The displayed matrix is the transpose convention for a companion matrix. Expanding along its last row givesIndeed, the last entry contributes and the entry in column contributes ; the cofactor signs cancel those from the superdiagonal entries . ConsequentlyThe Cayley-Hamilton theorem gives , so divides . To exclude a smaller minimal polynomial, let be the standard basis. The first rows of showIf , multiplying on the left by gives , so every coefficient is zero. No nonzero polynomial of degree below vanishes at . Since and are monic polynomials,
Write , where has in each diagonal block and zero elsewhere, while has immediately above the diagonal and zero elsewhere. These block matrices satisfy : either product has immediately above the diagonal. Also, has on its th superdiagonal and is zero elsewhere.
The binomial theorem for commuting matrices therefore yieldsOnly can contribute to block , provided that block lies in the matrix. HenceThus , interpreted as an element of the field. The formula remains valid in positive field characteristic: some of these coefficients can then vanish. This possibility matters in the next part.
Write . Part (ii) identifies the first superdiagonal block exactly:where is the formal derivative. Thus the candidate is . If the irreducible polynomial has , its polynomial degree makes and coprime. Equivalently, is a separable polynomial. This includes every irreducible polynomial over a field of characteristic zero, and every irreducible polynomial over a perfect field.
Under this separability hypothesis, Bézout's identity for polynomials gives . Evaluating at proves that is an invertible matrix. Moreover, has zero diagonal blocks, because . It is therefore a nilpotent matrix with . The only product of strictly upward block steps that reaches block uses the first superdiagonal every time, soFor , the corresponding assertion is simply . The block upper triangular matrix hasThe minimal polynomial divides this characteristic polynomial. Since is an irreducible polynomial, it must be a power of ; the exact nilpotency index just found forces
The arbitrary-field qualification is necessary. In the rational function field , take . This is an irreducible polynomial: a square of a rational function has even order of vanishing at , while has odd order. Its formal derivative is zero. With ,The off-diagonal block in is zero, and , rather than . No alternative polynomial coprime to could represent that block: would imply . Thus the printed coprimality claim fails as stated over a general field.
There is also a precise general replacement. In characteristic , let be the largest power for which , so that ; set in characteristic zero. Irreducibility of implies that is an irreducible polynomial, so and are coprime. The binomial theorem in characteristic gives . Expanding , with the coefficients equivalently supplied by the Hasse derivatives, giveswhere commutes with and is a block upper triangular matrix whose diagonal blocks are . These blocks are invertible by Bézout's identity for polynomials, since . Thus is invertible, andThe same characteristic polynomial and divisibility argument now prove the corrected arbitrary-field answer:This is the minimal polynomial of a companion block chain; recovers the intended separable case.
Articles by others on the same topic
There are currently no matching articles.