Differentiate the defining relation at . The linear term gives the Lie algebraSolving this equation between matrices yieldswhere a convenient basis isThe first two generate Lorentz boosts and the last a spatial rotation. Direct commutators giveThere are three independent real coefficients, so . A Cartan subalgebra is , and the rank of a semisimple Lie algebra is one. Explicitly, if and , their commutator vanishes exactly whenFor nonzero , these equations force to be proportional to , so there is no two-dimensional commuting subalgebra. The split real rank is also one, realized by the semisimple Lorentz boost generator . ThusFor this Lorentz algebra in three spacetime dimensions, disconnected components of the full Lorentz group do not change its tangent Lie algebra at the identity.
In the complexification of a Lie algebra, defineThe relations in a becomeThe special unitary Lie algebra has real basis , where the Pauli matrices satisfy . Its commutators are the same: . The complex-linear map therefore preserves the bracket and maps a basis to a basis. ConsequentlyThe real Lie algebras are not isomorphic: multiplying the boosts by changes their real form. For example, the Adjoint representation of a Lie algebra evaluated at has real eigenvalues , whereas the corresponding nonzero compact SU(2) generators have purely imaginary adjoint eigenvalues.
Every complex Lie algebra representation of the real algebra extends uniquely by complex linearity to its complexification of a Lie algebra. The finite-dimensional complex irreducible representations are therefore classified by a nonnegative integer highest weight , just as for SU(2). There is one equivalence class for eachThese are statements about Lie algebra representations. They do not assert positive-definite unitarity for the noncompact real form, or automatic descent to the full Lorentz group. In particular, half-integer gives a sign under a spatial rotation, so its integration needs a covering group.
Choose the following Pauli matrix realization, with its spinor basis fixed for the later Dirac adjoint:The Pauli matrix multiplication rule verifiesExtending linearly therefore gives a two-dimensional Lie algebra representation. For an irreducible representation, it suffices to rule out an invariant line. Any such line would have to be an eigenline of , whose two eigenvalues are distinct. Those two coordinate lines are interchanged by , so neither is invariant. There is no proper nonzero invariant subspace.
This is a spinorial representation rather than a single-valued two-dimensional representation of the identity component of the specified orthogonal group:The mismatch explicitly exhibits the need for the spin double cover. It causes no obstruction to the requested infinitesimal construction.
The Clifford algebra condition for signature isEach Pauli matrix squares to , and distinct Pauli matrices anticommute. Therefore the given choice obeysThese check all diagonal and off-diagonal anticommutators, provingThus they are viable three-dimensional gamma matrices. Their Hermitian adjoints satisfy and for . Two components are minimal: one-dimensional nonzero scalar matrices cannot anticommute while all having nonzero squares.
The spinor basis in c is compatible with the supplied gamma matrices. The rotation generator is anti-Hermitian and commutes with . The two boost generators are Hermitian matrices and anticommute with . It follows separately for all three generators, and hence for every real , thatFor the infinitesimal Lorentz transformation, and . Hence the Dirac adjoint transforms contragrediently:The two contributions to the scalar variation cancel:This proves the spinor invariant in three spacetime dimensions has infinitesimal Lorentz invariance. Real transformation parameters matter because the Hermitian adjoint conjugates coefficients; this is not an invariance under arbitrary complexified parameters. For ordinary commuting spinor components, the bilinear is purely imaginary in this mostly-plus convention, and multiplying it by gives a real invariant. Its reality is separate from its invariance.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.