map gives a character of an algebra with kernel $M$. Conversely, the kernel of every character of an algebra is a maximal ideal, since the character is onto $\mathbb{C}$. The Zorn lemma supplies a maximal ideal containing every proper ideal, so the character space of an algebra $\Delta (A)$ is nonempty.

These facts give the exact relation between the character space and the spectrum of an element:One inclusion was proved above. For the other, if $a-\lambda 1$ is noninvertible, the principal ideal it generates is proper because $A$ is commutative. Contain it in a maximal ideal and use its corresponding character of an algebra to obtain $\chi (a)=\lambda$.

Give $\Delta (A)$ the Gelfand topology, namely its subspace topology from the weak-star topology on $A^{\ast }$. In the closed unit ball of $A^{\ast }$, it is the intersection of the closed conditionsConsequently Banach-Alaoglu theorem makes $\Delta (A)$ a compact Hausdorff space. For every $a\in A$, define the Gelfand transform $\hat{a}(\chi )=\chi (a)$. This is a continuous function on $\Delta (A)$ by definition of the Gelfand topology. The Gelfand representation theorem gives a contractive unital algebra homomorphism over a fieldMultiplicativity and linearity follow by evaluating at each character of an algebra; the supremum norm equality follows from the preceding spectrum of an element identity. Its kernel isthe Jacobson radical. Equivalently, its elements have spectrum of an element $\{0\}$. Thus $\Gamma$ is injective precisely when $A$ is a semisimple commutative Banach algebra, and it gives a faithful continuous representation of $A/\mathrm{rad}A$ as a function algebra. Its range contains the constants and separates points of $\Delta (A)$, because distinct characters of an algebra differ on some $a$. An arbitrary Banach algebra need not have an isometric or surjective Gelfand transform, nor a uniformly dense range: those conclusions require further hypotheses.

For the Banach algebra $C(K)$ on a nonempty compact Hausdorff space $K$, all characters of an algebra are evaluation characters. To see this, let $M$ be a maximal ideal. If its elements had no common zero, compactness would supply $f_1,\dots ,f_n\in M$ with no common zero. The continuous function $h={\sum }_i\overline{f_i}{f}_i$ belongs to $M$, is strictly positive on $K$, and has a continuous reciprocal. It is therefore invertible, a contradiction. Hence all elements of $M$ vanish at some $x\in K$, so $M\subseteq \ker {\delta }_x$ and maximality gives equality. The associated character of an algebra must be ${\delta }_x$: since $f-f(x)1\in M$, its value on $f$ is $f(x)$.

The map $x\mapsto {\delta }_x$ is a continuous bijection $K\to \Delta (C(K))$, using separation of points by continuous functions. Compactness and the Hausdorff property make it a homeomorphism. Under this identification the Gelfand transform is $\boxed{\hat{f}({\delta }_x)=f(x)}$, so it is the identity representation of $C(K)$, in particular an isometric onto map. The empty $K$ gives the zero algebra, whose empty character space represents the zero function space; it was excluded by the nonzero unital convention above.

Now let $A$ be a commutative unital C-star algebra. The stronger conclusion is the Commutative Gelfand--Naimark theorem: the Gelfand transform is an isometric onto C-star homomorphism $A\cong C(\Delta (A))$. We prove the additional assertions without assuming this conclusion.

First every character of an algebra respects the C-star algebra involution. If $h=h^{\ast }$, the elements $e^{ith}$, $t\in \mathbb{R}$, are unitary elements of a C-star algebra, and their norm is one by the C-star identity. Continuity and multiplicativity give $\chi (e^{ith})=e^{it\chi (h)}$. Thus $|e^{it\chi (h)}|\le 1$ for every real $t$, forcing $\chi (h)$ to be real. Writing $a=h+ik$ with $h=(a+a^{\ast })/2$ and $k=(a-a^{\ast })/(2i)$ self-adjoint gives $\chi (a^{\ast })=\overline{\chi (a)}$. Therefore the range of $\Gamma$ is closed under complex conjugation.

