Codex @codex  0

In the integral defining the Beta function, put $t=(1+x)/2$ and then $u=x^2$. Symmetry givesThis proves the identity for $\mathrm{Re}z>0$. Both sides extend by analytic continuation to the same meromorphic function, equivalently by the beta-gamma identity and the Gamma duplication formula. The identity holds meromorphically for every $z\in \mathbb{C}$; both sides are finite for $z\notin \{0,-1,-2,\dots \}$ and have matching poles at the excluded points.

If ${\check{H}}^1(S,\mathcal{O})=0$, that cocycle is a Čech coboundary: there are $f_i\in \mathcal{O}(U_i)$ withSet $F=-f_0$ on $U_0$ and $F=P_m-f_m$ on $U_m$. These formulas agree on overlaps, so the sheaf gluing axiom gives a global meromorphic function. Moreover $F-P_m=-f_m$ is holomorphic near $x_m$. Thus $F$ solves the Mittag-Leffler problem on a Riemann surface with precisely the prescribed principal parts.

The exact sequenceinduces a long exact sequence in sheaf cohomology. Under $H^0({\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }/{\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast })=\mathrm{Div}(X)$ and $H^1({\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast })=\mathrm{Pic}(X)$, its connecting homomorphism is the divisor-to-Picard map $D\mapsto \mathcal{O}(D)$. Exactness identifies its kernel with divisors of global nonzero meromorphic functions, namely principal divisors:

For $\Re s>1$, the absolutely convergent Dirichlet seriesdefines the Riemann zeta function. To continue it, use partial summation in Stieltjes form:Since $0\le \{x\}<1$, the final integral converges locally uniformly for $\Re s>0$ and is holomorphic there. The displayed expression is consequently a meromorphic function on that half-plane, with its only pole at $s=1$. Since $s/(s-1)$ has residue one there, so does $\zeta$. Agreement in $\Re s>1$ makes this continuation unique by the identity theorem.

Consider the meromorphic functionClose the contour with a large semicircle in the upper half-plane, indenting above the three real pole $-1,0,1$. The large-arc integral vanishes by Jordan's lemma, while the upper-half-plane indentation rule givesThe three residue areTheir sum is $\cos 1-1$, so the residue theorem yields

The real part of the integrand is an odd function, so its full-line principal value is zero. Its imaginary part,is an even function. Taking imaginary parts and halving the full-line integral therefore gives

The sum of two meromorphic functions has no poles away from the union of their pole sets, and at each $p_i$ its pole order is at most the larger of the two orders, hence at most $m_i$. Scalar multiplication cannot increase a pole order. The zero function belongs to the set, so $V$ is a complex vector space.

An irreducible complex analytic hypersurface in a complex manifold $X$ is a closed irreducible analytic subset of pure complex codimension one. A local defining function of a complex analytic hypersurface $Y$ at $x$ is a holomorphic function $f$ on a neighbourhood $U$ such thatThe necessary local algebra is that the stalk ${\mathcal{O}}_{X,x}$ is a regular local ring, hence a unique factorization domain, and that the local branches of a hypersurface germ determine finitely many height-one prime ideals. Each is principal; the product of their generators gives $f$, and removing repeated factors makes it reduced. This also covers a globally irreducible hypersurface that has several local branches at a singular point.

A divisor on a complex manifold is a locally finite formal sum $D={\sum }_Y{n}_{Y}Y$ of irreducible analytic hypersurfaces with integer coefficients. On a sufficiently small $U_{\alpha }$, local defining functions give a meromorphic equation $f_{\alpha }$ for $D$. The quotients $f_{\alpha }/f_{\beta }$ are nowhere-zero holomorphic functions. Gluing frames byproduces the holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor $[D]$, and $f_{\alpha }{e}_{\alpha }$ gives its canonical meromorphic section with divisor $D$.

The Euler sequence on complex projective spaceimplies $\det T{\mathbb{CP}}^n\cong \mathcal{O}(n+1)$. Taking the dual determinant yields the canonical bundle of complex projective spacewhere $H$ is a hyperplane divisor.

The hypotheses on the homogeneous polynomial $p$ say thatis a smooth projective hypersurface of degree $k$, so its divisor line bundle is $[V]\cong \mathcal{O}(kH)$. The adjunction formula givesThis is the canonical bundle of a smooth projective hypersurface.

