A unit in a ring is an element with a multiplicative inverse in , so for some .
An irreducible element is a nonzero nonunit such that every factorization has at least one of a unit in a ring.
A prime element is a nonzero nonunit such that implies or . Equivalently its principal ideal is a nonzero prime ideal. These are definitions in the given commutative ring; the equivalence between irreducibility and primality requires additional hypotheses on the ring.
A Euclidean domain is an integral domain with a function such that, for and nonzero , there exist with and either or . This is the Euclidean-ring convention used here.
If an ideal is zero, it is generated by zero. Otherwise choose nonzero with minimal. For any , Euclidean division gives , with . A nonzero remainder would have , contradicting the choice. Hence and . The reverse inclusion follows from , proving
Now suppose is an irreducible element. Its principal ideal is proper because is not a unit. If , write by the result just proved. Then for some . Irreducibility gives either a unit, so , or a unit, so . There is no intermediate proper ideal, and therefore is a maximal ideal.
For a field , the polynomial ring is an integral domain and the polynomial division algorithm gives with or . Thus the polynomial degree is a Euclidean function, proving is a Euclidean domain.
The polynomial is irreducible over by Eisenstein's criterion with prime two: all coefficients except the leading one are divisible by two, while the constant coefficient is not divisible by four. Together with Gauss's lemma, this establishes irreducibility in . Part (b) shows that its principal ideal is a maximal ideal, so
Let denote the residue class of . The polynomial division algorithm gives every residue class a representative of degree less than , so span over . If a linear combination of them vanished, its degree-less-than- representative would be a multiple of the degree- polynomial , and hence would be zero. They are therefore a basis, giving
The quadratic polynomial has no rational root, so it is irreducible over . The same maximal-ideal argument proves is a field.
These two quadratic fields are not isomorphic. In , the class of squares to . But embeds in by sending its class of to : evaluation at has kernel , by irreducibility and polynomial division. No real number squares to , so no element of does. A field isomorphism preserves one, minus one and squaring, so it cannot carry to .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.