Assume a steady spherical outflow of fixed composition. Let be its mean particle mass, and define the constant isothermal sound speed by . Subsonic here refers to this isothermal closure, so . Mass conservation and radial momentum balance giveLogarithmically differentiating the first equation yields . Substitution eliminates the density gradient and gives the isothermal Parker wind equationAt a smooth speed maximum, , while the left prefactor is finite and negative. The right side must vanish, henceFor both the right side and the prefactor are negative, so ; for , . This is a true maximum on a subsonic isothermal breeze, not the accelerating transonic branch.
There is an underdetermination in the requested density estimate. Introduce the peak Mach number , where . The density at the maximum speed of an isothermal breeze is exactlyThe hypotheses do not fix . A boundary density or pressure, or an equivalent wind integration constant, is needed. The definite statement following from subsonicity is the lower boundIf a maximum speed of order is intended as an extra estimate, then . A very slow breeze can have a much larger density, so setting as an exact equality would contradict the stated always-subsonic assumption. The mean particle mass is another implicit fixed-composition input needed to express a temperature as a squared sound speed.
One can see the free parameter directly by integrating the wind equation:Different give different subsonic maxima at the same radius. The original plot illustrates this nonuniqueness. These breeze branches require nonzero ambient pressure at large radius; they are not the usual transonic escape into a low-pressure exterior.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.
