C-C is strongest; N-N is much weaker despite nitrogen's smaller size. Carbon's effective nuclear attraction and good overlap of compact second-row valence orbitals favor a strong C-C sigma bond. The larger, more electron-deficient boron centres give less effective B-B bonding in the stated molecule, despite its relatively high-s-character trigonal bonding.
In hydrazine, the two neighboring nitrogen lone pairs strongly repel one another, destabilizing the N-N bond. Bond strength therefore cannot be predicted from atomic size alone; lone-pair repulsion explains the especially low N-N value.
This illustrates bonding trends in second-period single bonds.
B-F has a large favorable polar/ionic contribution because electron-deficient boron and fluorine have a large electronegativity difference. Fluorine lone-pair donation into boron's empty 2p orbital can additionally strengthen bonding in planar BF. C-F is a strong, polar second-row sigma bond, but tetrahedral CF has no equivalent empty carbon 2p acceptor for that pi donation.
N-F has less favorable bond polarity and substantial repulsion between nitrogen and fluorine lone pairs, making it weaker. Invoking occupied boron d orbitals is unnecessary and inappropriate for this second-row comparison.
Group 6: cohesion increases from chromium to molybdenum to tungsten. partially occupied d bands make a major contribution to metallic cohesion. Relative to localized 3d orbitals in Cr, more extended 4d/5d orbitals support stronger overlap and broader bonding bands. Strong 5d bonding and the compact dimensions associated with lanthanide/relativistic effects help make W especially cohesive.
Group 11: cohesion increases from silver to copper to gold. the filled d shell changes the balance from Group 6. Going from Cu to larger Ag weakens overlap and lowers cohesion. Gold reverses that simple size trend: relativistic 6s stabilization/contraction, changes in the 5d orbitals and stronger s-d participation enhance bonding. A size-only argument cannot explain Au exceeding both Ag and Cu.
Group 15, As > Sb > Bi: bonding in these elemental solids involves directional p-orbital interactions. Increasing size and longer separations weaken overlap down the group, reducing enthalpy of atomization. Changes in detailed solid structure and relativistic effects refine the numbers, but the underlying weakening of p-derived bonding explains the trend.
Enthalpy of atomization measures removal from the entire standard-state solid to gaseous ground-state atoms; it is not simply the dissociation energy of one selected diatomic bond.
Graphite: each carbon forms three strong in-plane sigma bonds in an sp honeycomb layer. The remaining p orbitals form delocalized pi bands, allowing electrical conduction especially along the layers. Much weaker interlayer attraction permits sliding, explaining softness without implying weak in-plane C-C bonds.
Carborundum is silicon carbide, SiC. A suitable structure is a three-dimensional, tetrahedrally coordinated covalent network: each Si has four C neighbors and each C four Si neighbors. Strong directional bonding in all directions resists slip and gives hardness. Its filled bonding states are separated from empty states by a substantial band gap, giving low conductivity when pure and undoped.
“Non-conductor” is the intended contrast with graphite; SiC is more precisely a wide-bandgap semiconductor, whose conductivity can change with doping and temperature.
Potassium intercalates between graphite layers and donates electron density to the graphitic pi system. Occupation of formerly less populated electronic states raises the mobile-carrier density, increasing electrical conductivity under the stated comparison.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.