Chebyshev polynomial Created 2026-09-24 Updated 2026-10-18
The first-kind Chebyshev polynomial converts a multiple-angle cosine into a polynomial:The cosine addition formula gives the recurrence relationThis constructs polynomials valid for every real , including outside , where the real-angle description is unavailable. For example,For , has polynomial degree and leading coefficient . On its uniform norm is one, even as its oscillations become more numerous.[ref]
https://dlmf.nist.gov/18.5#i. T. H. Koornwinder and collaborators, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, §18.5(i), equation 18.5.1: trigonometric representation
[ref]https://dlmf.nist.gov/18.9#i. Koornwinder and collaborators, NIST DLMF, §18.9(i), Table 18.9.1: recurrence coefficients
The polynomial roots of are especially simple:They correspond to equally spaced angles, but their locations in cluster near and . For , the polynomial roots are . For , the positive polynomial roots are approximately , with their negatives completing the set. The distance from the right endpoint to the nearest polynomial root is ; central neighboring polynomial roots are separated on the larger scale . The small change of cosine near angles zero and explains the clustering.
Analytical illustration of the eight roots of T8: equally spaced angles on a semicircle project to endpoint-clustered interpolation nodes
. Details. These polynomial roots supply interpolation nodes for a polynomial interpolation of polynomial degree at most . They differ from the Chebyshev-Lobatto nodes , which include both endpoints. This choice of polynomial roots has nodal polynomialThe monic Chebyshev extremal polynomial minimizes the uniform norm of this product among monic polynomials of polynomial degree on . Consequently, if has continuous derivatives, the usual polynomial interpolation error gives the useful boundThis optimizes the nodal factor in that bound, not the actual error for every function. Endpoint clustering helps control the large endpoint oscillations of equally spaced interpolation associated with Runge's phenomenon. The two node conventions and their geometric construction are discussed in Trefethen's authored text.[ref]
https://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/trefethen/ATAP/ATAPfirst6chapters.pdf. Lloyd N. Trefethen, Approximation Theory and Approximation Practice, Chapters 2–3 and Exercise 2.4: endpoint clustering, first-kind roots and polynomials
The same cosine substitution for polynomial approximation explains the weighted orthogonality:The endpoint singularities of the weight are integrable. Thus the Chebyshev polynomials are orthogonal polynomials for this weight, making coefficients in a least-squares polynomial in an orthogonal-polynomial basis separate cleanly. Their polynomial roots also give Chebyshev–Gauss quadrature, connecting polynomial interpolation to Gaussian quadrature.[ref]
Accuracy still depends on the target function. The absolute value function has a corner at zero, so the hypothesis requiring continuous derivatives in the displayed polynomial interpolation error bound fails. Endpoint clustering cannot remove that corner. A jump poses a stronger obstruction: polynomials are continuous functions, so they cannot converge in the uniform norm to a discontinuous function on the whole interval. Chebfun's documented examples show persistent overshoot for such jumps; these are a limitation of global polynomial interpolation, not a universal promise of rapid accuracy from Chebyshev polynomials.[ref]
https://www.chebfun.org/docs/guide/guide04.html#4.3. Chebfun development team, Chebfun Guide, §4.3: polynomial interpolation of discontinuous functions
Past exam of the approximation of functions course of the University of Oxford 2011 2 a Solution 2026-10-31
Take , as intended by the stated normalization. The Chebyshev polynomial recurrence , with and , shows by mathematical induction that has polynomial degree and leading coefficient . Consequently is a monic polynomial. At the ordered Chebyshev extreme points ,and .
Suppose a monic polynomial of the same polynomial degree had . The difference has degree at most because its leading coefficients cancel. Its signs at the ordered extreme points strictly alternate. The intermediate value theorem supplies a distinct root of a polynomial between each consecutive pair, giving at least roots. This contradicts its degree bound. Hence the monic Chebyshev extremal polynomial satisfiesAt the printed formula instead gives , which is not monic; the degree-zero minimizer is the constant one. This endpoint case requires the separate normalization .
For , set . It is monic by part (a), and its supremum norm on is . At the successive extreme points it alternates between and .
Suppose a monic degree- polynomial had . At each , the difference would have the sign of . These signs alternate, so the intermediate value theorem forces a root in each of the successive gaps. But the leading monic terms cancel, making , a contradiction. ThereforeThis is the monic monic Chebyshev extremal polynomial. The positive-degree restriction matters: at the printed scaling gives the constant two, while the only monic constant is one, so that version is false. The customary theorem uses .
Past exam of the mathematics course of the University of Cambridge 2005 iii Paper 68 2 Solution Created 2026-10-03 Updated 2026-10-14
Put . The trigonometric identitygivesStarting with and , this recurrence proves inductively that each Chebyshev polynomial is a polynomial. For , the highest-degree term in cannot cancel against , so the degree increases by one and its leading coefficient doubles. ThusThe constant polynomial has leading coefficient one.
For , the points , , give . They are all the points where , since exactly when is an integer multiple of . Therefore there are equioscillation points, including the two endpoints. Reversing their order makes an increasing alternating sequence. For the polynomial is constant: every point has unit value, but an alternating sequence has at most one point.
Now take and . Since is monic, has degree at most , and . This proves the upper bound for the best error.
For the lower bound, suppose a polynomial of degree at most had . At each of the ordered extrema, must have the same strictly nonzero sign as : if , then gives , and if , then gives . Between every consecutive pair, the intermediate value theorem gives a zero of . These are distinct zeros, impossible for a nonzero polynomial of degree at most ; is incompatible with the strict error improvement. This first-principles sign argument proves the monic Chebyshev extremal polynomial bound without using the alternation theorem:The displayed supplies an actual best approximating polynomial.
