The Banach-Steinhaus convergence theorem can be stated as follows. Let be a normed space, a Banach space, and . If
and converges in for every in a dense subset , then converges for every . The pointwise limit is a bounded linear operator and
If is also a Banach space, the uniform operator norm bound is necessary: pointwise convergence implies pointwise boundedness, so the Banach-Steinhaus theorem, namely the Uniform boundedness principle, supplies it. The limit is convergence in the strong operator topology; it need not be convergence in operator norm.
To see the sufficient direction, write . For the triangle inequality gives
First approximate by , then let . Completeness of gives the limit. Linearity passes to limits, and gives the displayed bound. If a candidate bounded linear operator is already given and on , the same approximation proves convergence to even when is merely a normed space.
Composition with preserves continuity, so maps the space of continuous functions on a compact space into itself and is linear. Since maps onto itself,
For , the mean value theorem applied to gives
The same bound holds at . Each has uniform continuity by the Heine-Cantor theorem. With its modulus of continuity , we obtain
Alternatively, the bound proves convergence on every polynomial; the Weierstrass approximation theorem makes these a dense subset of , and the Banach-Steinhaus convergence theorem with gives the same conclusion.
The open mapping theorem states that a surjective bounded linear operator between Banach spaces is an open map: is an open set in whenever is an open set in . Equivalently, there is such that
where both displayed balls are open. In particular, a bijective bounded linear operator between Banach spaces has a bounded inverse, the bounded inverse theorem.
Use the closed unit ball first, and put . This is a convex set symmetric about zero. If , then , so taking midpoints gives
Write . By scaling,
Fix with . Starting with , recursively choose such that
At each step the previous residual lies in the open ball on the left of the scaled inclusion, so the definition of closure permits this approximation. The series converges to some because is a Banach space, and the triangle inequality gives . Continuity of gives , since . Thus
Scaling by now gives the slightly smaller open ball
This proves the assertion whether the original unit ball is taken open or closed. Only completeness of was used; the normed space need not be complete. The argument is geometric correction for approximate surjectivity.
For put , with closure taken in . Then
If every has empty interior, then each is a nowhere dense set, because it is closed. Each is then a nowhere dense set too. Consequently is a meagre set, that is, a set of the first category in .
Otherwise some has nonempty interior. Scaling gives nonempty interior of . The geometric correction for approximate surjectivity proved in the preceding part gives an open ball about zero inside . Since is a vector subspace, it then equals : scale any into this ball and scale its preimage back. Hence is a closed set.
Thus, in fact, the stronger operator range category dichotomy holds:
In particular is closed or of the first category, as required. The only substantive theorem used here is the preceding geometric correction for approximate surjectivity: for a bounded linear operator from a Banach space to a normed space, nonempty interior of the closure of the image of the unit ball implies nonempty interior of the image itself. Its series proof was given there, so this proof does not require the Baire category theorem or completeness of .
Let send a continuous function to its almost everywhere equivalence class. The domain with the supremum norm and the target with the L1 norm are Banach spaces, and
Thus is a bounded linear operator, and the requested vector subspace is .
To show this image of a linear map is not closed, consider the continuous functions
and . Their L1 norm difference is the area of one triangle:
But has no continuous function representative. Indeed, a continuous function equal to zero almost everywhere on must be identically zero there: any nonzero value would persist on an open interval of positive Lebesgue measure. Likewise any continuous representative would be identically one on . Continuity at makes these requirements incompatible. Therefore , although it lies in its closure.
The preceding operator range category dichotomy proves continuous functions are meagre in L1:

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.