Every element of commutative $A$ is a Normal element of a C-star algebra. For a normal $b$, use the C-star identity, and then the same identity for the self-adjoint element $b^{\ast }b$, to obtainIts powers are also normal, so $\Vert a^{2^n}\Vert =\Vert a{\Vert }^{2^n}$. The spectral radius formula gives $r(a)=\Vert a\Vert$, hence $\Vert \hat{a}{\Vert }_{\infty }=\Vert a\Vert$. The Gelfand transform is therefore an isometry, and its range is complete and closed in the supremum norm. It contains constants, separates points and is closed under complex conjugation. The complex Stone-Weierstrass theorem makes that range dense, hence all of $C(\Delta (A))$.

The approximation step in Stone-Weierstrass theorem can also be seen directly here. For a unital conjugation-closed point-separating subalgebra $B\subseteq C(K)$, the real-valued part of its uniform closure is closed under absolute values, by polynomial approximation to $|t|$ on bounded intervals, hence under pointwise maxima and minima. Its real-valued functions separate points. Given real $f\in C(K)$ and $\epsilon >0$, for each $x,y$ an affine rescaling of a separating function produces $b_{x,y}$ agreeing with $f$ at $x,y$; take a constant when $x=y$. For fixed $x$, finitely many neighbourhoods of $y$ where $b_{x,y}>f-\epsilon$ cover $K$. Their maximum $b_x$ exceeds $f-\epsilon$ everywhere and agrees with $f$ at $x$, hence is less than $f+\epsilon$ near $x$. Finitely many of these latter neighbourhoods cover $K$; the minimum of their $b_x$ lies between $f-\epsilon$ and $f+\epsilon$ everywhere. Approximate real and imaginary parts separately. This proves the density used above and completes the C-star algebra conclusion.

Evaluation at a real point defines a surjective ring homomorphism $p\mapsto p(a,b)$ from $\mathbb{R}[x,y]$ to $\mathbb{R}$. Its kernel is $(x-a,y-b)$: subtracting the constant $p(a,b)$ expresses the remainder as a multiple of $x-a$ plus a multiple of $y-b$, by successive polynomial division. The first isomorphism theorem therefore identifies the quotient ring with the field $\mathbb{R}$, proving each $I_{a,b}$ is maximal.

For a maximal ideal not on this list, takeEvaluation $p(x,y)\mapsto p(i,0)$ is onto $\mathbb{C}$, and its kernel is $J$: first subtract a multiple of $y$, then divide the remaining polynomial in $x$ by $x^2+1$. Hence $\mathbb{R}[x,y]/J\cong \mathbb{C}$, a field. Finally, if $J=I_{a,b}$ for real $a,b$, the member $x^2+1\in J$ would vanish at $(a,b)$, requiring $a^2+1=0$, which is impossible over $\mathbb{R}$.

The Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz states that if $k$ is an algebraically closed field, every maximal ideal of $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]$ isEquivalently, every proper ideal has a common zero. We prove the more general field statement, the Zariski lemma: a field finitely generated as a $k$-algebra is a finite field extension of $k$.

Write such a field as $L=k[b_1,\dots ,b_s]$. Choose a maximal set of algebraically independent elements $t_1,\dots ,t_r$ among these generators and denote the remaining generators by $c_1,\dots ,c_h$. Each $c_j$ is an algebraic element over $K=k(t_1,\dots ,t_r)$, so $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Clearing the denominators in their monic equations, choose a nonzero $d\in k[t_1,\dots ,t_r]$ such that each $c_j$ is an integral element overBecause $L$ is a field and $d^{-1}\in L$, we have $L=D[c_1,\dots ,c_h]$. Thus $L$ is an integral extension of $D$.

A subring over which a field is integral must itself be a field. Indeed, for $0\ne a\in D$, an integral equation for $a^{-1}$ multiplied by $a^{m-1}$ expresses $a^{-1}$ as an element of $D$. But if $r>0$, the ring $D$ is not a field: choose an irreducible polynomial $q(t_1)\in k[t_1]$ which does not divide $d$. There are infinitely many monic irreducible polynomials in $k[t_1]$, by the usual product-plus-one argument, whereas only finitely many can divide the nonzero $d$. The prime ideal $(q)$ stays proper after inverting $d$, so $q$ has no inverse in $D$. Therefore $r=0$, proving that $L/k$ is a finite field extension, and in particular an algebraic field extension.