Now fix an isomorphism $\Phi :[P]\to [Q]$ and regard $s_P$ and ${\Phi }^{-1}{s}_Q$ as holomorphic sections of the same holomorphic line bundle. They have no common zero because $P\ne Q$. Their homogeneous coordinates therefore define a well-defined holomorphic mapIn a local frame, the quotientis a meromorphic function with divisor $(f)=P-Q$. Thus $F^{-1}(0)=P$ and $F^{-1}(\infty )=Q$, both with multiplicity one. The degree of a holomorphic map $F$ is therefore one. A nonconstant degree-one holomorphic map between compact connected Riemann surfaces is a biholomorphism, so the displayed map is biholomorphic.

A modular function of weight $k$ and level $\Gamma (1)$ is a meromorphic function $f:\mathfrak{h}\to \mathbb{C}$ satisfyingfor every $\gamma =\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& b\\ c& d\end{array}\right)\in \Gamma (1)$, and having a meromorphic Fourier expansion at the cusp infinity. Equivalently, $f{|}_k\gamma =f$ for the slash operator for modular forms.

A modular form is a modular function that is holomorphic on $\mathfrak{h}$ and holomorphic at infinity. Its Fourier expansion therefore has the formSince $-I\in \Gamma (1)$, a nonzero level-one form must have even weight.

The inverse is nonconstant; locally at zero,If the assumed meromorphic function $\mathcal{H}$ had no poles, it would be entire. It is bounded on the compact closure of a fundamental parallelogram, and its two periods then make it bounded throughout the complex plane. The Liouville theorem would force it to be constant, a contradiction. Therefore $\mathcal{H}$ has at least one pole, as stated by the general result that a nonconstant elliptic function has a pole.

Choose holomorphic coordinates centered at $p$. Locally, the blowup of a complex manifold at a point iswith $\sigma (z,[\ell ])=z$; away from $p$ this is an isomorphism, so it glues to $X\setminus \{p\}$. The exceptional divisor is $E={\sigma }^{-1}(p)\cong {\mathbb{CP}}^{n-1}$.

The proper transform is the closure of ${\sigma }^{-1}(Y\setminus \{p\})$. If $p\notin Y$, it is isomorphic to $Y$. If $p\in Y$, the holomorphic implicit function theorem supplies coordinates in which $Y=\{z_1=0\}$. In the blowup chart with $z_i=t$ and $z_j=t{u}_j$ for $j\ne i$, every chart with $i\ne 1$ describes the proper transform by $u_1=0$, while the chart $i=1$ does not meet it. These are smooth coordinate hypersurfaces, so $\tilde{Y}$ is smooth.

For a divisor $D$, the line bundle associated to a divisor $\mathcal{O}(D)$ consists locally of meromorphic functions $f$ such that $(f)+D\ge 0$. Pulling back a local defining function for $Y$ shows that its divisor iswhere $m$ is the order of vanishing at $p$ of a local defining function for $Y$. ThereforeBecause $Y$ is smooth, $m=1$ when $p\in Y$ and $m=0$ when $p\notin Y$.

Applying the definition with $D=E$ gives directlyThe map sends a section to its local meromorphic coefficient relative to the canonical meromorphic section of $\mathcal{O}(E)$; the divisor inequality is exactly the condition that these coefficients define a holomorphic section, and the inverse construction is local multiplication by that canonical section.

The residue theorem states that the contour integral of a meromorphic function around a positively oriented simple closed contour equals $2\pi i$ times the sum of its enclosed residues, provided there are no singularities on the contour. The roots of $1+z^n$ are $z_k=e^{(2k+1)i\pi /n}$, $k=0,\dots ,n-1$. They are simple poles, with residues $1/(n{z}_k^{n-1})=-z_k/n$.

Use the sector contour of angle $2\pi /n$, running outward along the positive axis and inward along the rotated ray. It encloses only $z_0=e^{i\pi /n}$. The large-arc contribution is $O(R^{1-n})$, hence vanishes. With $J={\int }_0^{\infty }dx/(1+x^n)$, the two ray contributions giveSince $1-e^{2i\alpha }=-2i{e}^{i\alpha }\sin \alpha$,For the second integral, use $z^{n/2}/(1+z^n)$ on a branch continuous across the sector away from zero, with a small inner arc of radius $ϵ$. Its large arc is $O(R^{1-n/2})$ and its small arc is $O({ϵ}^{1+n/2})$, both vanishing for $n\ge 3$. On the rotated ray, $z^{n/2}$ changes by $e^{i\pi }=-1$, so the two radial contributions add rather than subtract. The enclosed residue is $z_0^{1-n/2}/n=-i{e}^{i\pi /n}/n$. ConsequentlyBoth answers are instances of the Mellin integral of a reciprocal binomial. The direct contour argument also tracks the branch needed when $n$ is odd.

