With angles measured from the downward vertical, the upper mass rises by and the lower by . Taking zero gravitational potential energy at the hanging equilibrium therefore gives the exact result
Both masses contribute to the elevation change caused by the upper rod.
Use positions and . Their squared speeds are and . Summing their kinetic energies gives
No small-angle approximation has been used here.
Retain terms quadratic in the small displacements and velocities. The approximations and yield
Thus the correct quadratic forms are
Source correction. The printed kinetic-energy matrix formula omits both time-derivative dots. It cannot hold as a function of angles alone: at , , , the actual kinetic energy is , whereas the printed undifferentiated quadratic form vanishes.
For the constant small-oscillation matrices, the total mechanical energy satisfies
The specified conservative pendulum has Lagrangian , whose Euler-Lagrange equations give
or and . These equations make .
The scalar energy law alone is insufficient to infer two unique equations: energy conservation does not uniquely determine equations of motion. In particular, adding on the right with antisymmetric changes the dynamics but contributes zero power. The conservative-force structure of the given pendulum excludes that extra gyroscopic force and supplies the information needed for the displayed matrix equations.
For , a nonzero normal mode satisfies . With , its determinant is . Hence the normal modes of a double pendulum with a two-to-one length ratio have
The slow mode is in phase and the fast mode out of phase. The general small motion is their superposition with independent amplitudes and phases; ordinary frequencies are .

Articles by others on the same topic (0)

There are currently no matching articles.