Apply the Zariski lemma to the residue field $k[Y_1,\dots ,Y_s]/\mathfrak{m}$ of a maximal ideal. When $k$ is an algebraically closed field, this field is $k$ itself. The images $a_i$ of $Y_i$ then give $\mathfrak{m}=(Y_1-a_1,\dots ,Y_s-a_s)$, proving the Weak Hilbert Nullstellensatz.

For the real Laurent polynomial ring, the same argument applies because it is the finitely generated algebraEvery residue field at a maximal ideal is consequently a finite field extension of $\mathbb{R}$, and so is $\mathbb{R}$ or $\mathbb{C}$. Here we use the fundamental theorem of algebra, which makes $\mathbb{C}$ the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{R}$ of degree two. The images of $X_1,X_2$ must be nonzero since these elements are units. It follows that the answer iswith $(\alpha ,\beta )$ and $(\overline{\alpha },\overline{\beta })$ defining the same maximal ideal. If both coordinates are real, evaluation has image $\mathbb{R}$; otherwise its image is $\mathbb{C}$. Thus every displayed kernel is maximal, and the Zariski lemma shows that this list is exhaustive.

For explicit generating sets of an ideal, there are three cases. For real nonzero $a,b$,If $\alpha =a\in {\mathbb{R}}^{\times }$ and $\beta =s+it$ with $t\ne 0$,If $\alpha =u+iv$ with $v\ne 0$ and $\beta =s+it$, thenThe last two quotients are $\mathbb{C}$; the nonzero coordinate condition ensures that the Laurent inverses exist in them. There are no further coincidences in the classification: equal kernels induce an $\mathbb{R}$-isomorphism between the evaluation image fields. The only $\mathbb{R}$-automorphisms of $\mathbb{C}$ are the identity and complex conjugation, so the two pairs must agree or be conjugate.

To prove the intersection assertion, fix a prime ideal $P$ and an element $f\notin P$. The integral domain $B=R/P$ has nonzero image $\bar{f}$. Its localization of a ring $B[{\bar{f}}^{-1}]$ is nonzero and still a finitely generated algebra over $\mathbb{R}$, so it has a maximal ideal $\mathfrak{n}$. By the Zariski lemma, the field $L=B[{\bar{f}}^{-1}]/\mathfrak{n}$ is finite over $\mathbb{R}$.

The image of $B$ in $L$ is a subring containing $\mathbb{R}$ and is a finite-dimensional $\mathbb{R}$-vector space. It is an integral domain, hence a field: multiplication by any nonzero element is an injective linear map of a finite-dimensional vector space and therefore surjective. The kernel of $B\to L$ is thus a maximal ideal which avoids $\bar{f}$, since $\bar{f}$ is invertible in $L$. Its inverse image in $R$ is a maximal ideal containing $P$ but avoiding $f$. As this works for every $f\notin P$,This is the Jacobson ring property for this Laurent polynomial ring.

For a nonzero finitely generated module $M$, its set of associated primes isHere ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)=\{a\in R:am=0\}$ is the annihilator of the element. The Laurent polynomial ring $R$ is a Noetherian ring, so the nonempty collection of annihilators of nonzero elements of $M$ has a maximal member, say $P={\mathrm{Ann}}_R(m)$. It is proper because $m\ne 0$.

If $ab\in P$ and $b\notin P$, then $bm\ne 0$ andMaximality forces ${\mathrm{Ann}}_R(bm)=P$, hence $a\in P$. Thus $P$ is a prime ideal, proving $\boxed{{\mathrm{Ass}}_R(M)\ne \varnothing }$. This argument in fact only needs that $R$ is Noetherian, not the finite generation of $M$.

A proper ideal $Q$ is $P$-primary when its radical of an ideal is $P$ andEquivalently, $ab\in Q$ and $b\notin P$ imply $a\in Q$; equivalently, every zero divisor of $R/Q$ is nilpotent. These formulations distinguish the actual primary ideal property from the weaker assertion that there is only one minimal prime ideal.

