In a frame rotating with angular velocity , a particle of relative velocity experiences the Coriolis force
For nearly horizontal atmospheric motion, the relevant vertical rotation component is , with latitude . In the northern hemisphere the horizontal deflection is to the right of the motion. A low-pressure center produces an inward pressure-gradient force; an anticlockwise circulation has an outward Coriolis force to oppose it. A high-pressure center instead supports clockwise circulation, with inward Coriolis force opposing the outward pressure-gradient force.
The sense reverses in the southern hemisphere. There, anticlockwise circulation is anticyclonic and corresponds to high atmospheric pressure. Hence
This is the large-scale rotating-fluid interpretation; friction, centrifugal acceleration and departures from ideal balance modify actual wind profiles. NASA's description independently identifies the southern, counterclockwise Great Red Spot as a high-pressure system.[ref]
Let denote the planar rotation matrix, and choose the initial cup center on the positive axis, as in the requested equations. Its trajectory is . The handle rotates relative to the radial line at signed rate , so its absolute angular velocity is . A positive recurrence time is ; the sign records rotation direction.
Writing , the relation is
or explicitly
One obtains the same result by rotating cup coordinates through into the radially aligned axes, then rotating through into the inertial axes.
At , , and
The axes maintain a fixed orientation in inertial space while their origin accelerates around a circle. This is translation without rotation of the cup frame; it is not an inertial frame because the origin accelerates. In particular its inertial correction is a spatially uniform fictitious force, rather than a Coriolis force from rotation of these axes.
Treat the marble as a frictionless point particle; no size, rolling constraint or friction law is supplied. Neglect its vertical kinetic energy as requested, but retain the gravitational potential energy .
For completeness keep the general constant cup rotation rate . In cup components the center's velocity is . With , the horizontal velocity norm is . Thus
In the nonrotating translating case , this reduces to
The time-only constant may be dropped. Integrating the cross-velocity term by parts gives an equivalent Lagrangian
It differs by a total derivative and a time-only term, so gives the same trajectories but different expressions for the canonical momenta. The small-vertical-velocity approximation is typically consistent at small surface slope ; it need not remain valid during unlimited resonant growth.
For the original Lagrangian of solution, differentiation with respect to the generalized velocities gives
In contrast, using in the nonrotating case gives , ; this is the expected momentum shift under adding a total derivative.
The Euler-Lagrange equations in the general cup frame are
These include the Coriolis and centrifugal terms when the cup axes really rotate. Set to obtain
For , its complete solution is
where the two complex constants provide the four real initial data. The driving denominator is independent of cup-axis rotation: rotation changes the coordinate description, not the physical trap frequency.
In the requested special case , an equivalent real form is
For example , , and determine the constants.
At resonance with nonzero , replace the particular term by
In the nonrotating cup frame this has components , plus the homogeneous solution. Secular growth eventually invalidates a finite cup or the neglected vertical kinetic energy. If the ride does not rotate, its forcing vanishes and ordinary free oscillations remain.
Figure 1.
Marble response in a nonrotating cup frame with a circularly accelerating origin: bounded off-resonant motion and secular resonant growth, starting at the cup center at rest
. Details.

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.