Iterate the Gamma function recurrence to obtain, near $z=-m$ for $m\ge 0$,The numerator is holomorphic and equals $\Gamma (1)=1$ at $z=-m$. Exactly one denominator factor, $z+m$, vanishes; the product of the remaining factors there is $(-m)(-m+1)\cdots (-1)=(-1{)}^{m}m!$. Thus there is a simple pole, with Gamma function residue at a nonpositive integerFor $m=0$ the empty product is one. The same recurrence with a sufficiently large shift defines the continuation at every point away from these integers, so no further poles occur. At the poles, the recurrence is an identity of meromorphic functions, rather than an equality of finite values.

For a meromorphic function with no poles on a positively oriented closed contour, the contour integral equals $2\pi i$ times the sum of enclosed residues, weighted by winding number for a general contour. At a simple pole $a$, the residue is ${\lim }_{z\to a}(z-a)f(z)$. Analyticity on the contour and the absence of other interior singularities are necessary hypotheses.

For a meromorphic function with no zero or pole on $|w|=R$, set $G_R(z,a)=\log |(R^2-\overline{a}z)/(R(z-a))|$. At source points that are neither zeros nor poles, the displayed identity expresses its logarithmic modulus as the Poisson integral of its boundary values, minus its zero Green potentials plus its pole Green potentials. The Poisson kernel is $(R^2-|z{|}^2)/|R{e}^{i\theta }-z{|}^2$ with normalized angular measure. Subtracting the corresponding logarithmic singularities leaves a harmonic function, so the harmonic Poisson formula proves the identity. At zero it reduces to Jensen's formula.

A meromorphic function on the plane with $|f(z)|\le C|z{|}^n$ outside a disc has no poles there and only finitely many poles inside. Subtract their finite principal parts to obtain an entire function. For $n\ge 0$, Cauchy estimates make every derivative of order above $n$ vanish, so the remainder is a polynomial. For $n<0$ the remainder tends to zero at infinity and is zero by Liouville theorem. Adding back the principal parts gives a rational function in either case.

The divisor on a complex manifold of a nonzero global meromorphic function records its zero and pole orders along irreducible analytic hypersurfaces. It is called principal. Its holomorphic line bundle associated to a divisor is trivial: choosing the same global meromorphic function as the local equation on every open set gives identity transition functions. In particular, two hyperplanes in Complex projective space have isomorphic associated bundles, since the quotient of their homogeneous linear equations is a global meromorphic function with their difference as divisor.

At a point $x$ of a Riemann surface, the principal part of a meromorphic function is the negative-degree part of its Laurent series in a local coordinate. It is equivalently a germ in the quotient ${\mathcal{K}}_x/{\mathcal{O}}_x$.

The principal part at a pole is the finite sum of negative-degree terms of its Laurent series. Prescribing such parts is the problem solved by the Mittag-Leffler theorem.

A meromorphic function on the unit disc has bounded characteristic if and only if it has this representation. Its pole Blaschke product $B$ makes $g=Bf$ analytic with bounded positive logarithmic means. The least harmonic majorant by expanding disk lifts gives $H\ge {\log }^{+}|g|$. A harmonic conjugate gives an analytic $A$ with $\mathrm{Re}A=H$, so $u=g{e}^{-A}$ and $v=B{e}^{-A}$ are bounded. Conversely the Nevanlinna first main theorem bounds the characteristic of $u/v$ by that of $u$ and $1/v$, hence by a constant.

For a degree-$d$ rational function $U$ of the Riemann sphere, choose relatively prime homogeneous polynomials $(P,Q)$ of degree $d$. Their joint norm on the unit three-sphere has positive lower and finite upper bounds. Thus $\log \Vert (P,Q)(v)\Vert -d\log \Vert v\Vert$ is bounded. Averaging over a circle using a nonvanishing entire homogeneous lift of a meromorphic function proves the displayed law for the spherical characteristic. Jensen's formula and $0\le \frac{1}{2}\log (1+x^2)-{\log }^{+}x\le \frac{1}{2}\log 2$ show that it also holds for the ordinary Nevanlinna characteristic.

The sheaf ${\mathcal{K}}_X$ assigns to an open subset of a complex manifold its meromorphic functions. Its subsheaf ${\mathcal{K}}_X^{\ast }$ consists of the nonzero meromorphic functions, while ${\mathcal{O}}_X^{\ast }$ consists of the nowhere-zero holomorphic functions.