For the final example, set $u=X_1-1$ and $v=X_2-1$. ThenSince $R/P\cong \mathbb{R}[X_2,X_2^{-1}]$ is an integral domain, $P$ is a prime ideal. Moreover $I\subseteq P$ and $u^2\in I$, so $\sqrt{I}=P$. Consequently $P$ is the unique minimal prime ideal over $I$.

Nevertheless $uv\in I$, while $u\notin I$ and no power of $v$ belongs to $I$. For the first assertion, reduce modulo $v$: the image of $I$ is $(u^2)$ in $\mathbb{R}[X_1,X_1^{-1}]$, and $u$ is not a multiple of $u^2$ because $u$ is a nonunit in this integral domain. For the second, $v\notin P$, so $v^j\notin P\supseteq I$ for every $j\ge 1$. Thus $I$ is not a $P$-primary ideal: a unique minimal prime does not imply primary. In $R/I$, the nonzero class of $u$ is killed by $v$, a zero divisor which is not nilpotent.

Put $u=X_1-1$ and $v=X_2-1$. Evaluation at $(1,1)$ is surjective, andso its kernel is the prime ideal $\boxed{P=(u,v)}$. In particular $P/P^2$ is naturally an $R/P=\mathbb{Z}$-module, generated by the classes of $u,v$.

For integers $a,b$, including negative integers, reduction modulo $P^2$ givesFor negative powers, this follows from $(1+u{)}^{-1}\equiv 1-u$ and $(1+v{)}^{-1}\equiv 1-v$; the mixed product $uv$ vanishes modulo $P^2$. Therefore a Laurent polynomial $f$ satisfiesThe formal derivatives obey the product rule, so $D_i(ab)=\theta (a)D_i(b)+\theta (b)D_i(a)$. If $a,b\in P$, both terms vanish. Hence both $D_i$ vanish on $P^2$ and define a mapIt sends $[u]$ to $(1,0)$ and $[v]$ to $(0,1)$, and the displayed expansion gives its inverse. Thus the conormal module has the explicit basis

Let $A=R_P$ be the localization at a prime ideal, with maximal ideal $\mathfrak{m}=P{R}_P$. Every nonzero integer lies outside $P$ and is therefore inverted. The residue field isIndeed there is an explicit identificationinverting $1+u$ and $1+v$ has no effect in this local ring, and a polynomial denominator lies outside $(u,v)$ precisely when its constant term is nonzero. Conversely, clearing rational denominators turns every such fraction into a fraction from $R_P$.

For the Krull dimension, the prime ideal correspondence for localization preserves the strict chainof prime ideals in $R$. They are prime because the successive quotients are the integral domains $R$, $\mathbb{Z}[X_2,X_2^{-1}]$, and $\mathbb{Z}$. They remain distinct after localization at a prime ideal because they are all contained in $P$. Hence $\dim A\ge 2$.

For the upper bound, $R$ is a Noetherian ring by the Hilbert basis theorem and Localization of a Noetherian ring. Since $P$ is generated by two elements, the Krull height theorem gives $\mathrm{ht}P\le 2$. The prime ideal correspondence for localization identifies $\dim R_P$ with $\mathrm{ht}P$, so

A Noetherian local ring $(B,\mathfrak{n})$ with residue field $\kappa$ is a regular local ring ifBy the Nakayama lemma, the dimension on the left is the minimal number of generators of $\mathfrak{n}$; this is also called the embedding dimension.

The localization of a module is exact and commutes with quotients and products of ideals. Applying it to the already computed conormal module gives the cotangent space of a local ringIts dimension is two, equal to $\dim A$. Therefore $\boxed{R_P\text{ is a regular local ring}}$. Notice that $P/P^2$ has a basis over $\mathbb{Z}$, whereas the localized cotangent space of a local ring has a basis over the residue field $\mathbb{Q}$.

An integral domain $A$ is an integrally closed domain if every element of its fraction field which is an integral element over $A$ belongs to $A$. Explicitly, if $z\in \mathrm{Frac}A$ satisfiesthen $z\in A$. Thus $\boxed{A\text{ is integrally closed exactly when its integral closure in its fraction field is }A}$.

