In a smooth oblique collision, the impulse is parallel to the contact normal , while tangential velocity components remain unchanged. Incoming velocities, masses, and a coefficient of restitution do not determine the outgoing velocities until that contact normal, or equivalent scattering data, is specified. For an elastic collision of masses , incoming velocities and , and outgoing first velocity , conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy give . Thus specifying only the first outgoing component leaves a family: gives , while gives .
A totally inelastic collision in the sticking sense has zero final relative velocity, so . Both velocities are the conserved centre-of-momentum frame velocity:Thus the bodies move together along the original incident direction; the moving projectile has . The common outgoing state is stationary in the centre-of-momentum frame. The lost translational kinetic energy iswhich can become internal energy. As explained in part 8, setting only the normal coefficient of restitution to zero in a smooth oblique collision does not force sticking: tangential relative motion can remain.
In the laboratory frame, the initial target is at rest and the outgoing directions are directly related to detector positions. The centre-of-momentum frame has zero total momentum, so the two outgoing momenta are equal and opposite; it cleanly separates bulk motion from relative kinetic energy. Transforming back is needed to predict laboratory angles and speeds. Neither reference frame removes the need for an appropriate collision law.
Take the incident direction as and put . Momentum conservation fixes the centre-of-momentum frame velocity, and a Galilean transformation gives the initial velocities in that frame:After the collision, . Hence both particles have the same final-to-initial speed ratio,The relative kinetic energy is multiplied by . This common ratio exists independently of how the outgoing direction is selected.
The meaning of restitution matters here. The usual coefficient of restitution is a ratio of normal separation and approach speeds, not total speeds. In a smooth oblique collision, the tangential relative velocity is unchanged. If the incoming relative velocity makes angle to the contact normal, thenFor example, and give . Therefore the requested identification is not generally true with the standard normal definition. The printed equation is valid if its denotes the relative speed retention in an oblique collision, namely , or if an additional collision model supplies that equality. The elastic cases have and are unaffected by this qualification.
To derive the scattering formula under that convention, write . Its components give the laboratory scattering circleSolving the resulting quadratic for the nonnegative speed yieldsWith , this is the requested formula. A real square root and are both necessary: a negative algebraic root is not a second physical speed, and does not define a scattering angle. The subsequent limits are taken using this laboratory scattering circle.
Take upwards in the source diagram. Write for 's incoming speed, so the initial velocities areA contact-direction assumption is needed for a unique answer. The diagram specifies the incoming velocities but does not specify the contact normal or an outgoing angle. First adopt the usual intended model: the impulse is horizontal, so neither particle changes its component of velocity. This is the smooth oblique collision model with a horizontal line of centres at impact. Bringing to rest in the direction then brings it entirely to rest.
Let be 's outgoing component of velocity. Conservation of momentum and conservation of kinetic energy givePut . The second equation becomes , so . ThereforeThe outgoing kinetic energies areThe outgoing speed of is , directed above the negative axis at angle . The initial kinetic energy is also , as required for an elastic collision.
For the perfectly inelastic collision with these same incoming velocities, both particles share a common outgoing velocity. Conservation of momentum givesIts direction is again above the negative axis. The separate translational kinetic energies of the constituents and their total areThe loss of translational kinetic energy isThis becomes internal energy, for example deformation and heating; total energy is conserved. In the elastic collision no kinetic energy is lost and the particles separate with different velocities. In the perfectly inelastic collision relative motion disappears and the common velocity is the original centre of mass velocity.
The limitation of the printed data can be made explicit. Without the horizontal-impulse assumption, write the final velocity of as . Then conservation of momentum determinesand conservation of kinetic energy gives onlyThere is a family of possibilities. For a concrete second solution, givesThese velocities conserve both components of momentum and conserve kinetic energy, and they satisfy the specified vanishing component for , while requiring a different incoming speed. They can arise from a smooth contact normal proportional to . Thus the horizontal-impulse result is conditional, rather than uniquely implied by the printed statement. For any member of this family the corresponding sticking result remains well determined once is chosen:The last expression is the lost relative kinetic energy in a perfectly inelastic collision of these two point masses.
For a two-particle collision conserving total momentum, the outgoing speeds in the centre-of-momentum frame are multiplied by the same . The relative kinetic energy is multiplied by . For a smooth oblique collision with normal coefficient of restitution and incident relative velocity inclined by to the contact normal, unchanged tangential relative motion gives . Thus is not a general oblique-impact identity: and give . Sticking requires all relative motion to vanish, not merely its normal component.