The fundamental case. Set , where . Fixing this vector forces the fourth column of a unitary matrix to be , and hence also fixes its fourth row. The remaining three-by-three block has determinant one. ThereforeEvery nonzero complex vector can be brought to this form by an SU(4) transformation: complete its normalized direction to a unitary basis and adjust the phase of a complementary basis vector to obtain determinant one. Thus a generic nonzero fundamental vacuum expectation value has a conjugate of as its exact unbroken subgroup. The particular embedded of the question is fixed only when the vacuum expectation value lies along .
The antisymmetric case. With , takeSince for , this antisymmetric tensor is fixed by for every . Its transformation is , so any stabilizing also preservesIf , its two eigenspaces force with unitary two-by-two blocks. For each nonzero block, forces the block determinant to be one. If one block is zero, the SU(4) determinant condition forces the other block determinant to be one as well. HenceThe unitary skew-diagonalization of an antisymmetric matrix shows that a generic complex has two distinct paired singular values; choosing an SU(4) rather than a basis merely leaves an allowed overall phase in . Thus its generic stabilizer is conjugate to .
If instead , the form is proportional, up to unitary coordinates and phases, to a nondegenerate standard symplectic form. Its stabilizer is the compact symplectic group , of dimension ten, containing properly. The explicit choice is a concrete counterexample to inferring an exact stabilizer from the existence of two singlets alone. For a real , the real structure of the SU4 exterior square imposes in this form, so these equal magnitudes are compulsory. Every nonzero real therefore has the larger compact symplectic group stabilizer. The zero vacuum expectation value preserves all of .
The adjoint cases. The -fixed and -fixed traceless matrices have respectively the formsFor a Hermitian adjoint scalar field, choose real. More generally a complex gives the same stabilizers. The repeated eigenvalues implyHere means that the product of the block determinants is one. These groups contain respectively and , together with an additional continuous . Explicit extra transformations are and . They commute with and for every , proving that neither exact endpoint or occurs for a single adjoint vacuum expectation value.
Nor do these larger subgroups survive for a generic Hermitian traceless matrix: four distinct eigenvalues leave only the maximal torus . For a generic complex adjoint matrix, there need not even be a continuous stabilizer; generically its unitary centralizer is just the centre of a group . Thus the displayed degenerate adjoint directions are special. All these statements concern the stabilizer of a possible vacuum expectation value; no unspecified scalar potential can be assumed to select a particular direction or a particular reality condition.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.