Suppose $A$ is a unique factorization domain and $z=a/b$ is integral, with $a,b\in A$, $b\ne 0$, and with no common irreducible element as a factor. Multiplying its monic equation by $b^d$ givesHence $b$ divides $a^d$. Every irreducible element dividing $b$ is a prime element, so it would divide $a$, contrary to the choice of the fraction. Therefore $b$ is a unit, and $z\in A$. We have proved

The going-down theorem is the following. Let $A\subseteq B$ be an integral extension of integral domains with $A$ an integrally closed domain. IfthenWe first prove this for a module-finite ring extension and then remove that extra hypothesis. We use the Lying-over theorem, the Going-up theorem, and the incomparability theorem for integral extensions: primes exist over every base prime, prime chains can be extended upwards, and distinct primes over the same base prime cannot contain one another. The Going-up theorem follows by applying the Lying-over theorem to the quotient by the lower prime. These results concern arbitrary integral extensions; none assumes the going-down theorem.

For the finite case, let $K=\mathrm{Frac}A$ and $L=\mathrm{Frac}B$. Since $B$ is module-finite, $L/K$ is a finite field extension. Take a finite normal field extension $E/K$ containing $L$, obtained as a splitting field of the minimal polynomials of finitely many field generators. The extension $E/K$ need not be a separable field extension. Let $C$ be the integral closure of $A$ in $E$. Then $B\subseteq C$, and $C$ is integral over both $A$ and $B$.

We need one auxiliary fact: the finite group $G={\mathrm{Aut}}_K(E)$ acts transitively on the prime ideals of $C$ over any fixed prime ideal $\mathfrak{p}$ of $A$. First observe that an element $w\in E$ fixed by all of $G$ is a purely inseparable algebraic element over $K$. Indeed, all $K$-embeddings of $K(w)$ into an algebraic closure extend to $K$-automorphisms of the normal field extension $E$. Hence the minimal polynomial of an algebraic element $w$ has only one distinct root. In characteristic zero this says $w\in K$; in characteristic $p>0$ it says $w^{p^e}\in K$ for some $e\ge 0$.

Now let $Q,Q^{\prime }$ be primes of $C$ over $\mathfrak{p}$, and suppose $Q$ is different from every $\sigma (Q^{\prime })$, $\sigma \in G$. By the incomparability theorem for integral extensions, $Q$ is contained in none of these conjugate primes. The prime avoidance lemma suppliesThe productis fixed by $G$, is integral over $A$, and lies in $Q$ because one factor is $x$. Choose an exponent $e_0$ equal to $1$ in characteristic zero, or a power of $p$ in characteristic $p$, such that $h^{e_0}\in K$. Since $A$ is an integrally closed domain, $h^{e_0}\in A$. It also lies in $Q\cap A=\mathfrak{p}$, hence in $Q^{\prime }$. Because $Q^{\prime }$ is a prime ideal, some factor $\sigma (x)$ lies in $Q^{\prime }$. This means $x\in {\sigma }^{-1}(Q^{\prime })$, contradicting our choice. Thus $Q=\sigma (Q^{\prime })$ for some $\sigma$, proving transitivity. The power $e_0$ accounts for the possible purely inseparable field extension and makes the argument valid in every characteristic.

Lift the prescribed ${\mathfrak{q}}_2$ to a prime $Q_2$ of $C$ by the Lying-over theorem for $B\subseteq C$. Separately, choose a prime $Q_1^{\prime }$ over ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$ and use the Going-up theorem to find $Q_2^{\prime }\supseteq Q_1^{\prime }$ over ${\mathfrak{p}}_2$. Transitivity gives $\sigma \in G$ with $\sigma (Q_2^{\prime })=Q_2$. ThenContracting to $B$ gives ${\mathfrak{q}}_1=Q_1\cap B\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2$ with the required contraction. This proves the going-down theorem for the module-finite case.

For a general integral extension $A\subseteq B$, consider $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$ and the idealWe claim that $J$ is disjoint from $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. Otherwise, clearing the finitely many denominators in an expression for an element $a\in J\cap (A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1)$ givesThe subalgebra $B_0=A[s,b_1,\dots ,b_h]$ is a module-finite ring extension of $A$, since all its generators are integral elements. Apply the finite case to ${\mathfrak{q}}_2\cap B_0$: there is a prime $Q_1\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2\cap B_0$ contracting to ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$. The displayed identity puts $sa$ in $Q_1$, but $a\notin Q_1$. Thus $s\in Q_1\subseteq {\mathfrak{q}}_2$, a contradiction.

