For the Laplace transform of a derivative, first apply integration by parts on a finite interval:Under the usual transform hypotheses, including sufficient regularity for integration by parts, existence of the derivative's Laplace transform, and , passing to the limit givesThese conditions hold, for example, for a continuously differentiable with and of exponential order, in a sufficiently far right half-plane. Existence of alone does not establish all of these derivative-transform hypotheses; the finite-interval identity displays exactly which boundary term must disappear. The polynomial solution in the last part satisfies them for every .
For , the complex exponential tends to zero, since its modulus is . Therefore direct integration givesThe condition on the real part also gives absolute convergence of this improper integral.
Write . For , exponential decay dominates every fixed power of , so the improper integral converges absolutely and . For , integration by parts givesThe preceding part gives the base case . Repeated application, or mathematical induction, yields
Taking the Laplace transform, using linearity and the preceding three formulas, givesSince , division by gives for in the domain of convergence. There is no genuine singularity at : continuity of the Laplace transform there supplies the same value. One can also first work with , where division is harmless.
The formula in part (iii) identifies as the Laplace transform of . By uniqueness of the Laplace transform,As a direct check, and . Any two solutions of this initial value problem differ by and have the same initial value, forcing . This also verifies uniqueness independently of transform inversion.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.