Localize $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$ further at the multiplicative subset $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. The extension of $J$ is a proper ideal, by the disjointness just proved. Choose a maximal ideal containing it and contract back to a prime ideal of $B_{{\mathfrak{q}}_2}$. This prime contains $J$ and avoids $A\setminus {\mathfrak{p}}_1$. Its contraction ${\mathfrak{q}}_1$ to $B$ lies inside ${\mathfrak{q}}_2$ by the prime ideal correspondence for localization, and its contraction to $A$ is exactly ${\mathfrak{p}}_1$. This completes the proof of the going-down theorem without any finite generation assumption on $B$.

The Artin-Rees lemma states that, for a Noetherian ring $R$, an ideal $I$, a finitely generated module $M$, and a submodule $N\subseteq M$, there is $c\ge 0$ such thatThus the filtration on $N$ induced from the I-adic filtration of $M$ is eventually determined by one of its terms.

For the proof, form the Rees ring and its Rees module:Since $R$ is a Noetherian ring, write $I=(a_1,\dots ,a_s)$. Then $\mathcal{R}(I)=R[a_{1}t,\dots ,a_{s}t]$, so it is a Noetherian ring by the Hilbert basis theorem. Generators of $M$ in degree zero generate ${\mathcal{R}}_I(M)$ as a module over $\mathcal{R}(I)$, so this is a Noetherian module.

The graded submoduleis therefore finitely generated. Choose homogeneous generators $z_{\alpha }{t}^{d_{\alpha }}$ with $d_{\alpha }\le c$ for some $c$. For $j\ge c$, taking degree-$j$ components givesThe same generators show that the final sum is exactly $I^{c}M\cap N$. This proves the Artin-Rees lemma. If $L=0$, one may simply take $c=0$.

Now letIt is a submodule of the Noetherian module $M$, hence a finitely generated module. Apply the Artin-Rees lemma with $N=K$ and $j=c+1$. Since $K$ is contained in every $I^{j}M$ (including $I^{0}M=M$), its conclusion reduces toWrite generators as $y_1,\dots ,y_h$. There is a matrix $A=(a_{ij})$ with entries in $I$ such that $y_i={\sum }_j{a}_{ij}{y}_j$. Multiplication by the adjugate of $I_h-A$ shows thatThe determinant is congruent to $1$ modulo $I$, so it is $1+r$ for some $r\in I$. This determinant trick produces a single such element annihilating all of $K$, and in particular annihilating each $m\in K$. If $K=0$, use $r=0$.

Conversely, if $(1+r)m=0$ with $r\in I$, then $m=-rm$. Iterating gives $m=(-r{)}^{j}m\in I^{j}M$ for every $j\ge 1$. Hence the exact description isIn a local ring with $I$ contained in the maximal ideal, every $1+r$ is a unit, so this also yields the usual vanishing form of the Krull intersection theorem.

For a failure without the Noetherian ring hypothesis, let $D=\mathbb{Z}[1/2{]}_{\ge 0}$ and use the semigroup algebraIts elements are finite sums of formal monomials $t^q$, with multiplication $t^q{t}^{q^{\prime }}=t^{q+q^{\prime }}$. Each ring in the union is a polynomial ring and the inclusions are injective, so $R$ is an integral domain. It is not a Noetherian ring, sinceIndeed the generator on the left is the square of the next generator, while division in the opposite direction would require a negative exponent, which is unavailable in $R$.

Let $I$ be the ideal of elements with zero constant term, equivalentlyIt is proper because taking the constant term gives $R/I\cong k$. Every generator $t^q$ is $(t^{q/2}{)}^2$, with $t^{q/2}\in I$, so $I^2=I$. Thus this is a nonzero idempotent ideal, with $I^j=I$ for every $j\ge 1$. TakeFor every $r\in I$, the constant term of $1+r$ is $1$, so $1+r\ne 0$. Since $R$ is an integral domain and $t\ne 0$, we have $(1+r)t\ne 0$. This gives all three requested objects and proves that no element of the required form annihilates $m$.